The Carer Experience Scale (CES) is an index measure of the caring experience, focusing on six domains: activities outside caring, support from family and friends, assistance from the government and other organizations, fulfilment from caring, control over caring and getting on with the care recipient. This is an initial study of the construct validity of the CES focusing on validity in a heterogeneous group of carers in the UK.
The CES was included in a cross-sectional quality of life survey conducted in a UK city in 2010. The survey included a number of questions about the characteristics of the carer, care recipient, caring situation and motivation for caring. Hypotheses regarding the anticipated associations between these contextual variables and the caring experience were developed and statistically tested.
Seven hundred and thirty carers fully completed the CES questionnaire. Associations between variables hypothesised to relate to the caring experience (such as recipient health and intensity of caring) and the CES were largely as expected, providing evidence that the CES captures the caring experience in a valid way. Most hypothesised associations were statistically significant in both carers of older and younger adults.
This study provides early encouraging evidence for the construct validity of the CES instrument. Further investigation is required to examine the validity of the CES in specific clinical subgroups and to examine the responsiveness of the CES in detecting changes in the carer’s outcomes over time.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Pickard, L., Wittenberg, R., Comas-Herrera, A., Davies, B., & Darton, R. (2000). Relying on informal care in the new century? Informal care for elderly people in England to 2031.
Ageing & Society,20(6), 745–772.
Stone, P. W., Chapman, R. H., Sandberg, E. A., Liljas, B., & Neumann, P. J. (2000). Measuring costs in cost-utility analyses. Variations in the literature.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,16(1), 111–124.
Brouwer, W. B. (2006). Too important to ignore: Informal caregivers and other significant others.
Goodrich, K., Kaambwa, B., & Al-Janabi, H. (2012). The inclusion of informal care in applied economic evaluation: A review.
Value in Health,15, 975–981.
Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T. N., & Coast, J. (2011). QALYs and carers.
Al-Janabi, H., Coast, J., & Flynn, T. N. (2008). What do people value when they provide unpaid care to an older person? A meta-ethnography with interview follow-up.
Social Science and Medicine,67(1), 111–121.
Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T. N., & Coast, J. (2011). Estimation of a preference-based Carer Experience Scale.
Medical Decision Making,31(3), 458–468.
Brouwer, W. B., van Exel, N. J., van Gorp, B., & Redekop, W. K. (2006). The CarerQol instrument: A new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations.
Quality of Life Research,15(6), 1005–1021.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psycological tests.
Psychological Bulletin,52, 281–302.
Kane, M. T. (2001). Current concerns in validity theory.
Journal of Educational Measurement,38(4), 319–342.
Al-Janabi, H., Frew, E., Brouwer, W. B., Rappange, D., & Van Exel, J. (2010). The inclusion of positive aspects of caring in the Caregiver Strain Index: Tests of feasibility and validity.
International Journal of Nursing Studies,47(8), 984–993.
van Exel, N. J., Brouwer, W. B., van den Berg, B., Koopmanschap, M., & van den Bos, G. (2004). What really matters: An inquiry into the relative importance of dimensions of informal caregiver burden.
Clinical Rehabilitation,18(6), 683–693.
Hoefman, R. J., van Exel, N. J., Looren de Jong, S., Redekop, K., & Brouwer, W. B. (2011). A new test of the construct validity of the CarerQol instrument: Measuring the impact of informal care giving.
Quality of Life Research,20(6), 875–887.
Hoefman, R. J., van Exel, N. J., Foets, M., & Brouwer, W. B. (2011). Sustained informal care: The feasibility, construct validity and test–retest reliability of the CarerQol-instrument to measure the impact of informal care in long-term care.
Aging & Mental Health,15(8), 1018–1027.
Scholte op Reimer, W. J. M., de Haan, R. J., Rijnders, P. T., Limburg, M., & van den Bos, G. A. M. (1998). The burden of caregiving in partners of long-term stroke survivors.
van Exel, N. J., Scholte op Reimer, W., Brouwer, W. B., van den Berg, B., Koopmanschap, M., & van den Bos, G. (2004). Instruments for assessing the burden of informal caregiving for stroke patients in clinical practice: A comparison of CSI, CRA, SCQ and self-rated burden.
Clinical Rehabilitation,18(2), 203–214.
Bobinac, A., van Exel, N. J., Rutten, F., & Brouwer, W. B. (2010). Caring for and caring about: Disentangling the caregiver effect and the family effect.
Journal of Health Economics,29(4), 549–556.
Almberg, B., Grafstrom, M., & Winblad, B. (1997). Caring for a demented elderly person—burden and burnout among caregiving relatives.
Journal of Advanced Nursing,25(1), 109–116.
van den Heuvel, E. T., deWitte, L. P., Schure, L. M., Sanderman, R., & Meyboom de Jong, B. (2001). Risk factors for burn-out in caregivers of stroke patients, and possibilities for intervention.
Clinical Rehabilitation,15(6), 669–677.
van Exel, N. J., Koopmanschap, M. A., van den Berg, B., Brouwer, W. B., & van den Bos, G. A. (2005). Burden of informal caregiving for stroke patients.
Cerebrovascular Diseases,19(1), 11–17.
Peters, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Doll, H., Playford, D., & Jenkinson, C. (2011). Does self-reported well-being of patients with Parkinson’s disease influence caregiver strain and quality of life?
Parkinsonism and Related Disorders,17(5), 348–352.
Choi-Kwon, S., Kim, H. S., Kwon, S. U., & Kim, J. S. (2005). Factors affecting the burden on caregivers of stroke survivors in South Korea.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,86(5), 1043–1048.
Bugge, C., Alexander, H., & Hagen, S. (1999). Stroke patients’ informal caregivers. Patient, caregiver, and service factors that affect caregiver strain.
Tooth, L., McKenna, K., Barnett, A., Prescott, C., & Murphy, S. (2005). Caregiver burden, time spent caring and health status in the first 12 months following stroke.
Brain Injury,19(12), 963–974.
Brouwer, W. B., van Exel, N. J., van den Berg, B., van den Bos, G., & Koopmanschap, M. (2005). Process utility from providing informal care: The benefit of caring.
Health Policy,74(1), 85–99.
Grant, J., Bartolucci, A., Elliot, T., & Newman Giger, J. (2000). Sociodemographic, physical, and psychosocial characteristics of depressed and non-depressed family caregivers of stroke survivors.
Brain Injury,14(12), 1089–1100.
Montgomery, R., Gonyea, J., & Hooyman, N. (1985). Caregiving and the experience of subjective and objective burden.
Family Relations,34, 19–26.
Pozzilli, C., Palmisano, L., Mainero, C., Tomassini, V., Marinelli, F., et al. (2004). Relationship between emotional distress in caregivers and health status in persons with multiple sclerosis.
Multiple Sclerosis,10(4), 442–446.
Orbell, S., Hopkins, N., & Gillies, B. (1993). Measuring the impact of informal caring.
Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology,3, 149–163.
Jones, D. A., & Vetter, N. J. (1985). Formal and informal support received by carers of elderly dependants.
British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition),291, 643–645.
Zarit, S. H., Reever, K. E., & Bach-Peterson, J. (1980). Relatives of the impaired elderly: Correlates of feelings of burden.
The gerontologist,20(6), 649–655.
Cohen, J. (1988).
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Über diesen Artikel
An investigation into the construct validity of the Carer Experience Scale (CES)
Ilias Goranitis Joanna Coast Hareth Al-Janabi
Springer International Publishing
Quality of Life Research
An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation - An Official Journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649