Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

An Assessment of the Paper Industry Firms Listed in Borsa Istanbul Using Entropy-Based MAUT Method

verfasst von : Mehmet Apan, Ahmet Oztel, Mehmet Islamoglu

Erschienen in: Financial Environment and Business Development

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The aim of this study is to measure the market and financial performance of the paper industry firms listed in Borsa Istanbul by adopting multiple attribute utility theory (MAUT) which is one of the most widely used multi-criterion decision-making (MCDM) methods. The performance of the firms is assessed for the period between 2011 and 2013. The weights of evaluation criteria are determined by applying entropy, which is an objective weighting method. In the analysis, the firms are ranked by integrating entropy-based MAUT method. According to the analysis results, Kartonsan has the highest performance rate for all the years, whereas Viking has shown the poorest performance except for the year 2011. During the period, Mondi and Olmuksan, which are acquired by foreign investors, have shown relatively stable performance; however, the performance rate of Kaplamin is unstable. The only firm that has a rising performance trend during the period is Alkim. On the other hand, the sample is also analyzed by using equal weighted MAUT.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Butler, J., Morrice, D. J., & Mullarkey, P. W. (2001). A multiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection. Management Science, 47(6), 800–816.CrossRef Butler, J., Morrice, D. J., & Mullarkey, P. W. (2001). A multiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection. Management Science, 47(6), 800–816.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, S. J. J., Hwang, C. L., Beckmann, M. J., & Krelle, W. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. New York: Springer.CrossRef Chen, S. J. J., Hwang, C. L., Beckmann, M. J., & Krelle, W. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. New York: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Erol, I., Sencer, S., & Sari, R. (2011). A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain. Ecological Economics, 70(6), 1088–1100.CrossRef Erol, I., Sencer, S., & Sari, R. (2011). A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain. Ecological Economics, 70(6), 1088–1100.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications, a state of the art survey. New York: Springer.CrossRef Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications, a state of the art survey. New York: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-criteria decision analysis: Methods and software. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRef Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-criteria decision analysis: Methods and software. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Islamoglu, M., Apan, M., & Oztel, A. (2015). An evaluation of the financial performance of REITs in Borsa Istanbul: A case study using the entropy-based TOPSIS method. International Journal of Financial Research, 6(2), 124–138.CrossRef Islamoglu, M., Apan, M., & Oztel, A. (2015). An evaluation of the financial performance of REITs in Borsa Istanbul: A case study using the entropy-based TOPSIS method. International Journal of Financial Research, 6(2), 124–138.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Islamoglu, M., & Çelik, N. (2015). Financial performance determinants of paper and paper products firms listed in Borsa Istanbul. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(4), 233–243.CrossRef Islamoglu, M., & Çelik, N. (2015). Financial performance determinants of paper and paper products firms listed in Borsa Istanbul. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(4), 233–243.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Johansson, H. J., Mchugh, P., Pendlebury, A. J., & Wheeler, W. A., III. (1993). Business process reengineering: Breakpoint strategies for market dominance. New York: Wiley. Johansson, H. J., Mchugh, P., Pendlebury, A. J., & Wheeler, W. A., III. (1993). Business process reengineering: Breakpoint strategies for market dominance. New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley. Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagoudis, I. N., Lalwani, C. S., & Naim, M. M. (2006). Ranking of factors contributing to higher performance in the ocean transportation industry: A multi-attribute utility theory approach. Maritime Policy and Management, 33(4), 345–369.CrossRef Lagoudis, I. N., Lalwani, C. S., & Naim, M. M. (2006). Ranking of factors contributing to higher performance in the ocean transportation industry: A multi-attribute utility theory approach. Maritime Policy and Management, 33(4), 345–369.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Olson, D. L. (1995). Decision aids for selection problems. New York: Springer. Olson, D. L. (1995). Decision aids for selection problems. New York: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Özarslan, D. D., Altay, M. C., Arabaci, M. C., Altay, H. F., & Sivri, N. (2011). Effects of high economic importance of industrial branches on human life quality and environment. International Journal of Electronics, Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 2(1), 86–91. Özarslan, D. D., Altay, M. C., Arabaci, M. C., Altay, H. F., & Sivri, N. (2011). Effects of high economic importance of industrial branches on human life quality and environment. International Journal of Electronics, Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 2(1), 86–91.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandalcılar, A. R. (2012). Relationship between paper consumption and economic growth in Turkey: Cointegration and causality analysis. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 1–15. Sandalcılar, A. R. (2012). Relationship between paper consumption and economic growth in Turkey: Cointegration and causality analysis. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 1–15.
Zurück zum Zitat Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sopadang, A., Cho, B. R., & Leonard, M. (2002). Development of the hybrid weight assessment system for multiple quality attributes. Quality Engineering, 15(1), 75–89.CrossRef Sopadang, A., Cho, B. R., & Leonard, M. (2002). Development of the hybrid weight assessment system for multiple quality attributes. Quality Engineering, 15(1), 75–89.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Suslick, S. B., & Furtado, R. (2001). Quantifying the value of technological, environmental and financial gain in decision models for offshore oil exploration. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 32(2), 115–125.CrossRef Suslick, S. B., & Furtado, R. (2001). Quantifying the value of technological, environmental and financial gain in decision models for offshore oil exploration. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 32(2), 115–125.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, T. C., & Hsu, J. C. (2004). Evaluation of the business operation performance of the listing companies by applying TOPSIS method. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 2. IEEE. Wang, T. C., & Hsu, J. C. (2004). Evaluation of the business operation performance of the listing companies by applying TOPSIS method. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 2. IEEE.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber, M., & Borcherding, K. (1993). Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 67(1), 1–12.CrossRef Weber, M., & Borcherding, K. (1993). Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 67(1), 1–12.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, S. Q., Hu, Z. G., Liu, Q., Huang, H., & Pu, J. P. (2004). Multi-objective decision analysis of diversion standards based on entropy. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 8, 45–47. Xu, S. Q., Hu, Z. G., Liu, Q., Huang, H., & Pu, J. P. (2004). Multi-objective decision analysis of diversion standards based on entropy. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 8, 45–47.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeleny, M. (1974). Linear multi objective programming. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Zeleny, M. (1974). Linear multi objective programming. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zeleny, M., & Cochrane, J. L. (Eds.). (1973). Multiple criteria decision making. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. Zeleny, M., & Cochrane, J. L. (Eds.). (1973). Multiple criteria decision making. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Zietsman, J., Rilett, L. R., & Kim, S. J. (2006). Transportation corridor decision-making with multi-attribute utility theory. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 7(2–3), 254–266.CrossRef Zietsman, J., Rilett, L. R., & Kim, S. J. (2006). Transportation corridor decision-making with multi-attribute utility theory. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 7(2–3), 254–266.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zou, Z. H., Yi, Y., & Sun, J. N. (2006). Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 18(5), 1020–1023.CrossRef Zou, Z. H., Yi, Y., & Sun, J. N. (2006). Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 18(5), 1020–1023.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
An Assessment of the Paper Industry Firms Listed in Borsa Istanbul Using Entropy-Based MAUT Method
verfasst von
Mehmet Apan
Ahmet Oztel
Mehmet Islamoglu
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39919-5_2