Skip to main content
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

Open Access 2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

62. Action Learning

verfasst von : Olivier Serrat

Erschienen in: Knowledge Solutions

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
loading …

Abstract

Action learning is a structured method that enables small groups to work regularly and collectively on complicated problems, take action, and learn as individuals and as a team while doing so.
In a Word Action learning is a structured method that enables small groups to work regularly and collectively on complicated problems, take action, and learn as individuals and as a team while doing so.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/chp%3A10.1007%2F978-981-10-0983-9_62/MediaObjects/372422_1_En_62_Figa_HTML.gif

Rationale

Conventional approaches to learning hinge on the presentation of knowledge and skills. Then again, knowledge is revealed through methods of questioning amid risk, confusion, and opportunity. Reginald Revans, the originator of action learning, recommended that one should keep away from experts with prefabricated answers.1 Rather, people should become aware of their lack of knowledge and be prepared to explore their ignorance with suitable questions and help from others: finding the right questions rather than the right answers is important, and it is one’s perception of a problem, one’s evaluation of what is to be gained by solving it, and one’s estimation of the resources available to solve it that supply the springs of human action.2 Figure 62.1 depicts the cycle of learning.

Definition

Action learning is an educational process by which a person studies his or her own actions and experience to improve performance. Put simply, it is about solving problems and getting things done. In action learning, a small group of 5–8 persons (called action learning set) meets regularly for a day or half a day over at least 6 months and works collectively on a problem faced in ongoing practice.3 The action learning set helps a “presenter” work on a problem through supportive but challenging questioning. It encourages a deeper understanding of the issues involved, a reflective reassessment of the problem, and an exploration of ways forward. (Action learning requires that actions be agreed at the end of each meeting.) By so doing, it provides a structured way of working that provide the discipline we often need to learn from what we do and improve practice as a result.

Applications

The most common applications of action learning are in professional and managerial learning and development, namely
  • A work-based project or program in which set members are involved and for which they have a level of responsibility and are therefore able to realistically influence by their actions.
  • An issue that concerns how set members operate in their work context, and one that they wish to improve and that could benefit from the support and challenge of the other members.
Action learning is not useful if the task that a set member is working on is a technical puzzle with a limited number of correct solutions. In such instances, it is better to tackle that the issue through consultation with experts, research, or training.

Benefits

Action learning sets have been used by civil and nongovernment organizations. They
  • Increase awareness and enable individuals to identify personal development challenges.
  • Develop self-confidence and readiness to take responsibility and initiative.
  • Help people relate to and communicate and network with others more effectively.
  • Provide structured peer support.
  • Enable more disciplined ways of working in powerful teams.
  • Enable individuals and teams to learn while working.4
  • Build leadership competencies.
  • Develop systems thinking, creativity, flexibility, and problem-solving skills.
  • Foster the emergence of corporate cultures that can handle change and learn.
  • Support innovation.
Still, for organizations to really feel the benefits of action learning there must be will to support participation in sets and respect for their outcomes. The disciplines and behaviors that encourage action learning are those of a learning organization. Peter Senge catalogs the attributes of learning organizations as personal mastery, shared vision, mental models, team learning, and systems thinking (the fifth discipline that integrates the other four).

Key Principles of Action Learning

The key principles of action learning are that
  • Learning begins with not knowing.
  • Individuals and groups who assume responsibility stand the best chance of taking actions that will make a difference.
  • Learning involves both programmed knowledge and questioning insight. Learning should be greater than the rate of change.

Process

Action learning brings together small groups of participants with the following intentions. Figure 62.2 depicts the action learning process as cyclical: it begins at the top of the diagram and moves round systematically, giving each set member the opportunity to present a problem and comment on others.
A typical set meeting might run like this5:
  • Before the meeting, each set member thinks about the work-based issues he or she wishes to bring to the set.
  • Set members agree to set aside the necessary time for the meeting. It should be held where they will be free from distraction.
  • The facilitator might remind set members of the ground rules established during the formation of the set and may recap the key principles of the methodology.
  • The set members check-in and those who had an opportunity to explore their issue in the previous set report to the others on actions taken since the last meeting.
  • One of the set members is given airtime for about 1 hour. This begins with the member taking 5–10 uninterrupted minutes to outline the work-based issue that he or she is bringing to the set members. Then, the other members ask questions of clarification, move into reflective and analytical questions, and towards the end question future action.
  • During this process, the facilitator may sometimes “stop” the set to raise awareness on matters of process, for example if set members are giving advice packaged as questions.
  • At the end of the airtime, the set member presenting the issue provides feedback on how he or she experienced the process and what learning took place. Set members also offer observations and learnings on both process and content.
  • The process of airtime is repeated for as many set members as possible in the time available. (This is normally two members in a half-day or four in a full day meeting).
  • The meeting may conclude with the completion of an action review sheet that aims to capture key learnings and action plans from the meeting. The logistics of the next meeting are also agreed.

Facilitation

A significant aspect of action learning is the “unlearning” of all-too-common habits of jumping from problem to solution and offering advice. For this, it is necessary to adhere to a disciplined methodology of good listening and questioning. A skilled and experienced facilitator can help to achieve this. Specifically, a facilitator would help create safe space for honest discussion, remind set members of the methodology, model helpful questioning, ensure that the questioning moves around the action learning cycle at an appropriate pace, draw attention to issues of process, and act as timekeeper.

Tips

Action learning is most effective when the commitment is voluntary. It should also focus on real-life, practice-related problems that are open-ended in nature and do not have a right or wrong answer. Importantly, action learning sets should be clear about the objective; engage the support of management; decide on selection criteria for set members; commit regular time; set dates for meetings and workshops; make sure there is some energy; be honest with themselves and others; respect others and their viewpoint; learn to listen; ask helpful questions6; refrain from giving advice; follow the action learning cycle; give individual airtime to others; take responsibility for their actions; and decide early on how the program will be evaluated, who will be involved, and how the results and future actions will be communicated more widely.
The opinions expressed in this chapter are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Asian Development Bank, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent.
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 IGO license (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​3.​0/​igo/​) which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the Asian Development Bank, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
Any dispute related to the use of the works of the Asian Development Bank that cannot be settled amicably shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL rules. The use of the Asian Development Bank’s name for any purpose other than for attribution, and the use of the Asian Development Bank’s logo, shall be subject to a separate written license agreement between the Asian Development Bank and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC-IGO license. Note that the link provided above includes additional terms and conditions of the license.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Fußnoten
1
Revans distinguished cleverness, i.e., knowledge, and wisdom. He described the formula L = P + Q where L is learning, P is programmed, i.e., taught or read, knowledge, and Q is questioning to create insight. Q uses four major questions: where? who? when? what?; and three minor questions: why? how many? how much? From this, he demonstrated that powerful learning comes from people learning with and from others.
 
2
High-level questions theorize, reflect, and hypothesize. Low-level questions seek factual answers and tend to converge in that they have correct answers. High-level questions require people to make connections and to engage in application, analysis, interpretation, or evaluation of ideas. Examples include: Are you in agreement with the group's answer? What do you think would happen if …? What is the difference between … and …? How are … and … similar? Why do you believe these differences or similarities occur? Low-level questions require people to recall information that has been presented or to retrieve information from memory.
 
3
Revans believed that those best able to help in developing the self are those comrades in adversity who also struggle to understand themselves.
 
4
Learning can take place at several levels. They include learning about the wider organization of which the set members are a part, learning about group processes, learning about the issue being presented, learning about oneself, the way one works and interacts with issues and people, and learning how to learn.
 
5
This section draws from BOND Guidance Notes No. 5.1. (Pay 2004).
 
6
Examples include: What other questions does this question raise for us? What is it that we do not understand about this situation? What would someone who had a very different set of beliefs than we do say about this situation? Why did you draw those conclusions? How does x affect y? In your opinion, which is best, x or y? And why? What are the strengths and weakness of …?
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Pay C (2004) Action learning sets (Guidance Notes No. 5.1). BOND, London Pay C (2004) Action learning sets (Guidance Notes No. 5.1). BOND, London
Metadaten
Titel
Action Learning
verfasst von
Olivier Serrat
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Verlag
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_62