Innovation activities provide considerable challenges to small firms due to resource constraints. Conversely, large, established firms are often forced to buy technologies to remain innovative. This paper investigates the interplay of these two aspects in a specific software-based startup context. Based on structured interviews, the paper analyses what characteristics of startups and small firms and resources accessed through networking determine acquisition likelihoods and growth. This addresses a gap in the literature, namely understanding better the dual role of venture capital, specifically with regard to the type of innovation pursued by small firms and in its interplay with other determinants of growth and acquisition.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Freeman, J., Carroll, G.R., Hannan, M.T.: The liability of newness: age dependence in organizational death rates. Am. Sociol. Rev.
48, 692–710 (1983)
CrossRef
2.
Davidsson, P., Kirchhoff, B., Hatemi, J.A., Gustavsson, H.: Empirical analysis of business growth factors using Swedish data. J. Small Bus. Manage.
40(4), 332–350 (2002)
CrossRef
3.
Desyllas, P., Hughes, A.: The revealed preferences of high technology acquirers: an analysis of the characteristics of their targets. Cambridge J. Econom.
33(6), 1089–1111 (2009)
CrossRef
4.
Gans, J.S., Hsu, D.H., Stern, S.: When does startup innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND J. Econom.
33(4), 571–586 (2000)
CrossRef
5.
Gambardella, A., Torrisi, S.: Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Res. Policy
27, 445–463 (1998)
CrossRef
6.
Hall, B., Ziedonis, R.: The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry 1979–1995. RAND J. Econom.
32(1), 101–128 (2001)
CrossRef
7.
Linden, G., Somaya, D.: System-on-a-chip integration in the Semiconductor Industry: industry structure and firm strategies. Corp. Ind. Change
12(2), 545–576 (2003)
CrossRef
8.
Chakrabarti, A.K., Rubenstein, A.H.: Interorganizational transfer of technology – a study of adoption of NASA innovations. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag.
23(1), 20–34 (1976)
CrossRef
9.
Henderson, R.: Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND J. Econom.
24(2), 248–270 (1993)
CrossRef
10.
Birkinshaw, J., Van Basten Batenburg, R., Murray, G.: Venturing to succeed. Bus. Strat. Review
13(4), 1–17 (2002)
CrossRef
11.
Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.: The tides of EDA. IEEE Des. Test Comput.
29(6), 5–74 (2003)
MATH
12.
Grover, V., Purvis, R.L., Segars, A.H.: Exploring ambidextrous innovation tendencies in the adoption of telecommunications technologies. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag.
54(2), 268–285 (2007)
CrossRef
13.
Morris, D.J., Hay, D.A.: Industrial Economics & Organisation – Theory & Evidence. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991)
14.
Bruno, A.V., Cooper, A.C.: Patterns of development and acquisitions for Silicon Valley Startups. Technovation
1(4), 275–290 (1982)
CrossRef
15.
Penrose, E.: The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1959)
16.
Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E., Silverman, B.S.: Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Res. Policy
27, 507–523 (1998)
CrossRef
17.
Gulati, R.: Managing network resources. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)
18.
Stinchcombe, A.L.: Organizations and social structure. In: March, J.G. (ed.) Handbook of organizations, pp. 142–193. Rand-McNally, Chicago (1965)
19.
Kaulio, M.A.: Initial conditions or process of development? Critical incidents in the early stages of new ventures. R&D Manag.
33(2), 165–175 (2003)
CrossRef
20.
Lindsey, L.: Blurring firm boundaries: the role of venture capital in strategic alliances. J. Finan.
63(3), 1137–1168 (2008)
CrossRef
21.
Teece, D.J.: Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy
15, 285–305 (1986)
CrossRef
22.
Pisano, G.: Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution. Res. Policy
35, 1122–1130 (2006)
CrossRef
23.
Powell, W., Koput, K., Smith-Doerr, L.: Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Q.
41(1), 116–145 (1996)
CrossRef
24.
Henderson, R., Clark, K.: Architectural Innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Q.
35, 9–30 (1990)
CrossRef
25.
Jelinek, M., Markham, S.: Industry-university IP relations: Integrating perspectives and policy solutions. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag.
54(2), 257–267 (2007)
CrossRef
26.
Santoro, M., Chakrabarti, A.: Corporate strategic objectives for establishing relationships with university research centers. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag.
48(2), 15–163 (2001)
CrossRef
27.
Geisler, E., Furino, A., Kiersuk, T.J.: Toward a conceptual model of cooperative research: Patterns of development and success in university-industry alliances. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag.
38(2), 136–145 (1991)
CrossRef
28.
Katz, R., Allen, T.J.: Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D Project groups. R&D Manag.
12(1), 7–19 (1982)
CrossRef
29.
Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A.: Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Q.
35, 128–152 (1990)
CrossRef
30.
Bingham, R.: In support of an EDATech: pooling resources for competitive advantage. IEEE Des. Test Comput.
20(6), 74–75 (2003)
31.
West, J., Gallagher, S.: Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Manag.
36(3), 319–331 (2006)
CrossRef
32.
Utterback, J.M.: Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1994)
33.
Jovanovic, B.: Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica
50, 649–670 (1982)
CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
34.
Klepper, S.: Entry, exit, growth and innovation over the product life cycle. Am. Econ. Rev.
86, 562–583 (1996)
35.
Klepper, S.: Firm survival and the evolution of oligopoly. RAND J. Econom.
33(1), 3–61 (2002)
CrossRef
36.
Jovanovic, B., MacDonald, G.M.: The life cycle of a competitive industry. J. Polit. Econ.
102(2), 322–347 (1994)
CrossRef
37.
Helfat, C., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., Winter, S.G.: Dynamic Capabilities - Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Blackwell Publishing, New York (2007)
38.
Wiklund, J., Shepherd, D.: The effectiveness of alliances and acquisitions: the role of resource combination activities. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract.
33(1), 193–212 (2009)
CrossRef
39.
Wagner, M.: Growth of university-based startups and acquisition as an exit strategy in academic entrepreneurship evidence from software-based ventures. Int. J. Entrepreneurship Small Bus.
12(4), 39–412 (2011)
CrossRef
40.
Stuart, T.: Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strateg. Manag. J.
21, 791–811 (2000)
CrossRef
41.
Wagner, M.: Acquisitions as a means of innovation sourcing by incumbents and growth of technology-oriented ventures. Int. J. Tech. Manag.
52, 118–134 (2010)
CrossRef
42.
Bloom, N., Kretschmer, T., Van Reenen, J.: Are family-friendly workplace practices a valuable firm resource? Strateg. Manag. J.
32, 343–367 (2011)
CrossRef
Lee, A.S., Baskerville, R.L.: Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Inf. Syst. Res.
14(3), 221–243 (2003)
CrossRef
45.
Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., Gartner, W.: Arriving at the high growth firm. J. Bus. Ventur.
18(2), 189–216 (2003)
CrossRef
46.
Shepherd, D., Wiklund, J.: Are we comparing Apples with Apples or Apples with Oranges? Appropriateness of knowledge accumulation across growth studies. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract.
33(1), 105–123 (2009)
CrossRef
47.
Romijn, H., Albaladejo, M.: Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Res. Policy
31, 1053–1067 (2002)
CrossRef
MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Preacher, K.J., Hong, S.: Sample size in factor analysis: the role of model error. Multivar. Behav. Res.
36, 611–637 (2001)
CrossRef
50.
Preacher, K., MacCallum, R.: Exploratory factor analysis in behavior genetics research: Factor recovery with small sample sizes. Behav. Genet.
32, 153–161 (2002)
CrossRef
51.
Costello, A.B., Osborne, J.W.: Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval.
10(7) (2005).
http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7a.pdf
52.
Allison, P.D.: Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociol. Methodol.
20, 93–114 (1990)
CrossRef
53.
Henkel, J., Rønde, T., Wagner, M.: And the winner is – acquired entrepreneurship as a contest yielding radical innovations. Res. Policy
44, 295–310 (2015)
CrossRef
54.
Tyrväinen, P., Warsta, J., Seppänen, V.: Evolution of secondary software businesses: understanding industry dynamics. In: León, G., Bernardos, A.M., Casar, J.R., Kautz, K., De Gross, J.I. (eds.) TDIT 2008. ITIFIP, vol. 287, pp. 381–401. Springer, Boston (2008). doi:
10.1007/978-0-387-87503-3_22CrossRef
55.
Tyrväinen, P., Mazhelis, O. (eds.): Vertical Software Industry Evolution - Analysis of Telecom Operator Software. Springer-Physica, Heidelberg (2009). doi:
10.1007/978-3-7908-2352-3
Über dieses Kapitel
Titel
Acquisitions and Growth of Software Startups: The Dual Role of Venture Capital as a Success Factor
Die B2B-Firmensuche für Industrie und Wirtschaft: Kostenfrei in Firmenprofilen nach Lieferanten, Herstellern, Dienstleistern und Händlern recherchieren.
Unternehmen haben das Innovationspotenzial der eigenen Mitarbeiter auch außerhalb der F&E-Abteilung erkannt. Viele Initiativen zur Partizipation scheitern in der Praxis jedoch häufig. Lesen Sie hier - basierend auf einer qualitativ-explorativen Expertenstudie - mehr über die wesentlichen Problemfelder der mitarbeiterzentrierten Produktentwicklung und profitieren Sie von konkreten Handlungsempfehlungen aus der Praxis. Jetzt gratis downloaden!
