Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 5/2016

16.05.2016 | RESEARCH PAPER

An immersed boundary approach for shape and topology optimization of stationary fluid-structure interaction problems

verfasst von: Nicholas Jenkins, Kurt Maute

Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to shape and topology optimization of fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problems at steady state. The overall approach builds on an immersed boundary method that couples a Lagrangian formulation of the structure to an Eulerian fluid model, discretized on a deforming mesh. The geometry of the fluid-structure boundary is manipulated by varying the nodal parameters of a discretized level set field. This approach allows for topological changes of the fluid-structure interface, but free-floating volumes of solid material can emerge in the course of the optimization process. The free-floating volumes are tracked and modeled as fluid in the FSI analysis. To sense the isolated solid volumes, an indicator field described by linear, isotropic diffusion is computed prior to analyzing the FSI response of a design. The fluid is modeled with the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, and the structure is assumed linear elastic. The FSI model is discretized by an extended finite element method, and the fluid-structure coupling conditions are enforced weakly. The resulting nonlinear system of equations is solved monolithically with Newton’s method. The design sensitivities are computed by the adjoint method and the optimization problem is solved by a gradient-based algorithm. The characteristics of this optimization framework are studied with two-dimensional problems at steady state. Numerical results indicate that the proposed treatment of free-floating volumes introduces a discontinuity in the design evolution, yet the method is still successful in converging to meaningful designs.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader AM (2004) Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method. J Comput Phys 194(1):363–393MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader AM (2004) Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method. J Comput Phys 194(1):363–393MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Allaire G, Dapogny C, Frey P (2014) Shape optimization with a level set based mesh evolution method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 282:22–53MathSciNetCrossRef Allaire G, Dapogny C, Frey P (2014) Shape optimization with a level set based mesh evolution method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 282:22–53MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Allen M, Maute K (2004) Reliability based optimization of aeroelastic structures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 24:228–242CrossRef Allen M, Maute K (2004) Reliability based optimization of aeroelastic structures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 24:228–242CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Allen M, Maute K (2005) Reliability-based shape optimization of structures undergoing fluid structure interaction phenomena. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:3472–3495CrossRefMATH Allen M, Maute K (2005) Reliability-based shape optimization of structures undergoing fluid structure interaction phenomena. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:3472–3495CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Amestoy P, Duff I, L’Excellent JY (2000) Multifrontal parallel distributed symmetric and unsymmetric solvers. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 184(24):501–520CrossRefMATH Amestoy P, Duff I, L’Excellent JY (2000) Multifrontal parallel distributed symmetric and unsymmetric solvers. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 184(24):501–520CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Annavarapu C, Hautefeuille M, Dolbow JE (2012) A robust nitsches formulation for interface problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 225228(0):44–54MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Annavarapu C, Hautefeuille M, Dolbow JE (2012) A robust nitsches formulation for interface problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 225228(0):44–54MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Arora D, Behr M, Pasquali M (2004) A tensor-based measure for estimating blood damage. Artif Organs 28:1002–1115CrossRef Arora D, Behr M, Pasquali M (2004) A tensor-based measure for estimating blood damage. Artif Organs 28:1002–1115CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computational Fluid-Structure Interaction: Methods and applications Wiley; 1 edition (February 11, 2013) Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computational Fluid-Structure Interaction: Methods and applications Wiley; 1 edition (February 11, 2013)
Zurück zum Zitat Bendsøe M (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Multidiscip Optim 1 (4):193–202CrossRef Bendsøe M (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Multidiscip Optim 1 (4):193–202CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brampton C, Kim HA, Cuningham J (2012) Level set topology optimisation of aircraft wing considering aerostructural interaction. In: 12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Opterations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSM Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Indianapolis, IN, September 17 - 19 Brampton C, Kim HA, Cuningham J (2012) Level set topology optimisation of aircraft wing considering aerostructural interaction. In: 12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Opterations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSM Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Indianapolis, IN, September 17 - 19
Zurück zum Zitat Burger M, Osher SJ (2005) A survey in mathematics for industry a survey on level set methods for inverse problems and optimal design. Euro Jnl of Appl Math 16:263–301MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Burger M, Osher SJ (2005) A survey in mathematics for industry a survey on level set methods for inverse problems and optimal design. Euro Jnl of Appl Math 16:263–301MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Butler R, Lillico M, Banerjee J, Guo S (1995) Optimum design of high aspect ratio wings subject to aeroelastic constraints. In: Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials and Co-located Conferences, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Butler R, Lillico M, Banerjee J, Guo S (1995) Optimum design of high aspect ratio wings subject to aeroelastic constraints. In: Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials and Co-located Conferences, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Zurück zum Zitat Christiansen AN (2014) Combined shape and topology optimization. PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark Christiansen AN (2014) Combined shape and topology optimization. PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark
Zurück zum Zitat Coffin P, Maute K (2015) A level-set method for steady-state and transient natural convection problems. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 1–21 Coffin P, Maute K (2015) A level-set method for steady-state and transient natural convection problems. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 1–21
Zurück zum Zitat Dapogny C (2014) Shape optimization, level set methods on unstructured meshes and mesh evolution. PhD thesis, Thèse de lUniversité Paris VII Dapogny C (2014) Shape optimization, level set methods on unstructured meshes and mesh evolution. PhD thesis, Thèse de lUniversité Paris VII
Zurück zum Zitat van Dijk N, Maute K, Langelaar M, Keulen F (2013) Level-set methods for structural topology optimization: A review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 1–36 van Dijk N, Maute K, Langelaar M, Keulen F (2013) Level-set methods for structural topology optimization: A review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 1–36
Zurück zum Zitat Dillinger J, Abdalla M, Klimmek T, Gurdal Z (2013) Static aeroelastic stiffness optimization and investigation of forward swept composite wings. In: 10th World Congress on Structural and Multidisplinary Optimization. May 19 - 24, Orlando, Florida Dillinger J, Abdalla M, Klimmek T, Gurdal Z (2013) Static aeroelastic stiffness optimization and investigation of forward swept composite wings. In: 10th World Congress on Structural and Multidisplinary Optimization. May 19 - 24, Orlando, Florida
Zurück zum Zitat Dunning P, Stanford B, Kim H (2014) Coupled aerostructural topology optimization using a level set method for 3d aircraft wings. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 1–20 Dunning P, Stanford B, Kim H (2014) Coupled aerostructural topology optimization using a level set method for 3d aircraft wings. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 1–20
Zurück zum Zitat Dunning P, Stanford B, Kim HA (2015) Coupled aerostructural topology optimization using level set method for 3d aircraft wings. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51:1113–1132 Dunning P, Stanford B, Kim HA (2015) Coupled aerostructural topology optimization using level set method for 3d aircraft wings. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51:1113–1132
Zurück zum Zitat Gasbarri P, Chiwiacowsky LD, de Campos Velho H (2009) A hybrid multilevel approach for aeroelastic optimization of composite wing-box. Struct Multidiscip Optim 39(6):607–624MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Gasbarri P, Chiwiacowsky LD, de Campos Velho H (2009) A hybrid multilevel approach for aeroelastic optimization of composite wing-box. Struct Multidiscip Optim 39(6):607–624MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Gern FH, Gundlach JF, Ko A, Naghshineh-Pour A, Sulaeman E, Tetrault PA, Grossman B, Kapania RK, Mason WH, Schetz JA, Haftka R (1999). In: Multidisciplinary design optimization of a transonic commercial transport with a strut-braced wing 1999 World Aviation Congress, San Franciso, CA, October 19 - 21 Gern FH, Gundlach JF, Ko A, Naghshineh-Pour A, Sulaeman E, Tetrault PA, Grossman B, Kapania RK, Mason WH, Schetz JA, Haftka R (1999). In: Multidisciplinary design optimization of a transonic commercial transport with a strut-braced wing 1999 World Aviation Congress, San Franciso, CA, October 19 - 21
Zurück zum Zitat Ghazlane I, Carrier G, Dumont A, Marcelet M, Désidéri JA (2011) Aerostructural optimization with the adjoint method. In: EUROGEN 2011, Capua, Italy, September 14 - 15 Ghazlane I, Carrier G, Dumont A, Marcelet M, Désidéri JA (2011) Aerostructural optimization with the adjoint method. In: EUROGEN 2011, Capua, Italy, September 14 - 15
Zurück zum Zitat Gomes AA, Suleman A (2008) Topology optimization of a reinforced wing box for enhanced roll maneuvers. AIAA J 46:548–556CrossRef Gomes AA, Suleman A (2008) Topology optimization of a reinforced wing box for enhanced roll maneuvers. AIAA J 46:548–556CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Griffith BE (2012) Immersed boundary model of aortic heart valve dynamics with physiological driving and loading conditions. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 28(3):317–345MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Griffith BE (2012) Immersed boundary model of aortic heart valve dynamics with physiological driving and loading conditions. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 28(3):317–345MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Gumbert CR, Hou GJW, Newman PA (2001) Simultaneous aerodynamic analysis and design optimization (saado) for a 3-d flexible wing. In: Proceedngs of the 39th Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, January 8-11, 2001, Reno, NV, AIAA 2001- 1107 Gumbert CR, Hou GJW, Newman PA (2001) Simultaneous aerodynamic analysis and design optimization (saado) for a 3-d flexible wing. In: Proceedngs of the 39th Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, January 8-11, 2001, Reno, NV, AIAA 2001- 1107
Zurück zum Zitat Guo S (2007) Aeroelastic optimization of an aerobatic aircraft wing structure. Aerosp Sci Technol 11(5):396–404CrossRefMATH Guo S (2007) Aeroelastic optimization of an aerobatic aircraft wing structure. Aerosp Sci Technol 11(5):396–404CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Guo S, Cheng W, Cui D (2005) Optimization of composite wing structures for maximum flutter speed. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics & Materials Conference, Austin, TX, April 21 - 25 Guo S, Cheng W, Cui D (2005) Optimization of composite wing structures for maximum flutter speed. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics & Materials Conference, Austin, TX, April 21 - 25
Zurück zum Zitat Hansbo P, Hermansson J, Svedberg T (2004) Nitsches method combined with space-time finite elements for ale fluid-structure interaction problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 193:4195–4206MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Hansbo P, Hermansson J, Svedberg T (2004) Nitsches method combined with space-time finite elements for ale fluid-structure interaction problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 193:4195–4206MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Hart JD (2002) Fluid-structure interaction in the aortic heart valve a three-dimensional computational analysis. PhD thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven Hart JD (2002) Fluid-structure interaction in the aortic heart valve a three-dimensional computational analysis. PhD thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu MC, Kamensky D, Bazilevs Y, Sacks M, Hughes T (2014) Fluidstructure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves: significance of arterial wall deformation. Comput Mech 54(4):1055–1071MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Hsu MC, Kamensky D, Bazilevs Y, Sacks M, Hughes T (2014) Fluidstructure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves: significance of arterial wall deformation. Comput Mech 54(4):1055–1071MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat James K, Martins J (2010) Topology optimization using a level set method with an arbitrary structured mesh. In: 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Orlando, FL, April 12 - 16 James K, Martins J (2010) Topology optimization using a level set method with an arbitrary structured mesh. In: 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Orlando, FL, April 12 - 16
Zurück zum Zitat Jenkins N, Maute K (2015) Level set topology optimization of stationary fluid-structure interaction problems. Struct Multidiscip Optim 52:179–195MathSciNetCrossRef Jenkins N, Maute K (2015) Level set topology optimization of stationary fluid-structure interaction problems. Struct Multidiscip Optim 52:179–195MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kamensky D, Hsu MC, Schillinger D, Evans JA, Aggarwal A, Bazilevs Y, Sacks MS, Hughes TJ (2015) An immersogeometric variational framework for fluidstructure interaction: Application to bioprosthetic heart valves. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 284(0):1005–1053MathSciNetCrossRef Kamensky D, Hsu MC, Schillinger D, Evans JA, Aggarwal A, Bazilevs Y, Sacks MS, Hughes TJ (2015) An immersogeometric variational framework for fluidstructure interaction: Application to bioprosthetic heart valves. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 284(0):1005–1053MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kreissl S, Maute K (2011) Topology optimization for unsteady flow. Int J Numer Methods Eng 87:1229–1253MathSciNetMATH Kreissl S, Maute K (2011) Topology optimization for unsteady flow. Int J Numer Methods Eng 87:1229–1253MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Krog L, Tucker A, Rollema G (2002) Application of topology, sizing and shape optimization methods to optimal design of aircraft components. In: 3 r d Altair UK HyperWorks Users Conference Krog L, Tucker A, Rollema G (2002) Application of topology, sizing and shape optimization methods to optimal design of aircraft components. In: 3 r d Altair UK HyperWorks Users Conference
Zurück zum Zitat Krog L, Tucker A, Kemp M, Boyd R (2004) Topology optimization of aircraft wing box ribs. In: 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, August 30 - September 1, Albany, New York Krog L, Tucker A, Kemp M, Boyd R (2004) Topology optimization of aircraft wing box ribs. In: 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, August 30 - September 1, Albany, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Liu S, Li Q, Chen W, Tong L, Cheng G (2015) An identification method for enclosed voids restriction in manufacturability design for additive manufacturing structures. Front Mech Eng 10(2):126–137CrossRef Liu S, Li Q, Chen W, Tong L, Cheng G (2015) An identification method for enclosed voids restriction in manufacturability design for additive manufacturing structures. Front Mech Eng 10(2):126–137CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lund E, Moller H, Jakobsen LA (2001) Shape design optimization of steady fluid-structure interaction problems with large displacements. In: 42cd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit. April 16-19 Lund E, Moller H, Jakobsen LA (2001) Shape design optimization of steady fluid-structure interaction problems with large displacements. In: 42cd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit. April 16-19
Zurück zum Zitat Luo Z, Tong L, Wang MY, Wang S (2007) Shape and topology optimization of compliant mechanisms using a parameterization level set method. J Comput Phys 227(1):680–705MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Luo Z, Tong L, Wang MY, Wang S (2007) Shape and topology optimization of compliant mechanisms using a parameterization level set method. J Comput Phys 227(1):680–705MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Makhija D, Maute K (2014) Numerical instabilities in level set topology optimization with the extended finite element method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(2):185–197MathSciNetCrossRef Makhija D, Maute K (2014) Numerical instabilities in level set topology optimization with the extended finite element method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49(2):185–197MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martins J, Alonso J, Reuther J (2005) A coupled-adjoint sensitivity analysis method for high-fidelity aero-structural design. Optim Eng 6(1):33–62CrossRefMATH Martins J, Alonso J, Reuther J (2005) A coupled-adjoint sensitivity analysis method for high-fidelity aero-structural design. Optim Eng 6(1):33–62CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Martins J RRA, Alonso JJ, Reuther JJ (2004) High-fidelity aerostructural design optimization of a supersonic business jet. J Aircr 41(3) Martins J RRA, Alonso JJ, Reuther JJ (2004) High-fidelity aerostructural design optimization of a supersonic business jet. J Aircr 41(3)
Zurück zum Zitat Maute K, Reich G (2006) Integrated multidisciplinary topology optimization approach to adaptive wing design. AIAA J Aircr 43(1):253–263CrossRef Maute K, Reich G (2006) Integrated multidisciplinary topology optimization approach to adaptive wing design. AIAA J Aircr 43(1):253–263CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Maute K, Nikbay M, Farhat C (2001) Coupled analytical sensitivity analysis and optimization of three-dimensional nonlinear aeroelastic systems. AIAA J 39(11):2051–2061CrossRefMATH Maute K, Nikbay M, Farhat C (2001) Coupled analytical sensitivity analysis and optimization of three-dimensional nonlinear aeroelastic systems. AIAA J 39(11):2051–2061CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Maute K, Nikbay M, Farhat C (2003) Sensitivity analysis and design optimization of three-dimensional nonlinear aeroelastic systems by the adjoint method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 56(6):911–933CrossRefMATH Maute K, Nikbay M, Farhat C (2003) Sensitivity analysis and design optimization of three-dimensional nonlinear aeroelastic systems by the adjoint method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 56(6):911–933CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer U, Popp A, Gerstenberger A, Wall W (2010) 3d fluidstructure-contact interaction based on a combined xfem fsi and dual mortar contact approach. Comput Mech 46(1):53–67MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Mayer U, Popp A, Gerstenberger A, Wall W (2010) 3d fluidstructure-contact interaction based on a combined xfem fsi and dual mortar contact approach. Comput Mech 46(1):53–67MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Morbiducci U, Ponzini R, Nobili M, Massai D, Montevecchi FM, Bluestein D, Redaelli A (2015) Blood damage safety of prosthetic heart valves. shear-induced platelet activation and local flow dynamics: A fluidstructure interaction approach. J Biomech 42:1952–1960CrossRef Morbiducci U, Ponzini R, Nobili M, Massai D, Montevecchi FM, Bluestein D, Redaelli A (2015) Blood damage safety of prosthetic heart valves. shear-induced platelet activation and local flow dynamics: A fluidstructure interaction approach. J Biomech 42:1952–1960CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Munk D, Vio G, Steven G (2015) Aerothermoelastic structural topology optimisation for a hypersonic transport aircraft wing. In: 11th World Congress on Structural and Mutlidisciplinary Optimization. June 7 - 12, Sydney, Australia Munk D, Vio G, Steven G (2015) Aerothermoelastic structural topology optimisation for a hypersonic transport aircraft wing. In: 11th World Congress on Structural and Mutlidisciplinary Optimization. June 7 - 12, Sydney, Australia
Zurück zum Zitat Osher SJ, Sethian JA (1988) Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys 79:12—49MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Osher SJ, Sethian JA (1988) Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys 79:12—49MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Picelli R, Vicente WM, Pavanello R, van Keulan F (2015) Topology optimization considering design-dependent stokes flow loads. In: 11th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. Sydney Australia, June 7 - 12 Picelli R, Vicente WM, Pavanello R, van Keulan F (2015) Topology optimization considering design-dependent stokes flow loads. In: 11th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. Sydney Australia, June 7 - 12
Zurück zum Zitat Pingen G, Waidmann M, Evgrafov A, Maute K (2010) A parametric level-set approach for topology optimization of flow domains. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(1):117–131MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Pingen G, Waidmann M, Evgrafov A, Maute K (2010) A parametric level-set approach for topology optimization of flow domains. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(1):117–131MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Sala M, Stanley KS, Heroux MA (2008) On the design of interfaces to sparse direct solvers. ACM Trans Math Softw 34(2):9:1–9:22MathSciNetMATH Sala M, Stanley KS, Heroux MA (2008) On the design of interfaces to sparse direct solvers. ACM Trans Math Softw 34(2):9:1–9:22MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Schleupen A, Maute K, Ramm E (2000) Adaptive fe-procedures in shape optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 19:282–302CrossRef Schleupen A, Maute K, Ramm E (2000) Adaptive fe-procedures in shape optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 19:282–302CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sigmund O, Maute K (2013) Topology optimization approaches: A comparative review. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(6):1031–1055MathSciNetCrossRef Sigmund O, Maute K (2013) Topology optimization approaches: A comparative review. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(6):1031–1055MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Haftka R (1997) Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments. Struct Optim 14(1):1–23CrossRef Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Haftka R (1997) Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments. Struct Optim 14(1):1–23CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stanford B (2008) Aeroelastic analysis and optimization of membrane micro air vehicle wings. PhD thesis, University of Florida Stanford B (2008) Aeroelastic analysis and optimization of membrane micro air vehicle wings. PhD thesis, University of Florida
Zurück zum Zitat Stanford B, Beran P (2013) Aerothermoelastic topology optimization with flutter and buckling metrics. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(1):149–171MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Stanford B, Beran P (2013) Aerothermoelastic topology optimization with flutter and buckling metrics. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(1):149–171MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Stanford B, Ifju P (2009) Aeroelastic topology optimization of membrane structures for micro air vehicles. Struct Multidiscip Optim 38(3):301–316CrossRef Stanford B, Ifju P (2009) Aeroelastic topology optimization of membrane structures for micro air vehicles. Struct Multidiscip Optim 38(3):301–316CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Svanberg K (2002) A class of globally convergent optimization methods based on conservative convex separable approximations. SIAM J on Optim 12(2):555–573MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Svanberg K (2002) A class of globally convergent optimization methods based on conservative convex separable approximations. SIAM J on Optim 12(2):555–573MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Terada K, Asai M, Yamagishi M (2003) Finite cover method for linear and non-linear analyses of heterogeneous solids. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58(9):1321–1346CrossRefMATH Terada K, Asai M, Yamagishi M (2003) Finite cover method for linear and non-linear analyses of heterogeneous solids. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58(9):1321–1346CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Tezduyar TE, Mittal S, Ray SE, Shih R (1992) Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity-pressure elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 95:221–242CrossRefMATH Tezduyar TE, Mittal S, Ray SE, Shih R (1992) Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity-pressure elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 95:221–242CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Tran AB, Yvonnet J, He QC, Toulemonde C, Sanahuja J (2011) A multiple level set approach to prevent numerical artifacts in complex microstructures with nearby inclusions within xfem. Int J Numer Methods Eng 85(11):1436–1459CrossRefMATH Tran AB, Yvonnet J, He QC, Toulemonde C, Sanahuja J (2011) A multiple level set approach to prevent numerical artifacts in complex microstructures with nearby inclusions within xfem. Int J Numer Methods Eng 85(11):1436–1459CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Vasava P, Jalali P, Dabagh M, Kolari PJ (2012) Finite element modelling of pulsatile blood flow in idealized model of human aortic arch: Study of hypotension and hypertension. Comput Math Methods Med 861837:1748–6718MathSciNetMATH Vasava P, Jalali P, Dabagh M, Kolari PJ (2012) Finite element modelling of pulsatile blood flow in idealized model of human aortic arch: Study of hypotension and hypertension. Comput Math Methods Med 861837:1748–6718MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Villanueva CH, Maute K (2014) Density and level set-xfem schemes for topology optimization of 3-d structures. Comput Mech 54(1):133–150MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Villanueva CH, Maute K (2014) Density and level set-xfem schemes for topology optimization of 3-d structures. Comput Mech 54(1):133–150MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Wang MY, Wang X, Guo D (2003) A level set method for structural topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192(1–2):227–246MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Wang MY, Wang X, Guo D (2003) A level set method for structural topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192(1–2):227–246MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Wang S, Wang M (2006) Radial basis functions and level set method for structural topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 65(12):2060–2090MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Wang S, Wang M (2006) Radial basis functions and level set method for structural topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 65(12):2060–2090MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon GH (2010) Topology optimization for stationary fluid–structure interaction problems using a new monolithic formulation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 82(5):591–616CrossRefMATH Yoon GH (2010) Topology optimization for stationary fluid–structure interaction problems using a new monolithic formulation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 82(5):591–616CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon GH (2014) Stress-based topology optimization method for steady-state fluidstructure interaction problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 278(0):499–523CrossRef Yoon GH (2014) Stress-based topology optimization method for steady-state fluidstructure interaction problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 278(0):499–523CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou M, Rozvany GIN (1991) The COC algorithm, part II: Topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 89(1–3):309–336CrossRef Zhou M, Rozvany GIN (1991) The COC algorithm, part II: Topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 89(1–3):309–336CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
An immersed boundary approach for shape and topology optimization of stationary fluid-structure interaction problems
verfasst von
Nicholas Jenkins
Kurt Maute
Publikationsdatum
16.05.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1615-147X
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-1488
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1467-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.