Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Effects of Small Group Discussion: Case Study of Community Disaster Risk Management in Japan Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

An Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Method to Determine the Criteria Weights

verfasst von : Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Hossein Gitinavard, Seyed Meysam Mousavi, Ali Siadat

Erschienen in: Outlooks and Insights on Group Decision and Negotiation

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In a multi-criteria group decision analysis, numerous methods have been developed and proposed to determine the weight of each criterion; however, the group decision methods, except AHP, have rarely considered for obtaining the criteria weights. This study presents a new TOPSIS method based on interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information to compute the criteria weights. In this respect, the weight of each expert and the experts’ judgments about the criteria weights are considered in the proposed procedure. In addition, an application example about the location problem is provided to show the capability of the proposed weighting method. Finally, results of the proposed method are compared with some methods from the related literature in the presented illustrative example to show the validation of the proposed interval-valued hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS method.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel A Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Approach for Facility Location Selection Using PROMETHEE Under a Fuzzy Environment
Nächstes Kapitel Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Under Hesitant Fuzzy Environment
Literatur
1.
Ahn, B.S., Park, K.S.: Comparing methods for multiattribute decision making with ordinal weights. Comput. Oper. Res. 35(5), 1660–1670 (2008)CrossRef
2.
Barron, F.H., Barrett, B.E.: Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Manage. Sci. 42(11), 1515–1523 (1996)CrossRef
3.
Solymosi, T., Dombi, J.: A method for determining the weights of criteria: the centralized weights. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 26(1), 35–41 (1986)CrossRef
4.
Bottomley, P.A., Doyle, J.R.: A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: good, better, and best. Omega 29(6), 553–560 (2001)CrossRef
5.
Goodwin, P., Wright, G., Phillips, L.D.: Decision Analysis for Management Judgment. Wiley, London (2004)
6.
Tzeng, G.-H., Huang, J.-J.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. CRC Press, New York (2011)
7.
Takeda, E., Cogger, K., Yu, P.: Estimating criterion weights using eigenvectors: a comparative study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 29(3), 360–369 (1987)CrossRef
8.
Roberts, R., Goodwin, P.: Weight approximations in multi-attribute decision models. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 11(6), 291–303 (2002)CrossRef
9.
Doyle, J.R., Green, R.H., Bottomley, P.A.: Judging relative importance: direct rating and point allocation are not equivalent. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 70(1), 65–72 (1997)CrossRef
10.
Horsky, D., Rao, M.: Estimation of attribute weights from preference comparisons. Manage. Sci. 30(7), 801–822 (1984)CrossRef
11.
Srinivasan, V., Shocker, A.D.: Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences. Psychometrika 38(3), 337–369 (1973)CrossRef
12.
Xu, X.: A note on the subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156(2), 530–532 (2004)CrossRef
13.
Wu, Z., Chen, Y.: The maximizing deviation method for group multiple attribute decision making under linguistic environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 158(14), 1608–1617 (2007)CrossRef
14.
Wei, G.-W.: Maximizing deviation method for multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Knowl.-Based Syst. 21(8), 833–836 (2008)CrossRef
15.
Deng, H., Yeh, C.-H., Willis, R.J.: Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput. Oper. Res. 27(10), 963–973 (2000)CrossRef
16.
Wang, Y.-M., Luo, Y.: Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Math. Comput. Modell. 51(1), 1–12 (2010)CrossRef
17.
Ma, J., Fan, Z.-P., Huang, L.-H.: A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 112(2), 397–404 (1999)CrossRef
18.
Mousavi, S.M., Torabi, S.A., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.: A hierarchical group decision-making approach for new product selection in a fuzzy environment. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 38(11), 3233–3248 (2013)CrossRef
19.
Mousavi, S.M., Jolai, F., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.: A fuzzy stochastic multi-attribute group decision-making approach for selection problems. Group Decis. Negot. 22(2), 207–233 (2013)CrossRef
20.
Vahdani, B., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Mousavi, S.M., Ghodratnama, A.: Soft computing based on new interval-valued fuzzy modified multi-criteria decision-making method. Appl. Soft Comput. 13(1), 165–172 (2013)CrossRef
21.
Vahdani, B., Zandieh, M.: Selecting suppliers using a new fuzzy multiple criteria decision model: the fuzzy balancing and ranking method. Int. J. Prod. Res. 48(18), 5307–5326 (2010)CrossRef
22.
Parreiras, R., et al.: A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments. Inf. Sci. 180(7), 1075–1089 (2010)CrossRef
23.
Xu, Z.: Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Inf. Sci. 177(11), 2363–2379 (2007)CrossRef
24.
Hashemi, H., Bazargan, J., Mousavi, S.M.: A compromise ratio method with an application to water resources management: an intuitionistic fuzzy set. Water Resour. Manage 27(7), 2029–2051 (2013)CrossRef
25.
Torra, V., Narukawa, Y.: On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2009, FUZZ-IEEE 2009. IEEE (2009)
26.
Torra, V.: Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Int. Syst. 25(6), 529–539 (2010)
27.
Chen, N., Xu, Z., Xia, M.: Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl.-Based Syst. 37, 528–540 (2013)CrossRef
28.
Wang, J.-q: Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making problems. Knowl.-Based Syst. 288, 55–72 (2014)
29.
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Giove, S.: The Choquet integral with respect to a level dependent capacity. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 175(1), 1–35 (2011)CrossRef
30.
Doria, S.: Characterization of a coherent upper conditional prevision as the Choquet integral with respect to its associated Hausdorff outer measure. Ann. Oper. Res. 195(1), 33–48 (2012)CrossRef
31.
Demirel, T., Demirel, N.Ç., Kahraman, C.: Multi-criteria warehouse location selection using Choquet integral. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(5), 3943–3952 (2010)CrossRef
32.
Wang, J.Q.: Multi-criteria outranking approach with hesitant fuzzy sets. OR Spectr. 36(4), 1–19 (2013)
33.
Qin, J., Liu, X.: Study on interval intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making method based on Choquet integral. Procedia Comput. Sci. 17, 465–472 (2013)CrossRef
34.
Fan, Z.-P., Ma, J., Zhang, Q.: An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 131(1), 101–106 (2002)CrossRef
35.
Wang, Y.-M., Parkan, C.: A general multiple attribute decision-making approach for integrating subjective preferences and objective information. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 157(10), 1333–1345 (2006)CrossRef
36.
Chen, C.-F., Lee, C.-L.: Determining the attribute weights of professional conference organizer selection: an application of the fuzzy AHP approach. Tourism Econ. 17(5), 1129–1139 (2011)CrossRef
37.
Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, J.: Objective attributes weights determining based on shannon information entropy in hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014, 7 (2014)
38.
Xu, Z., Zhang, X.: Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl.-Based Syst. 52, 53–64 (2013)CrossRef
39.
Beg, I., Rashid, T.: TOPSIS for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 28(12), 1162–1171 (2013)CrossRef
40.
Zhang, J.L., Qi, X.W., Huang, H.B.: A hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making approach based on TOPSIS for parts supplier selection. Appl. Mech. Mater. 357, 2730–2737 (2013)CrossRef
41.
Feng, X.: TOPSIS method for hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 26(5), 2263–2269 (2014)
42.
Jahanshahloo, G.R., Lotfi, F.H., Davoodi, A.: Extension of TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data: Interval efficiency. Math. Comput. Modell. 49(5), 1137–1142 (2009)CrossRef
43.
Yue, Z.: An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers. Knowl.-Based Syst. 24(1), 146–153 (2011)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
An Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Method to Determine the Criteria Weights
verfasst von
Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam
Hossein Gitinavard
Seyed Meysam Mousavi
Ali Siadat
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Buch
Outlooks and Insights on Group Decision and Negotiation

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19514-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-19515-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19515-5_13