Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Methodology for Quantified Risk Assessment Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Analysis Techniques

verfasst von : Jan-Erik Vinnem, Willy Røed

Erschienen in: Offshore Risk Assessment Vol. 2

Verlag: Springer London

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Chapter 14 has presented an overview of all the steps involved in performing a QRA. This chapter is devoted to the main analysis techniques that may be used. Hazard identification, analysis of causes, frequencies and dependencies as well as accident sequences are covered. Leak modelling and ignition modelling as well as escalation modelling are also main topics of this chapter.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Methodology for Quantified Risk Assessment
Nächstes Kapitel Presentation of Risk Results from QRAQRA Studies
Literatur
1.
Crawley F, Preston M, Tyler B (2000) HAZOP: guide to best practice for the process and chemical industries. UK, Institution of Chemical Engineers
2.
Lees FP (2004) Lees’ loss prevention in the process industries, 3rd edn. Butterworth–Heinemann, Oxford
3.
Lloyds Register Consulting (2004) An assessment of safety, risks and costs associated with subsea pipeline disposals, Kjeller, Norway. Report No.: 32.701.001/R1
4.
CCPS (2018) Bow ties in risk management: a concept book for process safety. Wiley. ISBN: 978-1-119-49039-5
5.
McGlone J (2015) Inherent safety against cyber attack for process facilities. In: SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific oil & gas conference and exhibition, Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia, 20–22 Oct 2015
6.
Rausand M, Haugen S (2013) Risk assessment: theory, methods, and applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
7.
Vesely WE, Goldberg FF, Roberts NM, Haasl DF (1981) Fault tree handbook (NUREG–0492). Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC
8.
9.
Stamatis DH (1995) Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. American Society for Quality, Milwaukee
10.
11.
Vinnem JE, Aven T, Hundseid H, Vassmyr KA, Vollen F et al (2003) Risk assessments for offshore installations in the operational phase. In: European safety and reliability conference 2003, Maastricht, The Netherlands
12.
Vinnem JE, Hauge S, Seljelid J, Aven T (2003) Operational risk analysis—total analysis of physical and non–physical barriers. Preventor, Bryne, Norway, Preventor Report 200254–03, 16 Oct 2003
13.
Vinnem JE, Aven T, Hauge S, Seljelid J, Veire G (2004) Integrated barrier analysis in operational risk assessment in offshore petroleum operations. In: Proceedings of the international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management PSAM7 and European safety and reliability conference, Berlin, Germany, 14–18 June 2004
14.
Aven T, Sklet S, Vinnem JE (2006) Barrier and operational risk analysis of hydrocarbon releases (BORA–release). Part I, method description, J Hazard Mater A137:681–691CrossRef
15.
Thomassen O, Sørum M (2002) Mapping and monitoring the safety level. In: SPE international conference on health, safety and environment in oil and gas exploration and production, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. SPE paper 73923, 20–22 Mar 2002
16.
17.
PSA (2006) Trends in risk levels, main report 2017 (in Norwegian only). Petroleum Safety Authority, 26 Apr 2018
18.
Zhen X, Vinnem JE, Penga C, Huang Y (2018) Quantitative risk modelling of maintenance work on major offshore process equipment. Loss Prev Process Ind 56:430–443CrossRef
19.
Jensen FV (2001) Bayesian networks and decision graphs. Springer, LondonCrossRef
20.
Pearl J (2001) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufman, San MateoMATH
21.
Mosleh A, Dias A, Eghbali G, Fazen K (2004) An integrated framework for identification, classification and assessment of aviation systems hazards. In: Proceedings of the international conference on probabilistic safety assessment and management PSAM7 and European safety and reliability conference, Berlin, Germany, 14–18 June 2004
22.
Røed W, Mosleh A, Vinnem JE, Aven T (2009) On the use of hybrid causal logic method in offshore risk analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(2):445–455CrossRef
23.
Kongsvik T, Johnsen SÅ, Sklet S (2011) Safety climate and hydrocarbon leaks: an empirical contribution to the leading-lagging indicator discussion. J Loss Prev Process Ind 24:405–411CrossRef
24.
Vinnem JE, Veire G, Heide B, Aven T (2004) A method for developing and structuring risk activity indicators for major accidents, presented at PSAM7, Berlin, 14–18 June, 2004
25.
Sklet S, Ringstad AJ, Steen SA, Tronstad L, Haugen S, Seljelid J, Kongsvik T, Wærø I (2010) Monitoring of human and organizational factors influencing risk of major accidents. In: SPE international conference on health, safety and environment in oil and gas exploration and production, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 12–14 April 2010
26.
Øien K (2001) Risk indicators as a tool for risk control. Reliab Eng Syst Saf (RESS) 74(2):147–167CrossRef
27.
Vinnem JE et al (2012) Risk modelling of maintenance work on major process equipment on offshore petroleum installations. Loss Prev Process Ind 25(2):274–292CrossRef
28.
Gran BA et al (2012) Evaluation of the risk model of maintenance work on major process equipment on offshore petroleum installations. Loss Prev Process Ind 25(3):582–593CrossRef
29.
Vinnem JE (2013) On the development of failure models for hydrocarbon leaks during maintenance work in process plants on offshore petroleum installations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 113CrossRef
30.
Nielsen DS (1976) The cause consequence diagram as a basis for quantitative accident analysis. RISØ National Laboratory, Denmark. Report No.: M–1374
31.
SCI (1998) Blast and fire engineering for topside systems, phase 2. Ascot. SCI. Report No.: 253
32.
Standard Norge (2010) Z-013 risk and emergency preparedness assessment (Rev. 3, Oct. 2010)
33.
34.
Bäckström O (2003) Pilot project fault tree analysis for Statfjord A (in Swedish only). Stockholm; Lloyds Register Consulting. Report No.: 99161–R–005, May 2003
35.
IEC (2010) Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems. Part 1: general requirements. IEC 61508:2010
36.
Norwegian Oil and Gas (2018) 070 guidelines for the application of IEC 61508 and IEC 61511 in the petroleum activities on the continental shelf (Recommended SIL requirements), 26 June 2018
37.
IEC (2016) Functional safety—safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector. Part 1: framework, definitions, system, hardware and software requirements, IEC61511-1
38.
Morris MI, Miles A, Cooper JPS (1994) Quantification of escalation effects in offshore quantitative risk assessment. J Loss Prev Process Ind 7(4):337–344CrossRef
39.
Jones JC, Irvine P (1997) PLATO software for offshore risk assessment: a critique of the combustion features incorporated. J Loss Prev Process Ind 10(4):259–264CrossRef
40.
Skogdalen JE, Vinnem JE (2012) Combining precursor incidents investigations and QRA in oil and gas industry. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 101:48–58CrossRef
41.
Skogdalen JE, Vinnem JE (2011) Quantitative risk analysis offshore-human and organizational factors. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96:468–479CrossRef
42.
43.
DNV GL (1996). JIP ignition modelling, time dependent ignition probability model, DNV report 96–3629, Rev. 04
44.
Lloyds Register Consulting (2006) Ignition modelling in risk analysis. Lloyds Register Consulting, Kjeller, Norway. Report No.: 27.390.033/R1
45.
PSA (2012). Trends in risk level on the Norwegian continental shelf, main report (in Norwegian only, English summery report). Petroleum Safety Authority, Stavanger, 25 Apr 2012
46.
Lloyd’s Register Consulting (2018) Modelling of ignition sources on offshore oil and gas facilities—MISOF(2). Kjeller, Norway. Report No.: 107566/R2
47.
Cox AW, Lees FP, Ang ML (1991) Classification of hazardous locations. Institution of Chemical Engineers, UK
48.
Vinnem JE, Hauge S (1999) Operational safety of FPSOs, MP3; riser failure due to inadequate response to rapid wind change. NTNU, Trondheim
49.
Vinnem JE, Pedersen JI, Rosenthal P (1996) Efficient risk management: use of computerized QRA model for safety improvements to an existing installation. In: Presented at SPE 3rd international conference on health, safety and environment, New Orleans, June 1996
50.
IOGP (2010). Vulnerability of plant/structure, iogp risk assessment data directory. Report No. 434–15, IOGP, Mar 2010
51.
Mendonos S (2003) Improvement of rule sets for quantitative risk assessment in various industrial sectors, safety and reliability. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2003, vol 2. Balkema Publishers
52.
Gowan RG (1978) Developments in fire protection of offshore platforms. Applied Science Publisher Ltd., London
53.
API (1976). Recommended practice for the design and installation of pressure–relieving systems in refineries. Part 1—Design, API recommended practice 520. American Petroleum Institute, Washington
54.
American Iron and Steel Institute (1979). Fire-safe structural steel. A Design Guide, Washington
55.
56.
Henderson Y, Haggard HW (1943) Noxious gases, 2nd edn. Reinhold Publishing Co., New York
57.
Sax NI (1984) Dangerous properties of industrial materials, 6th edn. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York
58.
59.
Statoil (2016) Statoil’s global risk management including IT security, lecture by Monica Solem at NTNU Marin Technology Dept, October 2016
60.
Jacobs T (2016) Industrial-sized cyber attacks threaten the upstream sector. J Petrol Technol
61.
62.
Kott A, Wang C, Erbacher RF (2014) Cyber defense and situational awareness. Springer
63.
Connors E, Jones RET, Endsley MR (2010) A comprehensive study of requirements and metrics for cyber defense situation awareness. SA Technologies Inc, Marietta, GA
64.
API (1997) Guide for pressure relieving and depressuring systems, RP 521. American Petroleum Institute, Washington DC
Metadaten
Titel
Analysis Techniques
verfasst von
Jan-Erik Vinnem
Willy Røed
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Verlag
Springer London
Buch
Offshore Risk Assessment Vol. 2

Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-7447-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4471-7448-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7448-6_15

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise