Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Biomass and Biofuels
The paper focuses on the progress related to models and approaches for an optimal design and management of biomass supply chains. A literature review has been conducted, and previous review papers have been used as bases. Do most of the current models adopt the same decision level, mathematical methodology and type of objective of those identified by previous reviews? Are there any innovative approaches to revitalise the considered research topic?
Most of the works published in 2017 and in early 2018 reflect the past literature reviews; regrettably, few relevant advances have been achieved in the recent period to face up the major gaps. Innovative works apply Life Cycle Assessment, Multi-Criteria Analysis, CyberGIS or Agent-Based approaches to biomass supply chain optimisation.
Future research should address, for instance, sustainability of biomass supply chains through a more comprehensive approach including economic, environmental, social and policy-related issues, integration of the decision levels to meet the needs of different stakeholders.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
•• Vasković S, Gvero P, Medaković V, Halilović V: Energy chains optimization for selection of sustainable energy supply. In: Krmac E, edited by. Sustainable Supply Chain Management. InTech; 2016. The application of a MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) approach coupled with a mathematical model to calculate optimisation criteria based on three types of objective: environmental, energetic and economic.
Yue D, You F, Snyder SW. Biomass-to-bioenergy and biofuel supply chain optimization: overview, key issues and challenges. Computers Chem Eng. 2014;66:36–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.11.016. CrossRef
Dessbesell L, Xu C, Pulkki R, Leitch M, Mahmood N. Forest biomass supply chain optimization for a biorefinery aiming to produce high-value bio-based materials and chemicals from lignin and forestry residues: a review of literature. Can J For Res. 2017;47:277–88. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2016-0336. CrossRef
• Hong BH, How BS, Lam HL. Overview of sustainable biomass supply chain: from concept to modelling. Clean Techn Environ Policy. 2016;18:2173–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1155-6. An overview of problems and decisions along a biomass supply chain, to define a sustainable integrated biomass supply chain. A SWAT analysis is suggested CrossRef
De Meyer A, Cattrysse D, Rasinmäki J, Van Orshoven J. Methods to optimise the design and management of biomass-for-bioenergy supply chains: a review. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2014;31:657–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.036. CrossRef
Bochtis DD, Dogoulis P, Busato P, Sørensen CG, Berruto R, Gemtos T. A flow-shop problem formulation of biomass handling operations scheduling. Comp Electr Agr. 2013;91:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2012.11.015. CrossRef
Gracia C, Velázquez-Martí B, Estornell J. An application of the vehicle routing problem to biomass transportation. Biosyst Eng. 2014;124:40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.06.009. CrossRef
Pavlou D, Orfanou A, Busato P, Berruto R, Sørensen C, Bochtis D. Functional modeling for green biomass supply chains. Comp Electr Agr. 2016;122:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.01.014. CrossRef
Montgomery TD, Han HS, Kizha AR. Modeling work plan logistics for centralized biomass recovery operations in mountainous terrain. Biomass Bioenergy. 2016;85:262–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.11.023. CrossRef
Igathinathane C, Tumuluru JS, Keshwani D, Schmer M, Archer D, Liebig M, et al. Biomass bale stack and field outlet locations assessment for efficient infield logistics. Biomass Bioenergy. 2016;91:217–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.05.019. CrossRef
Malladi KT, Sowlati T. Optimization of operational level transportation planning in forestry: a review. Int J For Eng. 2017;28(3):198–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2017.1362825.
Mobini M, Sowlati T, Sokhansanj S. A simulation model for the design and analysis of wood pellet supply chains. Appl En. 2013;111:1239–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.06.026. CrossRef
Windisch J, Röser D, Mola-Judego B, Sikanen S, Asikainen A. Business process mapping and discrete-event simulation of two forest biomass supply chains. Biomass Bioenergy. 2013;56:370–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.05.022. CrossRef
Sahoo K, Mani S. GIS based discrete event modeling and simulation of biomass supply chain. Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference-IEEE 2015:967–978. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2015.7408225.
• Holmgren J, Ramstedt L. An extended TAPAS-Z model and a case study of the transport of forest products. Procedia Comp Sci. 2017;109C:343–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.362. Provision of an extension of an already developed Agent-Based freight transport analysis model (TAPAS-Z), for decision-making in woody biomass transport chains CrossRef
Rauch P, Gronalt M. The terminal location problem in the forest fuels supply network. Int J Forest Eng. 2013;21(2):32–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2010.10702596.
Grigoroudis E, Petridis K, Arabatsis G. RDEA: a recursive DEA based algorithm for the optimal design of biomass supply chain networks. Ren En. 2014;71:113–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.001. CrossRef
Roni MS, Eksioglu SD, Searcy E, Jha K. A supply chain network design model for biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants. Transp Res Part E. 2014;61:115–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.10.007. CrossRef
Taskhiri MS, Garbs M, Geldermann J. Sustainable logistics network for wood flow considering cascade utilisation. J Cle Pro. 2016;110:25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.098. CrossRef
Paolucci N, Bezzo F, Tugnoli A. A two-tier approach to the optimization of a biomass supply chain for pyrolysis processes. Biomass Bioenergy. 2016;84:87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.11.011. CrossRef
Palander T. Applying dynamic multiple-objective optimization in inter-enterprise collaboration to improve the efficiency of energy wood transportation and storage. Scandin J For Research. 2015;30(4):346–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.1001780.
Paulo H, Azcue X, Barbosa-Póvoa AP, Relvas S. Supply chain optimization of residual forestry biomass for bioenergy production: the case study of Portugal. Biomass Bioenergy. 2015;83:245–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.09.020. CrossRef
d’Amore F, Bezzo F. Strategic optimisation of biomass-based energy supply chains for sustainable mobility. Comp Chem Eng. 2016;87:68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.01.003. CrossRef
• Lim CH, Lam HL. Biomass supply chain optimisation via novel Biomass Element Life Cycle Analysis (BELCA). Appl En. 2016;161:733–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.030. A multi-objective model including economic and environmental objectives for an efficient use of potential underutilised biomass CrossRef
Hu H, Lin T, Wang S, Rodriguez LF. A CyberGIS approach to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in biomass supply chain optimization. Appl En. 2017;203:26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.107. CrossRef
• Lin T, Wang S, Rodríguez LF, Hu H, Liu Y. CyberGIS-enabled decision support platform for biomass supply chain optimization. Env Model Soft. 2015;70:138–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.03.018. A CyberGIS approach using a MILP model to support strategic decisions. It guarantees a high computational performance of complex problems. CrossRef
Zamar DS, Gopaluni B, Sokhansanj S, Newlands NK. A quantile-based scenario analysis approach to biomass supply chain optimization under uncertainty. Comp Chem Eng. 2017;97:114–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.11.015. CrossRef
Rentizelas AA, Tolis AI, Tatsiopoulos IP. Optimisation and investment analysis of two biomass-to-heat supply chain structures. Biosyst Eng. 2014;120:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.07.012. CrossRef
Rentizelas AA, Tatsiopoulos IP. Locating a bioenergy facility using a hybrid optimization method. Int J Prod Econ. 2010;123(1):196–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.08.013. CrossRef
Golecha R, Gan J. Biomass transport cost from field to conversion facility when biomass yield density and road network vary with transport radius. App En. 2016;164:321–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.070. CrossRef
•• Kylili A, Christoforou E, Fokaides PA. Environmental evaluation of biomass pelleting using Life Cycle Assessment. Biom Bioe. 2016;84:107–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.11.018. The Life Cycle Assessment methodology has been used to support the optimisation of a pellet supply chain; a new mathematical parametric model and non-linear programming have been developed for the transportation CrossRef
ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management—Life Cycle Assessment—principles and framework.
ISO 14044:2006. Environmental management—Life Cycle Assessment—requirements and guidelines.
Correll D, Suzuki Y, Martens BJ. Logistical supply chain design for bioeconomy applications. Biomass Bioenergy. 2014;66:60–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.036. CrossRef
Martinkus N, Shi W, Lovrich N, Pierce J, Smith P, Wolcott M. Integrating biogeophysical and social assets into biomass-to-biofuel supply chain siting decisions. Biomass Bioenergy. 2014;66:410–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.04.014. CrossRef
Delivand MK, Cammerino ARB, Garofalo P, Monteleone M. Optimal locations of bioenergy facilities, biomass spatial availability, logistics costs and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions: a case study on electricity productions in South Italy. J Cle Pro. 2015;99:129–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.018. CrossRef
• Ribeiro Teixeira T, Alvares Soares Ribeiro CA, Rosa dos Santos A, Marcatti GE, Lorenzon AS, de Castro NLM, et al. Forest biomass power plant installation scenarios. Biom Bioe. 2018;108:35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.006. Fuzzy logic and GIS have been used to manage economic, environmental and social complexities of biomass supply chains, by minimising transport distances and costs CrossRef
Ackerman PA, van der Merwe EA, Pulkki RE. A South African softwood saw timber supply chain case study. South For J For Sc. 2017;79(4):329–38. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2016.1255380.
Guilhermino A, Lourinho G, Brito P, Almeida N. Assessment of the use of forest biomass residues for bioenergy in Alto Alentejo, Portugal: logistics, economic and financial perspectives. Waste Biomass Valor. 2017;9:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9830-3.
• Martinkus N, Latta G, Morgan T, Wolcott MA. comparison of methodologies for estimating delivered forest residue volume and cost to a wood-based biorefinery. Biom Bioe. 2017;106:83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.08.023. Comparison between two spatial methods (a past-predictive model and a future-predictive bio-economic model in a GIS environment) of estimation of biomass volume and costs of delivered forest residues to a biorefinery CrossRef
Chung W, Anderson N. Spatial modeling of potential woody biomass flow, in: 35th annual meeting of the council on forest engineering: engineering new solutions for energy supply and demand 2012.
Shabani N, Sowlati T, Ouhimmou M, Rönnqvist M. Tactical supply chain planning for a forest biomass power plant under supply uncertainty. Ener. 2014;78:346–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.019. CrossRef
Sosa A, Acuna M, McDonnell K, Devlin G. Controlling moisture content and truck configurations to model and optimise biomass supply chain logistics in Ireland. App En. 2015;137:338–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.018. CrossRef
Marques A, Rasinmäki J, Soares R, Amorim P. Planning woody biomass supply in hot systems under variable chips energy content. Biomass Bioenergy. 2018;108:265–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.11.016. CrossRef
Shabani N, Sowlati T. A hybrid multi-stage stochastic programming-robust optimization model for maximizing the supply chain of a forest-based biomass power plant considering uncertainties. J Cle Pro. 2016;112:3285–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.034. CrossRef
Zhang L, Hu G. Supply chain design and operational planning models for biomass to drop-in fuel production. Biomass Bioenergy. 2013;58:238–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.08.016. CrossRef
Pudel SR, Marufuzzaman M, Bian L. A hybrid decomposition algorithm for designing a multi-modal transportation network under biomass supply uncertainty. Transp Res Part E. 2016;94:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.07.004. CrossRef
Ekşioğlu SD, Karimi H, Ekşioğlu B. Optimization models to integrate production and transportation planning for biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants. IIE Trans. 2016;48(10):901–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1126004. CrossRef
Ekşioğlu SD, Karimi H. A model for analyzing the impact of production tax credit on renewable electricity production. IIE Ann Conference and Expo. 2014:2407–16.
Xie F, Huang Y, Eksioglu S. Integrating multimodal transport into cellulosic biofuel supply chain design under feedstock seasonality with a case study based on California. Bioresour Technol. 2014;152:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.074. CrossRef
How BS, Tan KY, Lam HL. Transportation decision tool for optimisation of integrated biomass flow with vehicle capacity constraints. J Cle Pro. 2016;136:197–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.142. CrossRef
Zhang F, Johnson DM, Wang J. Integrating multimodal transport into forest-delivered biofuel supply chain design. Ren En. 2016;93:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.047. CrossRef
Balaman ŞY, Matopoulos A, Wright DJ, Scott J. Integrated optimization of sustainable supply chains and transportation networks for multi technology bio-based production: a decision support system based on fuzzy e-constraint method. J Cle Pro. 2017;172:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.150.
Lin T, Rodríguez LF, Shastri YN, Hansen AC, Ting KC. Integrated strategic and tactical biomass—biofuel supply chain optimization. Bioresour Technol. 2014;156:256–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.121. CrossRef
De Meyer A, Cattrysse D, Orshoven JV. Considering biomass growth and regeneration in the optimisation of biomass supply chains. Ren En. 2016;87:990–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.043. CrossRef
Orfanou A, Busato P, Bochtis DD, Edwards G, Pavlou D, Sørensen CG, et al. Scheduling for machinery fleets in biomass multiple-field operations. Comp Electr Agr. 2013;94:12–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2013.03.002. CrossRef
Ghaderi H, Pishvaee MS, Moini A. Biomass supply chain network design: an optimization-oriented review and analysis. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.027.
Mafakhteri F, Nasiri F. Modeling of biomass-to-energy supply chain operations: applications, challenges and research directions. En Pol. 2014;67:116–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.071. CrossRef
Atashbar NZ, Labadie N, Prins C. Modeling and optimization of biomass supply chains: a review and a critical look. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2016;49(12):604–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.742. CrossRef
ISO 14046:2014. Environmental management—Water footprint—principles, requirements and guidelines.
Ba BH, Prins C, Prodhon C. Models for optimization and performance evaluation of biomass supply chains: an operations research perspective. Ren En. 2016;87:977–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.045. CrossRef
- An Overview of Current Models and Approaches to Biomass Supply Chain Design and Management
Pier F. Orrù
- Springer International Publishing
Systemische Notwendigkeit zur Weiterentwicklung von Hybridnetzen