Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Cluster Computing
Erschienen in: Cluster Computing 3/2019

03.12.2018

Analysis model for server consolidation of virtualized heterogeneous data centers providing internet services

verfasst von: Bo Wang, Ying Song, Yuzhong Sun, Jun Liu

Erschienen in: Cluster Computing | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Server consolidation based on virtualization technology simplifies system administration, reduces the cost of power and physical infrastructure, and improves resource utilizations in today’s service-oriented Internet data centers. How many servers for the underlying physical infrastructure are saved via server consolidation in virtualized data centers is of great interest to the administrators and designers of the data centers. Various workload consolidations differ in saving physical servers for the infrastructure. The impacts caused by virtualization to these concurrent services are fluctuating considerably which may have a great effect on server consolidation. This paper proposes an analytic model for server consolidation in virtualized Internet data centers based on the queuing theory. According to the features of these services’ workloads, this model can provide the supremum number of consolidated physical servers needed to guarantee QoS with same loss probabilities of requests as in dedicated servers. We verify the model via a case study. The experiments results confirm the superior accuracy of our model and show that the virtual machine-based server consolidation saves up to 50% physical infrastructure and improves 50% CPU resource utilization as well as 2.67 times in I/O bandwidth utilization, satisfying required QoS.
Vorheriger Artikel Cost-efficient parallel processing of irregularly structured problems in cloud computing environments
Nächster Artikel Benchmarking based search framework

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
In this paper, dedicated servers represent physical servers providing only one service at one time in the dedicated scenario.
 
Literatur
1.
Gupta, D., Lee, S., Vrable, M., Savage, S., Snoeren, Alex C., Varghese, George, Voelker, Geoffrey M., Vahdat, Amin: Difference engine: harnessing memory redundancy in virtual machines. Commun. ACM 53(10), 85–93 (2010)CrossRef
2.
Willmann, P., Rixner, S., Cox, A.L.: Protection strategies for direct access to virtualized I/O devices. In: USENIX 2008 Annual Technical Conference on Annual Technical Conference, ATC’08, pp. 15–28. (2008)
3.
Cui, L., Li, J., Li, B., Huai, J., Hu, C., Wo, T., Al-Aqrabi, H., Liu, L..: VMScatter: migrate virtual machines to many hosts. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGPLAN/SIGOPS International Conference on Virtual Execution Environments, VEE ’13, pp. 63–72, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2013)
4.
Guo, Y., Stolyar, A.L., Walid, A.: Shadow-routing based dynamic algorithms for virtual machine placement in a network cloud. In: 2013 Proceedings of the IEEEINFOCOM, pp. 620–628 (2013)
5.
Song, Y., Wang, H., Li, Y., Feng, B., Sun, Y.: Multi-tiered on-demand resource scheduling for vm-based data center. In: Proceedings of the 2009 9th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, CCGRID ’09, pp. 148–155. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2009)
6.
Song, Y., Sun, Y., Shi, W.: A two-tiered on-demand resource allocation mechanism for vm-based data centers. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 6(1), 116–129 (2013)CrossRef
7.
Padala, P., Shin, K.G., Zhu, X., Uysal, M., Wang, Z., Singhal, S., Merchant, A., Salem, K.: Adaptive control of virtualized resources in utility computing environments. In: Proceedings of the 2Nd ACM SIGOPS/EuroSys European Conference on Computer Systems 2007, EuroSys ’07, pp. 289–302. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007)
8.
Vasić, N., Novaković, D., Miučin, S., Kostić, D., Bianchini, R.: DejaVu: Accelerating resource allocation in virtualized environments. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, ASPLOS XVII, pp. 423–436. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2012)
9.
Wood, T., Cherkasova, L., Ozonat, K., Shenoy, P.: Profiling and modeling resource usage of virtualized applications. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Middleware, Middleware ’08, pp. 366–387. Springer, New York, NY, USA (2008)
10.
Chiang, R.C., Hwang, J., Huang, H.H., Wood, T.: Matrix: achieving predictable virtual machine performance in the clouds. In: 11th International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC 14), pp. 45–56, Philadelphia, PA (2014)
11.
Kundu, S., Rangaswami, R., Dutta, K., Zhao, M.: Application performance modeling in a virtualized environment. In: 2010 IEEE 16th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), pp. 1–10. (2010)
12.
Kundu, S., Rangaswami, R., Gulati, A., Zhao, M., Dutta, K.: Modeling virtualized applications using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGPLAN/SIGOPS Conference on Virtual Execution Environments, VEE ’12, pp. 3–14. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2012)
13.
Song, Y., Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., Shi, W.: Utility analysis for internet-oriented server consolidation in VM-based data centers. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing and Workshops, CLUSTER ’09, pp. 1–10. (2009)
14.
Gross, D., Harris, C.M.: Fundamentals of Queueing Theory. Wiley, New York, NY (1988)MATH
15.
Heidelberger, P., Lavenberg, Stephen S: Computer performance evaluation methodology. Comput. IEEE Trans. C–33(12), 1195–1220 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRef
16.
Smith, J.E.: Characterizing computer performance with a single number. Commun. ACM 31(10), 1202–1206 (1988)CrossRef
17.
Lilja, David J.: Measuring Computer Performance: A Practitioner’s Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRef
18.
John, L.K.: More on finding a single number to indicate overall performance of a Benchmark suite. SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News 32(1), 3–8 (2004)CrossRef
19.
Krishnaswamy, U., Scherson, I.D.: A Framework for computer performance evaluation using benchmark sets. Comput. IEEE Trans. 49(12), 1325–1338 (2000)CrossRef
20.
Chen, T., Chen, Y., Guo, Q., Temam, O., Wu, Y., Hu, W.: Statistical performance comparisons of computers. In: 2012 IEEE 18th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), pp. 1–12 (2012)
21.
Chen, T., Guo, Q., Temam, O., Wu, Y., Bao, Y., Xu, Z., Chen, Y.: Statistical performance comparisons of computers. Comput. IEEE Trans. 64, 1442–1455 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRef
22.
Cao, J., Andersson, M., Nyberg, C., Kihl, M.: Web server performance modeling using an M/G/1/K*PS queue. In: 10th International Conference on Telecommunications, ICT 2003, vol. 2, pp. 1501–1506. (2003)
23.
Liu, X., Heo, J., Sha, L.: Modeling 3-tiered web applications. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, 2005, pp. 307–310. (2005)
24.
Ghaith, S., Wang, M., Perry, P., Murphy, L.: Software contention aware queueing network model of three-tier web systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering, ICPE ’14, pp. 273–276. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2014)
25.
Malkowski, S., Hedwig, M., Pu, C.: Experimental evaluation of N-tier systems: observation and analysis of multi-bottlenecks. In: IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization, IISWC 2009, pp. 118–127. IEEE (2009)
26.
Lim, S.-H., Huh, J.-S., Kim, Y., Shipman, G.M., Das, C.R.: D-factor: a quantitative model of application slow-down in multi-resource shared systems. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGMETRICS/PERFORMANCE Joint International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, SIGMETRICS ’12, pp. 271–282. CM, New York, NY, USA (2012)
27.
Yao, J., Jung, G.: Bottleneck detection and solution recommendation for cloud-based multi-tier application. In: Xavier, F., Aditya, G., Grace, L., Sami, B. (eds.) Service-Oriented Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 470–477. Springer, Berlin (2014)CrossRef
28.
Padala, P., Zhu, X., Wang, Z., Singhal, S., Shin, K.G, et al.: Performance Evaluation of Virtualization Technologies for Server Consolidation. HP Labs Tec. Report (2007)
29.
Deshane, T., Shepherd, Z., Matthews, J., Ben-Yehuda, M., Shah, A., Rao, B.: Quantitative Comparison of Xen and KVM, pp. 1–2. Xen Summit, Boston (2008)
30.
Scheepers, M.J.: Virtualization and containerization of application infrastructure: A Comparison. In: 21st Twente Student Conference on IT, Enschede, The Netherlands (2014)
31.
Iosup, A., Ostermann, S., Yigitbasi, M.N., Prodan, R., Fahringer, T., Epema, D.H.J.: Performance analysis of cloud computing services for many-tasks scientific computing. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 22(6), 931–945 (2011)CrossRef
32.
Gupta, D., Gardner, R., Cherkasova, L.: XenMon: QoS monitoring and performance profiling tool. Technical report, HP Labs, HPL-2005-187 (2005)
33.
Benevenuto, F., Fernandes, C., Santos, M., Almeida, V., Almeida, J., Janakiraman, G., Santos, J.: Performance models for virtualized applications. In: Frontiers of High Performance Computing and Networking–ISPA 2006 Workshops, pp. 427–439. Springer (2006)
34.
Menascé, D.A.: Virtualization: concepts, applications, and performance modeling. In: International Conference on CMG, pp. 407–414 (2005)
35.
Huber, N., von Quast, M., Brosig, F., Kounev, S.: Analysis of the performance-influencing factors of virtualization platforms. In: OTM 2010 on the On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, pp. 811–828. Springer, Berlin (2010)
36.
Huber, N., von Quast, M., Brosig, F., Hauck, M., Kounev, S.: A method for experimental analysis and modeling of virtualization performance overhead. In: Cloud Computing and Services Science, pp. 353–370. Springer, New York (2012)
37.
Minhas, U.F., Yadav, J., Aboulnaga, A., Salem, K.: Database systems on virtual machines: how much do you lose? In: IEEE 24th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop, 2008. ICDEW 2008, pp. 35–41 (2008)
38.
Zhang, S., Qian, Z., Luo, Z., Wu, J., Lu, S.: Burstiness-aware resource reservation for server consolidation in computing clouds. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 27(4), 964–977 (2016)CrossRef
39.
He, L., Zou, D., Zhang, Z., Chen, C., Jin, Hai, Jarvis, Stephen A.: Developing resource consolidation frameworks for moldable virtual machines in clouds. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 32, 69–81 (2014)CrossRef
40.
Speitkamp, B., Bichler, Martin: A mathematical programming approach for server consolidation problems in virtualized data centers. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 3(4), 266–278 (2010)CrossRef
41.
Chiang, R.C., Huang, H.H.: Profiling-based workload consolidation and migration in virtualized data centers. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 26(3), 878–890 (2015)CrossRef
42.
Ferreto, T.C., Netto, M.A.S., Calheiros, R.N., Rose, C.A.F.: Server consolidation with migration control for virtualized data centers. Future Generat. Comput. Syst. 27(8), 1027–1034 (2011)CrossRef
43.
Srikantaiah, S., Kansal, A., Zhao, F.: Energy aware consolidation for cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Power Aware Computing and Systems, HotPower’08 (2008)
44.
Nathuji, R., Schwan, K.: VirtualPower: coordinated Power Management in Virtualized Enterprise Systems. In: Proceedings of Twenty-first ACM SIGOPS Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, SOSP ’07, pp. 265–278. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007)
45.
Beloglazov, A., Buyya, R.: Managing overloaded hosts for dynamic consolidation of virtual machines in cloud data centers under quality of service constraints. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 24(7), 1366–1379 (2013)CrossRef
46.
Medina, V., García, Juan Manuel: A survey of migration mechanisms of virtual machines. ACM Comput. Surv. 46(3), 30:1–30:33 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRef
47.
Verma, A., Ahuja, P., Neogi, A.: pMapper: Power and migration cost aware application placement in virtualized systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Middleware, Middleware ’08, pp. 243–264. Springer, New York, USA (2008)
48.
Strunk, A., Dargie, W.: Does live migration of virtual machines cost energy? In: 2013 IEEE 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), pp. 514–521 (2013)
49.
Liu, H., Xu, C.-Z., Jin, H., Gong, J., Liao, X.: Performance and energy modeling for live migration of virtual machines. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, HPDC ’11, pp. 171–182. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2011)
50.
Fei, X., Fangming, L., Hai, J., Vasilakos, A.V.: Managing performance overhead of virtual machines in cloud computing. Proc. IEEE Surv. State Art Future Dir. 102, 11–31 (2014)
51.
Menasce, D.: Two-level iterative queuing modeling of software contention. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunications Systems, 2002, pp. 267–276. MASCOTS (2002)
52.
Rao, L., Liu, X., Xie, L., Liu, W.: Coordinated energy cost management of distributed internet data centers in smart grid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 3(1), 50–58 (2012)CrossRef
53.
Lin, M., Wierman, A., Andrew, L.L.H., Thereska, E.: Dynamic right-sizing for power-proportional data centers. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw 21(5), 1378–1391 (2013)CrossRef
54.
55.
Storn, R., Price, Kenneth: Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Glob. Optim. 11(4), 341–359 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
56.
Deb, Kalyanmoy: Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley, Hoboken (2001)MATH
57.
Barham, P., Dragovic, B., Fraser, K., Hand, S., Harris, T., Ho, A., Neugebauer, R., Pratt, I., Warfield, A.: Xen and the art of virtualization. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, SOSP ’03, pp. 164–177. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2003)
58.
Cain, H.W., Rajwar, R., Marden, M., Lipasti, M.H.: An Architectural Evaluation of Java TPC-W. In: Proceedings of the The Seventh International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture, HPCA, pp. 229–240 (2001)
59.
Cooper, B.F, Silberstein, A., Tam, E., Ramakrishnan, R., Sears, R.: Benchmarking cloud serving systems with YCSB. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, SoCC ’10, pp. 143–154. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2010)
60.
61.
62.
Korf, R.E.: A new algorithm for optimal bin packing. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 731–736. American Association for Artificial Intelligence Menlo Park, CA, USA (2002)
63.
Meisner, D., Sadler, C.M., Barroso, L.A., Weber, W.-D., Wenisch, T.F.: Power management of online data-intensive services. In: 38th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), 2011, pp. 319–330. IEEE (2011)
64.
Rameshan, N., Navarro, L., Monte, E., Vlassov, V.: Stay-away, protecting sensitive applications from performance interference. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Middleware Conference, Middleware ’14, pp. 301–312. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2014)
65.
Xu, F., Liu, F., Liu, L., Jin, H., Li, B., Li, B.: iAware: making live migration of virtual machines interference-aware in the cloud. IEEE Trans. Comput. 63(12), 3012–3025 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
66.
Chiang, R.C., Huang, H.H.: TRACON: interference-aware scheduling for data-intensive applicationsin virtualized environments. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 25(5), 1349–1358 (2014)CrossRef
67.
Novaković, D., Vasić, N., Novaković, S., Kostić, D., Bianchini, R.: DeepDive: transparently identifying and managing performance interference in virtualized environments. In: Proceedings of the 2013 USENIX Conference on Annual Technical Conference., pp. 219–230. USENIX ATC’13 (2013)
Metadaten
Titel
Analysis model for server consolidation of virtualized heterogeneous data centers providing internet services
verfasst von
Bo Wang
Ying Song
Yuzhong Sun
Jun Liu
Publikationsdatum
03.12.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Cluster Computing / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1386-7857
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7543
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2880-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Cluster Computing 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Cloud workload prediction based on workflow execution time discrepancies

OriginalPaper

FCR-NS: a novel caching and forwarding strategy for Named Data Networking based on Software Defined Networking

OriginalPaper

Adaptive QoE-based architecture on cloud mobile media for live streaming

OriginalPaper

Online Smart Disguise: real-time diversification evading coresidency-based cloud attacks

OriginalPaper

SD-CPS: software-defined cyber-physical systems. Taming the challenges of CPS with workflows at the edge

OriginalPaper

Designing data cubes in OLAP systems: a decision makers’ requirements-based approach