Skip to main content

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

16. America First? Ambidexterity in Safety and Security: A Study Across the World’s Fifteen Leading Military Powers, 2006–2016

verfasst von : Marion Bogers, Robert Beeres, Myriame Bollen

Erschienen in: The Yin-Yang Military

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In absolute terms, the United States of America (US), by far, spends most on defence and is considered the world’s leading military power. Because of today’s diverging safety and security issues, in addition to the military dimension, nations find themselves challenged to come up with answers to cope with climate change, poverty, irregular migration and terrorism. This chapter investigates, from 2006 to 2016, the extent to which the US has operated ambidextrously, i.e. display equal skilfulness on various approaches in the safety and security domains. Using quantitative measures, we compare the absolute and relative US contributions to different safety and security dimensions (i.e. defence, poverty, migration and climate change) among the next 14 largest global military powers. We find the US scores almost persistently in the top 5 regarding safety and security. We conclude that during the Obama administration the US indeed operated ambidextrously in the safety and security domains.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Own calculations, based on the Worldbank (2019) GDP figures of China and India.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Baldwin, D. A. (1997). The concept of security. Review of international studies, 23(1), 5–26.CrossRef Baldwin, D. A. (1997). The concept of security. Review of international studies, 23(1), 5–26.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barnett, T. P. M. (2004). The pentagon’s new map. War and peace in the twenty-first century. New York: G.P. Putnam’s sons. Barnett, T. P. M. (2004). The pentagon’s new map. War and peace in the twenty-first century. New York: G.P. Putnam’s sons.
Zurück zum Zitat Beeres, R., Van der Meulen, J., Soeters, J., & Vogelaar, A. (2012). Mission uruzgan. collaborating in multiple coalitions for Afghanistan. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Beeres, R., Van der Meulen, J., Soeters, J., & Vogelaar, A. (2012). Mission uruzgan. collaborating in multiple coalitions for Afghanistan. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Beeres, R., Bollen, M., & De Waard, E. (2016). Introduction: Organizing for safety and security in military organizations. In R. Beeres, G. Bakx, E. de Waard, S. Rietjens (Eds.), NL ARMS Netherlands annual review of military studies 2016. Organizing for safety and security in military organizations (pp. 1–20). The Hague: TMC Asser Press. Beeres, R., Bollen, M., & De Waard, E. (2016). Introduction: Organizing for safety and security in military organizations. In R. Beeres, G. Bakx, E. de Waard, S. Rietjens (Eds.), NL ARMS Netherlands annual review of military studies 2016. Organizing for safety and security in military organizations (pp. 1–20). The Hague: TMC Asser Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bogers, M., Beeres, R., & Bollen, M. (2019). Burden-sharing for global cooperation on safety and security. Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 14(1), 27–38.CrossRef Bogers, M., Beeres, R., & Bollen, M. (2019). Burden-sharing for global cooperation on safety and security. Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 14(1), 27–38.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boyer, M. A. (1990). A simple and untraditional analysis of western alliance burden-sharing. Defence and Peace Economics, 1(3), 243–259.CrossRef Boyer, M. A. (1990). A simple and untraditional analysis of western alliance burden-sharing. Defence and Peace Economics, 1(3), 243–259.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Byman, D. (2006). Remaking alliances for the war on terrorism. Journal of Strategic Studies, 29(5), 767–811.CrossRef Byman, D. (2006). Remaking alliances for the war on terrorism. Journal of Strategic Studies, 29(5), 767–811.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chalmers, M. (2000). Sharing security: The political economy of burden sharing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Chalmers, M. (2000). Sharing security: The political economy of burden sharing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hamre, J. J., & Conley, H. A. (2016). III. The centrality of the North Atlantic to NATO and US strategic interests. Whitehall Papers, 87(1), 43–58.CrossRef Hamre, J. J., & Conley, H. A. (2016). III. The centrality of the North Atlantic to NATO and US strategic interests. Whitehall Papers, 87(1), 43–58.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kalkman, J. P. (2019). Focus on the frontline: Civil-military collaboration in domestic and European crisis management. Breda: NLDA. Kalkman, J. P. (2019). Focus on the frontline: Civil-military collaboration in domestic and European crisis management. Breda: NLDA.
Zurück zum Zitat La Porte, T. R. (1996). High reliability organizations: Unlikely, demanding and at risk. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4(2), 60–71.CrossRef La Porte, T. R. (1996). High reliability organizations: Unlikely, demanding and at risk. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4(2), 60–71.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leveson, N. (2004). A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science, 42(4), 237–270.CrossRef Leveson, N. (2004). A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science, 42(4), 237–270.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents. Living with high-risk technologies. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents. Living with high-risk technologies. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Piètre-Cambacédès, L., & Chaudet, C. (2010). The SEMA referential framework: Avoiding ambiguities in the terms “security” and “safety”. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 3(2), 55–66.CrossRef Piètre-Cambacédès, L., & Chaudet, C. (2010). The SEMA referential framework: Avoiding ambiguities in the terms “security” and “safety”. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 3(2), 55–66.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reid, T. R. (2004). The United States of Europe. The new superpower and the end of American supremacy. New York: Penguin Press. Reid, T. R. (2004). The United States of Europe. The new superpower and the end of American supremacy. New York: Penguin Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Soeters, J. (2008). Ambidextrous military: Coping with contradictions of new security policies. In M. Den Boer & J. De Wilde (Eds.), The viability of human security (pp. 109–124). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Soeters, J. (2008). Ambidextrous military: Coping with contradictions of new security policies. In M. Den Boer & J. De Wilde (Eds.), The viability of human security (pp. 109–124). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Soeters, J. (2013). Odysseus prevails over Achilles. A Warrior Model suited to post-9/11 conflicts. In Burk J. (Ed.), How 9/11 changed our ways of war (pp. 89–115). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Soeters, J. (2013). Odysseus prevails over Achilles. A Warrior Model suited to post-9/11 conflicts. In Burk J. (Ed.), How 9/11 changed our ways of war (pp. 89–115). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Swuste, P., van Gulijk, C., & Zwaard, W. (2010). Safety metaphors and theories, a review of the occupational safety literature of the US, UK and The Netherlands, till the first part of the 20th century. Safety Science, 48(8), 1000–1018.CrossRef Swuste, P., van Gulijk, C., & Zwaard, W. (2010). Safety metaphors and theories, a review of the occupational safety literature of the US, UK and The Netherlands, till the first part of the 20th century. Safety Science, 48(8), 1000–1018.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Fenema, P. C. (2010a). Military organizations and national crisis response. In J. Soeters, P. C. Van Fenema, & R. Beeres (Eds.), Managing military organizations: Theory and practice (pp. 187–200). Abingdon: Routledge. Van Fenema, P. C. (2010a). Military organizations and national crisis response. In J. Soeters, P. C. Van Fenema, & R. Beeres (Eds.), Managing military organizations: Theory and practice (pp. 187–200). Abingdon: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Fenema, P. C., & Beeres R. (2010) (Re-)drawing the boundaries. Sourcing operational and supportive services in military organizations. In J. Soeters, P. C. Van Fenema, R. Beeres (Eds.), Managing military organizations: Theory and practice (pp. 84–96). Abingdon: Routledge. Van Fenema, P. C., & Beeres R. (2010) (Re-)drawing the boundaries. Sourcing operational and supportive services in military organizations. In J. Soeters, P. C. Van Fenema, R. Beeres (Eds.), Managing military organizations: Theory and practice (pp. 84–96). Abingdon: Routledge.
Metadaten
Titel
America First? Ambidexterity in Safety and Security: A Study Across the World’s Fifteen Leading Military Powers, 2006–2016
verfasst von
Marion Bogers
Robert Beeres
Myriame Bollen
Copyright-Jahr
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52433-3_16