Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Data availability: Contact the authors.
CEO compensation has received much attention from both academics and regulators. However, academics have given scant attention to understanding judgments about CEO compensation by third parties such as investors. Our study contributes to the ethics literature on CEO compensation by examining whether judgments about CEO compensation (e.g., say-on-pay) are influenced by two aspects of a company’s tone at the top—social ties between the CEO and members of the Executive Compensation Committee (ECC) and the CEO’s Reputation, particularly for financial reporting and disclosures. Although, stock exchanges such as NASDAQ require ECC members to be independent, CEOs still may have social connections to the ECC. In addition, CEOs develop a reputation for the quality of their company’s financial reporting and disclosures. We expect both CEO Social Ties and CEO Reputation to impact say-on-pay judgments, and that fairness perceptions about the CEO compensation will mediate the relationship. We conduct an experiment to test our hypotheses. In this study, we employ a two by two experimental design where we manipulate CEO Social Ties with members of the ECC (present/absent) and CEO Reputation for the quality of financial reporting disclosures (favorable/unfavorable). Participants were MBA students who provided a say-on-pay judgment (e.g., their agreement or disagreement with a resolution stating approval of the compensation paid to the Company’s CEO), and judgments about the fairness of the CEO’s compensation. Results indicate that CEO Social Ties affected participants’ say-on-pay judgments, which were fully mediated by their perceptions about fairness of the CEO’s compensation. Further, the CEO’s Reputation also affected participants’ say-on-pay judgments, which were fully mediated by their perceptions about fairness of the CEO’s compensation. Implications for research and public policy are presented.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
American Institute of Certified Pubic Accountants (AICPA). (1994). Improving business reporting—A customer focus: A comprehensive report of the special committee on financial reporting. New York: AICPA.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. CrossRef
Bebchuk, L., & Fried, J. (2004). Pay without performance: The unfilled promise of executive compensation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bebchuk, L., & Fried, J. (2006). Pay without performance: An overview of the issues. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 5–24. CrossRef
Bierstaker, J. L., Cohen, J. R., DeZoort, F. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2012). Audit committee compensation, fairness, and the resolution of accounting disagreements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31, 131–150. CrossRef
Blader, S. L. (2007). What determines people’s fairness judgments? Identification and outcomes influence procedural justice evaluations under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 986–994. CrossRef
Bogle, J. (2005). The ownership of corporate America-rights and responsibilities. Remarks by John C. Bogle, the Vanguard Group, 20th Anniversary Meeting of the Council of Institutional Investors. http: www.vangaurd.com/bogle_site/sp20050411.htm.
Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review, 72(3), 323–349.
Cianci, A. M., & Kaplan, S. E. (2010). The effect of CEO reputations and explanations for poor performance on investors’ judgments about the company’s future performance and management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 478–495. CrossRef
Cohen, J., Holder-Webb, L., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2011). Perceptions of retail investors of the decision-usefulness of non-financial information. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 23(1), 109–129. CrossRef
Cohen, J. R., Holder-Webb, L., Sharp, D. J., & Pant, L. W. (2007). The effects of perceived fairness on opportunistic behavior. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(4), 1119–1138. CrossRef
Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2008). Form versus substance: The implications for auditing practice and research of alternative perspectives on corporate governance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(2), 181–198. CrossRef
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. CrossRef
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Judge, T. A., & Shaw, J. C. (2006). Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 110–127. CrossRef
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (1992). Internal control-integrated framework. Jersey City, NJ: AICPA.
Core, J. E., Guay, W., & Larcker, D. F. (2008). The power of the pen and executive compensation. Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 1–25. CrossRef
Dey, M., & Radhakrishna, B. (2007). Who trades around earnings announcements? Evidence from TORQ data. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 26, 1–27.
Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protect Act (Dodd–Frank Act) of 2010. (2010). Public L. no. 111-203, H.R. 4173.
Elliott, W. B., Hodge, F. D., & Jackson, K. E. (2008). The association between nonprofessional investors’ information choices and their portfolio returns: The importance of investing experience. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2), 473–489. CrossRef
Elliott, W. B., Hodge, F. D., Kennedy, J. J., & Pronk, M. (2007). Are M.B.A. students a good proxy for nonprofessional investors? The Accounting Review, 82(1), 139–168. CrossRef
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325. CrossRef
Fortin, M. (2008). Perspectives on organizational justice: Concept clarification, social context integration, time and links with morality. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(2), 93–126. CrossRef
Gilbert, D. (1995). Attribution and interpersonal perception. In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 99–147). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hallock, K. F. (1997). Reciprocally interlocking boards of directors and executive compensation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 32, 31–344. CrossRef
Harris, J. D. (2009). What’s wrong with executive compensation? Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 147–156. CrossRef
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 405–440. CrossRef
Hermanson, D. R., Tompkins, J. G., Veliyath, R., & Ye, Z. (2012). The compensation committee process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 666–709. CrossRef
Hilton, D. J., Smith, R. H., & Alicke, M. D. (1988). Knowledge-based information acquisition: Norms and the function of consensus information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(4), 530–540. CrossRef
Hoitash, U. (2011). Should independent board members with social ties to management disqualify themselves from serving on the board? Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 399–423. CrossRef
Jones, D. A., & Martens, M. L. (2009). The mediating role of overall fairness and the moderating role of trust certainty in justice-criteria relationships: The formation and use of fairness heuristics in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 1025–1051. CrossRef
Kaplan, S. E., & Mauldin, E. G. (2008). Auditor rotation and the appearance of independence: Evidence from non-professional investors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27, 177–192. CrossRef
Koonce, L., Williamson, M., & Winchel, J. (2010). Consensus information and nonprofessional investors’ reaction to the revelation of estimate inaccuracies. The Accounting Review, 85(3), 979–1000. CrossRef
Lang, M. H., & Lundholm, R. J. (1996). Corporate disclosure and analysts behavior. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 467–492.
Larcker, D., Richardson, S.A., Seary, A.J. & Tuna, I. (2006). Director networks, executive compensation, and organizational performance. Working paper, Stanford University.
Lee, D. C., & O’Neill, B. D. (2010). Executive compensation: Dodd–Frank’s “Say-on-Pay” provisions. Insights: The Corporate & Securities Law Advisor, 24(10), 1–10.
Libby, T. (2001). Referent cognitions and budgetary fairness: A research note. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13, 91–105. CrossRef
Malsch, B., Tremblay, M.-S., & Gendron, Y. (2012). Sense-making in compensation committees: A cultural theory perspective. Organization Studies, 33(3), 38–421. CrossRef
Milliken, G. A., & Johnson, D. E. (1992). Analysis of messy data, volume I: designed experiments. London: Chapman and Hall.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Main, B. G. M. (2007). Setting the CEO’s pay: It’s more than simple economics. Organizational Dynamics, 36(1), 1–12. CrossRef
Rogers, W., & Gago, S. (2003). A model capturing ethics and executive compensation. Journal of Business Ethics, 48, 189–202. CrossRef
Shah, M. (2013). Executive pay votes may be harming shareholders. New York Times February 26, 2013, B3.
Skitka, L. J. (2002). Do the means always justify the ends, or do the ends sometimes justify the means? A value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 588–597. CrossRef
Tosi, H., Werner, W., Katz, J. P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2000). How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies. Journal of Management, 26, 301–339. CrossRef
Walsh, J. P. (2008). CEO compensation and the responsibilities of the business scholar to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 26–33. CrossRef
Wentzel, K. (2002). The influence of fairness perceptions and goal commitment on managers’ performance in a budget setting. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14, 247–271. CrossRef
Wilkins, A., Hermanson, D., & Cohen, J. (2013). Changing management’s performance targets during a compensation cycle: Examining compensation committee member judgments. Working paper, Kennesaw State University.
- An Examination of the Effect of CEO Social Ties and CEO Reputation on Nonprofessional Investors’ Say-on-Pay Judgments
Steven E. Kaplan
Janet A. Samuels
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Voraussetzungen für wirtschaftliche additive Fertigung/© Marco2811 | Fotolia