Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Age Differences in Acceptance of Self-driving Cars: A Survey of Perceptions and Attitudes Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Addressing Issues of Need, Adaptability, User Acceptability and Ethics in the Participatory Design of New Technology Enabling Wellness, Independence and Dignity for Seniors Living in Residential Homes

verfasst von : Joan Cahill, Sean McLoughlin, Michael O’Connor, Melissa Stolberg, Sean Wetherall

Erschienen in: Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Aging, Design and User Experience

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper reports on human factors research concerning the advancement of new technology facilitating seniors leading fulfilling, meaningful and independent lives, with dignity in the community. Specifically, this paper provides a roadmap for the specification of new technology for use in residential homes - which seeks to establish the appropriate balance between enabling the independence and well-being of residents (including supporting their privacy) and protecting residents from potential hazards. This research adopts a stakeholder evaluation/participatory approach to requirements elicitation and user interface design. The technology is defined from the perspective of addressing specific end user and stakeholder needs, and achieving relevant states/benefits associated with well-being, successful ageing, and relationship centred care. This research is being undertaken as an industry/academia collaboration involving Trinity College Dublin (TCD) Ireland and Oneview Healthcare.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Co-creation Methods: Informing Technology Solutions for Older Adults
Nächstes Kapitel Towards Accessible Automatically Generated Interfaces Part 2: Study with Model-Based Self-voicing Interfaces
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Seeman, T.E., Charpentier, P.A., Berkman, L.F., Tinetti, M.E., Guralnik, J.M., Albert, M., et al.: Predicting changes in physical performance in a high-functioning elderly cohort. MacArthur studies of successful aging. J Gerontol. 49(3), M97–108 (1994)CrossRef
2.
Rowe, J.W., Kahn, R.L.: Successful Aging. Pantheon Books, New York (1998)
3.
Silverstein, M., Parker, M.G.: Leisure activities and quality of life among the oldest old in Sweden. Res. Aging 24(5), 28–47 (2002)CrossRef
4.
Leonard, W.M.: Successful aging: an elaboration of social and psychological factors. Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev. 14(3), 23–32 (1981)
5.
Bowling, A., Iliffe, S.: Which model of successful ageing should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal survey of ageing. Age Ageing 35, 7–14 (2006)CrossRef
6.
Engel, G.: The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedical science. Science 196, 6–9 (1977)CrossRef
7.
Havelka, M., Lucanin, J.D., Lucanin, D.: Biopsychosocial model – the integrated approach to health and disease. Coll. Antropol. 33(1), 303–310 (2009)
8.
Rodgers, V., Neville, S.: Personal autonomy for older people living in residential care: an overview. Nurs. Prax. NZ 23(1), 29 (2007)
9.
Barnes, M., Blom, A., Cox, K.: The social exclusion of older people: evidence from the first wave of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) final report. Office for the Deputy of Prime Minister (2006)
10.
Perkins, M.M., Ball, M.M., Whittington, F.J., Hollingsworth, C.: Relational autonomy in assisted living: a focus on diverse care settings for older adults. J. Aging Stud. 26(2), 214–225 (2012)CrossRef
11.
Hillcoat-Nallétamby, S.: The meaning of “independence” for older people in different residential settings. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 69(3), 419–430 (2014)
12.
Ferrand, G., Martinent, N., Durmaz, N.: Psychological need satisfaction and well-being in adults aged 80 years and older living in residential homes: using a self-determination theory perspective. J. Aging Stud. 30(1), 104–111 (2014)CrossRef
13.
O’Connor, B.P., Vallerand, R.J.: Motivation, self-determination, and person environment fit as predictors of psychological adjustment among nursing home residents. Psychol. Aging 9(2), 189–194 (1994)
14.
Bourdieu, P.: The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J.G. (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood, New York (1986). Putnam RD
15.
Putnam, R.D.: Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York (2000)CrossRef
16.
Morgan, A., Swann, C. (eds.): Social Capital for Health: Issues of Definition, Measurement and Links to Health. Health Development Agency, London (2004)
17.
Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C (2001)
18.
Starfield, B.: Is patient-centered care the same as person-focused care? Permanente J. 15(2), 63–69 (2011)CrossRef
19.
Kitwood, T.: Dementia Reconsidered: The Person Comes First. Open University Press, Buckingham (1997)
20.
Nolan, M.: Relationship-centred care: towards a new model of rehabilitation. Int. J. Ther. Rehabil. 9, 472–477 (2002)
21.
Soklaridis, S., Ravitz, P., Adler, G., Nevo, A., Lieff, S.: Relationship-centered care in health: a 20-year scoping review. Patient Exp. J. 3(1), 130–145 (2016)
22.
Beach, M.C., Inui, T.: Relationship-cantered care research network. Relationship-centered care: a constructive reframing. J. Gen. Int. Med. 21(Suppl 1), 3–8 (2006)CrossRef
23.
American Association of Retired Persons: Aging in Place: A State Survey of Livability Policies and Practices A Research Report by the National Conference of State Legislatures and the AARP Public Policy Institute. AARP Public Policy Institute, Washington (2011)
24.
Milligan, C.: There’s No Place Like Home: Place and Care in an Ageing Society, 1st edn. Ashgate, Farnham (2009)
25.
Rabiee, P.: Exploring the relationships between choice and independence: experiences of disabled and older people. Brit. J. Soc. Work 43, 1–17 (2012)
26.
Baldwin, N., Harris, J., Kelly, D.: Institutionalisation: why blame the institution? Ageing Soc. 13, 69–81 (1993)CrossRef
27.
Kane, R.A.: Definition, measurement, and correlates of quality of life in nursing homes: toward a reasonable practice, research, and policy agenda. Gerontologist 43(II), 28–36 (2003)
28.
Forbes-Thompson, S., Gessert, C.E.: Nursing homes and suffering: part of the problem or part of the solution? J. Appl. Gerontol. 25(3), 234–252 (2006)CrossRef
29.
Gawande, A.: Being Mortal: Illness, Medicine and What Matters in the End. Profile Books, London (2015)
30.
Bradshaw, S.A., Playford, E.D., Riaz, A.: Living well in care homes: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Age Ageing 41(4), 429–440 (2012)CrossRef
31.
European Commission: European Charter of Rights and Responsibilities of older people in need of long term care and assistance (2010)
32.
Alzheimer’s Society: Human rights and older people in Ireland (Policy Paper), December 2013
33.
34.
Kane, R.A., Lum, T.Y., Cutler, L.J., Degenholtz, H.B., Yu, T.C.: Resident outcomes in small-house nursing homes: a longitudinal evaluation of the initial green house program. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 55, 832–839 (2007)CrossRef
35.
Frost and Sullivan: Acuity-based staffing as the key to hospital competitiveness: why the smartest hospitals are tying their nurse labor investment to patient care. Frost & Suillivan White Paper (2015). http://​www.​quadramed.​com. Accessed 20 Jan 2016
36.
Dupuy, L., Consel, C., Sauzéon, H.: Self determination based design to achieve acceptance of assisted living technologies for older adults. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65, 508–521 (2016)CrossRef
37.
Chen, K., Chan, A.H.S.: A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology 10(1), 1–12 (2011)CrossRef
38.
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–339 (1989)CrossRef
39.
Lee, Y., Lee, J., Hwang, Y.: Relating motivation to information and communication technology acceptance: self-determination theory perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 418–428 (2015)CrossRef
40.
41.
Boenink, M., Swierstra, T., Stemerding, D.: Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: a scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology. Stud. Ethics Law Technol. 4(2), 1–38 (2010)CrossRef
42.
Bødker, S., Burr, J.: The design collaboratorium. A place for usability design. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Inter. 9(2), 152–169 (2002)CrossRef
43.
Cousins, J.B., Whitmore, E., Shulha, L.: Arguments for a common set of principles for collaborative inquiry in evaluation. Am. J. Eval. 34(1), 7–22 (2013)CrossRef
44.
Lindseth, A., Norberg, A.: A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 18(2), 145–153 (2004)
45.
Smith, J.A., Osborn, M.: Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Smith, J.A. (ed.) Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Methods, 2nd edn. Sage, London (2008)
46.
Pruitt, J., Grudin, J.: Personas: practice and theory. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences (2003)
47.
Carroll, J.M.: Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development. Wiley, New York (1995)
48.
Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Addressing Issues of Need, Adaptability, User Acceptability and Ethics in the Participatory Design of New Technology Enabling Wellness, Independence and Dignity for Seniors Living in Residential Homes
verfasst von
Joan Cahill
Sean McLoughlin
Michael O’Connor
Melissa Stolberg
Sean Wetherall
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Aging, Design and User Experience

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58529-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-58530-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58530-7_7

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise