Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Cognitive Computation
Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation 3/2011

01.09.2011

Agreement and its Multimodal Communication in Debates: A Qualitative Analysis

verfasst von: Isabella Poggi, Francesca D’Errico, Laura Vincze

Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The paper defines the notion of agreement from a cognitive point of view and analyses types of agreement signals in TV debates. Agreement is defined as a relation of identity, similarity or congruence between the opinions of two or more persons, by contrasting it with confirmation and admission, and the connected notions of proposal, assessment and opinion are overviewed. Research is then presented on the multimodal signals of agreement in debates from the Canal 9 and the AMI corpora; different ways to express agreement are singled out in extensive discourse, single words and body signals, and analysed through an annotation scheme of multimodal data. Different types of agreement are illustrated, including true, indirect and apparent agreement.
Vorheriger Artikel Movements and Holds in Fluent Sentence Production of American Sign Language: The Action-Based Approach
Nächster Artikel Sentic Web: A New Paradigm for Managing Social Media Affective Information

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
In Italian, these two meanings of “to agree” respectively correspond to two different verb phrases: essere d’accordo—the stative meaning, a preceding steady state—and mettersi d’accordo—a social action aimed at coming to an agreement. A third Italian phrase including “d’accordo” is “andare d’accordo”, meaning that two persons generally have the same goals, they have consonant feelings, they are empathic to each other, so they generally need not argue or discuss to make shared decisions. If I say: “Maria ed io andiamo d’accordo” (Maria and I have a feeling with each other), it means that we feel well together, we have similar feelings, and that there is no conflict between us; so, no reason of striving to come to an agreement. In this case, the similarity is not one of opinions nor of goals, but one of emotions or feelings.
 
Literatur
1.
Vinciarelli A, Pantic M, Heylen D, Pelachaud C, Poggi I, D’Errico F. Social signal processing: bridging the gap between social animal and unsocial machine. 2010 (forthcoming).
2.
Conte R, Castelfranchi C. Cognitive and social action. University College of London Press: London; 1995.
3.
Poggi I. Mind, hands, face and body. A goal and belief view of multimodal communication. Berlin: Weidler; 2007.
4.
Parisi D, Antinucci F. Elementi di grammatica. Torino: Boringhieri; 1973.
5.
Vendler Z. Verbs and times. In: Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca New York; 1967. pp. 97–121.
6.
Comrie B. Universali del linguaggio e tipologia linguistica. Bologna; 1983.
7.
Tavosanis M, Gasperetti M. Comunicare. Milano: Apogeo; 2004.
8.
9.
Ogden R. Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. J Pragmat. 2006;38:1752–75.CrossRef
10.
Castelfranchi C, Poggi I. Blushing as a discourse: was Darwin wrong? In: Crozier R, editor. Shyness and embarrassment. Perspectives from social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990. pp. 230–51.
11.
Miceli M, Castelfranchi C. The role of evaluation in cognition and social interaction. In: Dautenhahn K editor. Human cognition and agent technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2000. pp. 225–61.
12.
Poggi I, D’Errico F. Social signals and the action—cognition loop. The case of overhelp and evaluation. Proceedings of the 1St IEEE International Workshop on Social Signal Processing, Amsterdam, 13 September 2009.
13.
Stoetzel J. Théorie des opinions, Paris: Puf; 1943.
14.
Moscovici S. Social influence and social change, London: Academic Press; 1976.
15.
Price V. Public opinion. London: Sage; 1992.
16.
Wiebe GD. Some implications of separating opinion from attitudes. Public Opin Q. 1953;17:328–52.CrossRef
17.
Billig M. Ideology and opinions, London: Sage; 1991.
18.
Amblard F, Deffuant G. The role of network topology on extremism propagation with the relative agreement opinion dynamics. Physica A. 2004; 343:725–38.
19.
Castelfranchi C, Poggi I. Bugie, finzioni, sotterfugi. Per una scienza dell’inganno. Roma: Carocci; 1998.
20.
Stern DN. The interpersonal world of the infant, New York: Basic Book; 1985.
21.
Poggi I, Castelfranchi C, Parisi D. Answers, replies and reactions. In: Parret H, Sbisà M, Verschueren J editors. Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics. Asterdam: John Benjamins; 1982. pp. 569–91.
22.
Poggi I, D’Errico F, Vincze L. Types of nods. The polysemy of a social signal. In: Calzolari N, Choukri K, Maegaard B, Mariani L, Odijk J, Piperidis S, Rosner M, Tapias D editors. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on language resources and evaluation, 17–23 May 2010, Valletta, Malta; 2010.
23.
Vinciarelli A, Dielmann A, Favre S, Salamin H. Canal9: a database of political debates for analysis of social interactions. In: Proceedings of the international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (IEEE International Workshop on Social Signal Processing), Amsterdam, Netherlands; 2009. pp. 1–4.
24.
Carletta J, Evert S, Heid U, Kilgour J, Robertson J, Voormann H. The NITE XML Toolkit: flexible annotation for multi-modal language data. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003; 3:353–63.
25.
Vincze L, Poggi I. Communicative functions of eye closing behaviours. Second international workshop on social signal processing, Firenze; 2010.
26.
Bousmalis K, Mehu M, Pantic M. Spotting agreement and disagreement: a survey of nonverbal audiovisual cues and tools. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interfaces. 2009; 2:121–9.
27.
Kendon A. Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
28.
Müller C. Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: a case of a gesture family? In: Mueller C, Posner R editors. The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures. Berlin: Weidler; 2004.
Metadaten
Titel
Agreement and its Multimodal Communication in Debates: A Qualitative Analysis
verfasst von
Isabella Poggi
Francesca D’Errico
Laura Vincze
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Cognitive Computation / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1866-9956
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-9964
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-010-9068-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Cognitive Computation 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Developing Prognosis Tools to Identify Learning Difficulties in Children Using Machine Learning Technologies

OriginalPaper

Sentic Web: A New Paradigm for Managing Social Media Affective Information

OriginalPaper

Movements and Holds in Fluent Sentence Production of American Sign Language: The Action-Based Approach

OriginalPaper

Embodied Gesture Processing: Motor-Based Integration of Perception and Action in Social Artificial Agents

OriginalPaper

Extracting and Associating Meta-features for Understanding People’s Emotional Behaviour: Face and Speech

EditorialNotes

Cognitive Computation Special Issue on Cognitive Behavioural Systems