Skip to main content
Erschienen in: TechTrends 6/2016

28.07.2016 | Original Paper

An Instructional Design Framework for Fostering Student Engagement in Online Learning Environments

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Many approaches, models and frameworks exist when designing quality online learning environments. These approaches assist and guide instructional designers through the process of analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation of instructional processes. Some of these frameworks are concerned with student participation, some with motivation and some with student success. All these variables affect active participation and engagement of the student to some degree but the main concern is how to design online instruction conducive to high level of engagement. Therefore, this paper presents an instructional design framework along with a set of strategies that could be used to foster learner engagement in online learning. This framework is result of an extensive literature review on student engagement and is aimed at summarizing the results in a cohesive way for online instructors. For e-learning design and development to be successful online designers and instructors need better approaches to increasing student engagement and its authors hope that proposed framework provides such an approach.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Artino, A. R. (2010). Online or face-to-face learning? Exploring the personal factors that predict students' choice of instructional format. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 272–276.CrossRef Artino, A. R. (2010). Online or face-to-face learning? Exploring the personal factors that predict students' choice of instructional format. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 272–276.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 146–151.CrossRef Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 146–151.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carina, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32.CrossRef Carina, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, P. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54, 1222–1232.CrossRef Chen, P. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54, 1222–1232.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, W.-C. (2014). Actual and preferred teacher feedback on student blog writing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 402–414.CrossRef Chen, W.-C. (2014). Actual and preferred teacher feedback on student blog writing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 402–414.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1987). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics (Technical Report No. 403). BBN Laboratories. Cambridge: Centre for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois. January, 1987. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1987). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics (Technical Report No. 403). BBN Laboratories. Cambridge: Centre for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois. January, 1987.
Zurück zum Zitat Dixon, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1–13. Dixon, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1–13.
Zurück zum Zitat Durrington, V. A., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006). Strategies for enhancing student interactivity in an online environment. College Teaching, 54(1), 190–193.CrossRef Durrington, V. A., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006). Strategies for enhancing student interactivity in an online environment. College Teaching, 54(1), 190–193.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105.CrossRef Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Holley, D., & Oliver, M. (2010). Student engagement and blended learning: Portraits of risk. Computers & Education, 54, 693–700.CrossRef Holley, D., & Oliver, M. (2010). Student engagement and blended learning: Portraits of risk. Computers & Education, 54, 693–700.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hrastinski, S. (2008). What is online learner participation? A literature review. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1755–1765.CrossRef Hrastinski, S. (2008). What is online learner participation? A literature review. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1755–1765.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 78–82.CrossRef Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 78–82.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2001). Computing experience and good practices in undergraduate education: Does the degree of campus wiredness matter? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle: ERIC Database: ED 452 775. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED452775.pdf. Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2001). Computing experience and good practices in undergraduate education: Does the degree of campus wiredness matter? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle: ERIC Database: ED 452 775. Retrieved from http://​files.​eric.​ed.​gov/​fulltext/​ED452775.​pdf.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning With Technology: A Constructivist Perspective. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall. Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning With Technology: A Constructivist Perspective. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson, M. B., & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional design. New York: Routledge. Larson, M. B., & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional design. New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching. A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London: Routledge.CrossRef Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching. A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London: Routledge.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.CrossRef Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee, J., & Jang, S. (2014). A methodological framework for instructional design model development: Critical dimensions and synthesized procedures. Education Technology Research and Development, 62(6), 743–765. doi:10.1007/s11423-014-9352-7.CrossRef Lee, J., & Jang, S. (2014). A methodological framework for instructional design model development: Critical dimensions and synthesized procedures. Education Technology Research and Development, 62(6), 743–765. doi:10.​1007/​s11423-014-9352-7.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leeds, E., Campbell, S., Baker, H., Ali, R., Brawley, D., & Crisp, J. (2013). The impact of student retention strategies: An empirical study. International Journal of Management in Education, 7(1–2), 22–43.CrossRef Leeds, E., Campbell, S., Baker, H., Ali, R., Brawley, D., & Crisp, J. (2013). The impact of student retention strategies: An empirical study. International Journal of Management in Education, 7(1–2), 22–43.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2007). Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 27–42. Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2007). Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 27–42.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. (2011). Designing effective instruction (6th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. (2011). Designing effective instruction (6th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson Laird, T. F., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 211–233.CrossRef Nelson Laird, T. F., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 211–233.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & McCormick, A. C. (2011). An investigation of the contingent relationships between learning community participation and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 52(3), 300–322.CrossRef Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & McCormick, A. C. (2011). An investigation of the contingent relationships between learning community participation and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 52(3), 300–322.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, S. (2006). Institutional structures and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 47(5), 521–558.CrossRef Porter, S. (2006). Institutional structures and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 47(5), 521–558.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: The theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge. Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: The theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Roubides, P. (2004). E-Learning through effective facilitation. In J. Nall & R. Robson (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004 (pp. 1689–1693). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Roubides, P. (2004). E-Learning through effective facilitation. In J. Nall & R. Robson (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004 (pp. 1689–1693). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Zurück zum Zitat Saadé, R. G., He, X., & Kira, D. (2007). Exploring dimensions to online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1721–1739. Saadé, R. G., He, X., & Kira, D. (2007). Exploring dimensions to online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1721–1739.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, Y., & Chen, D. (2010). Promoting spontaneous facilitation in online discussions: Designing object and ground rules. Educational Media International, 47(3), 247–262.CrossRef Wang, Y., & Chen, D. (2010). Promoting spontaneous facilitation in online discussions: Designing object and ground rules. Educational Media International, 47(3), 247–262.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weil, S., McGuigan, N., & Kern, T. (2011). The usage of an online discussion forum for the facilitation of casebased learning in an intermediate accounting course: A New Zealand case. Open Learning, 26(3), 237–251. Weil, S., McGuigan, N., & Kern, T. (2011). The usage of an online discussion forum for the facilitation of casebased learning in an intermediate accounting course: A New Zealand case. Open Learning, 26(3), 237–251.
Metadaten
Titel
An Instructional Design Framework for Fostering Student Engagement in Online Learning Environments
Publikationsdatum
28.07.2016
Erschienen in
TechTrends / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

TechTrends 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe