Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Only in the last fifteen years, the application of the ergonomics principles stated the need to achieve a good IEQ (indoor environmental quality) as a result of thermal, visual, acoustic comfort and indoor air quality (IAQ). The awareness increased that an adequate design of the indoor environment, where people work and live, requires a synergic approach to all facets involved in full compliance with sustainability. IEQ strictly affects the overall building energy performances and exhibits an antagonistic relationship with respect to the energy saving requirements. In addition, the effects of low IEQ levels on the health and the productivity at work could even greater than those related to the energy costs of building facilities.
The role played by IEQ is very important especially in school environments. Particularly, children are extra sensitive to a poor indoor environment as they are physically still developing and, in comparison to healthy adults, will suffer the consequences of a poor indoor environment with also negative effects in learning ability. Because of all mentioned issues an integrated approach in the design and in the assessment of school buildings is required where ergonomics plays a crucial role.
Since more than 20 years InEQualitES (Indoor Environmental Quality and Energy Saving) team, made by researchers and professors from Universities of Salerno and Naples, has focused the research on the environmental quality in schools. The experience gained in the field allowed to build a large database of subjective and objective data and helped us to find effective solution aimed to solve most common problems related to the application of assessment methods.
Based upon this experience, this discussion will be mainly focused to the main criticalities related to the thermal comfort assessment in schools with special reference to the integration of objective investigations (referred to a mean subject statistically significant) and subjective investigations which are the only able to show possible differences (age, gender and so on) in experienced perception.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
ASHRAE (2016) Interactions Affecting the Achievement of Acceptable Indoor Environments - ASHRAE Guideline 10-2016, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning, Atlanta
CEN (2007) Criteria for the Indoor Environment including thermal comfort indoor air quality, light and noise. EN Standard 15251. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Bruxelles
d’Ambrosio Alfano FR, Olesen BW, Palella BI, Riccio G (2014) Thermal comfort: design and assessment for energy saving. Energy Build 81:326–336 CrossRef
Bellia L, Boerstra A, van Dijken F, Ianniello E, Lopardo G, Minichiello F, et al (2010) Indoor environment and energy efficiency in schools part 1: principles. REHVA Guidebook 13
Teli D, Bourikas L, James PAB, Bahaj AS (2017) Thermal performance evaluation of school buildings using a children-based adaptive comfort model. Procedia Environ Sci 38:844–851 CrossRef
d’Ambrosio Alfano FR, Ianniello E, Palella BI (2013) PMV–PPD and acceptability in naturally ventilated schools. Build Environ 67:129–137 CrossRef
d’Ambrosio Alfano FR, Palella BI, Ranesi G, Riccio G: Parameters that affect PMV in schools. In: Heiselberg PK (Ed) CLIMA 2016 - Proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress, Aalborg, vol 10, pp 1–8
ASHRAE (2017) Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
Fanger PO (1970) Thermal Comfort: Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering. Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen
Zhang G, Zheng C, Yang W, Zhang Q, Moschandreas DJ (2007) Thermal comfort investigation of naturally ventilated classrooms in a subtropical region. Indoor Built Environ, 148–158
Brager GS, de Dear RJ (1998) Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review. Energy Build 27:83–98 CrossRef
Fanger PO, Toftum J (2002) Extension of the PMV model to non-air-conditioned buildings in warm climates. Energy Build 34:533–536 CrossRef
ISO (1995) Ergonomics of the thermal environment e assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales. ISO Standard 10551. International Standardization Organization, Geneva
Sadat Zomorodian Z, Tahsildoost M, Hafezi M (2016) Thermal comfort in educational buildings: a review article. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:895–906 CrossRef
Indraganti M, Daryani RK (2010) Effect of age, gender, economic group and tenure on thermal comfort: a field study in residential buildings in hot and dry climate with seasonalvariations. Energy Build 42(3):273–281 CrossRef
Teli D, Jentsch MF, James PAB (2014) The role of a building’s thermal properties on pupils’ thermal comfort in junior school classrooms as determined in field studies. Energy Build 82:640–654 CrossRef
ISO (1998) Ergonomics of the thermal environment – instruments for measuring physical quantities. ISO Standard 7726. International Standardization Organization, Geneva
ISO (1998) Ergonomics of the thermal environment e determination of metabolic rate. ISO Standard 8996. International Standardization Organization, Geneva
ISO (2007) Ergonomics of the thermal environment and estimation of the thermal insulation and evaporative resistance of a clothing ensemble. ISO Standard 9920. International Standardization Organization, Geneva
ISO (2005) Ergonomics of the thermal environment - analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. International Standardization Organization, Geneva
d’Ambrosio Alfano FR, Palella BI, Riccio G (2016) Notes on the calculation of the PMV index by means of apps. Energy Procedia 101:249–256 CrossRef
d’Ambrosio Alfano FR, Olesen BW, Palella BI (2017) Povl Ole Fanger’s impact ten years later. Energy Build 152:243–249 CrossRef
- An Ergonomic Approach of IEQ Assessment: A Case Study
Francesca Romana d’Ambrosio Alfano
Boris Igor Palella
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA, Product Lifecycle Management/© Eisenhans | vege | Fotolia