Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 1/2018

22.08.2017

An Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network Considering the Video Stream

verfasst von: Imane Zaimi, Zineb Squalli Houssaini, Abdelali Boushaba, Mohammed Oumsis, Driss Aboutajdine

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In promising application field such as Vehicular Ad hoc Networks, the ability of the driver to exchange video streams smoothly over the network regardless of his position is one of the most incentive features. However, dynamic nature of mobility and current obstacles in urban areas bring considerable challenges to routing. To give gratifying transmission performances, the vehicular networks must ensure Quality of Experience as well as keeping a tolerable Quality of Service (QoS). Furthermore, studying and comparing the efficiency of existing protocols have been challenging since each protocol is appropriate to a specific environment of application. Additionally, the lack in literature of quantitative comparison between the existing video stream requirements-based study, led us in this survey to analyze ten promising routing protocols focusing on communication challenges. Since the protocol chosen in the industrial world depends on certain metrics including video stream requirements, the paper shows also which protocols are suitable for MPEG-4 video quality by raking merits of QoS.
Vorheriger Artikel A Hybrid Quantum Key Distribution Protocol for Tele-care Medicine Information Systems
Nächster Artikel Design and Performance Comparison of W-OFDM Under the Nonlinear HPA Environment

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Cunha, F., Villas, L., Boukerche, A., Maia, G., Viana, A., Mini, R., et al. (2016). Data communication in VANETs: Survey, applications and challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 44, 90–103.CrossRef
2.
Daniel, A., Paul, A., Ahmad, A., & Rho, S. (2016). Cooperative intelligence of vehicles for intelligent transportation systems (ITS). Wireless Personal Communications, 87(2), 461–484.CrossRef
3.
Kumar, N., Chilamkurti, N., & Rodrigues, J. J. (2014). Learning automata-based opportunistic data aggregation and forwarding scheme for alert generation in vehicular ad hoc networks. Computer Communications, 39, 22–32.CrossRef
4.
Bekris, K. E., Tsianos, K. I., & Kavraki, L. E. (2009). Safe and distributed kinodynamic replanning for vehicular networks. Mobile Networks and Applications, 14(3), 292–308.CrossRef
5.
Gonzalez, A. J., Alcober, J., de Pozuelo, R. M., Pinyol, F., & Ghafoor, K. Z. (2011). Context-aware multimedia service composition using quality assessment. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
6.
Joe, M. M., & Ramakrishnan, B. (2016). Review of vehicular ad hoc network communication models including WVANET (Web VANET) model and WVANET future research directions. Wireless Networks, 22(7), 2369–2386.CrossRef
7.
Joe, M. M., & Ramakrishnan, B. (2015). WVANET: Modelling a novel web based communication architecture for vehicular network. Wireless Personal Communications, 85(4), 1987–2001.CrossRef
8.
Tyagi, P., & Dembla, D. (2016). Performance analysis and implementation of proposed mechanism for detection and prevention of security attacks in routing protocols of vehicular ad-hoc network (VANET). Egyptian Informatics Journal, 18(2), 133–139.
9.
Hasrouny, H., Samhat, A. E., Bassil, C., & Laouiti, A. (2017). VANet security challenges and solutions: A survey. Vehicular Communications, 7, 7–20.
10.
Mohammed, N. H., El-Moafy, H. N., Abdel-Mageid, S. M., & Marie, M. I. (2017). Mobility management scheme based on smart buffering for vehicular networks. International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA), 4(2), 35–46.
11.
Zeadally, S., Hunt, R., Chen, Y. S., Irwin, A., & Hassan, A. (2012). Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETS): Status, results, and challenges. Telecommunication Systems, 50(4), 217–241.CrossRef
12.
Xu, S., Guo, P., Xu, B., & Zhou, H. (2012). Study on qos of video communication over VANET. In Information Computing and Applications (pp. 730–738). Springer.
13.
Dua, A., Kumar, N., & Bawa, S. (2014). A systematic review on routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks. Vehicular Communications, 1, 33–52.CrossRef
14.
Mohapatra, S., & Kanungo, P. (2012). Performance analysis of AODV, DSR, OLSR and DSDV routing protocols using NS2 Simulator. Procedia Engineering, 30, 69–76.CrossRef
15.
Husain, A., & Sharma, S. (2015). Simulated analysis of location and distance based routing in VANET with IEEE802. 11p. Procedia Computer Science, 57, 323–331.CrossRef
16.
Nefti, S., & Sedrati, M. (2016). PSNR and jitter analysis of routing protocols for video streaming in sparse MANET networks, using NS2 and the evalvid framework. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security. arXiv preprint arXiv:​1604.​03217.
17.
Sharef, B. T., Alsaqour, R. A., & Ismail, M. (2013). Comparative study of variant position-based VANET routing protocols. Procedia Technology, 11, 532–539.CrossRef
18.
Qadri, N. N., Fleury, M., Rofoee, B. R., Altaf, M., & Ghanbari, M. (2012). Robust P2P multimedia exchange within a VANET. Wireless Personal Communications, 63(3), 561–577.CrossRef
19.
Martinez, F. J., Fogue, M., Toh, C. K., Cano, J. C., Calafate, C. T., & Manzoni, P. (2013). Computer simulations of VANETs using realistic city topologies. Wireless Personal Communications, 69(2), 639–663.CrossRef
20.
Wang, S. Y., Wang, P. F., Li, Y. W., & Lau, L. C. (2011). Design and implementation of a more realistic radio propagation model for wireless vehicular networks over the NCTUns network simulator. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) (pp. 1937–1942). IEEE.
21.
Perkins, C. E., & Royer, E. M. (1999). Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computer Systems and Applications (p. 90). IEEE Computer Society.
22.
Perkins, C. E., & Bhagwat, P. (1994). Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (Vol. 24, pp. 234–244). ACM.
23.
Johnson, D. B., & Maltz, D. A. (1996). Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. In Mobile Computing (pp. 153–181). Springer.
24.
Espensen, K. L., Kjeldsen, M. K., & Kristensen, L. M. (2008). Modelling and initial validation of the DYMO routing protocol for mobile ad-hoc networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5062, 152–170.
25.
Pei, G., Gerla, M., & Chen, T. W. (2000). Fisheye state routing: A routing scheme for ad hoc wireless networks. In 2000 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2000 (Vol. 1, pp. 70–74). IEEE.
26.
Karp, B., & Kung, H. T. (2000). GPSR: Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (pp. 243–254). ACM.
27.
Al-Rabayah, M., & Malaney, R. (2012). A new scalable hybrid routing protocol for VANETs. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 61(6), 2625–2635.CrossRef
28.
Jacquet, P., Muhlethaler, P., Clausen, T., Laouiti, A., Qayyum, A., & Viennot, L. (2001). Optimized link state routing protocol for ad hoc networks. In Proceedings IEEE International Multi Topic Conference , IEEE INMIC 2001. Technology for the 21st Century (pp. 62–68).
29.
Zhao, J., & Cao, G. (2008). VADD: Vehicle-assisted data delivery in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 57(3), 1910–1922.CrossRef
30.
Haas, Z. J., & Pearlman, M. R. (2001). ZRP: A hybrid framework for routing in ad hoc networks. In Ad hoc Networking (pp. 221–253). Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
31.
Nouh, M. S. A., El-ramly, S. H., Zaki, M., & Elsayed, H. A. (2016). Enhanced route discovery mechanism of ad-hoc on demand distance vector for MANET. International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA), 3(6), 129–138.
32.
Sharma, S. K., & Sharma, S. (2017). Improvement over AODV considering QoS support in mobile ad-hoc networks. International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA), 4(2), 47–61.CrossRef
33.
Namboodiri, V., Agarwal, M., & Gao, L. (2004). A study on the feasibility of mobile gateways for vehicular ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (pp. 66–75). ACM.
34.
Billington, J., & Yuan, C. (2009). On modelling and analysing the dynamic MANET on-demand (DYMO) routing protocol. Trans. Petri nets and other models of concurrency (Vol. 3, pp. 98–126). Berlin: Springer.
35.
Walikar, G. A., & Biradar, R. C. (2017). A survey on hybrid routing mechanisms in mobile ad hoc networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 77, 48–63.CrossRef
36.
Ghafoor, K. Z., Lloret, J., Bakar, K. A., Sadiq, A. S., & Mussa, S. A. B. (2013). Beaconing approaches in vehicular ad hoc networks: A survey. Wireless Personal Communications, 73(3), 885–912.CrossRef
37.
Gonçalves Filho, J., Patel, A., Batista, B. L. A., & Celestino, J. (2016). A systematic technical survey of DTN and VDTN routing protocols. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 48, 139–159.CrossRef
38.
Mageid, S. A. (2017). Connectivity based positioning system for underground vehicular ad hoc networks. International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA), 4(1), 1–14.CrossRef
39.
Ghafoor, K. Z., Lloret, J., Sadiq, A. S., & Mohammed, M. A. (2015). Improved geographical routing in vehicular ad hoc networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 80(2), 785–804.CrossRef
40.
Mageid, S. A. (2016). Self-correcting localization scheme for vehicle to vehicle communication. International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA), 3(5), 95–107.
41.
Gupta, N., Prakash, A., & Tripathi, R. (2015). Medium access control protocols for safety applications in vehicular ad-hoc network: A classification and comprehensive survey. Vehicular Communications, 2(4), 223–237.CrossRef
42.
Zeng, X., Tao, C., & Chen, Z. (2009). The application of DSRC technology in intelligent transportation system. In IET International Communication Conference on Wireless Mobile and Computing (CCWMC 2009) (pp. 265–268).
43.
Spaho, E., Ikeda, M., Barolli, L., & Xhafa, F. (2013). Performance comparison of OLSR and AODV protocols in a VANET crossroad scenario. In Information Technology Convergence (pp. 37–45). Springer.
44.
Ali, F., Shaikh, F. K., Ansari, A. Q., Mahoto, N. A., & Felemban, E. (2015). Comparative analysis of VANET routing protocols: On road side unit placement strategies. Wireless Personal Communications, 85(2), 393–406.CrossRef
45.
Xu, S., Guo, P., Xu, B., & Zhou, H. (2013). QoS evaluation of VANET routing protocols. Journal of Networks, 8(1), 132–139.CrossRef
46.
Rodrigues, D., Cerqueira, E., & Monteiro, E. (2008). Quality of service and quality of experience in video streaming. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Traffic Management and Traffic Engineering for the Future Internet (FITraMEn2008), EuroNF NoE, Porto, Portugal (pp. 11–12).
47.
Xie, F., Hua, K., Wang, W., Ho, Y. H., et al. (2007). Performance study of live video streaming over highway vehicular ad hoc networks. In 2007 IEEE 66th Conference on Vehicular Technology, 2007. VTC-2007 Fall (pp. 2121–2125). IEEE.
48.
Xu, S. (2012). Simulated study on video communication over VANET. In World Automation Congress (WAC). IEEE.
49.
50.
Harri, J., & Fiore, M. (2006). VanetMobiSim: Vehicular ad hoc network mobility extension to the CanuMobiSim framework. Institut Eurécom Department of Mobile Communications, 6904, 1–19.
51.
De Felice, M., Cerqueira, E., Melo, A., Gerla, M., Cuomo, F., & Baiocchi, A. (2015). A distributed beaconless routing protocol for real-time video dissemination in multimedia VANETs. Computer Communications, 58, 40–52.CrossRef
52.
Park, J. S., Lee, U., & Gerla, M. (2010). Vehicular communications: Emergency video streams and network coding. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 1(1), 57–68.CrossRef
53.
Wang, H., Divakaran, A., Vetro, A., Chang, S. F., & Sun, H. (2003). Survey of compressed-domain features used in audio-visual indexing and analysis. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 14(2), 150–183.CrossRef
54.
Fitzek, F. H., & Reisslein, M. (2001). MPEG-4 and H. 263 video traces for network performance evaluation. IEEE Network, 15(6), 40–54.CrossRef
55.
Xu, F., & Zhang, Y. J. (2006). Evaluation and comparison of texture descriptors proposed in MPEG-7. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 17(4), 701–716.CrossRef
56.
Ziviani, A., Wolfinger, B. E., De Rezende, J. F., Duarte, O. C. M., & Fdida, S. (2005). Joint adoption of QoS schemes for MPEG streams. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 26(1), 59–80.CrossRef
57.
Rahman, M. H., Morshed, M. M., & Rahman, M. U. (2014). Realistic vehicular mobility impact of FTM, IDM, IDM-IM and IDM-LC on VANETs. International Journal of Computer Applications, 90(11), 5–12.
58.
Härri, J., Fiore, M., Filali, F., & Bonnet, C. (2009). Vehicular mobility simulation with VanetMobiSim. Simulation, 87, 275–300.CrossRef
59.
Härri, J., Filali, F., Bonnet, C., & Fiore, M. (2006). VanetMobiSim: Generating realistic mobility patterns for VANETs. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (pp. 96–97). ACM.
60.
Deng, D. J., Chen, H. C., Chao, H. C., & Huang, Y. M. (2011). A collision alleviation scheme for IEEE 802.11 p VANETs. Wireless Personal Communications, 56(3), 371–383.CrossRef
61.
Group, I. W., et al. (2010). IEEE standard for information technology-telecommunications and information exchange between systems-local and metropolitan area networks-specific requirements part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) Specifications. IEEE Std, 802(11), 1–1076.
62.
Winkler, S., Sharma, A., & McNally, D. (2001). Perceptual video quality and blockiness metrics for multimedia streaming applications. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (pp. 547–552).
63.
Chen, Y., Wu, K., & Zhang, Q. (2015). From QoS to QoE: A tutorial on video quality assessment. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(2), 1126–1165.CrossRef
64.
Aguiar, E., Riker, A., Abelém, A., Cerqueira, E., & Mu, M. (2012). Video quality estimator for wireless mesh networks. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 20th International Workshop on Quality of Service (p. 1). IEEE Press.
65.
Mu, M., Romaniak, P., Mauthe, A., Leszczuk, M., Janowski, L., & Cerqueira, E. (2012). Framework for the integrated video quality assessment. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 61(3), 787–817.CrossRef
66.
Chikkerur, S., Sundaram, V., Reisslein, M., & Karam, L. J. (2011). Objective video quality assessment methods: A classification, review, and performance comparison. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 57(2), 165–182.CrossRef
67.
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004). Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), 600–612.CrossRef
68.
Graphics, M. (2009). Media Lab. Msu video quality measurement tool.
69.
REC, I. (2006). P. 800.1, Mean opinion score (MOS) terminology.
70.
Zafar, S., & Manzoor, H. (2016). Throughput and delay analysis of AODV, DSDV and DSR routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks. International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications (IJCNA), 3(2), 1–7.
71.
Szigeti, T., & Hattingh, C. (2004). Quality of service design overview. San Jose, CA: Cisco.
72.
Bouras, C., Kapoulas, V., & Tsanai, E. (2015). A GPSR enhancement mechanism for routing in VANETs. In International Conference on Wired/Wireless Internet Communication (pp. 94–107). Springer.
73.
Houssaini, Z. S., Zaimi, I., Oumsis, M., & Ouatik, S. E. A. (2016). Improvement of GPSR protocol by using future position estimation of participating nodes in vehicular ad-hoc Networks. In International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM) (pp. 87–94). IEEE.
74.
Hu, T., Liwang, M., Huang, L., & Tang, Y. (2015). An enhanced GPSR routing protocol based on the buffer length of nodes for the congestion problem in VANETs. In 10th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) (pp. 416–419). IEEE
75.
Yi, J., Adnane, A., David, S., & Parrein, B. (2011). Multipath optimized link state routing for mobile ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 9(1), 28–47.CrossRef
76.
Boushaba, A., Benabbou, A., Benabbou, R., Zahi, A., & Oumsis, M. (2016). An intelligent multipath optimized link state routing protocol for QoS and QoE enhancement of video transmission in MANETs. Computing, 98(8), 803–825.MathSciNetCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
An Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network Considering the Video Stream
verfasst von
Imane Zaimi
Zineb Squalli Houssaini
Abdelali Boushaba
Mohammed Oumsis
Driss Aboutajdine
Publikationsdatum
22.08.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4903-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Wireless Personal Communications 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Joint Power and Time Allocation Scheme with QoS Constraints in Overlay Multi-user Cognitive Radio Networks

ReviewPaper

The Impact of Wireless Sensor Network in the Field of Precision Agriculture: A Review

OriginalPaper

Interference-Aware Transmission for D2D Communications in a Cellular Network

OriginalPaper

Analysis of the Influence of PCI Planning on the Physical Uplink Control Channel in LTE

OriginalPaper

Pre-equalization Schemes for MIMO CC-CDMA Systems Over Frequency-Selective Fading Channels

OriginalPaper

Privacy-Preserving and Energy-Efficient Continuous Data Aggregation Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Networks

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise