nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Advanced Supply Chains: Visibility, Blockchain and Human Behaviour

verfasst von : Alexander Kharlamov, Glenn Parry

Erschienen in: Innovation and Supply Chain Management

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Technological advances over the last decade saw the rise of ICT and IoT, paving the way for the Supply Chain of Things. Blockchain technology was one of the most recent and potentially most significant developments. Blockchain technology are secure by design and can enable decentralization and visibility, with application in cryptocurrency transactions, historical records, identity management, traceability, authentication, and many others. However, successful adoption of such technology requires that the people, process and technology are ready. We propose a conceptual framework where the concept and technology can balance between positive and negative manifestations depending on human behavior, therefore determining the success of Blockchain technology application in supply chains. While both the concept and technology are relatively ready, human behavior is a challenge as it is known that people suffer from habits and perform poorly when exposed to large volumes of data. Therefore, the development of advanced supply chains with much greater visibility enabled by Blockchain technology must take into consideration people in order to succeed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Adoption of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Supply Chains

See https://hubofallthings.com/

See https://blockchain.info/charts/blocks-size?timespan=3years

See https://coinmarketcap.com/ for more recent figures.

See https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ethereum/ for the latest figures.

See https://cryptopedia.wiki/Main_Page

https://zcoin.io

http://zerocoin.org/

http://www.potcoin.com/

https://www.sexcoin.info/

See for example https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/26/ibm-building-blockchain-for-seven-major-banks-trade-finance.html

See https://www.everledger.io/

See https://news.artnet.com/art-world/biggest-art-forgeries-2016-783464

See https://news.artnet.com/art-world/lee-ufan-verifies-denies-forgeries-540461

See http://koreabizwire.com/new-law-to-root-out-counterfeit-artwork-in-korea/67555

See http://www.artequesta.com/

See https://www.verisart.com/

See https://www.ascribe.io/

See http://uk.businessinsider.com

See https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2017/02/07/the-first-government-to-secure-land-titles-on-the-bitcoin-blockchain-expands-project/#296654334dcd

See https://hbr.org/2017/03/blockchain-will-help-us-prove-our-identities-in-a-digital-world

See https://followmyvote.com/

See https://bitnation.co/world-citizenship-id/

See https://cointelegraph.com/news/ripple-talks-with-peoples-bank-of-china-key-to-chinese-blockchain-market

See https://www.coindesk.com/central-bank-backed-group-plans-blockchain-platform-launch-india/

See for example https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2017/06/01/2189634/its-not-just-a-ponzi-its-a-smart-ponzi/

See: https://hbr.org/2017/01/the-truth-about-blockchain

See: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/02/german-reunification-25-years-on-how-different-are-east-and-west-really

Anderson CA (1980) Inoculation and counter-explanation: debiasing techniques in the perseverance of social theories. Soc Cogn 1(2):126–139CrossRef

Anderson CA (1983) Abstract and concrete data in the perseverance of social theories: when weak data lead to unshakeable beliefs. J Exp Soc Psychol 19(2):93–108CrossRef

Adams P, Adams J (1960) Confidence in the recognition and reproduction of words difficult to spell. Am J Psychol 73(4):544–552CrossRef

Attneave F (1953) Psychological probability as a function of experienced frequency. J Exp Psychol 46(2):81–86CrossRef

Barkan R, Danziger S, Ben-Bashat G, Busemeyer JR (2005) Framing reference points: the effect of integration and segregation on dynamic inconsistency. J Behav Decis Mak 18(3):213–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.496CrossRef

Bayer D, Haber S, Stornetta WS (1993) Improving the efficiency and reliability of digital time-stamping. In: Capocelli R, De Santis A, Vaccaro U (eds) Sequences II: Methods in communication, security and computer science. Springer, New York, pp 329–334CrossRef

Boldrin M, Christiano L, Fisher J (2001) Habit persistence, asset returns, and the business cycle. Am Econ Rev 91(1):149–166CrossRef

Boyle B, Dahlstrom R, Kellaris J (1998) Points of reference and individual differences as sources of bias in ethical judgments. J Bus Ethics 17(5):517–525

Chapman GB, Johnson EJ (1994) The limits of anchoring. J Behav Decis Mak 7(4):223–242CrossRef

Chapman G, Johnson E (1999) Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 79(2):115–153CrossRef

Cooper WW (1964) New perspectives in organization research. Wiley, New York

Cooper AC, Woo CY, Dunkelberg WC (1988) Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. J Bus Venturing 3(2):97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(88)90020-1CrossRef

Croskerry P, Singhal G, Mamede S (2013) Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change. BMJ Qual Saf 22(Suppl 2):ii65–ii72CrossRef

Croson R, Donohue K (2006) Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Manag Sci 52(3):323–336. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0436CrossRef

Donkers B, Melenberg B, Van Soest A (2001) Estimating risk attitudes using lotteries: a large sample approach. J Risk Uncertainty 22(2):165–195CrossRef

DuCharme W (1970) Response bias explanation of conservative human inference. J Exp Psychol 85(1):66–74CrossRef

Edwards W (1968) Conservatism in human information processing. In: Kleinmuntz B (ed) Formal representation of human judgment. Wiley, New York

Epley N, Gilovich T (2001) Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychol Sci 12(5):391–396CrossRef

Epley N, Gilovich T (2005) When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors. J Behav Decis Mak 18(3):199–212CrossRef

Erev I, Wallsten TS, Budescu DV (1994) Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: the role of error in judgment processes. Psychol Rev 101(3):519–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.519CrossRef

Faro D, Rottenstreich Y (2006) Affect, empathy, and regressive mispredictions of others’ preferences under risk. Manag Sci 52(4):529–541CrossRef

Fernandez R, Rodrik D (1991) Resistance to reform: status quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty. Am Econ Rev 81(5):1146–1155

Fiedler K (1991) The tricky nature of skewed frequency tables: an information loss account of distinctiveness-based illusory correlations. J Pers Soc Psychol 60(1):24–36. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.60.1.24CrossRef

Fischer I, Budescu DV (2005) When do those who know more also know more about how much they know? The development of confidence and performance in categorical decision tasks. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 98(1):39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.04.003CrossRef

Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S (1977) Knowing with certainty: the appropriateness of extreme confidence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 3(4):552–564. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.3.4.552CrossRef

Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S (1982) Lay foibles and expert fables in judgments about risk. Am Stat 36(3b):240–255CrossRef

Forrester JW (1958) Industrial dynamics: a major breakthrough for decision makers. Harv Bus Rev 36(4):37–66

Fox C, Levav J (2000) Familiarity bias and belief reversal in relative likelihood judgment. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82(2):268–292. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2898CrossRef

Friedlander ML, Phillips SD (1984) Preventing anchoring errors in clinical judgment. J Consult Clin Psychol 52(3):366–371CrossRef

Geerts GL, O’Leary DE (2014) A supply chain of things: the EAGLET ontology for highly visible supply chains. Decis Support Syst 63:3–22CrossRef

Gigerenzer G (1991) How to make cognitive illusions disappear: beyond “heuristics and biases”. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 2(1):83–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779143000033CrossRef

Haber S, Stornetta WS (1990) How to time-stamp a digital document. In: Conference on the theory and application of cryptography. Springer, pp 437–455

Hammond JJS, Keeney RRL, Raiffa H (1998) The hidden traps in decision making. Harv Bus Rev 76(5):47–58

Hilbert M (2012) Toward a synthesis of cognitive biases: how noisy information processing can bias human decision making. Psychol Bull 138(2):211–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025940CrossRef

Hogarth RM (1987) Judgement and choice: the psychology of decision, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

Idson L, Chugh D (2004) Overcoming focusing failures in competitive environments. J Behav Decis Mak 17(3):159–172CrossRef

Joyce E, Biddle G (1981) Are auditors’ judgments sufficiently regressive? J Account Res 19(2):323–349CrossRef

Juslin P, Winman A, Olsson H (2000) Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: a critical examination of the hard-easy effect. Psychol Rev 107(2):384–396. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.107.2.384CrossRef

Kahneman D (2012) Thinking, fast and slow. Studies in intelligence, vol 56. Penguin, New York

Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292CrossRef

Kahneman D, Knetsch J, Thaler R (1991) Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J Econ Perspect 5(1):193–206CrossRef

Kaplan S, Schoar A (2005) Private equity performance: returns, persistence, and capital flows. J Finance 60(4):1791–1823CrossRef

Kaufman E, Lord M, Reese T, Volkmann J (1949) The discrimination of visual number. Am J Psychol 62(4):498–525CrossRef

Kaufmann L, Michel A, Carter CR (2009) Debiasing strategies in supply management decision-making. J Bus Logist 30(1):85–106CrossRef

Kaufmann L, Carter CR, Buhrmann C (2010) Debiasing the supplier selection decision: a taxonomy and conceptualization. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 40(10):792–821CrossRef

Keren G (1988) On the ability of monitoring non-veridical perceptions and uncertain knowledge: some calibration studies. Acta Psychol 67(2):95–119CrossRef

Keren G (1990) Cognitive aids and debiasing methods: can cognitive pills cure cognitive ills? Adv Psychol 68:523–552CrossRef

Keren G (1997) On the calibration of probability judgments: some critical comments and alternative perspectives. J Behav Decis Making 10(3):269–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199709)10:3<269::AID-BDM281>3.0.CO;2-LCrossRef

Kharlamov AA (2016) Exploring the contribution of individual differences and planning policy parameters to demand planning performance. The University of Warwick

Kruger J (1999) Lake Wobegon be gone! The “below-average effect” and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. J Pers Soc Psychol 77(2):221–232CrossRef

Kruger J, Dunning D (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol 77(6):1121–1134CrossRef

Lamport L, Shostak R, Pease M (1982) The Byzantine generals problem. ACM Trans Program Lang Syst 4(3):382–401. https://doi.org/10.1145/357172.357176CrossRef

Larrick RP, Koehler DJ, Harvey N (2004) Debiasing. In: Koehler DJ, Harvey N (eds) Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Blackwell, Hoboken, pp 316–337CrossRef

Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Manag Rev 38(3):93

Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B (1977) Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organ Behav Hum Perform 183(3052):159–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(77)90001-0CrossRef

Lord C, Lepper M, Preston E (1984) Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. J Pers Soc Psychol 47(6):1231–1243CrossRef

MacGregor D, Lichtenstein S, Slovic P (1988) Structuring knowledge retrieval: an analysis of decomposed quantitative judgments. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 42(3):303–323CrossRef

Mackinnon AJ, Wearing AJ (1991) Feedback and the forecasting of exponential change. Acta Psychol 76(2):177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(91)90045-2CrossRef

Mason-Jones R, Towill DR (2000) Coping with uncertainty: reducing “Bullwhip” behaviour in global supply chains

McCord M, de Neufville R (1986) “Lottery equivalents”: reduction of the certainty effect problem in utility assessment. Manag Sci 32(1):56–60CrossRef

McFadden D (1999) Rationality for economists? J Risk Uncertainty 19(1):73–106CrossRef

McKinney K, Sprecher S, Orbuch T (1987) A person perception experiment examining the effects of contraceptive behavior on first impressions. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 8(3):235–248. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0803CrossRef

Merkle EC (2009) The disutility of the hard-easy effect in choice confidence. Psychonomic Bull Rev 16(1):204–213. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.204CrossRef

Moore DA, Cain DM (2007) Overconfidence and underconfidence: when and why people underestimate (and overestimate) the competition. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 103(2):197–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.002CrossRef

Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psychol Rev 115(2):502–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502CrossRef

Mussweiler T, Strack F, Pfeiffer T (2000) Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 26(9):1142–1150CrossRef

Nakamoto S (2008) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system

Neil Bearden J, Wallsten TS (2004) MINERVA-DM and subadditive frequency judgments. J Behav Decis Making 17(5):349–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.477CrossRef

Nelson MW (1996) Context and the inverse base rate effect. J Behav Decis Making 9(1):23–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199603)9:1<23::AID-BDM210>3.0.CO;2-XCrossRef

Niranjan TT, Metri BA, Aggarwal V (2009) Behavioral causes of bullwhip effect: breaking the mould. Int J Serv Oper Manag 5(3):350–374

Nordstrom CR, Hall RJ, Bartels LK (1998) First impressions versus good impressions: the effect of self-regulation on interview evaluations. J Psychol 132(5):477–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989809599281CrossRef

Parry G, Brax SA, Maull R, Ng I (2016) Visibility of consumer context: improving reverse supply with internet of things data. Supply Chain Manag Int J 21(2):228–244CrossRef

Peterson CR, Beach LR (1967) Man as an intuitive statistician. Psychol Bull 68(1):29–46CrossRef

Phillips LD, Edwards W (1966) Conservatism in a simple probability inference task. J Exp Psychol 72(3):346–354CrossRef

Phillips LD, Hays WL, Edwards W (1966) Conservatism in complex probabilistic inference. IEEE Trans Hum Factors Electron HFE-7(1):7–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/THFE.1966.231978CrossRef

Prodan M, Prodan A, Purcarea AA (2015) Three new dimensions to people, process, technology improvement model. In: Rocha A, Correia AM, Costanzo S, Reis LP (eds) New contributions in information systems and technologies, vol 1. Springer, Cham, pp 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16486-1_47CrossRef

Rabin M, Schrag J (1999) First impressions matter: a model of confirmatory bias. Q J Econ 114(1):37–82CrossRef

Sage AP (1981) Behaviour and organizational considerations in the design of information systems and processes for planning and decision support. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-11(9):640–678CrossRef

Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J Risk Uncertainty 1:7–59CrossRef

Slovic P (1975) Choice between equally valued alternatives. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1(3):280–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.280CrossRef

Sterman JD, Dogan G (2015) “I’m not hoarding, I’m just stocking up before the hoarders get here.”: Behavioral causes of phantom ordering in supply chains. J Oper Manag 39–40:6–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2015.07.002CrossRef

Strack F, Mussweiler T (1997) Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: mechanisms of selective accessibility. J Pers Soc Psychol 73(3):437–446CrossRef

Suantak L, Bolger F, Ferrell W (1996) The hard–easy effect in subjective probability calibration. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 67(2):201–221CrossRef

Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognit Psychol 5(2):207–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9CrossRef

Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124CrossRef

Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574CrossRef

Tversky A, Koehler DJ (1994) Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychol Rev 101(4):547–567. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.547CrossRef

Wagenaar W, Keren G (1985) Calibration of probability assessments by professional blackjack dealers, statistical experts, and lay people. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 36(3):406–416CrossRef

Wagenaar W, Timmers H (1979) The pond-and-duckweed problem; Three experiments on the misperception of exponential growth. Acta Psychol 43(1979):239–250CrossRef

Weber EU, Milliman RA (1997) Perceived risk attitudes: relating risk perception to risky choice. Manag Sci 43(2):123–144CrossRef

Titel: Advanced Supply Chains: Visibility, Blockchain and Human Behaviour
verfasst von: Alexander Kharlamov
Glenn Parry
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Innovation and Supply Chain Management
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74303-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-74304-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74304-2_15