nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

An Investigation of Argumentation Framework Characteristics

verfasst von : Josh Murphy, Isabel Sassoon, Michael Luck, Elizabeth Black

Erschienen in: Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between the structural properties of argumentation frameworks and their argument-based characteristics, examining the characteristics of structures of Dung-style frameworks and two generalisations: extended argumentation frameworks and collective-attack frameworks. Our results show that the structural properties of frameworks have an impact on the size of extensions produced, on the proportion of subsets of arguments that determine some topic argument to be acceptable, and on the likelihood that the addition of some new argument will affect the acceptability of an existing argument, all characteristics that are known to affect the performance of argumentation-based technologies. We demonstrate the applicability of our results with two case studies.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nächstes Kapitel Hypersequent-Based Argumentation: An Instantiation in the Relevance Logic RM

Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: On revising argumentation-based decision systems. In: Sossai, C., Chemello, G. (eds.) ECSQARU 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5590, pp. 71–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_8 CrossRef

Bistarelli, S., Rossi, F., Santini, F.: A comparative test on the enumeration of extensions in abstract argumentation. Fundam. Inform. 140(3–4), 263–278 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Black, E., Coles, A., Bernardini, S.: Automated planning of simple persuasion dialogues. In: Bulling, N., van der Torre, L., Villata, S., Jamroga, W., Vasconcelos, W. (eds.) CLIMA 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8624, pp. 87–104. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09764-0_6

Brewka, G., Polberg, S., Woltran, S.: Generalizations of dung frameworks and their role in formal argumentation. IEEE Intell. Syst. 29(1), 30–38 (2014)CrossRef

Brochenin, R., Linsbichler, T., Maratea, M., Wallner, J.P., Woltran, S.: Abstract solvers for dung’s argumentation frameworks. In: Black, E., Modgil, S., Oren, N. (eds.) TAFA 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9524, pp. 40–58. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_3 CrossRef

Cayrol, C., de Saint-Cyr, F., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 38, 49–84 (2010)MathSciNetMATH

Cerutti, F., Giacomin, M., Vallati, M.: Algorithm selection for preferred extensions enumeration. In: 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument. IOS Frontiers in AI and Applications, vol. 266, pp. 221–232 (2014)

Cerutti, F., Oren, N., Strass, H., Thimm, M., Vallati, M.: A benchmark framework for a computational argumentation competitions. In: 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument. IOS Frontiers in AI and Applications, vol. 266, pp. 459–460 (2014)

Cerutti, F., Palmer, A., Rosenfeld, A., Snajder, J., Toni, F.: A pilot study in using argumentation frameworks for online debates. In: 1st International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation, pp. 63–74 (2016)

10.

Charwat, G., Dvorak, W., Gaggl, S., Wallner, J., Woltran, S.: Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation: a survey. Artif. Intell. 220, 28–63 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

11.

Concannon, S., Healey, P., Purver, M.: How natural is argument in natural dialogue? In: 16th International Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (2016)

12.

Dung, P.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non-monotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321–357 (1995)CrossRefMATH

13.

Fisher, R.: Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Genesis Publishing, Guildford (1925)MATH

14.

Frank, S.: The common patterns of nature. J. Evol. Biol. 22(8), 1563–1585 (2009)CrossRef

15.

Hunter, A., Williams, M.: Aggregating evidence about the positive and negative effects of treatments. Artif. Intell. Med. 56(3), 173–190 (2012)CrossRef

16.

Liao, B., Jin, L., Koons, R.: Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method. Artif. Intell. 175(11), 1790–1814 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

17.

Modgil, S.: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell. 173(9), 901–934 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

18.

Modgil, S., et al.: The added value of argumentation. In: Ossowski, S. (ed.) Agreement Technologies, vol. 8, pp. 357–403. Springer, Dordrecht (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_21 CrossRef

19.

Murphy, J., Black, E., Luck, M.: Arguing from similar positions: an empirical analysis. In: Black, E., Modgil, S., Oren, N. (eds.) TAFA 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9524, pp. 177–193. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_11 CrossRef

20.

Murphy, J., Black, E., Luck, M.: A heuristic strategy for persuasion dialogues. In: 6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument. IOS Frontiers in AI and Apps, vol. 287, pp. 411–417 (2016)

21.

Nielsen, S., Parsons, S.: An application of formal argumentation: fusing Bayes nets in MAS. In: 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument. IOS Frontiers in AI and Applications, vol. 144, pp. 33–44 (2006)

22.

Nielsen, S.H., Parsons, S.: A generalization of Dung’s abstract framework for argumentation: arguing with sets of attacking arguments. In: Maudet, N., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I. (eds.) ArgMAS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4766, pp. 54–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75526-5_4 CrossRef

23.

Oren, N., Norman, T., Preece, A.: Loose lips sink ships: a heuristic for argumentation. In: 3rd International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. LNAI, vol. 4049, pp. 121–134. Springer (2006)

24.

Rosenfield, A., Kraus, S.: Strategical argumentative agent for human persuasion. In: 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IOS Frontiers in AI and Applications, vol. 285, pp. 320–328 (2016)

25.

Sassoon, I., Keppens, J., McBurney, P.: Preferences in argumentation for statistical model selection. In: 6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument. IOS Frontiers in AI and Applications, vol. 287, pp. 53–60 (2016)

26.

Sturges, H.: The choice of a class interval. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 21(153), 65–66 (1926)CrossRef

27.

Thimm, M.: Tweety - a comprehensive collection of Java libraries for logical aspects of artificial intelligence and knowledge representation. In: 14th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 528–537. AAAI Press (2014)

Titel: An Investigation of Argumentation Framework Characteristics
verfasst von: Josh Murphy
Isabel Sassoon
Michael Luck
Elizabeth Black
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75552-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-75553-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75553-3_1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"