Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications
Erschienen in: Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications 3/2012

01.09.2012

An incentive scheduling mechanism for peer-to-peer video streaming

verfasst von: Alireza Montazeri, Behzad Akbari, Mohammed Ghanbari

Erschienen in: Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications | Ausgabe 3/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

P2P video streaming networks are found as a scalable solution and an alternative for traditional client–server based video streaming over the Internet. One of the significant issues affecting the success of any P2P streaming network is cooperation between peers. Practical observations have proved the prevalence of free riders in P2P networks that degrade their performance. To solve this problem, using incentive mechanisms, which encourage peers to contribute more in the network, is necessary. In this paper, we designed and proposed a distributed and scalable incentive mechanism for mesh based P2P video streaming networks. In the proposed approach the contribution of the peers is measured and maintained in a distributed fashion. Furthermore, we proposed an incentive sending side scheduler in which peers are served based on their contribution in the network. Our simulation evaluations show the efficiency of the proposed approach in improving the overall perceived video quality by the non-free rider nodes and consequently in the whole network.
Vorheriger Artikel Effect of node churn on frame interval for peer-to-peer video streaming with data-block synchronization mechanism
Nächster Artikel File size models for shared content over the BitTorrent Peer-to-Peer network

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
Distributed Hash Table
 
Literatur
1.
Deering SE, Cheriton DR (1990) Multicast routing in datagram internetworks and extended LANs. ACM Trans Comput Syst (TOCS) 8:85–110CrossRef
2.
Perlman R (2004) “Models for IP multicast”, Proceedings of 12th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON 2004), pp. 678–682
3.
Chu Yang-hua, Rao S, Seshan S, Zhang Hui (2002) A case for end system multicast. IEEE J Sel Area Comm 20(8):1456–1471CrossRef
4.
Banerjee S, Bhattacharjee B, Kommareddy C (2002) “Scalable application layer multicast”, Proceedings of ASM SIGCOM
5.
Banerjee S, Lee S, Bhattacharjee B, Srinivasan A (2003) “Resilient multicast using overlays”, Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS, pp. 102–113
6.
Eugster PT, Guerraoui R, Kermarrec AM, Massoulié L (2004) From epidemics to distributed computing. IEEE Comput 37(5):60–67CrossRef
7.
Liu Z, Wu C, Li B, Zhao S (2010) “UUSee: large-scale operational on-demand streaming with random network coding”, Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’10), San Diego, California
8.
9.
10.
Jannotti J, Gifford DK, Johnson KL, Kaashoek MF, O'Toole JW, Jr, Frans M, James K (2000) “Overcast: reliable multicasting with an overlay network”, Proceedings of Operating System Design and Implementation
11.
Castro M, Druschel P, Kermarrec A, Nandi A, Rowstron A, Singh A (2003) “SplitStream: high-bandwidth multicast in cooperative environments”, Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SSOP 2003), pp. 298–313
12.
Padmanabhan V, Wang H, Chou P (2003) “Resilient peer-to-peer streaming”, Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, pp. 16–27
13.
Xinyan Zhang, Jiangchuan Liu, Bo Li, Yum Y (2005) “CoolStreaming/DONet: a data-driven overlay network for peer-to-peer live media streaming,” Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2005, pp. 2102–2111
14.
Liang J, Yu B, Yang Z, Nahrstedt K (2006) “A framework for future Internet-based TV broadcasting”, Proceedings of IPTV Workshop, International World Wide Web Conference
15.
Liao X, Jin H, Liu Y, Ni LM, Deng D (2006) “AnySee: peer-to-peer live streaming,” Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM2006
16.
Hughes D, Coulson G, Walkerdine J (2005) “Free riding on Gnutella revisited: the bell tolls?,” Proceedings of IEEE Distributed Systems
17.
Anceaume E, Gradinariu M, Ravoaja A (2005) “Incentives for P2P fair resource sharing,” Proceeding of Fifth IEEE International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing, pp. 253–260
18.
Yeung M, Yu-Kwong Kwok (2008) “Game theoretic peer selection for resilient peer-to-peer media streaming systems,” Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS '08), pp. 817–824
19.
Buragohain C, Agrawal D, Suri S (2003) “A game theoretic framework for incentives in P2P systems,” Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P 2003), pp. 48–56
20.
Vishnumurthy V, Chandrakumar S, Sirer EG (2003) “Karma: a secure economic framework for peer-to-peer resource sharing,” Proceedings of Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems
21.
Zghaibeh M, Harmantzis FC (2007) “An “S-string” scheme for business-oriented peer-to-peer networks,” Proceedings of Electronic Commerce Research, pp. 381–398
22.
Qiubo Huang, Shaoyin Huang, Chuanshan Gao (2007) “A differentiated service based incentive mechanism in P2P file-sharing systems,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Network and Parallel Computing, pp. 419–424
23.
Kamvar SD, Schlosser MT, Garcia-molina H (2003) “The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks,” Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 640–651
24.
Tang Y, Sun L, Zhang M, Yang S, Zhong Y (2006) “A novel distributed and practical incentive mechanism for peer to peer live video streaming,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Media and Expo, pp. 1533–1536
25.
Karakaya M, Korpeoglu I, Ulusoy Ö (2004) “A distributed and measurement-based framework against free riding in peer-to-peer networks,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing, pp. 276–277
26.
MyungJoo Ham, Gul Agha (2005) “ARA: a robust audit to prevent free-riding in P2P networks,” Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing, pp. 125–132
27.
Glassman S, Manasse M, Abadi M, Gauthier P, Sobalvarro P (1996) “The millicent protocol for inexpensive electronic commerce,” Proceedings of the Fourth International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 603–618
28.
29.
Sirbu, Marvin, Tyger JD (1995) "NetBill: an internet commerce system optimized for network delivered services", IEEE Personal Communication
30.
31.
Yang B, Garcia-molina H (2003) “PPay: micropayments for peer-to-peer systems,” Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 300–310
32.
Vlavianos A, Iliofotou M, Faloutsos M (2006) “BiToS: enhancing BitTorrent for supporting streaming applications,” Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2006, pp. 1–6
33.
Zhengye Liu, Yanming Shen, Panwar S, Ross K, Yao Wang (2007) “P2P video live streaming with MDC: providing incentives for redistribution,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Media and Expo, pp. 48–51
34.
Liu Z, Shen Y, Panwar SS, Ross KW, Wang Y (2007) “Using layered video to provide incentives in P2P live streaming.” Proceedings of the 2007 workshop on Peer-to-peer streaming and IP-TV
35.
Lin W, Zhao H, Liu K (2009) Incentive cooperation strategies for peer-to-peer live media streaming social networks. IEEE Trans Media 11(3):396–412
36.
Hoong PK, Matsuo H (2008) Push-pull incentive-based P2P live media streaming system. WSEAS Trans Comm 7(2):33–42
37.
38.
Byun H, Lee M (2009) “HOWTO: a hybrid overlay approach with tree optimization,” Proceedings of the 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering, pp. 311–315
39.
Huang Q, Jin H, Liao X (2007) “P2P live streaming with tree-mesh based hybrid overlay,” Proceedings of International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops, (ICPPW 2007), pp. 55–55
40.
Wang F, Xiong Y, Liu J (2007) “mtreebone: a hybrid tree/mesh overlay for application-layer live video multicast,” Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on on Distributed Computing Systems
41.
Metadaten
Titel
An incentive scheduling mechanism for peer-to-peer video streaming
verfasst von
Alireza Montazeri
Behzad Akbari
Mohammed Ghanbari
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2012
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications / Ausgabe 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1936-6442
Elektronische ISSN: 1936-6450
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-011-0121-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2012

Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications 3/2012 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Simulating peer-to-peer cloud resource scheduling

OriginalPaper

Verifying remote data integrity in peer-to-peer data storage: A comprehensive survey of protocols

OriginalPaper

Organisation and management of shared documents in super-peer networks based semantic hierarchical cluster trees

OriginalPaper

Effect of node churn on frame interval for peer-to-peer video streaming with data-block synchronization mechanism

OriginalPaper

Enabling broadcast of user-generated live video without servers

OriginalPaper

File size models for shared content over the BitTorrent Peer-to-Peer network