nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Extensions

verfasst von : Alessio Ishizaka

Erschienen in: New Perspectives in Multiple Criteria Decision Making

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a popular and long used multi-criteria decision analysis method. Despite this fact, there are still space for new research in all its methodological steps. These include problem structuring, pairwise comparisons, priorities derivation, consistency and reduction techniques of pairwise comparisons. Moreover, future research agenda can also be found in the extensions of AHP: Analytic Network Process (for dealing with interactions) and AHPSort (for sorting problems). Finally, we discuss visualisation techniques for the Analytic Hierarchy Process.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel New Trends in Preference, Utility, and Choice: From a Mono-approach to a Multi-approach

Nächstes Kapitel Beyond Multicriteria Ranking Problems: The Case of PROMETHEE

Barzilai, J. (1998). On the decomposition of value functions. Operations Research Letters, 22(4), 159–170.CrossRef

Benítez, J., Izquierdo, J., Pérez-García, R., & Ramos-Martínez, E. (2014). A simple formula to find the closest consistent matrix to a reciprocal matrix. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(15–16), 3968–3974.CrossRef

Bozóki, S., Fülöp, J., & Rónyai, L. (2010). On optimal completion of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52(1), 318–333.CrossRef

Brunelli, M., & Fedrizzi, M. (2014). Axiomatic properties of inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(1), 1–15.CrossRef

Budescu, D., Zwick, R., & Rapoport, A. (1986). A comparison of the eigenvalue method and the geometric mean procedure for ratio scaling. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10(1), 69–78.CrossRef

Carmone, F., Kara, A., & Zanakis, S. (1997). A Monte Carlo investigation of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 102(3), 538–553.CrossRef

Cho, E., & Wedley, W. (2004). A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices. Computers & Operations Research, 31(6), 893–908.CrossRef

Collins, A., Ishizaka, A., & Snowball, J. (2017). Film production incentives, employment transformation and domestic expenditure in South Africa: Visualizing subsidy effectiveness. International Journal of Cultural Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2016.1255206.

Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Ishizaka, A. (2016). Combining analytical hierarchy process and Choquet integral within non-additive robust ordinal regression. Omega (61), 2–18.

Crawford, G., & Williams, C. (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29(4), 387–405.CrossRef

Csató, L., & Rónyai, L. (2016). Incomplete pairwise comparison matrices and weighting methods. Fundamenta Informaticae, 309–320(3–4).

Dodd, F., & Donegan, H. (1995). Comparison of priotization techniques using interhierarchy mappings. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46(4), 492–498.CrossRef

Dung, T., Luan, N., & Quoc, L. (2016). The analytic approach in green supplier selection: a literature review. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(11), 6754–6762.

Fedrizzi, M., & Giove, S. (2007). Incomplete pairwise comparison and consistency optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 183(1), 303–313.CrossRef

Forman, E., & Gass, S. (2001). The analytic hierarchy process—An exposition. Operations Research, 49(4), 469–486.CrossRef

Golany, B., & Kress, M. (1993). A multicriteria evaluation of the methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices. European Journal of Operational Research, 69(2), 210–220.CrossRef

Golden, B., Wasil, E., & Harker, P. (1989). The analytic hierarchy process: Applications and studies. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef

Gomez-Ruiz, J., Karanik, M., & Peláez, J. (2010). Estimation of missing judgments in AHP pairwise matrices using a neural network-based model. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 216(10), 2959–2975.CrossRef

Grošelj, P., Zadnik Stirn, L., Ayrilmis, N., & Kuzman, M. (2015). Comparison of some aggregation techniques using group analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(4), 2198–2204.CrossRef

Harker, P. (1987). Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modelling, 9(11), 837–848.CrossRef

Harker, P., & Vargas, L. (1987). The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 33(11), 1383–1403.CrossRef

Herman, M., & Koczkodaj, W. (1996). A Monte Carlo study of pairwise comparison. Information Processing Letters, 57(11), 25–29.CrossRef

Ho, W. (2008). Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications—A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), 211–228.CrossRef

Ihrig, S., Ishizaka, A., & Mohnen, A. (2017). Target setting for indirect processes: A new hybrid method for the continuous improvement management of indirect processes. Production Planning & Control, 28(3), 220–231.CrossRef

Ishizaka, A. (2012). A multicriteria approach with AHP and clusters for the selection among a large number of suppliers. Pesquisa Operacional, 32(1), 1–15.CrossRef

Ishizaka, A., Balkenborg, D., & Kaplan, T. (2010). Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(4), 700–710.CrossRef

Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2009). Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: Benefits and limitations. OR Insight, 22(4), 201–220.CrossRef

Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011a). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336–14345.

Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011b). Selection of new production facilities with the group analytic hierarchy process ordering method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7317–7325.CrossRef

Ishizaka, A., & López, C. (2018). Cost-benefit AHPSort for performance analysis of offshore providers. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.00202018.01509393.

Ishizaka, A., & Lusti, M. (2006). How to derive priorities in AHP: A comparative study. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 14(4), 387–400.CrossRef

Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-criteria decision analysis. Chichester (United Kingdom): Wiley.

Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., & Pearman, C. (2012). AHPSort: An AHP based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4767–4784.CrossRef

Ishizaka, A., Siraj, S., & Nemery, P. (2016). Which energy mix for the UK? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA-AHP visualisation tool. Energy, 95, 602–611.CrossRef

Jandova, V., Krejci, J., Stoklasa, J., & Fedrizzi, M. (2017). Computing interval weights for incomplete pairwise-comparison matrices of large dimension—A weak consistency based approach. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, PP(99), 1–1.

Jones, D., & Mardle, S. (2004). A distance-metric methodology for the derivation of weights from a pairwise comparison matrix. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(8), 869–875.CrossRef

Kainulainen, T., Leskinen, P., Korhonen, P., Haara, A., & Hujala, T. (2009). A statistical approach to assessing interval scale preferences in discrete choice problems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(2), 252–258.CrossRef

Krejčí, J., & Ishizaka, A. (2018). FAHPSort: A fuzzy extension of the AHPSort method. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 17(04), 1119–1145.CrossRef

Kumar, S., & Vaidya, O. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.CrossRef

Kun, C., Gang, K., Tarn, M., & Yan, S. (2015). Bridging the gap between missing and inconsistent values in eliciting preference from pairwise comparison matrices. Annals of Operations Research, 235(1), 155–175.CrossRef

Liberatore, M., & Nydick, R. (2008). The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 194–207.CrossRef

Lootsma, F. (1989). Conflict resolution via pairwise comparison of concessions. European Journal of Operational Research, 40(1), 109–116.CrossRef

López, C., & Ishizaka, A. (2017). GAHPSort: A new group multi-criteria decision method for sorting a large number of the cloud-based ERP solutions. Computers in Industry, 92–93, 12–24.CrossRef

Ma, D., & Zheng, X. (1991). 9/9–9/1 scale method of AHP. In Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on the AHP (Vol. 1, pp. 197–202). Pittsburgh.

Mareschal, B., & Brans, J.-P. (1988). Geometrical representations for MCDA. European Journal of Operational Research, 34(1), 69–77.CrossRef

Marttunen, M., Lienert, J., & Belton, V. (2017). Structuring problems for multi-criteria decision analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations. European Journal of Operational Research, 263(1), 1–17.CrossRef

Meesariganda, B., & Ishizaka, A. (2017). Mapping verbal AHP scale to numerical scale for cloud computing strategy selection. Applied Soft Computing, 53, 111–118.CrossRef

Mikhailov, L., & Singh, M. G. (1999). Comparison analysis of methods for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Tokyo.

Nemery, P., Ishizaka, A., Camargo, M., & Morel, L. (2012). Enriching descriptive information in ranking and sorting problems with visualizations techniques. Journal of Modelling in Management, 7(2), 130–147.CrossRef

Omkarprasad, V., & Sushil, K. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.CrossRef

Pöyhönen, M., Hamalainen, R., & Salo, A. (1997). An experiment on the numerical modelling of verbal ratio statements. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6(1), 1–10.CrossRef

Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57.CrossRef

Saaty, T. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281.CrossRef

Saaty, T. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

Saaty, T. (2001). The analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.CrossRef

Saaty, T., & Forman, E. (1992). The hierarchon: A dictionary of hierarchies. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

Saaty, T., & Takizawa, M. (1986). Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 26(2), 229–237.CrossRef

Salo, A., & Hamalainen, R. (1997). On the measurement of preference in the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6(6), 309–319.CrossRef

Shim, J. (1989). Bibliography research on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 23(3), 161–167.CrossRef

Sipahi, S., & Timor, M. (2010). The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: An overview of applications. Management Decision, 48(5), 775–808.CrossRef

Stillwell, W., von Winterfeldt, D., & John, R. (1987). Comparing hierarchical and non-hierarchical weighting methods for eliciting multiattribute value models. Management Science, 33(4), 442–450.CrossRef

Vargas, L. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 2–8.CrossRef

Weber, M., Eisenführ, F., & von Winterfeldt, D. (1988). The effects of spitting attributes on weights in multiattribute utility measurement. Management Science, 34(4), 431–445.CrossRef

Zahedi, F. (1986). The analytic hierarchy process: A survey of the method and its applications. Interface, 16(4), 96–108.CrossRef

Titel: Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Extensions
verfasst von: Alessio Ishizaka
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: New Perspectives in Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11481-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-11482-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11482-4_2