Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Artificial Intelligence and Law 4/2019

10.01.2019 | Original Research

An axiomatic characterization of temporalised belief revision in the law

verfasst von: Luciano H. Tamargo, Diego C. Martinez, Antonino Rotolo, Guido Governatori

Erschienen in: Artificial Intelligence and Law | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper presents a belief revision operator that considers time intervals for modelling norm change in the law. This approach relates techniques from belief revision formalisms and time intervals with temporalised rules for legal systems. Our goal is to formalise a temporalised belief base and corresponding timed derivation, together with a proper revision operator. This operator may remove rules when needed or adapt intervals of time when contradictory norms are added in the system. For the operator, both constructive definition and an axiomatic characterisation by representation theorems are given.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alchourrón CE, Bulygin E (1981) The expressive conception of norms. In: Hilpinen R (ed), New studies in deontic logic, pp 95–125. D. Reidel, DordrechtCrossRef Alchourrón CE, Bulygin E (1981) The expressive conception of norms. In: Hilpinen R (ed), New studies in deontic logic, pp 95–125. D. Reidel, DordrechtCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alchourrón Carlos E, Gärdenfors Peter, Makinson David C (1985) On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. J Symb Logic 50:510–530MathSciNetCrossRef Alchourrón Carlos E, Gärdenfors Peter, Makinson David C (1985) On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. J Symb Logic 50:510–530MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alchourrón CE, Makinson DC (1981) Hierarchies of regulations and their logic. In: Risto H (ed) New studies in deontic logic, pp 125–148. D. Reidel, DordrechtCrossRef Alchourrón CE, Makinson DC (1981) Hierarchies of regulations and their logic. In: Risto H (ed) New studies in deontic logic, pp 125–148. D. Reidel, DordrechtCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alchourrón CE, Makinson David C (1982) The logic of theory change: contraction functions and their associated revision functions. Theoria 48:14–37MathSciNetCrossRef Alchourrón CE, Makinson David C (1982) The logic of theory change: contraction functions and their associated revision functions. Theoria 48:14–37MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alchourrón CE, Makinson David C (1985) On the logic of theory change: safe contraction. Studia Logica 44:405–422MathSciNetCrossRef Alchourrón CE, Makinson David C (1985) On the logic of theory change: safe contraction. Studia Logica 44:405–422MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Allen James F (1983) Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Commun ACM 26(11):832–843CrossRef Allen James F (1983) Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Commun ACM 26(11):832–843CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Allen James F (1984) Towards a general theory of action and time. Artif Intell 23(2):123–154CrossRef Allen James F (1984) Towards a general theory of action and time. Artif Intell 23(2):123–154CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Augusto JC, Simari Guillermo R (2001) Temporal defeasible reasoning. Knowl Inf Syst 3(3):287–318CrossRef Augusto JC, Simari Guillermo R (2001) Temporal defeasible reasoning. Knowl Inf Syst 3(3):287–318CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boella G, Pigozzi G, Van Der Torre L (2009) A normative framework for norm change. In: Proc. AAMAS 2009, pp 169–176. ACM Boella G, Pigozzi G, Van Der Torre L (2009) A normative framework for norm change. In: Proc. AAMAS 2009, pp 169–176. ACM
Zurück zum Zitat Bonanno Giacomo (2007) Axiomatic characterization of the AGM theory of belief revision in a temporal logic. Artif Intell 171(2–3):144–160MathSciNetCrossRef Bonanno Giacomo (2007) Axiomatic characterization of the AGM theory of belief revision in a temporal logic. Artif Intell 171(2–3):144–160MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bonanno G (2009) Belief revision in a temporal framework. In: New perspectives on games and interaction, volume 4 of texts in logic and games, pp 45–80. University Press, Amsterdam Bonanno G (2009) Belief revision in a temporal framework. In: New perspectives on games and interaction, volume 4 of texts in logic and games, pp 45–80. University Press, Amsterdam
Zurück zum Zitat Budán MC, Cobo ML, Marténez DC, Simari Guillermo R (2017) Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks. Int J Approx Reason 84:1–22MathSciNetCrossRef Budán MC, Cobo ML, Marténez DC, Simari Guillermo R (2017) Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks. Int J Approx Reason 84:1–22MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gabbay Dov M, Pigozzi Gabriella, Woods John (2003) Controlled revision—an algorithmic approach for belief revision. J Log Comput 13(1):3–22MathSciNetCrossRef Gabbay Dov M, Pigozzi Gabriella, Woods John (2003) Controlled revision—an algorithmic approach for belief revision. J Log Comput 13(1):3–22MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Governatori G, Palmirani M, Riveret R, Rotolo A, Sartor G (2005) Norm modifications in defeasible logic. In: Legal knowledge and information systems—JURIX 2005: the eighteenth annual conference on legal knowledge and information systems, Brussels, Belgium, 8–10 December 2005, pp 13–22 Governatori G, Palmirani M, Riveret R, Rotolo A, Sartor G (2005) Norm modifications in defeasible logic. In: Legal knowledge and information systems—JURIX 2005: the eighteenth annual conference on legal knowledge and information systems, Brussels, Belgium, 8–10 December 2005, pp 13–22
Zurück zum Zitat Governatori G, Palmirani M, Riveret R, Rotolo A, Sartor G (2005) Norm modifications in defeasible logic. In: JURIX 2005, pp 13–22. IOS Press, Amsterdam Governatori G, Palmirani M, Riveret R, Rotolo A, Sartor G (2005) Norm modifications in defeasible logic. In: JURIX 2005, pp 13–22. IOS Press, Amsterdam
Zurück zum Zitat Governatori G, Rotolo Antonino (2010) Changing legal systems: legal abrogations and annulments in defeasible logic. Logic J IGPL 18(1):157–194MathSciNetCrossRef Governatori G, Rotolo Antonino (2010) Changing legal systems: legal abrogations and annulments in defeasible logic. Logic J IGPL 18(1):157–194MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Governatori Guido, Rotolo Antonino (2015) Logics for legal dynamics. In: Logic in the theory and practice of lawmaking, pp 323–356CrossRef Governatori Guido, Rotolo Antonino (2015) Logics for legal dynamics. In: Logic in the theory and practice of lawmaking, pp 323–356CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Governatori G, Rotolo A, Olivieri F, Scannapieco S (2013) Legal contractions: a logical analysis. In: Proc. ICAIL 2013 Governatori G, Rotolo A, Olivieri F, Scannapieco S (2013) Legal contractions: a logical analysis. In: Proc. ICAIL 2013
Zurück zum Zitat Governatori G, Rotolo A, Riveret R, Palmirani M, Sartor G (2007) Variants of temporal defeasible logic for modelling norm modifications. In: Proc. ICAIL’07, pp 155–159 Governatori G, Rotolo A, Riveret R, Palmirani M, Sartor G (2007) Variants of temporal defeasible logic for modelling norm modifications. In: Proc. ICAIL’07, pp 155–159
Zurück zum Zitat Governatori G, Rotolo A, Sartor G (2005) Temporalised normative positions in defeasible logic. In: Proc. ICAIL 2005 Governatori G, Rotolo A, Sartor G (2005) Temporalised normative positions in defeasible logic. In: Proc. ICAIL 2005
Zurück zum Zitat Governatori G, Terenziani P (2007) Temporal extensions to defeasible logic. In: Mehmet AO, John T (eds) AI 2007, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4830. Springer, Berlin, pp 476–485 Governatori G, Terenziani P (2007) Temporal extensions to defeasible logic. In: Mehmet AO, John T (eds) AI 2007, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4830. Springer, Berlin, pp 476–485
Zurück zum Zitat Hansson Sven O (1999) A textbook of belief dynamics: theory change and database updating. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRef Hansson Sven O (1999) A textbook of belief dynamics: theory change and database updating. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hart HLA (1994) The concept of law. Clarendon Press, Oxford Hart HLA (1994) The concept of law. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Zurück zum Zitat Monica Della D, Goranko V, Montanari A, Sciavicco G (2011) Interval temporal logics: a journey. Bull Eur Assoc Theor Comput Sci EATCS 105:01MathSciNetMATH Monica Della D, Goranko V, Montanari A, Sciavicco G (2011) Interval temporal logics: a journey. Bull Eur Assoc Theor Comput Sci EATCS 105:01MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Rotolo A (2010) Retroactive legal changes and revision theory in defeasible logic. In: Governatori G, Sartor G (eds) DEON 2010, volume 6181 of LNAI. LNAI. Springer, Berlin, pp 116–131 Rotolo A (2010) Retroactive legal changes and revision theory in defeasible logic. In: Governatori G, Sartor G (eds) DEON 2010, volume 6181 of LNAI. LNAI. Springer, Berlin, pp 116–131
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro S, Pagnucco M, Lesprance Y, Levesque HJ (2011) Iterated belief change in the situation calculus. Artif Intell 175(1):165–192. John McCarthy’s LegacyMathSciNetCrossRef Shapiro S, Pagnucco M, Lesprance Y, Levesque HJ (2011) Iterated belief change in the situation calculus. Artif Intell 175(1):165–192. John McCarthy’s LegacyMathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stolpe Audun (2010) Norm-system revision: theory and application. Artif Intell Law 18(3):247–283CrossRef Stolpe Audun (2010) Norm-system revision: theory and application. Artif Intell Law 18(3):247–283CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tamargo LH, Martinez DC, Rotolo A, Governatori G (2017) Temporalised belief revision in the law. In: Wyner AZ, Casini G (eds) Legal knowledge and information systems - JURIX 2017: the thirtieth annual conference, Frontiers in artifcial intelligence and applications, vol. 302, Luxembourg, IOS Press, pp 49–58 Tamargo LH, Martinez DC, Rotolo A, Governatori G (2017) Temporalised belief revision in the law. In: Wyner AZ, Casini G (eds) Legal knowledge and information systems - JURIX 2017: the thirtieth annual conference, Frontiers in artifcial intelligence and applications, vol. 302, Luxembourg, IOS Press, pp 49–58
Zurück zum Zitat Wassermann R (2000) Resource bounded belief revision. Ph.D. Thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC). University of Amsterdam Wassermann R (2000) Resource bounded belief revision. Ph.D. Thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC). University of Amsterdam
Zurück zum Zitat Wheeler GR, Alberti M (2011) No revision and no contraction. Minds Mach 21(3):411–430CrossRef Wheeler GR, Alberti M (2011) No revision and no contraction. Minds Mach 21(3):411–430CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
An axiomatic characterization of temporalised belief revision in the law
verfasst von
Luciano H. Tamargo
Diego C. Martinez
Antonino Rotolo
Guido Governatori
Publikationsdatum
10.01.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Artificial Intelligence and Law / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0924-8463
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8382
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09241-4