Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Detection and Prevention of DDoS Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Adaptability of Various Mobility Models for Flying AdHoc Networks—A Review

verfasst von : Kuldeep Singh, Anil Kumar Verma

Erschienen in: Networking Communication and Data Knowledge Engineering

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Researchers worldwide have immensely contributed towards the field of MANETs. In recent years, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are being extensively used to create ad hoc networks due to their ability to be used in tactical as well as civilian areas. Interestingly, the research focus is being extended from one large UAV based network to multi-UAV ad hoc network consisting mini or micro UAVs, commonly known as Flying Ad hoc Network (FANET). There are various mobility models that are being used in MANETs and it is the right time to explore the capabilities of those mobility models for their use in FANETs. The underlying mobility model plays a vital role in simulating the performance of a routing protocol. In this paper, an analysis of various mobility models have been carried on parameters such as dependencies, connectivity metrics and real time applications with an eye on the adaptability of these models in FANETs.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel IP Traceback Schemes for DDoS Attack
Nächstes Kapitel Reliable Packet Delivery in Vehicular Networks Using WAVE for Communication Among High Speed Vehicles
Literatur
1.
Bekmezci, I., Sahingoz, O.K. and Temel, Ş., 2013. Flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): A survey. Ad Hoc Networks, 11(3), pp. 1254–1270.
2.
Sahingoz, O.K., 2014. Networking models in flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): Concepts and challenges. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 74(1–2), pp. 513–527.
3.
Singh, K. and Verma, A.K., 2014, May. Applying OLSR routing in FANETs. In Advanced Communication Control and Computing Technologies (ICACCCT), 2014 International Conference on (pp. 1212–1215). IEEE.
4.
Lim, S., Yu, C. and Das, C.R., 2006, November. Clustered mobility model for scale-free wireless networks. In Proceedings. 2006 31st IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (pp. 231–238). IEEE.
5.
Aschenbruck, N., Gerhards-Padilla, E., Gerharz, M., Frank, M. and Martini, P., 2007, October. Modelling mobility in disaster area scenarios. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Symposium on Modeling, analysis, and simulation of wireless and mobile systems (pp. 4–12). ACM.
6.
Lakhtaria, K.I. ed., 2012. Technological Advancements and Applications in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks: Research Trends: Research Trends. IGI Global.
7.
Pomportes, S., Tomasik, J. and Vèque, V., 2011. A composite mobility model for ad hoc networks in disaster areas. REV Journal on Electronics and Communications, 1(1).
8.
Roy, R.R., 2011. Mobility Model Characteristics. In Handbook of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for Mobility Models (pp. 23–32). Springer US.
9.
Sindhuja, M., Selvamani, K., Kannan, A. and Kanimozhi, S., 2015. Mobility Assisted Uncertainty Reduction in MANETS Using Forward Node Optimization. Procedia Computer Science, 48, pp. 408–413.
10.
Aschenbruck, N., Gerhards-Padilla, E. and Martini, P., 2008. A survey on mobility models for performance analysis in tactical mobile networks. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, pp. 54–61.
11.
Kumar, R. and Dave, M., 2014. Mobility models and their affect on data aggregation and dissemination in vehicular networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 79(3), pp. 2237–2269.
12.
Bettstetter, C., 2001. Mobility modeling in wireless networks: categorization, smooth movement, and border effects. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 5(3), pp. 55–66.
13.
Bouachir, O., Abrassart, A., Garcia, F. and Larrieu, N., 2014, May. A mobility model for UAV ad hoc network. In Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 2014 International Conference on (pp. 383–388). IEEE.
14.
Musolesi, M., Hailes, S. and Mascolo, C., 2004, October. An ad hoc mobility model founded on social network theory. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems (pp. 20–24). ACM.
15.
Camp, T., Boleng, J. and Davies, V., 2002. A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless communications and mobile computing, 2(5), pp. 483–502.
16.
Bai, F., Sadagopan, N. and Helmy, A., 2003, March. IMPORTANT: A framework to systematically analyze the Impact of Mobility on Performance of RouTing protocols for Adhoc NeTworks. In INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-Second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications. IEEE Societies (Vol. 2, pp. 825–835). IEEE.
17.
Kumar, S., Sharma, S.C. and Suman, B., 2010. Mobility metrics based classification & analysis of mobility model for tactical network. International Journal of Next-Generation Networks, 2(3), pp. 39–51.
18.
Stepanov, I., Hahner, J., Becker, C., Tian, J. and Rothermel, K., 2003, October. A meta-model and framework for user mobility in mobile networks. In Networks, 2003. ICON2003. The 11th IEEE International Conference on (pp. 231–238). IEEE.
19.
Bettstetter, C., 2001, July. Smooth is better than sharp: a random mobility model for simulation of wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM international workshop on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems (pp. 19–27). ACM.
20.
Hong, X., Gerla, M., Pei, G. and Chiang, C.C., 1999, August. A group mobility model for ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international workshop on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems (pp. 53–60). ACM.
21.
Musolesi, M. and Mascolo, C., 2006, May. A community based mobility model for ad hoc network research. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Multi-hop ad hoc networks: from theory to reality (pp. 31–38). ACM.
22.
Aschenbruck, N., Gerhards-Padilla, E., Gerharz, M., Frank, M. and Martini, P., 2007, October. Modelling mobility in disaster area scenarios. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Symposium on Modeling, analysis, and simulation of wireless and mobile systems (pp. 4–12). ACM.
23.
Bittner, S., Raffel, W.U. and Scholz, M., 2005, March. The area graph-based mobility model and its impact on data dissemination. In Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2005.PerCom 2005 Workshops. Third IEEE International Conference on (pp. 268–272). IEEE.
24.
Broch, J., Maltz, D.A., Johnson, D.B., Hu, Y.C. and Jetcheva, J., 1998, October. A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols.In Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking (pp. 85–97). ACM.
25.
Tian, J., Hahner, J., Becker, C., Stepanov, I. and Rothermel, K., 2002, April. Graph-based mobility model for mobile ad hoc network simulation. In Simulation Symposium, 2002. Proceedings. 35th Annual (pp. 337–344). IEEE.
26.
Johansson, P., Larsson, T., Hedman, N., Mielczarek, B. and Degermark, M., 1999, August. Scenario-based performance analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking (pp. 195–206). ACM.
Metadaten
Titel
Adaptability of Various Mobility Models for Flying AdHoc Networks—A Review
verfasst von
Kuldeep Singh
Anil Kumar Verma
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Networking Communication and Data Knowledge Engineering

Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4584-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-10-4585-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4585-1_5

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise