nach oben

Soft Computing

Erschienen in:

04.07.2020 | Methodologies and Application

An FMEA-based TOPSIS approach under single valued neutrosophic sets for maritime risk evaluation: the case of ship navigation safety

verfasst von: Veysi Başhan, Hakan Demirel, Muhammet Gul

Erschienen in: Soft Computing | Ausgabe 24/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

As in terrestrial facilities, safety is one of the most important issue in ships. Vessels navigating in many parts of the world face many different, tough and dangerous navigational risks. In this context, twenty-three fundamental risks which are frequently encountered in ship navigation were considered in this study and examined by an FMEA-based TOPSIS approach under single valued neutrosophic sets. Because of the lack of data in the literature, the opinions of the experts (Masters) who have many years of experience in the sector were taken. As a result of the study, extreme weather conditions, injury of crew, loss of input of sensory equipment (depth, gyro, speed etc.), struck by ropes, exposure to high speed machineries under high pressures, loss of maneuverability are very important among these risks. Considering these risks, corrective-preventive action plans and managerial implications for ship navigation have been presented. Consequently, the results of this study have an important warning and solution recommendation regarding ship navigation risks.

Vorheriger Artikel Exploring multiple spatio-temporal information for point-of-interest recommendation

Nächster Artikel Rigorous reduction of partial shading condition in grid connected solar PV system using discrete time-based PSO controller

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abdel-Basset M, Mohamed M, Zhou Y, Hezam I (2017) Multi-criteria group decision making based on neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33:4055–4066

Abdel-Basset M, Manogaran G, Gamal A, Smarandache F (2018a) A hybrid approach of neutrosophic sets and DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Des Autom Embed Sys 22:257–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10617-018-9203-6CrossRef

Abdel-Basset M, Mohamed M, Sangaiah AK (2018b) Neutrosophic AHP-Delphi Group decision making model based on trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers. J Ambient Intell Hum Comput 9:1427–1443

af Geijerstam K, Svensson H (2008) Ship collision risk-an identification and evaluation of important factors in collisions with offshore installations. LUTVDG/TVBB–5275–SE. http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/1689121. Accessed 3 Jan 2020

Ak MF, Gul M (2019) AHP–TOPSIS integration extended with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for information security risk analysis. Complex Intell Syst 5:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-018-0087-7CrossRef

Akita Y (1988) Reliability and damage of ship structures. Mar Struct 1:89–114

Akyuz E (2017) Application of fuzzy FMEA to perform an extensive risk analysis in maritime transportation engineering. Int J Mar Eng 159:99–105

Akyuz E, Celik E (2018) A quantitative risk analysis by using interval type-2 fuzzy FMEA approach: the case of oil spill. Maritime Policy Manag 45:979–994

Ari I, Aksakalli V, Aydogˇdu V, Kum S (2013) Optimal ship navigation with safety distance and realistic turn constraints. Eur J Oper Res 229:707–717

Balmat J-F, Lafont F, Maifret R, Pessel N (2009) MAritime RISk Assessment (MARISA), a fuzzy approach to define an individual ship risk factor. Ocean Eng 36:1278–1286

Balmat J-F, Lafont F, Maifret R, Pessel N (2011) A decision-making system to maritime risk assessment. Ocean Eng 38:171–176

Bian T, Zheng H, Yin L, Deng Y (2018) Failure mode and effects analysis based on D numbers and TOPSIS. Qual Reliab Eng Int 34:501–515

Biswas P, Pramanik S, Giri BC (2016) TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Neural Comput Appl 27:727–737

Boran F, Boran K, Menlik T (2012) The evaluation of renewable energy technologies for electricity generation in Turkey using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS. Energy Sources Part B 7:81–90

Bozdag E, Asan U, Soyer A, Serdarasan S (2015) Risk prioritization in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis using interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Syst Appl 42:4000–4015

Bye RJ, Aalberg AL (2018) Maritime navigation accidents and risk indicators: An exploratory statistical analysis using AIS data and accident reports. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 176:174–186

Cao X, Deng Y (2019) A new geometric mean FMEA method based on information quality. IEEE Access 7:95547–95554

Carpitella S, Certa A, Izquierdo J, La Fata CM (2018) A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: A real-world case. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 169:394–402

Catelani M, Ciani L, Venzi M (2018) Failure modes, mechanisms and effect analysis on temperature redundant sensor stage. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 180:425–433

Celik E, Bilisik ON, Erdogan M et al (2013) An integrated novel interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to improve customer satisfaction in public transportation for Istanbul. Transp Res Part E Log TransRev 58:28–51

Cevik Onar S, Oztaysi B, Kahraman C (2014) Strategic decision selection using hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS and interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study. Int J Comput Intell Syst 7:1002–1021

Chai T, Weng J, De-qi X (2017) Development of a quantitative risk assessment model for ship collisions in fairways. Saf Sci 91:71–83

Chen L, Deng Y (2018) A new failure mode and effects analysis model using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory and grey relational projection method. Eng Appl Artif Intell 76:13–20

Chen S-M, Lee L-W (2010) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl 37:2790–2798

Chen T-Y, Tsao C-Y (2008) The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 159:1410–1428MathSciNetMATH

COLREG (2018) http://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/ListOfConventions/Pages/COLREG.aspx. Accessed 7 Dec 2018

Dong Y, Frangopol DM (2016) Incorporation of risk and updating in inspection of fatigue-sensitive details of ship structures. Int J Fatigue 82:676–688

Du Y, Lu X, Su X et al (2016) New failure mode and effects analysis: an evidential downscaling method. Qual Reliab Eng Int 32:737–746

Fang H, Li J, Song W (2020) Failure mode and effects analysis: an integrated approach based on rough set theory and prospect theory. Soft Comput 24:6673–6685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04305-8CrossRef

Fattahi R, Khalilzadeh M (2018) Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment. Saf Sci 102:290–300

Fu X, Ng AKY, Lau Y-Y (2010) The impacts of maritime piracy on global economic development: the case of Somalia. Mar Policy Manag 37:677–697

Fu S, Zhang D, Montewka J et al (2018) A quantitative approach for risk assessment of a ship stuck in ice in Arctic waters. Saf Sci 107:145–154

Garg H (2020) Algorithms for single-valued neutrosophic decision making based on TOPSIS and clustering methods with new distance measure. AIMS Math 5(3):2671MathSciNet

Gu X, Moan T (2002) Long-term fatigue damage of ship structures under nonlinear wave loads. Mar Technol 39:95–104

Gul M, Ak MF (2018) A comparative outline for quantifying risk ratings in occupational health and safety risk assessment. J Clean Prod 196:653–664

Guo J, Lin Z, Zu L, Chen J (2019) Failure modes and effects analysis for CO2 transmission pipelines using a hesitant fuzzy VIKOR method. Soft Comput 23:10321–10338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3583-1CrossRef

Gypa I, Boulougouris E, Vassalos D (2018) Quantification of the maritime security problem onboard passenger ship. In: Transport Research Arena (TRA) 2018, AUT. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1491597

Hsu W-KK (2012) Ports’ service attributes for ship navigation safety. Saf Sci 50:244–252

Hu S, Fang Q, Xia H, Xi Y (2007) Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92:369–377

Hu Y-P, You X-Y, Wang L, Liu H-C (2019) An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis based on uncertain linguistic GRA–TOPSIS method. Soft Comput 23:8801–8814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3480-7CrossRef

Huang J, Li ZS, Liu H-C (2017) New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 167:302–309

Huang Z, Jiang W, Tang Y (2018) A new method to evaluate risk in failure mode and effects analysis under fuzzy information. Soft Comput 22:4779–4787

International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) (2017) http://www.imo.org/en/about/conventions/listofconventions/pages/international-convention-for-the-prevention-of-pollution-from-ships-(marpol).aspx. Accessed 6 Oct 2017

International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974 (2018) http://www.imo.org/en/About/conventions/listofconventions/pages/international-convention-for-the-safety-of-life-at-sea-(solas),-1974.aspx. Accessed 7 Dec 2018

International Maritime Organization (2018) http://www.imo.org/en/Pages/Default.aspx. Accessed 4 Jan 2018

ISM Code (2018) http://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/humanelement/safetymanagement/pages/ismcode.aspx. Accessed 7 Dec 2018

Kahraman C, Oztaysi B, Cevik Onar S (2020) Single & interval-valued neutrosophic AHP methods: performance analysis of outsourcing law firms. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 38(1):749–759

Kao S-L, Lee K-T, Chang K-Y, Ko M-D (2007) A Fuzzy Logic Method for Collision Avoidance in Vessel Traffic Service. J Navig 60:17

Karahalios H (2014) The contribution of risk management in ship management: the case of ship collision. Saf Sci 63:104–114

Kim KO, Zuo MJ (2018) General model for the risk priority number in failure mode and effects analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 169:321–329

Kopacz Z, Morgas W, Urbanski J (2001) The maritime safety system, its main components and elements. J Navig 54(2):199–211

Kutlu AC, Ekmekçioğlu M (2012) Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Syst Appl 39:61–67

Li S, Meng Q, Qu X (2012) An overview of maritime waterway quantitative risk assessment models: maritime waterway quantitative risk assessment models. Risk Anal 32:496–512

Li YL, Wang R, Chin KS (2019) New failure mode and effect analysis approach considering consensus under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Soft Comput 23(22):11611–11626

Liu H-C (2016) FMEA using uncertainty theories and MCDM methods. In: FMEA Using Uncertainty Theories and MCDM Methods. Springer, pp 13–27

Liu B, Deng Y (2019) Risk Evaluation in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Based on D Numbers Theory. Int J Comput Commun Control 14(5):437–452

Liu Y, Frangopol DM (2018) Probabilistic risk, sustainability, and utility associated with ship grounding hazard. Ocean Eng 154:311–321

Liu P, Wang Y (2014) Multiple attribute decision-making method based on single-valued neutrosophic normalized weighted Bonferroni mean. Neural Comput Appl 25:2001–2010

Liu H-C, Liu L, Liu N (2013) Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review. Expert Syst Appl 40:828–838

Liu H-C, Chen Y-Z, You J-X, Li H (2016) Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy digraph and matrix approach. J Intell Manuf 27:805–816

Lo H-W, Liou JJ, Huang C-N, Chuang Y-C (2019) A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 183:173–183

Lo H-W, Shiue W, Liou JJH, Tzeng G-H (2020) A hybrid MCDM-based FMEA model for identification of critical failure modes in manufacturing. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04903-xCrossRef

Majumdar P, Samanta SK (2014) On similarity and entropy of neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26:1245–1252MathSciNetMATH

Mazaheri A, Montewka J, Kujala P (2014) Modeling the risk of ship grounding—a literature review from a risk management perspective. WMU J Mar Affairs 13:269–297

Mazaheri A, Montewka J, Kujala P (2016) Towards an evidence-based probabilistic risk model for ship-grounding accidents. Saf Sci 86:195–210

Mete S (2019) Assessing occupational risks in pipeline construction using FMEA-based AHP-MOORA integrated approach under Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 25:1645–1660. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1546115CrossRef

Ming FR, Zhang AM, Xue YZ, Wang SP (2016) Damage characteristics of ship structures subjected to shockwaves of underwater contact explosions. Ocean Eng 117:359–382

Nilsson R, Gärling T, Lützhöft M (2009) An experimental simulation study of advanced decision support system for ship navigation. Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav 12:188–197

Oz NE, Mete S, Serin F, Gul M (2019) Risk assessment for clearing and grading process of a natural gas pipeline project: An extended TOPSIS model with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for prioritizing hazards. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 25:1615–1632. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1495057CrossRef

Ozdemir Y, Gul M, Celik E (2017) Assessment of occupational hazards and associated risks in fuzzy environment: a case study of a university chemical laboratory. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 23:895–924

Park J, Park C, Ahn S (2018) Assessment of structural risks using the fuzzy weighted Euclidean FMEA and block diagram analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:2071–2080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1844-xCrossRef

Pedersen PT (1994) Ship grounding and hull-girder strength. Mar Struct 7:1–29

Perera LP, Guedes Soares C (2015) Collision risk detection and quantification in ship navigation with integrated bridge systems. Ocean Eng 109:344–354

Pietrzykowski Z (2008) Ship’s fuzzy domain—a criterion for navigational safety in narrow fairways. J Navig 61(3):499–514

Platt S (2015) Piracy. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 104–120

Ruiz ARJ, Granja FS (2009) A short-range ship navigation system based on ladar imaging and target tracking for improved safety and efficiency. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 10:186–197

Safari H, Faraji Z, Majidian S (2016) Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR. J Intell Manuf 27:475–486

Sato Y, Ishii H (1998) Study of a collision-avoidance system for ships. Control Eng Pract 6:1141–1149

Shenping H, Cunqiang C, Quangen F (2007) Risk assessment of ship navigation using Bayesian learning. In: Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2007 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, pp 1878–1882

Sii HS, Wang J, Ruxton T et al (2004) Use of fuzzy logic approaches to safety assessment in maritime engineering applications. J Mar Eng Technol 3:45–58

Smarandache F (2002) Neutrosophy and neutrosophic logic. In: First International Conference on Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Logic, Set, Probability, and Statistics University of New Mexico, Gallup, NM, pp 338–353

Soares CG, Moan T (1991) Model uncertainty in the long-term distribution of wave-induced bending moments for fatigue design of ship structures. Mar Struct 4:295–315

Statheros T, Howells G, Maier KM (2008) Autonomous ship collision avoidance navigation concepts, technologies and techniques. J Navig 61(1):129–142

Tam C, Bucknall R (2010) Collision risk assessment for ships. J Mar Sci Technol 15:257–270

Tam C, Bucknall R, Greig A (2009) Review of collision avoidance and path planning methods for ships in close range encounters. J Navig 62:455

Valdez Banda OA, Goerlandt F, Montewka J, Kujala P (2015) A risk analysis of winter navigation in Finnish sea areas. Accid Anal Prev 79:100–116

Valdez Banda OA, Goerlandt F, Kuzmin V et al (2016) Risk management model of winter navigation operations. Mar Pollut Bull 108:242–262

Xue Y, Deng Y (2020) Refined Expected Value decision rules under orthopair fuzzy environment. Mathematics 8(3):442

Yang Z, Bonsall S, Wang J (2008) Fuzzy rule-based Bayesian reasoning approach for prioritization of failures in FMEA. IEEE Trans Reliab 57:517–528

Yong D (2006) Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:839–844

Yoo S-L (2018) Near-miss density map for safe navigation of ships. Ocean Eng 163:15–21

Yoon K, Hwang C (1981) TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution)–a multiple attribute decision making, w: Multiple attribute decision making–methods and applications, a state-of-the-at survey. Springer Verlag, Berlin

Youssef SAM, Paik JK (2018) Hazard identification and scenario selection of ship grounding accidents. Ocean Eng 153:242–255

Yucesan M, Gul M (2019) Failure prioritization and control using the neutrosophic best and worst method. Granul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00206-1CrossRef

Zaman MB, Kobayashi E, Wakabayashi N et al (2014) Fuzzy FMEA model for risk evaluation of ship collisions in the Malacca Strait: based on AIS data. J Simul 8:91–104

Zhang J, Teixeira ÂP, Guedes Soares C, Yan X (2018) Quantitative assessment of collision risk influence factors in the Tianjin port. Saf Sci 110:363–371

Zhao H, You J-X, Liu H-C (2017) Failure mode and effect analysis using MULTIMOORA method with continuous weighted entropy under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Soft Comput 21:5355–5367

Titel: An FMEA-based TOPSIS approach under single valued neutrosophic sets for maritime risk evaluation: the case of ship navigation safety
verfasst von: Veysi Başhan
Hakan Demirel
Muhammet Gul
Publikationsdatum: 04.07.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Soft Computing / Ausgabe 24/2020
Print ISSN: 1432-7643
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7479
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05108-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 24/2020

Curve approximation by adaptive neighborhood simulated annealing and piecewise Bézier curves

Fixing state change inconsistency with self regulating particle swarm optimization

Fusion of self-organizing map and granular self-organizing map for microblog summarization

Online estimation of state of health for the airborne Li-ion battery using adaptive DEKF-based fuzzy inference system

Three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets based on Pythagorean fuzzy covering

Solving technician routing and scheduling problem using improved particle swarm optimization