nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Advances and New Orientations in Goal Programming

verfasst von : Dylan Jones, Carlos Romero

Erschienen in: New Perspectives in Multiple Criteria Decision Making

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter starts by providing a categorization of current goal programming literature by type of variant used. Subsequently, goal programming is presented as a secondary model of a general p-metric distance function primary model. This orientation allows us to link goal programming with several fields like the determination of social choice functions or the interpretation and implementation of the Simonian concepts of bounded rationality and “satisficing”. To undertake the latter task, this epistemic framework is understood as a Laudian “Research Tradition” instead of the usual understanding as a scientific theory. Finally, potential future developments to expand the use and flexibility of goal programming as well as to explore possible logical connections of goal programming with other decision-making areas are highlighted.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel New Directions in Ordinal Evaluation: Sugeno Integrals and Beyond

Nächstes Kapitel Robust Goal Programming with Interactive Fuzzy Coefficients

For the epistemological issues underlying the concepts of primary and secondary models and their respective links and problems of logic reductions see Nagel (1961), chapter 11 and especially pages 336–354.

The pioneers of linking the Simonian satisficing philosophy with goal programming are Lee (1972) and Ignizio (1976). An attempt of axiomatization of this interpretation of bounded rationality and satisficing, can be seen in González-Pachón and Romero (2004)

The reason for the incompatibility between lexicographic orderings and utility functions is the non-continuity of preferences inherent to a lexicographic structure of preferences. Albeit, the continuity of preferences is neither a fact nor a hypothesis corroborated by empirical evidence but just a non-falsifiable assumption necessary to axiomatize the neoclassical consumption theory (see e.g., Deaton and Muellbauer 1986, p. 27).

Expression (16) represents in mathematical terms the “Second Principle of Justice” proposed by Rawls (1971, pp. 65–75).

André, F. J., Cardenete, M. A., & Romero, C. (2010). Designing public policies-an approach based on multi-criteria analysis and computable general equilibrium modeling. Heidelberg: Springer.

Audet, C., Carrizosa, E., & Hansen, P. (2004). An exact method for fractional goal programming. Journal of Global Optimization, 29, 113–120.CrossRef

Bankian-Tabrizi, B., Shahanaghi, K., & Jabalameli, M. S. (2012). Fuzzy multi-choice goal programming. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36, 1415–1420.CrossRef

Bentham, J. (1948). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Blackwell (original work published in 1789).

Chang, C. T. (2007). Multi-choice goal programming. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 35, 389–396.CrossRef

Chang, C. T. (2008). Revised multi-choice goal programming. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 32, 2587–2595.CrossRef

Charnes, A., & Collomb, B. (1972). Optimal economic stabilization policy: Linear goal-interval programming models. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 6, 431–435.CrossRef

Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1961). Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. New York: Wiley.

Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1977). Goal programming and multiple objective optimization-Part I. European Journal of Operational Research, 1, 39–54.CrossRef

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Ferguson, R. O. (1955). Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Management Science, 1, 138–151.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Harrald, J., Karwan, K., & Wallace, W. (1976). A goal interval programming model for resource allocation in a marine environmental protection problem. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 3, 347–362.CrossRef

Choobineh, M., & Mohagheghi, S. (2016). A multi-objective optimization framework for energy and asset management in an industrial microgrid. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1326–1338.CrossRef

Deaton, A., & Muellbauer, J. (1986). Economics and consumer behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of value-an axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. New York: Wiley.

Flavell, R. B. (1976). A new goal programming formulation. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 4, 731–732.CrossRef

Gigerenzer, G. (2001). The adaptive toolbox. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality-the adaptive toolbox (pp. 37–50). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.). (2001). Bounded rationality-the adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

González-Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (1999). Distance-based consensus methods: A goal programming approach. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 27, 341–347.CrossRef

González-Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (2004). Satisficing logic and goal programming: Towards an axiomatic link. INFOR-Canadian Journal of Operational Research, 42, 157–161.CrossRef

González-Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (2006). An analytical framework for aggregating mutiattribute utiliy functions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 1241–1247.

González-Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (2007). Inferring consensus weights from pairwise comparison matrices. Annals of Operations Research, 154, 123–132.CrossRef

González-Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (2009). Aggregation of ordinal and cardinal preferences: A framework based on distance functions. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 15, 79–85.CrossRef

González-Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (2011). The design of socially optimal decisions in a consensus scenario. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 39, 179–185.CrossRef

González-Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (2016). Bentham, marx and rawls ethical principles: In search for a compromise. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 62, 47–51.CrossRef

Hannan, E. L. (1981). On fuzzy goal programming. Decision Sciences, 12, 522–531.CrossRef

Ignizio, J. P. (1976). Goal programming and extensions. Massachusetts: Lexington Books.

Ignizio, J. P., & Perlis, J. H. (1979). Sequential linear goal programming. Computers & Operations Research, 6, 141–145.CrossRef

Jones, D. F., Ouelhadj, D., & Glampedakis, A. (2017). Incorporation of poverty principles into goal programming. In: Paper Presented at the XII International Conference on Multiobjective and Goal Programming (MOPGP17), Metz, France (2017).

Jones, D. F., & Tamiz, M. (1995). Expanding the flexibility of goal programming via preference modeling techniques. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 23, 41–48.CrossRef

Jones, D. F., & Tamiz, M. (2010). Practical goal programming. New York: Springer.CrossRef

Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems-towards a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lee, S. M. (1972). Goal programming for decision analysis. Philadelphia: Auerbach.

Masri, H. (2017). A multiple stochastic goal programming approach for the agent portfolio selection problem. Annals of Operations Research, 251, 179–192.CrossRef

Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science-problems in the logic of scientific explanation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Narasimhan, R. (1980). Goal programming in a fuzzy environment. Decision Sciences, 11, 325–336.CrossRef

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rodríguez-Uría, M. V., Caballero, R., Ruiz, F., & Romero, C. (2002). Meta-goal programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 136, 422–429.CrossRef

Romero, C. (1991). Handbook of critical issues in goal programming. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Romero, C. (2001). Extended lexicographic goal programming: A unifying approach. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 29, 63–71.CrossRef

Romero, C. (2004). A general structure of achievement function for a goal programming model. European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 675–686.CrossRef

Romero, C., Tamiz, M., & Jones, D. F. (1998). Goal programming, compromise programming and reference point method formulations: Linkages and utility interpretations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, 986–991.CrossRef

Rubinstein, A. (1998). Modeling bounded rationality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Sargent, T. (1993). Bounded rationality in macroeconomics. Oxford: Clarendon.

Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.CrossRef

Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.CrossRef

Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69, 99–118.

Tamiz, M., Jones, D. F., & Romero, C. (1998). Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state-of-the-art. European Journal of Operational Research, 111, 569–581.CrossRef

Tamiz, M., Mirrazavi, S. K., & Jones, D. F. (1999). Extensions of Pareto efficiency analysis to integer goal programming. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 27, 179–188.CrossRef

Yu, P. L. (1973). A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management Science, 19, 936–946.CrossRef

Yu, P. L. (1985). Multiple criteria decision making: Concepts, techniques and extensions. New York: Plenum Press.

Titel: Advances and New Orientations in Goal Programming
verfasst von: Dylan Jones
Carlos Romero
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: New Perspectives in Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11481-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-11482-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11482-4_8