Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Agency in New Institutionalism

verfasst von : Jan Olsson

Erschienen in: Subversion in Institutional Change and Stability

Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan UK

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter deals with agency in new institutionalism, often argued to be sparsely theorized. A critical assessment is made of the micro-level theorizing of the dominant versions of new institutionalism. After that we present and assess the argument of Vivienne Lowndes and Mark Roberts (2013: Why institutions matter: The new institutionalism in political science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) that new institutionalism is entering a third phase of consolidation. Partly based on this argument, a theoretical positioning is made on how to perceive agency in a more political sense with a focus on various micro-mechanisms of action. Thus, it is an argument of consolidation and of upgrading political discourse and action in contrast to the dominance of new institutionalism theorizing inspired by economics and sociology.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alasuutari, P. (2015). The discursive side of new institutionalism. Cultural Sociology, 9(2), 162–184.CrossRef Alasuutari, P. (2015). The discursive side of new institutionalism. Cultural Sociology, 9(2), 162–184.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Bacchi, C., & Rönnblom, M. (2014). Feminist discursive institutionalism—A poststructural alternative. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 22(3), 170–186.CrossRef Bacchi, C., & Rönnblom, M. (2014). Feminist discursive institutionalism—A poststructural alternative. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 22(3), 170–186.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change. The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 20(5), 777–799.CrossRef Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change. The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 20(5), 777–799.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bell, S. (2011). Do we really need a new ‘constructivist institutionalism’ to explain institutional change? British Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 883–906.CrossRef Bell, S. (2011). Do we really need a new ‘constructivist institutionalism’ to explain institutional change? British Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 883–906.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boin, A., & Kuipers, S. (2008). Institutional theory and the public policy field: A promising perspective for perennial problems. In J. Pierre, G. B. Peters, & G. Stoker (Eds.), Debating Institutionalism. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Boin, A., & Kuipers, S. (2008). Institutional theory and the public policy field: A promising perspective for perennial problems. In J. Pierre, G. B. Peters, & G. Stoker (Eds.), Debating Institutionalism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunsson, N. (1985). The irrational organization: Irrationality as a basis for organizational action and change. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Brunsson, N. (1985). The irrational organization: Irrationality as a basis for organizational action and change. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunsson, N. (1989). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Brunsson, N. (1989). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunsson, N. (2006). Mechanisms of hope: Maintaining the dream of the rational organization. Malmö: Liber. Brunsson, N. (2006). Mechanisms of hope: Maintaining the dream of the rational organization. Malmö: Liber.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen, T., & Røvik, K.-A. (1999). The ambiguity of appropriateness. In M. Egeberg & P. Laegraid (Eds.), Organizing political institutions: Essays for Johan P. Olsen. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press. Christensen, T., & Røvik, K.-A. (1999). The ambiguity of appropriateness. In M. Egeberg & P. Laegraid (Eds.), Organizing political institutions: Essays for Johan P. Olsen. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos: International Review for Social Sciences, 47, 3–30.CrossRef Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos: International Review for Social Sciences, 47, 3–30.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and culture. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and culture. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Zurück zum Zitat Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown. Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
Zurück zum Zitat Eriksson, L. (2011). Rational choice theory: Potential and limits. New York: Palgrave. Eriksson, L. (2011). Rational choice theory: Potential and limits. New York: Palgrave.
Zurück zum Zitat Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk. An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk. An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Flyvbjerg, B., & Richardson, T. (2002). Planning and foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures: New directions for planning theory (pp. 44–62). London: Routledge. Flyvbjerg, B., & Richardson, T. (2002). Planning and foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures: New directions for planning theory (pp. 44–62). London: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press. Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner. Encouraging participatory planning processes. London: The MIT Press. Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner. Encouraging participatory planning processes. London: The MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodin, R. E. (1996). Institutions and their design. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The theory of institutional design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Goodin, R. E. (1996). Institutions and their design. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The theory of institutional design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Green, D., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications. New Haven: Yale University Press. Green, D., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 952–973.CrossRef Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 952–973.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 198–217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 198–217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hay, C. (2006). Constructivist institutionalism. In R. A. W. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hay, C. (2006). Constructivist institutionalism. In R. A. W. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hay, C., & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies, XLVI, 951–957.CrossRef Hay, C., & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies, XLVI, 951–957.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning and discovery. Cambridge: MIT Press. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning and discovery. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects and institutionalization. In W. W. Powell & P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects and institutionalization. In W. W. Powell & P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. London: Penguin Books. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Katznelson, I., & Weingast, B. (2005). Preferences and situations: Points of intersection between historical and rational choice institutionalism. New York: Russel Sage. Katznelson, I., & Weingast, B. (2005). Preferences and situations: Points of intersection between historical and rational choice institutionalism. New York: Russel Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Longman, Pearson. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. Boston: Longman, Pearson.
Zurück zum Zitat Krook, M. L., & Mackay, F. (Eds.). (2011). Gender, politics and institutions: Towards a feminist institutionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Krook, M. L., & Mackay, F. (Eds.). (2011). Gender, politics and institutions: Towards a feminist institutionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Krumholz, N., & Forester, J. (1990). Making equity planning work. Leadership in the public sector. Philadelpia: Temple University Press. Krumholz, N., & Forester, J. (1990). Making equity planning work. Leadership in the public sector. Philadelpia: Temple University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn, T. S. (1962). Structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). Structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.CrossRef Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lowndes, V., & Roberts, M. (2013). Why institutions matter: The new institutionalism in political science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Lowndes, V., & Roberts, M. (2013). Why institutions matter: The new institutionalism in political science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679.CrossRef Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2010). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2010). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Majone, G. (1992). Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Majone, G. (1992). Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78, 734–749.CrossRef March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78, 734–749.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. New York: Free Press. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. New York: Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York: Free Press. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York: Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2006). The logic of appropriateness. In M. Rein, M. Moran, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 689–708). Oxford: Oxford University Press. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2006). The logic of appropriateness. In M. Rein, M. Moran, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 689–708). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRef Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.CrossRef Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton. Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
Zurück zum Zitat North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Leary, R. (2014). The ethics of dissent: Managing guerrilla government (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRef O’Leary, R. (2014). The ethics of dissent: Managing guerrilla government (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen, J. P. (2010). Change and continuity: An institutional approach to institutions of democratic government. In J. Pierre & P. W. Ingraham (Eds.), Comparative administrative change and reform: Lessons learned. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press Olsen, J. P. (2010). Change and continuity: An institutional approach to institutions of democratic government. In J. Pierre & P. W. Ingraham (Eds.), Comparative administrative change and reform: Lessons learned. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press
Zurück zum Zitat Olsson, J., & Hysing, E. (2012). Theorizing inside activism: Understanding policymaking and policy change from below. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 257–273.CrossRef Olsson, J., & Hysing, E. (2012). Theorizing inside activism: Understanding policymaking and policy change from below. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 257–273.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ostrom, E. (2007). Challenges and growth: The development of the interdisciplinary field of institutional analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3, 239–264.CrossRef Ostrom, E. (2007). Challenges and growth: The development of the interdisciplinary field of institutional analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3, 239–264.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peters, G. B. (2011). Institutional theory in political science: The “new institutionalism”. London and New York: Pinter. Peters, G. B. (2011). Institutional theory in political science: The “new institutionalism”. London and New York: Pinter.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path-dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–267.CrossRef Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path-dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–267.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes, R. A. W. (2006a). Old institutionalisms. In R. Rhodes, S. Binder, & B. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rhodes, R. A. W. (2006a). Old institutionalisms. In R. Rhodes, S. Binder, & B. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes, R. A. W. (2006b). Policy network analysis. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 425–447). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rhodes, R. A. W. (2006b). Policy network analysis. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 425–447). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Riker, W. (1962). The theory of political coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press. Riker, W. (1962). The theory of political coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothstein, B. (1996). Political institutions: An overview. In R. E. Goodin & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), A new handbook of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rothstein, B. (1996). Political institutions: An overview. In R. E. Goodin & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), A new handbook of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326.CrossRef Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt, V. A. (2009). Putting political back into the political economy by bringing the state back in yet again. World Politics, 61(3), 516–546.CrossRef Schmidt, V. A. (2009). Putting political back into the political economy by bringing the state back in yet again. World Politics, 61(3), 516–546.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth “new institutionalism”. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25.CrossRef Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth “new institutionalism”. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493–511.CrossRef Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493–511.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Searing, D. D. (1991). Roles, rules, and rationality in the new institutionalism. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1239–1260.CrossRef Searing, D. D. (1991). Roles, rules, and rationality in the new institutionalism. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1239–1260.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Searle, J. R. (2001). Rationality in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Searle, J. R. (2001). Rationality in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Seidman, S. (1995). The postmodern turn. New perspectives on social theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Seidman, S. (1995). The postmodern turn. New perspectives on social theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper and Row. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper and Row.
Zurück zum Zitat Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism ‘old’ and ‘new’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270–277.CrossRef Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism ‘old’ and ‘new’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270–277.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro, I. (2005). The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Shapiro, I. (2005). The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Shepsle, K. (2006). Rational choice institutionalism. In R. A. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Shepsle, K. (2006). Rational choice institutionalism. In R. A. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Simon, H. (1947). Administrative behaviour. London: Macmillan. Simon, H. (1947). Administrative behaviour. London: Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., & Longstreth, F. (1992). Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., & Longstreth, F. (1992). Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Streek, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streek & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity. Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Streek, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streek & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity. Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Susen, S. (2015). The ‘postmodern turn’ in the social sciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Susen, S. (2015). The ‘postmodern turn’ in the social sciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2015). Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: New public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies, 26(5), 683–706.CrossRef Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2015). Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: New public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies, 26(5), 683–706.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage Publications. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Weyland, K. (2008). Toward a new theory of institutional change. World Politics, 60(2), 281–314.CrossRef Weyland, K. (2008). Toward a new theory of institutional change. World Politics, 60(2), 281–314.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Willners, R. (2011). Micro-politics: An underestimated field of qualitative research in political science. German Policy Studies, 7(3), 155–185. Willners, R. (2011). Micro-politics: An underestimated field of qualitative research in political science. German Policy Studies, 7(3), 155–185.
Zurück zum Zitat Zucker, L. G. (1991). Institutionalization and cultural persistence. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Zucker, L. G. (1991). Institutionalization and cultural persistence. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Metadaten
Titel
Agency in New Institutionalism
verfasst von
Jan Olsson
Copyright-Jahr
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94922-9_2