nach oben

Erschienen in:

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

10. Academic Interactions with Private, Public and Not-for-Profit Organisations: The Known Unknowns

verfasst von : Maria Abreu, Vadim Grinevich

Erschienen in: Cooperation, Clusters, and Knowledge Transfer

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

An increased emphasis on the role of innovation in economic development has focused attention on the university as an important contributor to the innovation process. Universities are engaged in research and education and, therefore, provide critical resources for innovation such as skills and knowledge. They are one of the main organisational elements of the innovation system (Cooke et al. 1997; Lundvall 1992; Nelson 1993) and one which is involved, through market and non-market linkages, with other innovation agents including business, government and nongovernmental organisations.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Academic Entrepreneurship Framework: The Best Practices of Bragança Polytechnic Institute

Nächstes Kapitel The Role of Academic Spin-Off Founders’ Motivation in the Hungarian Biotechnology Sector

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

The project was sponsored by Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) in partnership with the Scottish Funding Council (SFC), Department for Employment and Learning (DEL) in Northern Ireland, the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) and the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (HEFCW). Further details on the project are available on the Centre for Business Research website: http://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/research/programme1/project1-17.htm.

The survey is listed on the UK Data Archive website http://www.data-archive.ac.uk under “Cambridge Centre for Business Research Survey of Knowledge Exchange Activity by United Kingdom Academics, 2005–2009”, archive no. SN 6462 (Hughes et al. 2010).

See Abreu et al. (2009) for further details.

The “Higher Education—Business and Community Interaction Survey 2007–08” data are available through the Higher Education Funding Council for England (http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2009/09_23).

Available through the Office for National Statistics (www.statistics.gov.uk/popest/).

Abramovsky L, Harrison R, Simpson H (2007) University research and the location of business R&D. Econ J 117:114–141CrossRef

Abreu M, Grinevich V, Hughes A, Kitson M (2008) Universities, business and knowledge exchange. Council for Industry and Higher Education (CIHE) and Centre for Business Research (CBR)

Abreu M, Grinevich V, Hughes A, Kitson M (2009) Knowledge exchange between academics and the business, public and third sectors. UK Innovation Research Centre, University of Cambridge and Imperial College London

Agrawal A, Henderson R (2002) Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Manag Sci 48:44–60CrossRef

Ambos TC, Mäkelä K, Birkinshaw J, D’Este P (2008) When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. J Manag Stud 45:1424–1447CrossRef

Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. J Urban Econ 42:422–448CrossRef

Arundel A, Geuna A (2004) Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Econ Innov New Technol 13:559–580CrossRef

Azagra-Caro JM, Archontakis F, Gutierrez-Gracia A, Fernandez-de-Lucio I (2006) Faculty support for the objectives of university–industry relations versus degree of R&D cooperation: the importance of regional absorptive capacity. Res Policy 35:37–55CrossRef

Azoulay P, Ding W, Stuart T (2007) The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: demographics or opportunities? J Econ Behav Organ 63:599–623CrossRef

Baldini N (2008) Negative effects of university patenting: myths and grounded evidence. Scientometrics 75:289–311CrossRef

Baldini N, Grimaldi R, Sobrero M (2007) To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patenting. Scientometrics 70:333–354CrossRef

Belkhodja O, Landry R (2007) The triple-helix collaboration: why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors that influence the perceived barriers? Scientometrics 70:301–332CrossRef

Bercovitz J, Feldman M (2003) Technology transfer and the academic department: Who participates and why? Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2003, Copenhagen, 12–14 June 2003

Bush V (1945) Science: the endless frontier. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

Campbell TID, Slaughter S (1999) Faculty and administrators' attitudes toward potential conflicts of interest, commitment, and equity in university-industry relationships. J High Educ 70:309–352CrossRef

Carayol N (2007) Academic incentives, research organization and patenting at a large French university. Econ Innov New Technol 16:119–138CrossRef

Christman JJ, Hynes T, Fraser S (1995) Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: the case of the University of Calgary. J Bus Venturing 10:267–281CrossRef

Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2002) Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Manag Sci 48:1–123CrossRef

Collins SA, Wakoh H (2000) Universities and technology transfer in Japan: recent reforms in historical perspective. J Technol Transf 25:213–222CrossRef

Cooke P (2001) Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Ind Corp Change 10:945–974CrossRef

Cooke P (2002) Knowledge economies. Clusters, learning and cooperative advantage. Routledge, London

Cooke P, Uranga MG, Etxebarria G (1997) Regional innovation systems: institutional and organisational dimensions. Res Policy 26:475–491CrossRef

D’Este P, Iammarino S (2010) The spatial profile of university-business research partnerships. Pap Reg Sci 89:335–350CrossRef

D’Este P, Patel P (2007) University-industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry. Res Policy 36:1295–1313CrossRef

D’Este P, Perkmann M (2010) Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. J Technol Transf 36(3):316–339CrossRef

Debackere K, Veugelers R (2005) The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Res Policy 34:321–342CrossRef

Del Campo AA, Sparks A, Hill RC, Keller RT (1999) The transfer and commercialisation of university-developed medical imaging technology: opportunities and problems. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 46(3):289–299CrossRef

Dietz JS, Bozeman B (2005) Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Res Policy 34:349–367CrossRef

Ding WW, Murray F, Stuart TE (2006) Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science 313:665–667CrossRef

Donnelly-Cox G, Donoghue F, Hayes T (2001) Conceptualizing the third sector in Ireland, North and South. Voluntas 12:195–204CrossRef

Etzkowitz H (2003) Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Res Policy 32:109–121CrossRef

Etzkowitz H, Webster A, Gebhardt CA, Terra BRC (2000) The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Res Policy 29:313–330CrossRef

Faulkner W, Senker J (1994) Making sense of diversity: public-private sector research linkages in three technologies. Res Policy 23:673–695CrossRef

Feldman M (1994) The geography of innovation. Kluwer, Amsterdam

Freeman C (1987) Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Pinter, London

Friedman J, Silberman J (2003) University technology transfer: do incentives, management and location matter? J Technol Transf 28:17–30CrossRef

Geuna A, Nesta L (2006) University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence. Res Policy 35:790–807CrossRef

Gulbrandsen M, Smeby JC (2005) Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Res Policy 34:932–950CrossRef

Harmon B, Ardishvili A, Cardozo R, Elder T, Leuthold J, Parshall J, Raghian M, Smith D (1997) Mapping the university technology transfer process. J Bus Venturing 12:423–434CrossRef

HE-BCI (2007) The Higher Education—Business and Community Interaction Survey 2007–08. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE)

Henderson R, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (1998) Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Rev Econ Stat 80:119–127CrossRef

Hughes A, Kitson M, Abreu M, Grinevich V, Bullock A, Milner I (2010) Cambridge Centre for Business Research Survey of Knowledge Exchange Activity by United Kingdom Academics 2005–2009. UK Data Archive Study No. 6462

Jacob M, Lundqvist M, Hellsmark H (2003) Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish university system: the case of Chalmers university of Technology. Res Policy 32:1555–1568CrossRef

Jacobsson S (2002) Universities and industrial transformation: an interpretative and selective literature study with special emphasis on Sweden. Sci Public Pol 29:345–365CrossRef

Jaffe A (1989) Real effects of academic research. Am Econ Rev 79:957–970

Jensen R, Thursby M (2003) Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions. Am Econ Rev 91:240–259CrossRef

Kenney M, Goe WR (2004) The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford. Res Policy 33:691–707CrossRef

Kline SJ, Rosenberg N (1986) An overview of innovation. In: Landau R, Rosenberg N (eds) The positive sum strategy: harnessing technology for economic growth. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

Klofsten M, Jones-Evans D (2000) Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe—the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Bus Econ 14:299–309CrossRef

Landry R, Nabil A, Ouimet M (2005) A resource-based approach to knowledge-transfer: evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering. Paper presented at the DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference, Copenhagen, 27–29 June 2005

Laursen K, Reichstein T, Salter A (2010) Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom. Reg Stud 45(4):507–523CrossRef

Lee YS (1996) 'Technology transfer' and the research university: a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Res Policy 25:843–863CrossRef

Lester R (2003) Universities and local systems of innovation: a strategy approach. Paper presented at the Workshop on High-Tech Business: Clusters, Constraints, and Economic Development, Robinson College, University of Cambridge

Levin SG, Stephan PE (1991) Research productivity over the life cycle: evidence for academic scientists. Am Econ Rev 81:114–132

Link AN, Siegel DS (2005) Generating science-based growth: an econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university–industry technology transfer. Eur J Financ 11:169–181CrossRef

Link AN, Siegel DS, Bozeman B (2007) An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Ind Corp Change 16:641–655CrossRef

Lockett A, Wright M (2005) Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Res Policy 34:1043–1057CrossRef

Louis KS, Jones LM, Anderson MS, Blumenthal D, Campbell EG (2001) Entrepreneurship, secrecy, and productivity: a comparison of clinical and non-clinical life sciences faculty. J Technol Transf 26:233–245CrossRef

Lundvall B-A (ed) (1992) National systems of innovation. Pinter, London

Macho-Stadler I, Pérez-Castrillo P, Veugelers R (2007) Licensing of university inventions: the role of a technology transfer office. Int J Ind Organ 25:483–510CrossRef

Mansfield E (1995) Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics and financing. Rev Econ Stat 77:55–65CrossRef

Mansfield E, Lee J-Y (1996) The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Res Policy 25:1047–1058CrossRef

Markman GD, Gianiodis PHP, Balkin DB (2004) Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: do incentive systems matter? J Technol Transf 29:353–364CrossRef

Markman GD, Phan PH, Balkin DB, Gianiodis PT (2005) Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. J Bus Venturing 20:241–263CrossRef

Morgan RP, Kruytbosch C, Kannankutty N (2001) Patenting and invention activity of U.S. scientists and engineers in the academic sector: comparisons with industry. J Technol Transf 26:173–183CrossRef

Mosey S, Wright M (2007) From human capital to social capital: a longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs. Entrep Theory Pract 31:909–935CrossRef

Mowery DC, Sampat BN (2005) Universities in national innovation systems. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson RR (eds) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Mowery DC, Nelson RR, Sampat BN, Ziedonis AA (2001) The growth of patenting and licensing by the U.S. universities; an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Res Policy 30:99–119CrossRef

Murray F (2002) Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering. Res Policy 31:1389–1403CrossRef

Murray F, Graham L (2007) Buying science and selling science: gender differences in the market for commercial science. Ind Corp Change 16:657–689CrossRef

Nelson RR (ed) (1993) National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, New York

ONS (2005) Mid-year population estimates 2005 for UK, England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Office for National Statistics, UK

Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2001) To patent or not: faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. J Technol Transf 26:99–114CrossRef

Powers JB, McDougall PP (2005) Policy orientation effects on performance with licensing to start-ups and small companies. Res Policy 34:1028–1042CrossRef

Roberts EB (1991) Entrepreneurs in high technology. Lessons from MIT and beyond. Oxford University Press, New York/OxfordCrossRef

Rothaermel FT, Agung SD, Jiang L (2007) University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Ind Corp Change 16:691–791CrossRef

Schartinger D, Schibany A, Gassler H (2001) Interactive relations between universities and firms: empirical evidence for Austria. J Technol Transf 26:255–269CrossRef

Seashore Louis K, Blumenthal D, Gluck ME, Stoto MA (1989) Entrepreneurs in academe: an exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Adm Sci Q 34:110–131CrossRef

Shane S (2004) Academic entrepreneurship: university spinoffs and wealth creation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton

Siegel DS, Waldman DA, Atwater LE, Link AN (2003) Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. J High Technol Manag Res 14:111–133CrossRef

Siegel DS, Waldman DA, Atwater LE, Link AN (2004) Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. J Eng Technol Manag 21:115–142CrossRef

Siegel DS, Veugelers R, Wright M (2007) Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford Rev Econ Pol 23:640–660CrossRef

Stephan PE (2001) Educational implications of university-industry technology transfer. J Technol Transf 26:199–205CrossRef

Stephan PE, El-Ganainy A (2007) The entrepreneurial puzzle: explaining the gender gap. J Technol Transf 32:475–487CrossRef

Stephan PE, Gurmu S, Sumell A, Black G (2007) Who’s patenting in the university? Evidence from a survey of doctorate recipients. Econ Innov New Technol 16:71–99CrossRef

Stokes DE (1997) Pasteurs quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC

Thursby JG, Thursby MC (2003) Patterns of research and licensing activity of science and engineering faculty. In: Ehrenberg R, Stephan P (eds) Science and the university. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

Thursby JG, Thursby MC (2005) Gender patterns of research and licensing activity of science and engineering faculty. J Technol Transf 30:343–353CrossRef

Thursby JG, Jensen RA, Thursby MC (2001) Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: a survey of major U.S. universities. J Technol Transf 26:59–70CrossRef

Whittington KB, Smith-Doerr L (2005) Gender and commercial science: women’s patenting in the life sciences. J Technol Transf 30:355–370CrossRef

Titel: Academic Interactions with Private, Public and Not-for-Profit Organisations: The Known Unknowns
verfasst von: Maria Abreu
Vadim Grinevich
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Cooperation, Clusters, and Knowledge Transfer
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33193-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-33194-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33194-7_10

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"