Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Lead Editor: Jennifer Dawn Adams.
This forum article addresses issues raised in Phoebe A. Jackson and Gale Seiler’s paper entitled: I am smart enough to study postsecondary science: a critical discourse analysis of latecomers’ identity construction in an online forum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9818-0.
In this paper we reflect on the article “I am smart enough to study postsecondary science: a critical discourse analysis of latecomers’ identity construction in an online forum”, by Phoebe Jackson and Gale Seiler (Cult Stud Sci Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9818-0). In their article, the authors did a significant amount of qualitative analysis of a discussion on an online forum by four latecomer students with past negative experiences in science education. The students used this online forum as an out-of-class resource to develop a cultural model based on their ability to ask questions together with solidarity as a new optimistic way to position themselves in science. In this forum, we continue by discussing the identity of marginalized science students in relation to resources available in postsecondary science classes. Recent findings on a successful case of a persistent marginalized science student in spite of prior struggles and failures are introduced. Building on their model and our results, we proposed a new cultural model, emphasizing interaction between inside and outside classroom resources which can further our understanding of the identity of marginalized science students. Exploring this cultural model could better explain drop-outs or engagement of marginalized science students to their study. We, then, used this model to reflect on both current traditional and effective teaching and learning practices truncating or re-enforcing relationships of marginalized students with the learning environment. In this way, we aim to further the discussion initiated by Jackson and Seiler and offer possible frameworks for future research on the interactions between marginalized students with past low achievements and other high and mid achieving students, as well as other interactions between resources inside and outside science postsecondary classrooms.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Baurhoo, N., & Asghar, A. (2014). Using universal design for learning to construct inclusive science classrooms for diverse learners. Learning Landscapes, 7(2), 59–81.
Butler, D. L., Elaschuk, C. L., Poole, S. L., MacLeod, W. B., & Syer, K. D. (1997). Strategic interventions for post- secondary students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the Meeting of Canadian Society for Studies in Education, St. John’s, Newfoundland. http://ecps-educ.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2013/11/CSSE-Paper-1997-condensed-copy.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2017.
Chitty, C. (2001). Selection by specialisation. In C. C. A. B. Simon (Ed.), Promoting comprehensive education in the 21st century. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman, S., Spanjers, D., & Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. Best Practices in School Psychology, 5, 1099–1120.
Crosling, G., Heagney, M., & Thomas, L. (2009). Improving student retention in higher education: Improving teaching and learning. Australian Universities’ Review, 51(2), 9–18.
Hart, S., Dixon, A., & Drummond, M. J. (2007). Learning without limits. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2008). Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations. American Journal of Physics (Physics Education Research Section), 76(1), 79–91.
Holland, D. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Husbands, C., & Pearce, J. (2012). What makes great pedagogy? Nine claims from research. Nottingham. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/329746/what-makes-great-pedagogy-nine-claims-from-research.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2017.
James, M., Oates, T., Pollard, A., & Wiliam, D. (2011). The framework for the national curriculum. A report by the expert panel for the national curriculum review. London: Department of Education. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/13207/1/NCR-Expert%20Panel%20Report.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2017.
Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J., & Witt, E. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
Lave, J. (1991). Chapter 4: Situating learning in communities of practice. In M. Siegal, L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
McDonald, E. J. (2014). Learning to teach as situated learning: An examination of student teachers as legitimate peripheral participants in cooperating teachers’ classrooms. Ph.D., University of Minnesota, Ann Arbor, MN, USA (3643650).
National Research Council. (2011). Promising practices in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: Summary of two workshops. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about Leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview.
Sprong, M. E., Dallas, B. K., & Upton, T. D. (2014). Post-secondary faculty attitudes toward inclusive teaching strategies. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 80, 12+.
Watkins, J., & Mazur, E. (2013). Retaining students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 36–41.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- An Integrative Cultural Model to better situate marginalized science students in postsecondary science education
Hagar Ibrahim Labouta
Jennifer Dawn Adams
David Thomas Cramb
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Voraussetzungen für wirtschaftliche additive Fertigung/© Marco2811 | Fotolia