nach oben

Environmental Earth Sciences

Erschienen in:

01.06.2015 | Thematic Issue

Advanced aquifer characterization for optimization of managed aquifer recharge

verfasst von: Robert G. Maliva, Rolf Herrmann, Kapo Coulibaly, Weixing Guo

Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences | Ausgabe 12/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) will play an increasingly important role in solving water scarcity. The performance of MAR systems depends primarily upon local hydrogeology. Greatest opportunities for improvement in the implementation of MAR systems lie in the targeted application of conventional and advanced technologies to improve aquifer characterization. Surface geophysics (e.g., VES, TDEM, and seismic reflection and refraction) generally provide low resolution, but areal extensive data on subsurface hydrogeology. Times series of relative microgravity measurements have been used to map changes in both vadose and phreatic zone storage and to augment monitoring well systems. Surface nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has the potential to provide quantitative data on water-filled porosity and pore size distribution and, in turn, an estimate of hydraulic conductivity. Standard borehole geophysical logging techniques can provide coarse-scale data on aquifer heterogeneity. Advanced borehole logging techniques, such as NMR, microresistivity imaging, and gamma ray spectroscopy, have been used in MAR projects in the USA and UAE to provide fine-scale petrophysical data (e.g., porosity, porosity-types, and pore-size distribution). Groundwater modeling is used in MAR investigations to evaluate system feasibility and to optimize system design and operation. Opportunities to improve groundwater modeling exist through the application of advanced reservoir simulation platforms that allow for the processing and integration of available lithological, geophysical, and aquifer testing data and their subsequent incorporation into groundwater flow models. Advanced groundwater modeling programs are available that allow for the simulation of complex aquifers such as dual-porosity systems and variable density.

Vorheriger Artikel Risk assessment frameworks for MAR schemes in the UK

Nächster Artikel Hydrochemistry and stable isotopes during salinity ingress and refreshment in surface- and groundwater from the Arani–Koratallai (A–K) basin north of Chennai (India)

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abdalla OAE, Ali M, Al-Higgi K, Al-Zidi H, El-Hussain I, Al-Hinai S (2010) Rate of seawater intrusion estimated by geophysical methods in an arid region. Al Khabourah Oman. Hydrogeol J 18:1437–1445CrossRef

Allen D, Flaum C, Ramakrishnan TS, Bedford J, Castelijns K, Fairhurst D, Gubelin G, Heaton N, Minh CC, Norville MA, Seim MR, Pritchard T, Ramamoorthy R (2000) Trends in NMR logging. Oilfield Rev 12(3):2–19

Archie GE (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans Am Inst Min Metall Pet Eng 146:54–67

Boucher M, Faureau G, Vouillamos JM, Nazoumou Y, Legchencko A (2009) Estimating specific yield and transmissivity with magnetic resonance sounding in an unconfined sandstone aquifer (Niger). Hydrogeol J 17:1805–1815CrossRef

Bredehoeft JD (2003) From models to performance assessment: the conceptualization problem. Ground Water 41:571–577CrossRef

Bredehoeft JD (2005) The conceptualization model problem—surprise? Hydrogeol J 13:37–46CrossRef

Coates GR, Xiao L, Prammer MG (1999) NMR logging, principles and applications. Halliburton Energy Services, Houston

Cunningham KJ, Carlson JI, Hurley NF (2004) New method for quantification of vuggy porosity from digital optical borehole images as applied to the karstic pleistocene limestone of the Biscayne aquifer, southeastern Florida. J Appl Geophys 55:77–90CrossRef

Davis K, Li Y, Batzle M, Raynolds B (2005) Time-lapse gravity monitoring of an aquifer storage recovery project in Leyden, Colorado. Colorado School of Mines, Center for Gravity, Electrical & Magnetic Studies Golden, Colorado

Davis K, Li Y, Batzle M (2008) Time-lapse gravity monitoring: a systematic 4D approach with application to aquifer storage and recovery. Geophysics 73:WA-61–WA-69CrossRef

Dean T, Dupuis C, Herrmann R, Valuri J (2012) A brute-strength approach to improving the quality of Seismoelectric data. SEG Las Vegas annual meeting, SEG technical program expanded abstracts, pp 1–6

Dillon R, Toze S, Pavelic P, Vanderzalm J, Barry K, Ying G-L, Kookana R, Skjemstad J, Nicholson B, Miller R, Correll R, Prommer H, Greskowiak J, Stuyfzand P (2006) Water quality improvements during aquifer storage and recovery at ten sites. In: Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwater resources. Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on management of aquifer recharge, UNESCO, Berlin, pp 85–94

Fitterman DV, Stewart MT (1986) Transient electromagnetic soundings for groundwater. Geophysics 51:995–1006CrossRef

Freedman R (2006) Advances in NMR logging. J Petrol Technol 58:60–66CrossRef

Greskowiak J, Prommer H, Vanderzalm J, Le Gal La Salle C, Pavelic P, Dillon P (2005) PHT3D modeling of water quality changes during ASR at Bolivar. In: Dillon P (ed) Water quality improvements during aquifer storage and recovery. Final Report to AWWARF, Project 2618, pp 245–277

Greskowiak J, Prommer H, Vanderzalm J, Pavelic P, Dillon P (2006) Quantifying biogeochemical changes during ASR of reclaimed water at Bolivar, South Australia. In: Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwater resources. Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on management of aquifer recharge, Berlin, UNESCO, pp 360–365

Guo W, Coulibaly K, Maliva RG (2013) Modeling studies of aquifer heterogeneity on ASR recovery efficiency. In: Proceedings 8th international symposium on managed aquifer recharge, Beijing

Henderson S (2004) Nuclear magnetic resonance logging. In: Asquith C, Krygowski S (eds) Basic well log analysis, 2nd edn. Methods in exploration, No. 16. American Association Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, pp 103–113

Herrmann R (2009) Using oilfield technology in the water industry to improve integrated aquifer characterization. In: Executive session—tackling water scarcity—realizing the value of geophysics, 71st EAGE conference and exhibition SPE EUROPEC 2009, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Herrmann R (2010) Using oilfield technology in the water industry to improve integrated aquifer characterization. In: 9th Gulf water conference, March 2010, 22–25, Muscat

Howle JF, Phillips SP, Ikehara ME (2002) Estimating water-table change using microgravity surveys during an ASR program in Lancaster, California. In: Dillon P (ed) Management of aquifer recharge for sustainability. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, pp 269–272

Hurley NF (2004) Borehole imaging. In: Asquith C, Krygowski S (eds) Basic well log analysis, 2nd edn. Methods in exploration, No. 16. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, pp 151–163

Javandel I, Witherspoon PA (1969) A method of analyzing transient fluid flow in multi-layered aquifers. Water Resour Res 5:856–869CrossRef

Kenyon B, Kleinberg R, Straley C, Gubelin G, Morriss C (1995) Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging-technology for the 21st century. Oilfield Rev 7(3):19–33

Keys WS (1989) Borehole geophysics applied to ground water investigations. National Water Well Association, Dublin

Lawrie KC, Brodie RS, Dillon P, Tan KP, Gibson D, Magee J, Clarke JDA, Somerville P, Gow L, Halas L, Apps HE, Page D, Vanderzalm J, Abraham J, Hostetler S, Christensen NB, Miotlinski K, Brodie RC, Smith M, Schoning G (2012) Broken hill managed aquifer recharge (BHMAR) Project: assessment of conjunctive water supply options to enhance the drought security of Broken Hill, regional communities and industries—summary report. Record 2012/15. Geoscience Australia, Canberra

Maliva RG, Missimer TM (2010) Aquifer storage and recovery and managed aquifer recharge: Planning, hydrogeology, design, and operation Methods in water resources evaluation series no. 2, Schlumberger Corporation

Maliva RG, Clayton EA, Missimer TM (2009a) Application of advanced borehole geophysical logging to managed aquifer recharge investigations. Hydrogeol J 17:1547–1556CrossRef

Maliva RG, Missimer TM, Clayton EA, Dickson JAD (2009b) Diagenesis and porosity preservation in Eocene microporous limestones, South Florida, USA. Sediment Geol 217:85–94CrossRef

Maliva RG, Budd DA, Clayton EA, Missimer TM, Dickson JAD (2011) Insights into the dolomitization process and porosity modification in sucrosic dolostones, Avon Park Formation (Middle Eocene), East-Central Florida. J Sediment Res 81:218–232CrossRef

Mills T, Hoekstra P, Blohm M, Evans L (1988) Time domain electromagnetic soundings for mapping seawater intrusion in Monterey County, California. Ground Water 26:771–782CrossRef

Minsley BJ, Ajo-Franklin J, Mukhopadhyay A, Morgan FD (2011) Hydrogeophysical methods for analyzing aquifer storage and recovery systems. Ground Water 49:250–269CrossRef

Molz FJ, Morin RH, Hess AE, Melville JG, Güven O (1989) The impeller meter for measuring aquifer permeability variations: evaluation and comparison with other tests. Wat Resour Res 25:1677–1683CrossRef

Molz FJ, Güven O, Melville JG (1990) A new approach and methodologies for characterizing the hydrogeologic properties of aquifers: US Environmental Protection Agency, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada, Oklahoma Report EPA/600/2-90/002

Molz FJ, Boman GK, Young SC, Waldrop WR (1994) Borehole flowmeters: field applications and data analysis. J Hydrol 163:347–371CrossRef

Morin RH, Carleton GB, Poirer S (1997) Fractured-aquifer hydrogeology from geophysical logs: the passaic formation, New Jersey. Ground Water 35:328–338CrossRef

Mueller-Petke M, Hiller T, Herrmann R, Yaramanci U (2011) Reliability and limitations of surface NMR assessed by comparison to borehole NMR, EAGE, Near Surface Geophysics, vol 9,: pp 123–134

Paillet FL (1998) Flow modeling and permeability estimation using borehole flow logs in heterogeneous fractured formations. Water Resour Res 34:997–1010CrossRef

Paillet FL, Crowder RE (1996) A generalized approach for the interpretation of geophysical well logs in ground-water studies. Ground Water 34:663–898CrossRef

Paillet FL, Reese RS (2002) Integrating boreholes logs and aquifer tests in aquifer characterization. Ground Water 38:713–725CrossRef

Parkhurst DL, Kipp KL (2002) Parallel processing for PHAST—a three-dimensional reactive-transport simulator. In: Hassanizadeh SM, Schotting RJ, Gray WG, Pinder GG (eds) Computational methods in water resources, developments in water science 47. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 711–718

Pavelic P, Dillon PJ, Simmons CT (2006) Multiscale characterization of a heterogeneous aquifer using an ASR operation. Ground Water 44:155–164CrossRef

Poeter E (2007) “All models are wrong, how do we know which are useful?”—looking back at the Darcy lecture tour. Ground Water 45:390–391CrossRef

Poeter E, Anderson D (2005) Multimodel ranking and inference in ground water modeling. Ground Water 43:597–605CrossRef

Pool DR, Schmidt W (1997) Measurement of ground-water storage change and specific yields using the temporal-gravity method near Rillito Creek US Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report, Tucson 97-4125

Prensky SE (1999) Advances in borehole imaging technology and applications. In: Lovell MA, Williamson G, Harvey PK (eds) Borehole imaging: applications and case histories, Geol Soc SP, London, vol 259, pp 1–43

Prommer H, Stuyfzand PJ (2005) PHT3D modeling of water quality changes during deep well injection at Someren. In: Dillon P, Toze S (eds) water quality improvements during aquifer storage and recovery. Volume 1: water quality improvement processes. AWWA Research Foundation Report 91056F, Denver, pp 229–244

Prommer H, Stuyfzand P (2006) On the use of reactive multicomponent transport modeling for assessing water quality changes during managed aquifer recharge. In: Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwater resources. Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on management of aquifer recharge, UNESCO, Berlin, pp 415–420

Prommer H, Barry DA, Zheng C (2003) MODFLOW/MT3DMS based reactive multi-component transport modeling. Ground Water 41:257–347CrossRef

Saaltink MW, Ayora C, Stuyfzand PJ, Timmer H (2003) Analysis of a deep well recharge experiment by calibrating a reactive transport model with field data. J Contam Hydrol 65:1–18CrossRef

Serra O (2008) Well logging handbook. Éditions Technip, Paris

Williams JH, Johnson CD (2004) Acoustic and optical bore-hole wall imaging for fractured-rock aquifer studies. J Appl Geophys 55:151–159CrossRef

Yaramanci U, Müller-Petke M (2009) Surface nuclear magnetic resonance: a unique tool for hydrogeophysics. Lead Edge 28:1240–1247CrossRef

Young SC, Julian HE, Pearson HS, Molz FJ, Boman GK (1998) Application of the electromagnetic borehole flowmeter. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Report EPA/600/R-98/058

Titel: Advanced aquifer characterization for optimization of managed aquifer recharge
verfasst von: Robert G. Maliva
Rolf Herrmann
Kapo Coulibaly
Weixing Guo
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences / Ausgabe 12/2015
Print ISSN: 1866-6280
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-6299
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3167-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2015

Evaluation of immunomagnetic separation for the improvement of Salmonella detection in aquatic environment

Questioning the impact and sustainability of percolation tanks as aquifer recharge structures in semi-arid crystalline context

Occurrence and resource evaluation of the subsurface high-K brines in the Pingluoba brine-bearing structure in western Sichuan Basin

Experimental investigation of solute transport in unsaturated fractured rock

Effects of particle size on compaction behavior and particle crushing of crushed sandstone–mudstone particle mixture

Monitoring prospective sites for rainwater harvesting and stormwater management in the United Kingdom using a GIS-based decision support system