Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Anti-trust Proceedings and Fines

verfasst von : Walter Frenz

Erschienen in: Handbook of EU Competition Law

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The law of European anti-trust proceedings comprises all procedural rules relevant to the application of European competition law. These include not only procedural rules related to proceedings before the Commission but also rules related to proceedings in which the national competition authorities apply Art. 101, 102 TFEU. In addition, legal protection against decisions from the Commission and national competition authorities when applying European competition law and procedural rules related to the Commission’s handling of complaints submitted to it are of significance. The influence of the fundamental rights has become much stronger in the recent years. This concerns above all the exorbitant high fines.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
For details regarding prior history see Krumstroh (2004).
 
2
Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty, OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1.
 
3
Council Regulation No. 17: First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty of 6 February 1962, OJ No. 13, p. 204, last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No. 1216/1999, OJ 1999 L 148, p. 5.
 
4
The question of the suitable legal basis for this regulation will not be addressed here; for further discussion, see above paras 1168 et seq. Because no action for annulment was lodged against the regulation, we may consider anew the question if a court should indeed force us to do so by means of a submission under Art. 267 TFEU, Schmidt (2003), 1238.
 
5
See above para 294.
 
6
See above paras 1157 et seq. Cf. Koenigs (2003), 755 et seq.
 
7
See Schmidt (2003), 1238 et seq.; Weitbrecht (2003a), 69 et seq.
 
8
Weitbrecht (2003a), 70; expressing some concern based on primary law, Pace (2004), 301 et seq.
 
9
Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty, OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1.
 
10
Council Regulation (EC) No. 411/2004 of 26 February 2004 repealing Regulation (EEC) No. 3975/87 and amending Regulations (EEC) No. 3976/87 and (EC) No. 1/2003, in connection with air transport between the Community and third countries, OJ 2004 L 68, p. 1.
 
11
Council Regulation (EC) No. 1419/2006 of 25 September 2006 repealing Regulation (EEC) No. 4056/86 laying down detailed rules for the application of Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty to maritime transport, and amending Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 as regards the extension of its scope to include cabotage and international tramp services, OJ 2006 L 269, p. 1.
 
12
See also, Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4056/86 of 22 December 1986 laying down detailed rules for the application of Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty to maritime transport, OJ L 378, p. 4.
 
13
See Council Regulation (EC) No. 411/2004, OJ 2004 L 68 p. 1, Recital 3; Bechtold et al. (2009), Einführung para 19 which addresses the expansion in scope to cover maritime transportation services.
 
14
COM (2000), 582 final version, OJ 2000 C 365 E, p. 284.
 
15
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (para 83)—Toshiba.
 
16
ECJ, Case 14/68, ECLI:EU:C:1969:4 (para 3)—Walt Wilhelm; see above paras 306 et seq.
 
17
Later, e.g. ECJ, Case C-550/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:512 (para 103)—Akzo Nobel; Cases C-295–298/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:461 (para 38)—Manfredi as well as Case 14/68, ECLI:EU:C:1969:4 (para 3)—Walt Wilhelm.
 
18
ECJ, Case C-505/07, ECLI:EU:C:2009:591 (para 52)—Compañía Española de Comercialización de Aceite.
 
19
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (para 85)—Toshiba.
 
20
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (para 86)—Toshiba.
 
21
Comprehensive treatment of the entire topic, above paras 329 et seq.
 
22
Viewing this as an infringement of the necessity principle under Art. 5 (4) TEU, Pace (2004), 303 et seq. Nevertheless, Art. 3 (2) Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 is a part of the overall system and ensures the actual primacy of the EU rules on competition.
 
23
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 3 paras 12 et seq.
 
24
For additional discussion, see above paras 1066 et seq., 2338 et seq.
 
25
See above paras 340 et seq.
 
26
Recital 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
27
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 3 para 22 et seq.
 
28
For additional discussion, see below paras 3109 et seq.
 
29
ECJ, Case C-375/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:270 (paras 28 et seq.)—Tele2 Polska; see below para 2855.
 
30
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 3 para 18.
 
31
See, e.g. Möschel (2003), 571.
 
32
ECJ, Cases 212–217/80, ECLI:EU:C:1981:270 (para 9)—Meridionale Industria Salumi; Cases C-121 and 122/91, ECLI:EU:C:1993:285 (para 22)—CT Control and JCT Benelux; Case C-201/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:136 (para 31)—Molenbergnatie; Case C-450/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:91 (para 27)—Varec.
 
33
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (para 47)—Toshiba.
 
34
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (para 50)—Toshiba.
 
35
In particular, in light of ECJ, Cases 97–99/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:380—Dow Chemical Ibérica; Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (paras 56 et seq.)—Toshiba.
 
36
Frenz and Lülsdorf (2013), 170.
 
37
See ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (para 61)—Toshiba also citing generally applicable Art. 45 (2) Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
38
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (para 62)—Toshiba.
 
39
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (paras 63 et seq.)—Toshiba.
 
40
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (paras 63 et seq.)—Toshiba.
 
41
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (para 91)—Toshiba.
 
42
See fundamentally ECJ, Case 14/68, ECLI:EU:C:1969:4 (para 3)—Walt Wilhelm; Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (paras 81, 83 et seq.)—Toshiba with additional citations.
 
43
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (paras 70 et seq.)—Toshiba.
 
44
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (paras 77, 79)—Toshiba.
 
45
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (paras 80, 91)—Toshiba.
 
46
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (paras 83 et seq.)—Toshiba.
 
47
With an all-the-more conclusion, ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (para 91)—Toshiba.
 
48
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (paras 88 et seq.)—Toshiba.
 
49
ECJ, Case C-17/10, ECLI:EU:C:2012:72 (paras 97 et seq.)—Toshiba.
 
50
ECJ, Case 14/68, ECLI:EU:C:1969:4 (para 9)—Walt Wilhelm.
 
51
For further discussion, see above paras 306 et seq.
 
52
ECJ, Cases 253/78 and 1–3/79, ECLI:EU:C:1980:188 (para 16)—Giry and Guerlain. For additional discussion, see above paras 308 et seq.
 
53
Dougan (2003), 770; Craig (2004), 328.
 
54
Calliess, In: Calliess and Ruffert (2011), Art. 3 AEUV para 9; Frenz (2011), paras 2217 et seq. with additional discussion.
 
55
For further discussion, see Frenz (2010), paras 1740 et seq.
 
56
Cf. Ladenburger (2008), p. 121.
 
57
See Schmidt-Aßmann (1999), p. 18.
 
58
See, e.g. von Danwitz (2008), p. 316; Schmidt-Aßmann (1999), p. 18. In detail with additional citations Frenz (2010), paras 1740 et seq.
 
59
von Danwitz (2008), p. 316; Oppermann et al. (2014), § 11 para 3.
 
60
Frenz (2010), paras 1892 et seq.
 
61
In general, see Schmidt-Aßmann (2005), p. 6; Groß (2004), 20 et seq.; Pache (2007), 111.
 
62
In general, see Schmidt-Aßmann (2005), p. 7; Groß (2007), 155; Frenz (2010), paras 1897 et seq. likewise with regard to the legal basis.
 
63
Groß (2007), 155 with additional citations.
 
64
Ludwig (2004), 227.
 
65
Cf. below at paras 2476 et seq. regarding the allocation of cases.
 
66
Art. 35 (1) sent. 2 Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
67
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 8 paras 6 et seq. with additional citations; cf. also Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (para 2). For additional discussion, see paras 3101 et seq.
 
68
For additional discussion, see above paras 270 et seq.
 
69
Recitals 15 et seq. of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
70
With regard to the consequences, in particular in relation to the Bundeskartellamt (German Federal Cartel Office), Böge (2003), 441 et seq.
 
71
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43.
 
72
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 6.
 
73
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 6.
 
74
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 23.
 
75
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 7.
 
76
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 25.
 
77
Murach, In: Jaeger et al. (2013), Art 11 VO 1/2003 para 24.
 
78
Hossenfelder, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 11 VerfVO para 19.
 
79
Murach, In: Jaeger et al. (2013), Art 11 VO 1/2003 para 25.
 
80
See General Court, Case T-39/90 R, ECLI:EU:T:1990:70 (para 28)—SEP.
 
81
ECJ, Case C-36/92 P, ECLI:EU:C:1994:205 (para 35)—SEP.
 
82
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 16.
 
83
See below paras 2476 et seq.
 
84
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 7.
 
85
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 6.
 
86
This is made on the basis of the corresponding voluntary commitment provided in the Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (para 39) as well as the corresponding Annex, Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 42 in conjunction with fn. 70 et seq.
 
87
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 29.
 
88
See above para 2405.
 
89
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 30.
 
90
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 8.
 
91
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 paras 31, 33.
 
92
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 30.
 
93
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 31.
 
94
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 13; openly contrary, Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 38.
 
95
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 11.
 
96
Further discussion in relation to Germany, Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 10.
 
97
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 18.
 
98
Further discussion in Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 51.
 
99
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 52.
 
100
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 11.
 
101
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 53.
 
102
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (paras 18, 43 et seq.).
 
103
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 16.
 
104
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 9 para 8.
 
105
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (paras 16 et seq.); cf. below paras 2476 et seq.
 
106
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 11.
 
107
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (paras 43 et seq.).
 
108
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 17 citing Commission Decision of 14 April 2010, COMP/39351—Swedish Interconnection.
 
109
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 22.
 
110
ECJ, Case C-238 inter alia/99 P, ECLI:EU:C:2002:582 (paras 59 et seq.)—Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij.
 
111
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 18.
 
112
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (para 52).
 
113
Using this as a basis, Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 17 citing ECJ, Case 60/81, ECLI:EU:C:1981:264 (para 21)—IBM.
 
114
See Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 17.
 
115
Still referring to Art. 11 (6) Regulation No. 1/2003, Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 11, however different treatment in Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 16.
 
116
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 19.
 
117
Cf. para 2477.
 
118
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (para 55).
 
119
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 18.
 
120
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 20.
 
121
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 20.
 
122
For further discussion, see Frenz (2009), paras 3012 et seq.
 
123
See—however not referring to primacy of European Union law—Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 16 VO 1/2003 para 9.
 
124
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (para 54).
 
125
Also finding there to be a contradiction on this point, Leopold (2004), 541.
 
126
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 123.
 
127
See fundamentally ECJ, Case 283/81, ECLI:EU:C:1982:335 (para 14, 16)—C.I.L.F.I.T.
 
128
In favourable of such a transfer, Leopold (2004), 542.
 
129
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 124.
 
130
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 127.
 
131
See, e.g. Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 128.
 
132
Leopold (2004), 542 et seq.
 
133
Cf. ECJ, Case 60/81, ECLI:EU:C:1981:264 (paras 21 et seq.)—IBM regarding the legal acts associated with the initiation of proceedings and communication of the primary points of objection.
 
134
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 9 para 11; further discussion Leopold (2004), 545 et seq.; Schwarze (2006), p. 491.
 
135
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 17 end.
 
136
See above paras 356, 369 et seq.
 
137
See below para 2465.
 
138
Cf. Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (para 27).
 
139
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 3.
 
140
ECJ, Case C-67/91, ECLI:EU:C:1992:330 (paras 33 et seq.)—Spanish banking association.
 
141
“However schizophrenia was not required”, posits Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 1.
 
142
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 4.
 
143
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 9 para 15 and very critical in relation to the resulting limited protection for trade or business secrets § 5 paras 28 et seq.
 
144
Hossenfelder, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 12 VerfVO para 14.
 
145
ECJ, Case C-280/93, ECLI:EU:C:1994:367 (para 75)—Bananas; Frenz (2009), paras 2534, 2671.
 
146
Frenz (2009), para 4996.
 
147
See, e.g. Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 5.
 
148
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 5 end.
 
149
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 99; Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 7 with a specific example.
 
150
Bardong, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 100.
 
151
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 9 paras 16 et seq.
 
152
Following ECJ, Case C-617/10, ECLI:EU:C:2013:105—Åkerberg Fransson Jungheim (2013), 305 et seq. with additional citations.
 
153
See above paras 1753 et seq. Regarding current cases, below paras 2710 et seq.
 
154
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (paras 40 et seq.). Further discussion of the entire topic, Blake and Schnichels (2004), 552 et seq. as well as below paras 2483 et seq.
 
155
ECJ, Case C-536/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:366—Donau Chemie; further discussion below paras 2719 et seq.
 
156
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (paras 20 et seq.).
 
157
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 13 VO 1/2003 para 1; see also Lampert et al. (2004), Art. 13 para 254.
 
158
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 2.
 
159
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 13 VO 1/2003 para 3.
 
160
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 3.
 
161
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (paras 24 et seq.).
 
162
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (paras 22 et seq.).
 
163
See above paras 2451 et seq.
 
164
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 2.
 
165
De Bronett (2012), Art. 14 para 3.
 
166
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 14 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 4.
 
167
De Bronett (2012), Art. 14 para 3.
 
168
See, e.g. De Bronett (2012), Art. 14 para 3.
 
169
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 14 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 4.
 
170
Regarding limits in the context of practical realisation, see Dalheimer et al. (2005), Art. 14 para 7.
 
171
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 14 VO 1/2003 para 3.
 
172
De Bronett (2012), Art. 14 para 12; see also Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 11 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 12.
 
173
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 9 para 24; cf. Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (para 62).
 
174
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (para 61).
 
175
Cf. above paras 356, 369 et seq.
 
176
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (paras 63 et seq.).
 
177
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 2.
 
178
Jungheim (2013), 306.
 
179
Jungheim (2013), 307.
 
180
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 4 para 33.
 
181
Bischke, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 22 VO 1/2003 para 3.
 
182
Lampert et al. (2004), Art. 22 para 421.
 
183
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 22 VO 1/2003 para 24 with additional citations.
 
184
Dalheimer et al. (2005), Art. 22 para 5; Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 22 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 4.
 
185
Klees (2005), § 9 para 137.
 
186
Jungheim (2013), 307.
 
187
The national competition authorities also enforce EU competition law.
 
188
Bischke, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 22 VO 1/2003 para 3.
 
189
Austrian Supreme Court of Justice (OGH), Docket no. 160 k7/09; Jungheim (2013), 306 et seq.
 
190
Klees (2005), § 9 para 140.
 
191
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (paras 5 et seq.).
 
192
See above para 2405.
 
193
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (para 19).
 
194
Jungheim (2013), 307.
 
195
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (para 8).
 
196
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (paras 14 et seq.).
 
197
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (para 34); critical of this point, Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 9 para 42.
 
198
Jungheim (2013), 308.
 
199
Jungheim (2013), 310.
 
200
The Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 provides additional considerations in this regard, cf. also Blake and Schnichels (2004), 554 et seq.
 
201
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (paras 39 et seq.); critical of this point, Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 9 paras 48 et seq.
 
202
Blake and Schnichels (2004), 553.
 
203
Notice on the cooperation between the Commission and the courts of the EU Member States in the application of Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 54 (para 26).
 
204
For additional discussion, see Frenz (2013a), 778.
 
205
Other view, Blake and Schnichels (2004), 554, who presume, without explanation and contrary to the text of Art. 11 (6) Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, that competence to apply domestic competition law is also withdrawn from national authorities.
 
206
Commission Regulation (EC) No. 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ L 123, p. 18.
 
207
Art. 2 Commission Regulation (EC) No. 773/2004; see below para 2503, however also 2510 et seq.
 
208
For a detailed treatment, Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel questions concerning Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty that arise in individual cases (guidance letters), OJ 2004 C 101, p. 78 (para 14).
 
209
Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel questions concerning Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty that arise in individual cases (guidance letters), OJ 2004 C 101, p. 78 (paras 7 et seq.). For additional discussion, see paras 2858 et seq.
 
210
Regarding the standard process for a complaint procedure, see below paras 3182 et seq.
 
211
De Bronett (2012), Art. 7 para 16.
 
212
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 3.
 
213
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 6; other view with regard to the expense of lodging suit before a national court, Klees (2005), § 6 para 33.
 
214
Describing this alternative, Klees (2005), § 6 para 33 fn. 94.
 
215
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (paras 4, 32): general information, Klees (2005), § 6 para 33.
 
216
Klees (2005), § 6 para 31.
 
217
Contra, General Court, Case T-213/01 R, ECLI:EU:T:2001:292—Österreichische Postsparkasse; Case T-214/01 R, ECLI:EU:T:2001:293—Bank für Arbeit und Wirtschaft in response to an after-the-fact complaint from the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ).
 
218
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 4.
 
219
See, e.g. De Bronett (2012), Art. 7 para 18.
 
220
See Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 31); critical of this aspect, Klees (2005), § 6 para 35.
 
221
Klees (2005), § 6 para 32.
 
222
General Court, Cases T-133 and 204/95, ECLI:EU:T:1998:215 (para 79)—IECC; Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 40).
 
223
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 36).
 
224
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 36).
 
225
De Bronett (2012), Art. 7 para 19.
 
226
See previously, Commission Decision 74/433/EEC, OJ 1974 L 237, p. 16—FRUBO.
 
227
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 36); Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 7 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 12.
 
228
General Court, Case T-114/92, ECLI:EU:T:1995:11 (para 28)—BEMIM.
 
229
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (paras 35 et seq.)—citing General Court, Case T-114/92, ECLI:EU:T:1995:11 (para 28)—BEMIM; Cases T-133 and 204/95, ECLI:EU:T:1998:215 (paras 79 et seq.)—IECC.
 
230
General Court, Case T-213 and 214/01, ECLI:EU:T:2006:151 (paras 113 et seq.)—Österreichische Postsparkasse und Bank für Arbeit und Wirtschaft; Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 37).
 
231
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (paras 38 et seq.).
 
232
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 7 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 13.
 
233
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 40).
 
234
ECJ, Case 125/78, ECLI:EU:C:1979:237—GEMA.
 
235
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 7 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 13 as well as Art. 8 VO Nr. 1/2003 paras 3 et seq.; see also ECJ, Case 792/79 R, ECLI:EU:C:1980:18—Camera Care.
 
236
See immediately following para 2503.
 
237
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 61).
 
238
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 7 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 23.
 
239
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 75).
 
240
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 79).
 
241
ECJ, Case C-282/95 P, ECLI:EU:C:1997:159 (para 38)—Guérin automobiles.
 
242
ECJ, Cases 142 and 156/84, ECLI:EU:C:1987:490—BAT and Reynolds; General Court, Case T-64/89, ECLI:EU:T:1990:42 (para 57)—Automec I.
 
243
ECJ, Case C-282/95 P, ECLI:EU:C:1997:159 (para 36)—Guérin automobiles; from the literature Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 7 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 24.
 
244
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 7 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 25.
 
245
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 41).
 
246
ECJ, Case C-119/97 P, ECLI:EU:C:1999:116 (para 87)—Ufex; Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 42).
 
247
General Court, Case T-115/99, ECLI:EU:T:2001:54 (para 34)—SEP.
 
248
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 7 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 25.
 
249
General Court, Case T-24/90, ECLI:EU:T:1992:97 (para 76)—Automec.
 
250
See ECJ, Case C-119/97 P, ECLI:EU:C:1999:116 (para 93)—Ufex.
 
251
See Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 44).
 
252
See additional citations Klees (2005), § 6 para 40.
 
253
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 44).
 
254
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 44).
 
255
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (paras 44 et seq.) citing applicable case law of the ECJ.
 
256
General Court, Case T-319/99, ECLI:EU:T:2003:50 (para 43)—FENIN; Case T-575/93, ECLI:EU:T:1996:1 (para 40)—Koelman.
 
257
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 47).
 
258
General Court, Case T-24/90, ECLI:EU:T:1992:97 (para 88)—Automec; Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (paras 27 et seq.); Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 7 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 25.
 
259
General Court, Case T-427/08, ECLI:EU:T:2010:517 (para 27)—CEAHR; Case T-62/99, ECLI:EU:T:2001:53 (para 36)—Sodima; Case T-5/93, ECLI:EU:T:1995:12 (paras 59 et seq.)—Tremblay.
 
260
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 44 2nd indent) do not comprise hardcore restrictions.
 
261
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 44 2nd indent) do not comprise hardcore restrictions.
 
262
See above para 2505.
 
263
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 44 3rd indent) do not comprise hardcore restrictions.
 
264
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 45).
 
265
Frenz (2014), 367, regarding the preceding as well.
 
266
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 17–22 VO 1/2003 para 13.
 
267
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 17–22 VO 1/2003 para 2.
 
268
General Court, Case T-9/99, ECLI:EU:T:2002:70 (para 367)—HFB.
 
269
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 17–22 VO 1/2003 para 2.
 
270
See ECJ, Case 374/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:387 (para 14)—Orkem.
 
271
ECJ, Case 374/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:387 (para 14)—Orkem.
 
272
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 17–22 VO 1/2003 para 21.
 
273
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 47) with further citations
 
274
See above para 1183.
 
275
Recital 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
276
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 4 para 4.
 
277
General Court, Case T-34/93, ECLI:EU:T:1995:46 (para 77)—Société Générale.
 
278
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 17–22 VO 1/2003 para 15.
 
279
Detailed discussion of the limits on investigative powers, Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Vor Art. 17–22 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 8.
 
280
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Vor Art. 17–22 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 8.
 
281
Art. 6 ECHR and Art. 47 CFR.
 
282
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Vor Art. 17–22 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 8.
 
283
ECJ, Case 374/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:387 (para 3)—Orkem.
 
284
Art. 27 (1) Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
285
Art. 27 (2) Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
286
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Vor Art. 17–22 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 8, which derives this right from the common legal systems of the Member States; Dalheimer et al. (2005), Vor Art. 17 para 30.
 
287
Art. 28 (2) Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
288
Klees (2005), § 9 para 12; Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 17–22 VO 1/2003 para 14; Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 5.
 
289
Barthelmeß and Rudolf, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 17 VerfVO para 7 for the following as well.
 
290
Commission Decision of 13 May 2005, COMP/B-1/39.172 (para 4)—Electricity and COMP/B-1/39.173 (para 4)—Natural gas.
 
291
Commission Decision of 13 May 2005, COMP/B-1/39.172 (para 3 and 4)—Electricity and COMP/B-1/39.173 (para 3 and 4)—Natural gas.
 
292
Commission Decision of 13 May 2005, COMP/B-1/39.172 (para 3 and 4)—Electricity and COMP/B-1/39.173 (para 3 and 4)—Natural gas.
 
293
Press release IP/04/134, Investigation of the sale of sports rights to Internet and mobile communications providers “for the protection of access to sports rights and the avoidance of discrimination”.
 
294
Commission Decision of 15 January 2008, COMP/D2/39.514 (para 4)—Pharmaceuticals; Press release IP/08/49 of 16 January 2008, accessible at http://​europa.​eu/​rapid/​press-release_​IP-08-49_​de.​htm.
 
295
Commission Decision of 13/06/2005, COMP/D-1/39.190—Retail banking business.
 
296
Barthelmeß and Rudolf, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 17 VerfVO para 7.
 
297
Critical in this regard, Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 4 para 5.
 
298
Lorsque l’évolution des échanges entre États membres, la rigidité des prix ou dʼautres circonstances font présumer que la concurrence peut être restreinte ou faussée à l’intérieur du marché commun, la Commission peut mener son enquête sur un secteur particulier de l’économie ou un type particulier d’accords dans différents secteurs.
 
299
Where the trend of trade between Member States, the rigidity of prices or other circumstances suggest that competition may be restricted or distorted within the common market, the Commission may conduct its inquiry into a particular sector of the economy or into a particular type of agreements across various sectors.
 
300
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 3.
 
301
Barthelmeß and Rudolf, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 17 VerfVO paras 13 et seq.; contrary view, see e.g. Bischke, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 7.
 
302
See ECJ, Case 85/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:379 (paras 17 et seq.)—Dow Benelux.
 
303
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 3; Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 19.
 
304
Commission’s Final Report on the Business Insurance Sector Inquiry pursuant to Article 17 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, COM (2007) 556 final.
 
305
Executive Summary of the Pharmaceutical Sector Inquiry Report, COM (2009), 351 final version; Commission Decision of 15 January 2008 initiating an inquiry into the pharmaceutical sector pursuant to Article 17 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, COMP/D2/39.514.
 
306
Commission’s Final Report on the Retail Banking Sector Inquiry pursuant to Article 17 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, COM (2007) 33 final.
 
307
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 3.
 
308
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 19.
 
309
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 4.
 
310
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 24.
 
311
Barthelmeß and Rudolf, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 17 VerfVO para 8.
 
312
Prevailing opinion, Barthelmeß and Rudolf, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009) Art. 17 VerfVO para 9; Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 26; Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 6; Klees (2005), § 9 para 10.
 
313
Barthelmeß and Rudolf, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 17 VerfVO para 9.
 
314
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 27.
 
315
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 27.
 
316
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 27.
 
317
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 17–22 VO 1/2003 para 21 with additional citations.
 
318
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 17–22 VO 1/2003 para 21.
 
319
Critical here as well, Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 7 end.
 
320
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Vor Art. 17–22 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 3.
 
321
Cf. paras 2667 et seq.
 
322
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 17–22 VO 1/2003 para 48.
 
323
Cf. Recital 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
324
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 9.
 
325
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 17–22 VO 1/2003 para 66.
 
326
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 17 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 7; see also De Bronett (2012), Art. 28 para 3.
 
327
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 46.
 
328
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 17 VO 1/2003 para 46 with additional citations.
 
329
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 28 VO 1/2003 para 5.
 
330
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 28 VO 1/2003 para 5.
 
331
Barthelmeß and Rudolf, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 17 VerfVO para 9.
 
332
Nettesheim, In: Grabitz et al. (2014), Art. 288 AEUV para 199.
 
333
Barthelmeß and Rudolf, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 17 VerfVO para 9; Klees (2005), § 9 para 11.
 
334
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 4 paras 8 et seq.
 
335
See also immediately following para 2555 end.
 
336
See below paras 2565 et seq.
 
337
Klees (2005), § 9 para 32.
 
338
See below paras 2565 et seq.
 
339
See above para 2554.
 
340
See above para 2555.
 
341
Recital 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
342
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 18 VO 1/2003 para 8.
 
343
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 18 VO 1/2003 para 8.
 
344
See above para 2524.
 
345
ECJ, Case 155/79, ECLI:EU:C:1982:157—AM & S; Case 374/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:387 (paras 15 et seq.)—Orkem.
 
346
ECJ, Case 155/79, ECLI:EU:C:1982:157—AM & S; Case 374/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:387 (paras 15 et seq.)—Orkem.
 
347
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 18 VO 1/2003 para 6, more clearly Bechtold et al. (2014) Art. 18 VO 1/2003 para 2.
 
348
General Court, Case T-112/98, ECLI:EU:T:2001:61 (paras 59 et seq.)—Mannesmannröhren-Werke; for additional discussion, see General Court, Case T-236 inter alia/01, ECLI:EU:T:2004:118 (paras 402 et seq.)—Tokai Carbon with numerous additional citations.
 
349
E.g. Thomas and Putzo (2013), § 284 para 3; Zöller (2014), Vor § 284 para 5.
 
350
Similar position in general, Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 5 paras 32 et seq.
 
351
ECJ, Case 374/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:387 (paras 32 et seq.)—Orkem; General Court, Case T-112/98, ECLI:EU:T:2001:61 (para 65)—Mannesmannröhren-Werke. See however, below paras 2565 et seq.
 
352
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 18 VO 1/2003 paras 55 et seq.
 
353
See below para 2567.
 
354
ECJ, Case 374/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:387 (paras 32 et seq.)—Orkem.
 
355
With additional citations AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 41)—Schenker.
 
356
ECHR of 25 February 1993, Series A No. 256-A, para 44—Funke/France.
 
357
ECHR of 8 February 1996, EuGRZ 1996, 587 (para 45)—John Murray/United Kingdom; of 17 December 1996, Rec. 1996-IV (para 68)—Saunders/United Kingdom.
 
358
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 18 VO 1/2003 para 12 end, no longer in Bechtold et al. (2014).
 
359
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 18 VO 1/2003 para 12 citing General Court, Case T-112/98, ECLI:EU:T:2001:61 (para 76)—Mannesmannröhren-Werke, no longer in Bechtold et al. (2014).
 
360
ECJ, Case C-204 inter alia/00 P, ECLI:EU:C:2004:6 (paras 207 et seq.)—Aalborg Portland.
 
361
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 5 para 31.
 
362
ECJ, Case 155/79, ECLI:EU:C:1982:157 (paras 18 et seq.)—AM & S Europe.
 
363
General Court, Case T-30/89, ECLI:EU:T:1991:70 (paras 8, 18)—Hilti.
 
364
ECJ, Case C-550/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:512 (paras 43 et seq.)—Akzo Nobel.
 
365
ECJ, Case C-550/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:512 (paras 57 et seq.)—Akzo Nobel.
 
366
Seitz (2004), 233, 235.
 
367
See above para 2569.
 
368
Previously cited by Bechtold (1992), 51 et seq.
 
369
In favour of such a privilege Seitz (2004), 234 et seq. Also emphasising the required degree of independence, General Court (President), Cases T-125 and 253/03 R, ECLI:EU:T:2003:287 (paras 126 et seq.)—Akzo Nobel.
 
370
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 64)—Schenker.
 
371
Klees (2005), § 9 para 36 with additional citations.
 
372
Cf. above at para 2554.
 
373
Recital 25 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
374
Recital 25 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
375
Klees (2005), § 9 para 41.
 
376
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 19 VO 1/2003 para 4.
 
377
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 19 VO 1/2003 para 4.
 
378
Klees (2005), § 9 para 38.
 
379
Klees (2005), § 9 para 39.
 
380
ECJ, Cases 46/87 and 227/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:337 (para 16)—Hoechst.
 
381
ECJ, Cases 46/87 and 227/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:337 (para 16)—Hoechst.
 
382
ECJ, Case C-550/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:512 (paras 57 et seq.)—Akzo Nobel.
 
383
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 9 et seq.
 
384
Recital 25 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
385
Comprehensive discussion of this topic, see below paras 2667 et seq.
 
386
ECJ, Case 155/79, ECLI:EU:C:1982:157 (para 16)—AM & S; Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 45)—Roquette Frères.
 
387
ECJ, Case C-550/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:512 (paras 40 et seq.)—Akzo Nobel.
 
388
See above para 2587 with regard to interviews.
 
389
ECJ, Case 374/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:387 (para 35)—Orkem.
 
390
ECJ, Case 374/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:387 (paras 39 et seq.)—Orkem.
 
391
ECJ, Case 374/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:387 (paras 34 et seq.)—Orkem citing Regulation No. 17: First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty, OJ 1962 No. 13, p. 204 (paras 1 et seq.); now Commission Regulation (EC) No. 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ L 123, p. 18, last amended by Commission Regulation 622/2008, OJ 2008 L 171, p. 3.
 
392
ECJ, Case 136/79, ECLI:EU:C:1980:169 (paras 26 et seq.)—National Panasonic.
 
393
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 7.
 
394
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 4, no longer in Bechtold et al. (2014).
 
395
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 7.
 
396
Recital 24 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
397
Nowak, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 20 VerfVO para 5.
 
398
For further discussion, see Frenz (2012b), para 18 et seq.
 
399
Nowak, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009) Art. 20 VerfVO para 6.
 
400
ECJ, Case 374/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:387 (para 35)—Orkem.
 
401
Regarding the expansion of Art. 7 CFR, or its parallel under Art. 8 ECHR, to business premises as well as their reduced degree of protection, ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 29)—Roquette Frères and for further discussion, see Frenz (2009), paras 1234 et seq., 1239 et seq.
 
402
Nowak, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 20 VerfVO para 10.
 
403
For a detailed discussion, see Frenz (2009), paras 4988 et seq.
 
404
ECJ, Case 222/84, ECLI:EU:C:1986:206 (para 18)—Johnston; General Court, Case T-279/02, ECLI:EU:T:2006:103 (para 421)—Degussa.
 
405
ECJ, Case 222/84, ECLI:EU:C:1986:206 (para 19)—Johnston.
 
406
ECJ, Case 222/84, ECLI:EU:C:1986:206 (para 19)—Johnston.
 
407
ECJ, Case 222/84, ECLI:EU:C:1986:206 (para 18)—Johnston; Case C-424/99, ECLI:EU:C:2001:642 (para 45)—Commission/Austria; Case C-50/00 P, ECLI:EU:C:2002:462 (para 39)—Unión de Pequeños Agricultores; General Court, Case T-279/02, ECLI:EU:T:2006:103 (para 421)—Degussa.
 
408
Frenz (2009), para 5005.
 
409
See below paras 2652 et seq. regarding necessity in national law.
 
410
Also with regard to prior General Court, Case T-289 inter alia/11, ECLI:EU:T:2013:404 (paras 108, 111)—Deutsche Bahn.
 
411
General Court, Case T-289 inter alia/11, ECLI:EU:T:2013:404 (para 112)—Deutsche Bahn.
 
412
General Court, Case T-289 inter alia/11, ECLI:EU:T:2013:404 (para 111)—Deutsche Bahn.
 
413
See below paras 2664 et seq.
 
414
ECJ, Cases 46/87 and 227/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:337 (para 15)—Hoechst; with additional citations Hossenfelder, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 20 VerfVO para 15.
 
415
Frenz (2009), paras 5033 et seq. with further citations.
 
416
ECJ, Cases 46/87 and 227/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:337 (para 14)—Hoechst, citing Case 322/81, ECLI:EU:C:1983:313 (para 7)—Michelin.
 
417
ECJ, Cases 46/87 and 227/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:337 (para 15)—Hoechst.
 
418
ECJ, Cases 46/87 and 227/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:337 (para 16)—Hoechst.
 
419
ECJ, Cases 46/87 and C-227/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:337 (para 16)—Hoechst, citing Case 155/79, ECLI:EU:C:1982:157—AM & S; Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 46)—Roquette Frères; Case 85/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:379 (para 27)—Dow Benelux.
 
420
De Bronett (2012), Art. 20 para 1.
 
421
ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 77)—Roquette Frères.
 
422
ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 77)—Roquette Frères; Case 136/79, ECLI:EU:C:1980:169 (paras 28 et seq.)—National Panasonic.
 
423
ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 77)—Roquette Frères; Case 374/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:387 (para 15)—Orkem; Case 136/79, ECLI:EU:C:1980:169 (paras 28 et seq.)—National Panasonic.
 
424
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 4 para 20.
 
425
See above para 2609.
 
426
Cf. above at para 2554 regarding requests for information.
 
427
Sanctions pursuant to Art. 23 (1) alt. c) and d) Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
428
See above para 2610.
 
429
ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (paras 34 et seq.)—Roquette Frères.
 
430
See General Court, Case T-56 inter alia/99, ECLI:EU:T:2003:333—Marlines.
 
431
See above paras 584 et seq.
 
432
Cf. below at para 2570.
 
433
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 12.
 
434
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 12.
 
435
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 12 end.
 
436
ECJ, Case 136/79, ECLI:EU:C:1980:169 (para 15)—National Panasonic.
 
437
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 4 para 14.
 
438
For example, Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 4 para 14; Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 72.
 
439
See above paras 2552 et seq.
 
440
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 71.
 
441
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 73.
 
442
For additional discussion, see above paras 2565 et seq.
 
443
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 74.
 
444
Art. 4 Commission Regulation (EC) No. 773/2004.
 
445
Subject to dispute, see above paras 2622 et seq.
 
446
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 4 para 15.
 
447
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404—Schenker further discussion and criticism Frenz (2013f), 272.
 
448
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 4 para 18.
 
449
ECJ (President), Case 46/87 R, ECLI:EU:C:1987:167 (para 34)—Hoechst.
 
450
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 4 para 21. For additional discussion, see paras 2642 et seq.
 
451
See below paras 3139 et seq.
 
452
See above para 2603.
 
453
ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (paras 34 and 37)—Roquette Frères.
 
454
Regarding the role of national courts in an inspection conducted by the Commission, cf. also Notice on cooperation between national courts and the Commission in applying Articles 81 and 82 of the EEC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 54 (paras 38 et seq.).
 
455
Mestmäcker and Schweitzer (2004), § 19 para 16.
 
456
For additional discussion, see paras 2652 et seq., likewise with regard to the following.
 
457
Critical in this regard, Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 4 para 24.
 
458
ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603—Roquette Frères.
 
459
Critical of the resulting deficit in the right to pursue effective legal remedy, Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 4 para 23 with additional citations.
 
460
ECJ (President), Case 46/87 R, ECLI:EU:C:1987:167 (para 34)—Hoechst; ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 49)—Roquette Frères.
 
461
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 81.
 
462
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 35 with additional citations.
 
463
See ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (paras 30 et seq.)—Roquette Frères.
 
464
Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 35.
 
465
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 20 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 36.
 
466
ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 34)—Roquette Frères; ECJ (President), Case 46/87 R, ECLI:EU:C:1987:167 (paras 33 et seq.)—Hoechst.
 
467
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 10.
 
468
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 10.
 
469
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 20 VO 1/2003 para 10.
 
470
ECJ (President), Case 46/87 R, ECLI:EU:C:1987:167 (para 32)—Hoechst.
 
471
ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 74)—Roquette Frères.
 
472
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 20 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 40.
 
473
ECJ (President), Case 46/87 R, ECLI:EU:C:1987:167 (para 35)—Hoechst.
 
474
ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 39)—Roquette Frères.
 
475
Also with regard to the previous case, ECJ (President), Case 46/87 R, ECLI:EU:C:1987:167 (para 35)—Hoechst.
 
476
General Court, Case T-339/04, ECLI:EU:T:2007:80 (para 51)—France Télécom SA with additional citations.
 
477
General Court, Case T-339/04, ECLI:EU:T:2007:80 (para 52)—France Télécom SA.
 
478
ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (paras 54 et seq.)—Roquette Frères.
 
479
ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 54)—Roquette Frères.
 
480
General Court, Case T-339/04, ECLI:EU:T:2007:80 (para 60)—France Télécom SA; see also previously, ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (paras 55, 61, 99)—Roquette Frères.
 
481
ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 62)—Roquette Frères.
 
482
Also with regard to prior ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (paras 65 et seq.)—Roquette Frères.
 
483
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 4 para 24.
 
484
General Court, Case T-339/04, ECLI:EU:T:2007:80 (para 52)—France Télécom SA.
 
485
Most recently General Court, Case T-289 inter alia/11, ECLI:EU:T:2013:404 (para 193)—Deutsche Bahn, previously ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 76)—Roquette Frères; General Court, Case T-339/04, ECLI:EU:T:2007:80 (para 118)—France Télécom SA.
 
486
Most recently likewise with regard to prior General Court, Case T-289 inter alia/11, ECLI:EU:T:2013:404 (para 193, 216)—Deutsche Bahn; Case T-339/04, ECLI:EU:T:2007:80 (para 118)—France Télécom SA; see also previously, ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 77 with additional citations)—Roquette Frères.
 
487
General Court, Case T-289 inter alia/11, ECLI:EU:T:2013:404 (para 194)—Deutsche Bahn; Case T-339/04, ECLI:EU:T:2007:80 (para 118)—France Télécom SA; ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 78 with additional citations)—Roquette Frères.
 
488
General Court, Case T-289 inter alia/11, ECLI:EU:T:2013:404 (para 65)—Deutsche Bahn.
 
489
General Court, Case T-289 inter alia/11, ECLI:EU:T:2013:404 (para 50)—Deutsche Bahn.
 
490
General Court, Case T-289 inter alia/11, ECLI:EU:T:2013:404 (paras 65 et seq.)—Deutsche Bahn, approved by ECJ, Case C-583/13 P, ECLI:EU:C:2015:404—Deutsche Bahn.
 
491
ECHR of 15 February 2011, No. 56716/09 (paras 40, 44)—Harju/Finland; of 15 February 2011, No. 56715/09 (paras 40, 44)—Heino/Finland; of 1 April 2008, No. 73957/01 (para 70)—Varga/Romania; of 21 December 2010, No. 29408/08 (para 54)—Société Canal Plus inter alia/France.
 
492
General Court, Case T-289 inter alia/11, ECLI:EU:T:2013:404 (para 73)—Deutsche Bahn.
 
493
General Court, Case T-289 inter alia/11, ECLI:EU:T:2013:404 (para 74)—Deutsche Bahn.
 
494
ECJ, Case C-583/13 P, ECLI:EU:C:2015:404—Deutsche Bahn.
 
495
ECJ, Case C-72/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:712 (paras 53 et seq.)—Altrip.
 
496
ECJ, Case C-72/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:712 (paras 24 et seq.)—Altrip.
 
497
ECJ, Case C-583/13 P, ECLI:EU:C:2015:404 (para 64)—Deutsche Bahn.
 
498
ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 27)—Roquette Frères; Cases 46/87 and 227/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:337 (para 19)—Hoechst.
 
499
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 21 VO 1/2003 para 1.
 
500
See also Recital 26 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
501
ECJ, Cases 46/87 and 227/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:337 (para 17)—Hoechst.
 
502
ECJ, Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 29)—Roquette Frères; for further discussion, see Frenz (2009), paras 1234 et seq. and paras 1239 et seq.
 
503
Accord Mestmäcker and Schweitzer (2004), § 19 para 19; critical view, Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 4 paras 26 et seq.
 
504
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 21 VO 1/2003 para 2, related to a motor vehicle. Nonetheless, the documents will be located in the private residence prior to the start.
 
505
Cf. regarding Art. 13 GG BVerfGE 115, 166 (196); 103, 142 (150 et seq.).
 
506
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 21 VO 1/2003 para 4.
 
507
Opposed to fixed limits, Burrichter and Hennig, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 21 VO 1/2003 para 11, 13.
 
508
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 21 VO 1/2003 para 7.
 
509
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 21 VO 1/2003 para 5.
 
510
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 21 VO 1/2003 para 5.
 
511
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 21 VO 1/2003 para 10.
 
512
ECJ, Cases 46/87 and 227/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:337 (para 19)—Hoechst; Case C-94/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:603 (para 27)—Roquette Frères.
 
513
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 21 VO 1/2003 para 8.
 
514
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 21 VO 1/2003 para 9.
 
515
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 21 VO 1/2003 para 9.
 
516
Cf. above at paras 2653 et seq.
 
517
Accordingly, see above paras 2565 et seq., 2570 et seq.
 
518
In general, and likewise extensive discussion of the following topic, Heidenreich (2004), p. 31 et seq.
 
519
ECJ, Case 60/81, ECLI:EU:C:1981:264 (paras 20 et seq.)—IBM.
 
520
ECJ, Case 89 inter alia/85, ECLI:EU:C:1993:120 (para 42)—Ahlström.
 
521
See ECJ, Case 41/69, ECLI:EU:C:1970:71 (paras 91 et seq.)—Chemiefarma; Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 27 VO 1/2003 para 13.
 
522
ECJ, Case 107/82, ECLI:EU:C:1983:293 (para 30)—AEG.
 
523
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 27 VO 1/2003 para 13.
 
524
De Bronett (2012), Art. 27 para 17; Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 27 VO 1/2003 para 12.
 
525
ECJ, Case C-204 inter alia/00 P, ECLI:EU:C:2004:6 (para 60)—Aalborg Portland; ECJ, Case C-176/99 P, ECLI:EU:C:2003:524 (para 21)—ARBED; with additional citations.
 
526
ECJ, Cases C-395 and 396/96 P, ECLI:EU:C:2000:132 (paras 145 et seq.)—Compagnie maritime belge transports.
 
527
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 27 VO 1/2003 para 10 with reference to the exception in settlement proceedings.
 
528
General Court, Case T-31/99, ECLI:EU:T:2002:77 (paras 85 et seq.)—ABB; Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 27 VO 1/2003 para 11.
 
529
General Court, Case T-48/00, ECLI:EU:T:2004:219 (para 146)—Corus.
 
530
General Court, Case T-48/00, ECLI:EU:T:2004:219 (para 151)—Corus still with reference to a serious or very serious, respectively, infringement within the meaning of the Commission Guidelines, which have since been amended on this point. Severity is based on all relevant circumstances, Guidelines for setting fines pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 20).
 
531
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 27 VO 1/2003 para 11.
 
532
For further discussion, see General Court, Case T-120/04, ECLI:EU:T:2006:350 (para 50)—Peróxidos Orgánicos.
 
533
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 27 VO 1/2003 para 10.
 
534
Regarding the right to access files, General Court, Case T-25 inter alia/95, ECLI:EU:T:2000:77 (para 156)—Cimenteries CBR.
 
535
General Court, Case T-48/00, ECLI:EU:T:2004:219 (paras 154 et seq.)—Corus.
 
536
General Court, Case T-44/00, ECLI:EU:T:2004:219 (para 65)—Mannesmannröhren-Werke.
 
537
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 27 VO 1/2003 para 19.
 
538
ECJ, Case 27/76, ECLI:EU:C:1978:22 (para 270/273)—United Brands; Case 40 inter alia/73, ECLI:EU:C:1975:174 (para 96/97)—Suiker Unie.
 
539
General Court, Case T-44/00, ECLI:EU:T:2004:218 (paras 62 et seq.)—Mannesmannröhren-Werke.
 
540
De Bronett (2012), Art. 27 para 38.
 
541
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 27 VO 1/2003 para 21.
 
542
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 27 VO 1/2003 para 23.
 
543
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 5 para 26.
 
544
General Court, Case T-353/94, ECLI:EU:T:1996:119 (para 87)—Postbank.
 
545
ECJ, Case C-360/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:389 (para 32)—Pfleiderer.
 
546
ECJ, Case C-360/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:389 (para 32)—Pfleiderer.
 
547
ECJ, Case C-360/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:389 (para 17)—Pfleiderer.
 
548
ECJ, Case C-360/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:389 (para 20)—Pfleiderer.
 
549
Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union, OJ L 349, p. 1.
 
550
ECJ, Case C-360/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:389 (para 30)—Pfleiderer.
 
551
ECJ, Case C-360/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:389 (para 30)—Pfleiderer.
 
552
ECJ, Case C-360/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:389 (para 30)—Pfleiderer.
 
553
ECJ, Case C-360/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:389 (para 30)—Pfleiderer.
 
554
See e.g. ECJ, Case C-404/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:393 (paras 108 et seq.)—Éditions Odile Jacob; further discussion below para 2730.
 
555
ECJ, Case C-536/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:366 (para 34)—Donau Chemie citing Case C-360/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:389 (para 31)—Pfleiderer.
 
556
ECJ, Case C-536/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:366 (paras 40, 43)—Donau Chemie.
 
557
ECJ, Case C-536/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:366 (para 47)—Donau Chemie.
 
558
ECJ, Case C-536/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:366 (para 48)—Donau Chemie.
 
559
ECJ, Case C-536/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:366 (para 48)—Donau Chemie.
 
560
See ECJ, Case C-536/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:366 (para 47)—Donau Chemie.
 
561
Gussone and Maritzen (2013), 293.
 
562
ECJ, Case C-360/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:389 (paras 30 et seq.)—Pfleiderer; refusing accessing following this decision, AG Bonn, 51 Gs 53/09; see Hauger and Palzer (2012), 126 et seq.
 
563
ECJ, Case C-536/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:366 (para 49)—Donau Chemie with comments Hempel (2013).
 
564
Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union, OJ L 349, p. 1; see previously Art. 6 of the Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union of 11 June 2013, COM (2013) 404 final. With regard to the prior efforts, Milde (2013), p. 242 et seq., 264 et seq. as well as p. 240 et seq. with proposals from the literature.
 
565
Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty, OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1.
 
566
Regulation (EC) No. 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43.
 
567
See above, Nowak, fireu-Newsletter 14/2013, p. 6, accessible online at http://​www.​fireu.​de (last accessed on 27 March 2014).
 
568
Regarding the following discussion, see Frenz (2013a), 778.
 
569
ECJ, Case C-506/08 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:496 (para 72)—MyTravel with additional citations; General Court, Case T-437/08, ECLI:EU:T:2011:752 (para 32)—CDC.
 
570
See, e.g. General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (para 54 and 57)—EnBW.
 
571
See e.g. ECJ, Case C-28/08 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:378 (para 49)—Bavarian Lager.
 
572
Epiney, In: Fluck and Theuer (2012), D III 2.2 para 19.
 
573
ECJ, Case C-506/08 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:496 (paras 87 et seq.)—MyTravel.
 
574
In favour of a partial exclusionary effect, Kleine (2007), 307; additional citations pro et contra Westhoff (2007), p. 119 et seq.
 
575
Cf. Bueren (2011a), 74 et seq.
 
576
Milde (2013), p. 91 citing Schroll (2012), p. 189.
 
577
ECJ, Case C-139/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:376 (paras 55 et seq.)—TGI.
 
578
ECJ, Case C-404/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:393 (paras 108 et seq.)—Éditions Odile Jacob; Case C-477/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:394 (paras 50 et seq.)—Agrofert; Case C-28/08 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:378—Bavarian Lager; also Case C-514 inter alia/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:541 (para 100)—API citing Case C-139/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:376 (para 58)—TGI.
 
579
ECJ, Case C-506/08 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:496 (paras 72 et seq.)—MyTravel; following General Court, Case T-403/05, ECLI:EU:T:2008:316 (para 89)—MyTravel.
 
580
Milde (2013), p. 97 et seq. citing an exception in the law of civil servants, EuGÖD, Cases F-124/05 and 96/06, ECLI:EU:F:2010:2 (para 239)—A and G/Commission due to the special obligations to safeguard the right to mount a defence on the part of the respective person from Art. 26 of status as a civil servant. However, just as is the case with Art. 27 Regulation (EC) No. 1049/2001 this does not protect against the access rights of third parties (p. 98 et seq.).
 
581
Extensively highlighting this necessity, ECJ, Case C-365/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:112 (paras 83 et seq.)—EnBW.
 
582
See General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (paras 56 et seq.)—EnBW (appealed to the ECJ, Case C-365/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:112); with an entirely isolated examination, Case T-437/08, ECLI:EU:T:2011:752 (paras 33 et seq.)—CDC; detailed discussion, Palzer (2012), 583 et seq.; Frenz and Lülsdorf (2013), 170 et seq.
 
583
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-139/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:520 (paras 89 et seq.)—TGI.
 
584
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-139/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:520 (para 42)—TGI.
 
585
More detailed discussion, with additional citations Frenz (2009), paras 4625 et seq.; with regard to the latter, see also, e.g. Riemann (2004), p. 270 et seq.
 
586
ECJ, Case C-360/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:389 (paras 26 et seq.)—Pfleiderer; see also Case C-536/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:366 (para 33)—Donau Chemie.
 
587
Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union, OJ L 349, p. 1. See previously Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union of 11 June 2013, COM (2013) 404 final, following Art. 7 (1) precisely without access to “leniency statements”.
 
588
ECJ, Case C-453/99, ECLI:EU:C:2001:465 (paras 26 et seq.)—Courage and Crehan.
 
589
Most recently, ECJ, Case C-365/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:112 (para 63)—EnBW.
 
590
General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (paras 29, 45)—EnBW.
 
591
ECJ, Case C-39 and 52/05 P, ECLI:EU:C:2008:374 (para 49)—Turco; Case C-365/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:112 (para 65)—EnBW.
 
592
ECJ, Case C-365/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:112 (para 67)—EnBW.
 
593
General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (para 46)—EnBW; further discussion Frenz and Lülsdorf (2013), 170 et seq. with regard to the following as well.
 
594
General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (para 47)—EnBW; Case T-2/03, ECLI:EU:T:2005:125 (paras 74 et seq.)—VKI.
 
595
General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (para 50, 103)—EnBW.
 
596
General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (para 105)—EnBW.
 
597
General Court, Case T-2/03, ECLI:EU:T:2005:125 (para 114)—VKI.
 
598
In favour of an individual assessment, General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (paras 49, 62)—EnBW.
 
599
ECJ, Case C-365/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:112 (paras 93, 101)—EnBW.
 
600
ECJ, Case C-365/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:112 (paras 100 et seq.)—EnBW with additional citations.
 
601
ECJ, Case C-365/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:112 (para 64)—EnBW; General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (para 78)—EnBW.
 
602
ECJ, Case C-365/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:112 (para 82)—EnBW.
 
603
Directly also General Court, Case T-437/08, ECLI:EU:T:2011:752 (paras 33 et seq.)—CDC.
 
604
General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (paras 40, 134 with additional citations)—EnBW.
 
605
ECJ, Case C-365/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:112 (paras 94, 101 et seq.)—EnBW.
 
606
General Court, Case T-437/08, ECLI:EU:T:2011:752 (para 45)—CDC.
 
607
General Court, Case T-437/08, ECLI:EU:T:2011:752 (para 47)—CDC.
 
608
General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (paras 70 et seq.)—EnBW.
 
609
ECJ, Case C-536/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:366 (paras 40, 43)—Donau Chemie.
 
610
General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (paras 57, 61)—EnBW. More refined, ECJ, Case C-365/12 P (paras 88 et seq.)—EnBW.
 
611
General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (paras 57, 116 et seq.)—EnBW.
 
612
General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (paras 124 et seq.)—EnBW.
 
613
General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (para 125)—EnBW.
 
614
General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (para 126 with additional citations)—EnBW.
 
615
See also General Court, Case T-344/08, ECLI:EU:T:2012:242 (para 128)—EnBW.
 
616
Contra, Milde (2013), p. 172; Kleine (2007), 309. Open and leaving consideration to the national courts, ECJ, Case C-360/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:389 (paras 26 et seq.)—Pfleiderer in view of a parallel scenario.
 
617
ECJ, Case C-536/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:366 (paras 45 et seq.)—Donau Chemie.
 
618
Gussone and Maritzen (2013), 293.
 
619
See above paras 2721 et seq.
 
620
ECJ, Case C-536/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:366 (para 48)—Donau Chemie: “not disclosing … can be justified”.
 
621
See above para 2729.
 
622
See above para 2736 end.
 
623
General Court, Case T-25 inter alia/95, ECLI:EU:T:2000:77 (paras 147 et seq.)—Cimenteries CBR.
 
624
General Court, Case T-25 inter alia/95, ECLI:EU:T:2000:77 (para 156)—Cimenteries CBR; cf. above paras 2685 et seq. on the right to a hearing before the court.
 
625
Detailed discussion in General Court, Case T-25 inter alia/95, ECLI:EU:T:2000:77 (paras 241 et seq.)—Cimenteries CBR; ECJ, Case C-204 inter alia/00 P, ECLI:EU:C:2004:6 (paras 75 et seq.)—Aalborg Portland.
 
626
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 1.
 
627
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 1.
 
628
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 19.
 
629
Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 7 VO 1/2003 para 27.
 
630
ECJ, Case 6 and 7/73, ECLI:EU:C:1974:18 (para 45)—Commercial Solvents.
 
631
Mestmäcker and Schweitzer (2004), § 20 para 34.
 
632
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 para 23.
 
633
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 20.
 
634
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 12 VO 1/2003 para 21.
 
635
Art. 3 alt. b) Commission Decision 76/353/EEC, OJ 1976 L 95, p. 1—United Brands; affirmed in ECJ, Case C-27/76, ECLI:EU:C:1978:22—United Brands.
 
636
Commission Decision 93/50/EEC, OJ 1993 L 20, p. 23—Astra.
 
637
Commission Decision 76/353/EEC, OJ 1976 L 95, p. 1 (Art. 1 alt. b) and c), Art. 3 alt. a))—United Brands; 91/299/EEC, OJ 1991 L 152, p. 21 (Art. 1 alt. b), c), Art. 2)—Soda/Solvay; 92/163/EEC, OJ 1992 L 72, p. 1 (Art. 3 (3))—Tetra Pak II.
 
638
See, e.g. Commission Decision 92/163/EEC, OJ 1992 L 72, p. 1 (Art. 3 (1))—Tetra Pak II; 85/609/EEC, OJ 1985 L 374, p. 1 (Art. 3)—AKZO; ECJ, Case C-62/86, ECLI:EU:C:1991:286 (paras 155 et seq.)—AKZO Chemie.
 
639
Commission Decision 89/205/EEC, OJ 1989 L 78, p. 43 (Art. 2)—Magill; affirmed by ECJ, Case C-241 and 242/91 P, ECLI:EU:C:1995:98—Magill.
 
640
This may not itself be touched, Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 7 VO 1/2003 para 19. Ultimately, it is not prohibited as such.
 
641
Commission Decision 72/457/EEC, OJ 1972 L 299, p. 51 (Art. 2)—Commercial Solvents.
 
642
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 7 VO 1/2003 para 18.
 
643
Further discussion, Klees and Hauser (2007), 600 et seq. regarding ownership unbundling in the energy sector to the extent one even affirms such a competence at all, see Baur et al. (2008), 483; Pielow and Ehlers (2007), 259; Frenz (2009), para 2943 end.
 
644
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 7 VO 1/2003 para 24; Haus (2001), 662 et seq.
 
645
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 7 VO 1/2003 para 22.
 
646
Klees (2005), § 6 para 81; Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 7 VO 1/2003 para 23.
 
647
Schmidt (2003), 1242; Klees (2005), § 6 para 81 end.
 
648
See however, above paras 1542 et seq. with regard to public accessibility.
 
649
Recital 12 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
650
See above para 2758.
 
651
This may not always be made easily, Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 7 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 4 end.
 
652
With additional citations Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 7 VO 1/2003 para 48.
 
653
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 7 VO 1/2003 para 47.
 
654
See Dalheimer et al. (2005), Art. 7 para 14; Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 7 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 4.
 
655
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 7 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 4 citing draft Commission Regulation, COM (2000) 582 final (statement of purpose IV, Chap. III re Art. 7).
 
656
See above paras 2761 et seq.
 
657
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 7 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 4.
 
658
ECJ, Case 7/82, ECLI:EU:C:1983:52 (paras 24 et seq.)—GVL.
 
659
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 7 VO 1/2003 para 52 with citations; see ECJ, Case C-39/93, ECLI:EU:C:1994:253 (paras 28 et seq.)—SFEI.
 
660
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 7 VO 1/2003 para 51.
 
661
OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1.
 
662
Hirsbrunner (2011), 13.
 
663
Graham (2013), p. 339; comprehensive treatment Bueren (2011b).
 
664
Further discussion, including the following point as well, Frenz and Bresges (2012), 72 et seq.
 
665
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 5).
 
666
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 11).
 
667
Hirsbrunner (2011), 13.
 
668
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 14).
 
669
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 15).
 
670
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 15).
 
671
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 16).
 
672
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 17).
 
673
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 19).
 
674
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 20).
 
675
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 22).
 
676
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 26).
 
677
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 24).
 
678
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 29).
 
679
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 28).
 
680
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 32).
 
681
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 33).
 
682
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 29).
 
683
Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2008 C 167, p. 1 (para 29).
 
684
Hirsbrunner (2011), 15.
 
685
Hirsbrunner (2011), 16.
 
686
Frenz and Bresges (2012), 79.
 
687
Hirsbrunner (2011), 15.
 
688
Frenz and Bresges (2012), 79.
 
689
General Court, Case T-44/90, ECLI:EU:T:1992:5 (paras 28, 61 et seq.)—La Cinq.
 
690
General Court, Case T-44/90, ECLI:EU:T:1992:5 (paras 61 et seq.)—La Cinq; Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 8 VO 1/2003 para 4.
 
691
General Court, Case T-23/90, ECLI:EU:T:1991:45 (para 61)—Peugeot.
 
692
De Bronett (2012), Art. 8 para 2 end.
 
693
General Court, Case T-44/99, ECLI:EU:T:1992:5 (paras 61 et seq.)—La Cinq; Jaeger, In: Jaeger et al. (2013), Art 8 VO 1/2003 para 5.
 
694
General Court, Case T-184/01 R, ECLI:EU:T:2001:259 (para 68)—IMS Health.
 
695
General Court, Case T-23/90, ECLI:EU:T:1991:45 (para 63)—Peugeot.
 
696
Jaeger, In: Jaeger et al. (2013), Art 8 VO 1/2003 para 5.
 
697
See, e.g. Mestmäcker and Schweitzer (2004), § 20 paras 40 et seq.
 
698
Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 8 VO 1/2003 para 7.
 
699
Open to such an extent, Anweiler, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 8 VerfVO para 14.
 
700
Jaeger, In: Jaeger et al. (2013), Art 8 VO 1/2003 para 7.
 
701
De Bronett (2012), Art. 8 para 3; Jaeger, In: Jaeger et al. (2013), Art 8 VO 1/2003 para 7.
 
702
Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 8 VO 1/2003 para 7.
 
703
Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 8 VO 1/2003 para 9.
 
704
See Commission decision on the port of Roscoff, Commission press release IP 95/492 dated 16 May 1995, reproduced by Anweiler, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 8 VerfVO para 17.
 
705
See above paras 2208 et seq.
 
706
See, e.g. Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 8 VO 1/2003 para 10.
 
707
Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 8 VO 1/2003 para 8.
 
708
ECJ, Case 792/79 R, ECLI:EU:C:1980:18—Camera Care; General Court, Case T-184/01 R, ECLI:EU:T:2001:259 (para 71)—IMS Health.
 
709
Jaeger, In: Jaeger et al. (2013), Art 8 VO 1/2003 para 6.
 
710
General Court, Case T-44/90, ECLI:EU:T:1992:5 (paras 79 et seq.)—La Cinq.
 
711
Commission Decision 93/405/EEC, OJ 1993 L 183, p. 1—Schöller as well as Commission Decision 93/406/EEC, OJ 1993 L 183, p. 19—Langnese/Iglo; covered by Anweiler, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 8 VerfVO para 18.
 
712
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 para 56.
 
713
With additional citations Jaeger, In: Jaeger et al. (2013), Art 8 VO 1/2003 para 14.
 
714
Mestmäcker and Schweitzer (2004), § 6 para 42.
 
715
Jaeger, In: Jaeger et al. (2013), Art 8 VO 1/2003 para 9.
 
716
Earlier ECJ, Case 792/79 R, ECLI:EU:C:1980:18 (paras 18 et seq.)—Camera Care.
 
717
Jaeger, In: Jaeger et al. (2013), Art 8 VO 1/2003 para 9 end.
 
718
Jaeger, In: Jaeger et al. (2013), Art 8 VO 1/2003 para 11.
 
719
For further reference to the degree of probability in this connection, see Jaeger, In: Jaeger et al. (2013), Art 8 VO 1/2003 para 11.
 
720
General Court, Case T-184/01 R, ECLI:EU:T:2001:259 (para 120)—IMS Health.
 
721
However, in favour Jaeger, In: Jaeger et al. (2013), Art 8 VO 1/2003 para 11.
 
722
Referring to this also Anweiler, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 8 VerfVO para 21.
 
723
Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, OJ 2003 C 193, p. 41, last amended on 19 June 2013, OJ L 173, p. 66.
 
724
General Court (President), Case T-201/04 R, ECLI:EU:T:2004:372 (para 44)—Microsoft; Case T-217/03 R 2, ECLI:EU:T:2006:391 (para 68)—FNCBV.
 
725
In general, see ECJ, Case C-195/90 R, ECLI:EU:C:1990:314 (paras 30 et seq.)—Commission/Germany.
 
726
General Court (President), Case T-201/04 R, ECLI:EU:T:2004:372 (paras 320, 476 et seq.)—Microsoft also due to damages that are not irreparable.
 
727
General Court (President), Case T-201/04 R, ECLI:EU:T:2004:372 (para 34)—Microsoft.
 
728
Schmidt (2003), 1242 with reference to the elements of commitment practice, of the prerequisite and the condition included in this instrument.
 
729
Hirsbrunner and Rhomberg (2005), 62.
 
730
Hirsbrunner and Rhomberg (2005), 62.
 
731
For general, former legal situation, see Schwarze (2002), 745.
 
732
Therefore assuming a legal duty, Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 7 VO 1/2003 para 7; “any kind of right of the undertakings” qtd. Klees (2005), § 6 para 120.
 
733
Schweitzer (2011), p. 645.
 
734
ECJ, Case C-441/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:377 (para 47)—Alrosa.
 
735
For law, Schweitzer (2011), p. 648 et seq.
 
736
For latter, see Schweitzer (2011), p. 648 et seq. also to distinguish from earlier exemption decisions and negative clearances.
 
737
For further discussion, see paras 2839 et seq.
 
738
Recital 13 to the Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 para 72.
 
739
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 9 VO 1/2003 para 5.
 
740
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 9 VO 1/2003 para 6.
 
741
A formal submission of the statement of objections is not necessary contrary to Lang, ECLR 2003, 347 (347), see also Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 para 72; Art. 27 (1) Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 e contrario, Hirsbrunner and Rhomberg (2005), 63, with fn. 11; also Klees (2005), § 6 para 114; Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 9 VO 1/2003 para 3.
 
742
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 9 VO 1/2003 para 4.
 
743
For fusion control, see General Court, Case T-310/01, ECLI:EU:T:2002:254 (para 442)—Schneider Electric.
 
744
To distinguish from the preliminary investigation pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (ECMR) marked by the pressure of deadlines—which is missing here—, see Hirsbrunner and Rhomberg (2005), 64.
 
745
Klees (2005), § 6 para 115.
 
746
De Bronett (2012), Art. 9 para 8.
 
747
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 9 VO 1/2003 para 9 with reference to the CISAC proceedings, KOM IP 07/829 and IP 08/1168.
 
748
De Bronett (2012), Art. 9 para 14.
 
749
ECJ, Case C-441/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:377 (paras 41, 61)—Alrosa.
 
750
In general, see Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 9 VO 1/2003 para 7 as well as para 2816.
 
751
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 9 VO 1/2003 para 10.
 
752
Klees (2005), § 6 para 122.
 
753
See above para 2821.
 
754
Hirsbrunner and Rhomberg (2005), 62, 64.
 
755
ECJ, Case C-441/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:377 (para 61)—Alrosa.
 
756
See below para 2839.
 
757
Bartosch (2001), 102; Lang (2003), 351.
 
758
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 para 83.
 
759
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 9 VO 1/2003 para 17: numerus clausus.
 
760
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 9 VO 1/2003 para 32; no practical significance seen by de Bronett (2012), Art. 9 para 24.
 
761
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 9 VO 1/2003 para 32.
 
762
Anweiler, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 9 VerfVO para 37.
 
763
Anweiler, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 9 VerfVO para 38.
 
764
De Bronett (2012), Art. 9 para 25.
 
765
Busse and Leopold (2005), 149.
 
766
De Bronett (2012), Art. 9 para 25.
 
767
Unanimous opinion in this regard, e.g. Hossenfelder and Lutz (2003), 122; Hirsch (2003), 252.
 
768
For other view referring to future infringements of competition law, see Montag and Rosenfeld (2003), 132.
 
769
Lang (2003), 349; in general, cf. ECJ, Case C-344/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:689 (para 46)—Masterfoods.
 
770
Busse and Leopold (2005), 151.
 
771
Lang (2003), 348.
 
772
This case is not specifically covered by rules and is sanctioned as well, Busse and Leopold (2005), 152.
 
773
According to Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 para 79, this should only be effected after an attempt to enforce the commitment by means of penalty payments due to the principle of proportionality.
 
774
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 para 82.
 
775
Cf. Schmidt (2003), 1242.
 
776
In this respect, cf. Lampert et al. (2004), Art. 9 para 165; similar, Klees (2005), § 6 para 131; Schnelle et al. (2004), p. 121 et seq.
 
777
See above paras 2818 et seq., 2823.
 
778
Busse and Leopold (2005), 149 et seq.; see also Koenigs (2003), 756. Hirsbrunner and Rhomberg (2005), 64 et seq. rightly criticise.
 
779
Gruber (2005), 312 et seq.
 
780
De Bronett (2012), Art. 9 para 18; Gruber (2005), 313 et seq.
 
781
De Bronett (2012), Art. 9 para 18.
 
782
For predictions of the actual binding effect, see Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 para 95.
 
783
Mestmäcker and Schweitzer (2004), § 20 para 45, and para 47, which, in contrast, assumes that the Commission is obliged to revoke if a practice later turns out to be illegal (also by the finding of national authorities).
 
784
Völcker (2012), p. 172: 4–6 years before the ECJ.
 
785
For further discussion, see Völcker (2012), p. 172 et seq.; Frenz (2013c), 123 et seq.
 
786
ECJ, Case C-441/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:377 (paras 41 et seq.)—Alrosa, contrary to General Court, Case T-170/06, ECLI:EU:T:2007:220—Alrosa; further discussion in Frenz and Ehlenz (2010a), 507 et seq.; Schweitzer (2011), p. 640 et seq.
 
787
Particularly with regard to charges of third parties like in the case Alrosa, Frenz and Ehlenz (2010b), 308. Their right to bring action already resulted from their participation in the proceedings and inclusion in the commitment so that no general indicators arise, Schweitzer (2011), p. 653.
 
788
See above para 2831.
 
789
Tending in this direction Völcker (2012), p. 182.
 
790
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 paras 90 et seq.
 
791
Schweitzer (2011), p. 653.
 
792
Recital 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.
 
793
For inclusion of these, see Immenga (2012), p. 23.
 
794
Montag and Rosenfeld (2003), 115.
 
795
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 para 125.
 
796
Critic. also in Geiger (2000), 168.
 
797
See above para 70 et seq.
 
798
See above paras 1547 et seq.
 
799
See also Immenga (2005), 353.
 
800
See above paras 2354 et seq.
 
801
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 10 VO 1/2003 para 4 with additional citations.
 
802
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 10 VO 1/2003 para 11: full text only on the website of the Commission.
 
803
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 10 VO 1/2003 para 10: “State-of-Play-Meetings”.
 
804
General Court, Case T-177/04, ECLI:EU:T:2006:187 (para 35)—Easyjet with further citations.
 
805
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 10 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 14, see generally, e.g. General Court, Case T-158/00, ECLI:EU:T:2003:246 (paras 76 et seq.)—ARD.
 
806
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 para 113 and also para 116: no popular action.
 
807
See Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 10 VO 1/2003 para 15.
 
808
See ECJ, Case C-112/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:333 (para 82)—Schmidberger (Brenner Blockade), Frenz (2009), para 374.
 
809
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 10 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 12.
 
810
Schmidt (2003), 1241 et seq.
 
811
For further discussion, see Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 10 VO Nr. 1/2003 paras 10 et seq.
 
812
Schmidt (2003), 1242.
 
813
See Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 paras 106 et seq.
 
814
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 10 VO 1/2003 para 9.
 
815
Hirsch (2003), 251; Hossenfelder and Lutz (2003), 123; Klees (2005), § 6 para 162; Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 10 VO 1/2003 para 11 end. Röhling (2003), 1023.
 
816
De Bronett (2012), Art. 10 para 7.
 
817
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 10 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 8.
 
818
De Bronett (2012), Art. 10 para 7.
 
819
Detailed discussion in ECJ, Case C-375/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:270 (paras 28 et seq.)—Tele2 Polska.
 
820
See above paras 2832 et seq.
 
821
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 10 VO 1/2003 para 13 with examples.
 
822
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 10 VO 1/2003 para 14, 16.
 
823
Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel questions concerning Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty that arise in individual cases (guidance letters), OJ 2004 C 101, p. 78.
 
824
Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel questions concerning Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty that arise in individual cases (guidance letters), OJ 2004 C 101, p. 78 (paras 7 et seq.).
 
825
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 10 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 16.
 
826
Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel questions concerning Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty that arise in individual cases (guidance letters), OJ 2004 C 101, p. 78 (paras 9 et seq.).
 
827
For more information on the Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel questions concerning Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty that arise in individual cases (guidance letters), see OJ 2004 C 101, p. 78 (para 14).
 
828
Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel questions concerning Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty that arise in individual cases (guidance letters), OJ 2004 C 101, p. 78 (para 15).
 
829
Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel questions concerning Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty that arise in individual cases (guidance letters), OJ 2004 C 101, p. 78 (para 11).
 
830
Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel questions concerning Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty that arise in individual cases (guidance letters), OJ 2004 C 101, p. 78 (para 17).
 
831
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 para 136.
 
832
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 10 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 16.
 
833
Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel questions concerning Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty that arise in individual cases (guidance letters), OJ 2004 C 101, p. 78 (para 19).
 
834
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 10 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 21 end.
 
835
Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel questions concerning Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty that arise in individual cases (guidance letters), OJ 2004 C 101, p. 78 (para 21).
 
836
Klees (2005), § 2 para 59.
 
837
Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel questions concerning Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty that arise in individual cases (guidance letters), OJ 2004 C 101, p. 78 (paras 24 et seq.).
 
838
Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel questions concerning Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty that arise in individual cases (guidance letters), OJ 2004 C 101, p. 78 (paras 24 et seq.).
 
839
Klees (2005), § 2 paras 60 et seq.
 
840
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 29 VO 1/2003 para 7.
 
841
For further discussion, see Brinker (1994), p. 100 et seq.
 
842
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 29 VO 1/2003 para 10.
 
843
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 29 VO 1/2003 para 11.
 
844
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 29 VO 1/2003 para 11 end.
 
845
Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 29 VO 1/2003 para 6.
 
846
For further discussion, see Brinker (1994), p. 93 et seq.
 
847
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 29 VO 1/2003 para 12.
 
848
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 29 VO 1/2003 para 11; for further discussion, see Brinker (1994), p. 82 et seq.
 
849
See Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 29 VO 1/2003 para 29.
 
850
Using this as a basis, Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 29 VO 1/2003 para 13 also citing Art. 9 (2) FKVO.
 
851
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 29 VO 1/2003 para 13.
 
852
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 29 VO 1/2003 para 13 end.
 
853
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 29 VO 1/2003 para 14.
 
854
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 29 VO 1/2003 para 14.
 
855
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 29 VO 1/2003 para 14.
 
856
Commission, Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed on the basis of Art. 15 (2) of Council Regulation No. 17 and of Art. 65 (5) ECSC, OJ 1998 C 9, p. 3 (5 (5) alt. a)) with additional details.
 
857
Fundamentally, judgements concerning the district heating pipe cartel, General Court, Case T-9/99, ECLI:EU:T:2002:70 (para 452)—HFB; Case T-23/99, ECLI:EU:T:2002:75 (para 287)—LR; Case T-16/99, ECLI:EU:T:2002:72 (para 288)—Lögstör, critical response Kallmayer and Haupt (2002), 681 et seq.
 
858
See by contrast AG Stix Hackl, ECJ, Case C-196/99 P, ECLI:EU:C:2002:537 (paras 98 et seq.)—Aristrain; other view Pohlmann (1999), p. 42.
 
859
ECJ, Case C-508/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:289 (paras 64 et seq.)—ENI; AG Stix Hackl, ECJ, Case C-196/99 P, ECLI:EU:C:2002:537 (para 99)—Aristrain; Case C-48/69, ECLI:EU:C:1972:70 (para 132/135)—ICI.
 
860
ECJ, Case C-294/98 P, ECLI:EU:C:2000:632 (para 28)—Metsä-Serla: “Fine for an infringement … of which they are accused themselves due to this attribution.” By contrast, presuming an attribution of external behaviour Steinle (2004), 122, thus having considerable legal concerns (123); for the question of attributability in corporate groups, see above at paras 654 et seq.
 
861
Detailed discussion above at paras 668 et seq.
 
862
Steinle (2004), 123.
 
863
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 90 end.
 
864
ECJ, Case C-210/00, ECLI:EU:C:2002:440 (paras 33 et seq.)—Käserei Champignon.
 
865
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (paras 41 et seq.)—Schenker; for additional discussion, see Frenz (2013e), 209 et seq.
 
866
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404—Schenker, critic. Frenz (2013f), 272 et seq.
 
867
ECJ, Case C-199/92 P, ECLI:EU:C:1999:358 (paras 149 et seq.)—Hüls; Case C-89/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:738 (para 72)—E.ON; Case C-508/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:289 (para 50)—ENI; see also below para 2922.
 
868
In particular ECHR, ruling of 27 September 2011, No. 43509/08 (paras 38 et seq.)—Menarini/Italy.
 
869
In this respect, dedicated and in detail Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 7 with numerous citations.
 
870
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 90.
 
871
Also maintaining this qualification ECJ, Case C-266/06 P, ECLI:EU:C:2008:295 (para 38)—Evonik Degussa.
 
872
General Court, Case T-112/98, ECLI:EU:T:2001:61 (para 77)—Mannesmannröhren-Werke; Case T-25 inter alia/95, ECLI:EU:T:2000:77 (para 718)—Cimenteries CBR.
 
873
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 11 para 38 with a copy of the statement in Appendix 3.
 
874
See above para 1183, likewise with regard to the following.
 
875
See above paras 1184 et seq.
 
876
See above paras 2940 et seq.
 
877
For further discussion, see paras 2940 et seq.
 
878
Detailed discussion, Terhechte (2004), 235 et seq.
 
879
For additional discussion, see Jakobs, In: Rengeling et al. (2014), § 33.
 
880
Mestmäcker and Schweitzer (2004), § 21 para 2.
 
881
E.g. Schneider, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 24 VO 1/2003 para 4.
 
882
ECJ, Cases 46/87 and 227/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:337 (para 56)—Hoechst; Mestmäcker and Schweitzer (2004), § 21 para 4.
 
883
ECJ, Cases 46/87 and 227/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:337 (para 56)—Hoechst; General Court, Case T-596/97, ECLI:EU:T:1998:138—Dalmine.
 
884
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 24 VO 1/2003 para 11.
 
885
De Bronett (2012), Art. 24 paras 3 et seq.
 
886
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 24 VO 1/2003 para 8, citing the Microsoft case.
 
887
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 24 VO 1/2003 para 9; for previous legislation, see General Court, Case T-34/93, ECLI:EU:T:1995:46 (para 16)—Société Générale; Case T-46/92, ECLI:EU:T:1994:267 (para 4)—Scottish Football Association.
 
888
Schneider, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 24 VO 1/2003 para 5; however, there is relevance for the later determination of the penalty amount after non-compliance of obligations, Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 24 VO 1/2003 para 5.
 
889
Dannecker and Biermann, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 24 VO 1/2003 para 8.
 
890
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 24 VO 1/2003 para 3 end.
 
891
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 24 VO 1/2003 para 4.
 
892
Discussion of the concerns, Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 24 VO 1/2003 para 6 as well as additional discussion Art. 23 VO 1/2003 paras 24 et seq.
 
893
See Commission Decision of 27 February 2008, COMP/37702 (paras 294 et seq.)—Microsoft.
 
894
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 24 VO 1/2003 para 3.
 
895
For additional discussion, see above paras 684 et seq.
 
896
Dreher (2007), 287.
 
897
General Court, Cases T-101 and 111/05, ECLI:EU:T:2007:380 (para 158)—BASF.
 
898
Seifert (2013), p. 231 et seq. with numerous details; see supra above paras 684 et seq.
 
899
General Court, Case T-7/89, ECLI:EU:T:1991:75 (paras 307 et seq.)—Hercules Chemicals; later General Court, Case T-15/02, ECLI:EU:T:2006:74 (para 72)—BASF.
 
900
Practically already General Court, Case C-25 inter alia/95, ECLI:EU:T:2000:77 (para 4793)—Cimenteries CBR; see Wessely (2001), 763; Seifert (2013), p. 232 with fn. 1167; also, e.g., Commission Decision of 9 December 2004, COMP/37533 (paras 183 et seq.)—Cholinchlorid; see also AG Cosmas, ECJ, Case C-49/92 P, ECLI:EU:C:1997:357 (para 80)—Anic Partecipazioni.
 
901
Commission Decision of 28 January 2009, COMP/39406 (para 283 end)—Marine Hoses.
 
902
Seifert (2013), p. 233.
 
903
General Court, Case T-11/05, ECLI:EU:T:2010:201 (paras 96 et seq.)—Wieland-Werke.
 
904
ECJ, Case C-238 inter alia/99 P, ECLI:EU:C:2002:582 (para 157)—Limburgse Vinyl Maatschapij.
 
905
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 25 VO 1/2003 para 6; see ECJ, Cases 46/87 and 227/88, ECLI:EU:C:1989:337—Hoechst.
 
906
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 25 VO 1/2003 para 6.
 
907
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 25 VO 1/2003 para 7.
 
908
Seifert (2013), p. 233 et seq.
 
909
See General Court, Case T-120/04, ECLI:EU:T:2006:350 (para 47)—Peróxidos Orgánicos.
 
910
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 25 VO 1/2003 para 9.
 
911
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 25 VO 1/2003 para 9.
 
912
Seifert (2013), p. 234.
 
913
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 25 VO 1/2003 para 10.
 
914
General Court, Case T-439/07, ECLI:EU:T:2012:320 (para 159)—Coats Holdings.
 
915
General Court, Case T-439/07, ECLI:EU:T:2012:320 (para 160)—Coats Holdings.
 
916
General Court, Case T-439/07, ECLI:EU:T:2012:320 (para 162)—Coats Holdings.
 
917
General Court, Case T-439/07, ECLI:EU:T:2012:320 (para 161)—Coats Holdings; also General Court, Case T-379/06, ECLI:EU:T:2011:110 (para 51)—Kaimer, confirmed by ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 6)—Kaimer.
 
918
General Court, Case T-439/07, ECLI:EU:T:2012:320 (para 160)—Coats Holdings.
 
919
See above para 1183.
 
920
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 26 VO 1/2003 para 3.
 
921
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 26 VO 1/2003 para 6.
 
922
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 26 VO 1/2003 para 7.
 
923
Dannecker and Biermann, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 26 VO 1/2003 para 6.
 
924
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 26 VO 1/2003 para 8.
 
925
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 26 VO 1/2003 para 9.
 
926
See only ECJ, Case C-204 inter alia/00 P, ECLI:EU:C:2004:6 (para 200)—Aalborg Portland: “pure administrative proceedings”, with additional citations; Vilsmeier (2013), p. 10 et seq.
 
927
See above paras 2887 et seq.
 
928
Mestmäcker and Schweitzer (2004), § 21 para 33; Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004) § 7 paras 24 et seq.
 
929
ECJ, Case C-238 inter alia/99 P, ECLI:EU:C:2002:582 (para 61)—Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij.
 
930
ECJ, Case C-238 inter alia/99 P, ECLI:EU:C:2002:582 (para 62)—Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij.
 
931
Mestmäcker and Schweitzer (2004), § 21 para 2; above paras 1593 et seq., likewise with regard to the following.
 
932
ECJ, Case 14/68, ECLI:EU:C:1969:4 (para 11)—Walt Wilhelm; see also, e.g., General Court, Case T-223/00, ECLI:EU:T:2003:194 (para 98)—Kyowa Hakko; Case T-224/00, ECLI:EU:T:2003:195 (para 87)—Archer Daniels. This does not apply if the facts of the case and the direction are fully congruent, see ECJ, Cases 18 and 35/65, ECLI:EU:C:1966:24 (119)—Gutmann in another context.
 
933
See fundamentally ECJ, Case 14/68, ECLI:EU:C:1969:4 (para 11)—Walt Wilhelm; see also, e.g., General Court, Case T-141/89, ECLI:EU:T:1995:62 (para 191)—Tréfileurope.
 
934
Mestmäcker and Schweitzer (2004), § 21 paras 34 et seq.; see also, e.g., General Court, Case T-236 inter alia/01, ECLI:EU:T:2004:118 (paras 134 et seq.)—Tokai Carbon.
 
935
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 11.
 
936
ECHR, ruling of 27 September 2011, No. 43509/08 (paras 38 et seq.)—Menarini/Italy.
 
937
For open discussion, see also, e.g., General Court, Case T-67/01, ECLI:EU:T:2004:3 (para 36)—JCB Service; with citations in Vilsmeier (2013), p. 11.
 
938
General Court, Case T-138/07, ECLI:EU:T:2011:362 (paras 49 et seq.)—Schindler.
 
939
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 41)—Schenker.
 
940
ECJ, Case C-204 inter alia/00 P, ECLI:EU:C:2004:6 (para 338)—Aalborg Portland; also General Court, Case T-236 inter alia/01, ECLI:EU:T:2004:118 (para 130)—Tokai Carbon.
 
941
Dannecker and Biermann, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 243.
 
942
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 23 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 72.
 
943
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities (Network Notice), OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (para 19).
 
944
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 23 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 72.
 
945
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 23 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 72.
 
946
General Court, Case T-305 inter alia/94, ECLI:EU:T:1999:80 (paras 96 et seq.)—Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij; Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 53.
 
947
Dannecker and Biermann, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 244 citing, inter alia, ECJ, Case C-204 inter alia/00 P, ECLI:EU:C:2004:6 (para 138)—Aalborg Portland; also Case C-308/04 P, ECLI:EU:C:2006:433 (para 26)—SGL Carbon.
 
948
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 11.
 
949
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 53.
 
950
ECHR, judgement of 29 May 2001, ÖJZ 2001, 657 (658)—Franz Fischer/Austria. For a transposition into the EU Administrative Anti-competitive Offences Act, see Wils (2003), 134 et seq.; Dannecker and Biermann, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 244 with fn. 707 contra General Court, Case T-236 inter alia/01, ECLI:EU:T:2004:118 (para 135)—Tokai Carbon.
 
951
Dannecker and Biermann, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 245; Lampert et al. (2004), Art. 23 para 467; Roesen (2010), p. 172 et seq.
 
952
ECJ, Case C-436/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:165 (para 36)—van Esbroeck with regard to Art. 54 Schengen-Durchführungsübereinkommen; however, the Union is not a contracting party, Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 53. However, this does not change its great practical significance for the European Union; see Frenz (2011), paras 2723 et seq. For Schengen, see also ECJ, Case C-467/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:610—Gasparini; Case C-150/05, ECLI:EU:C:2006:614—van Straaten.
 
953
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 23 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 70 end, citing ECJ, Case 14/68, ECLI:EU:C:1969:4 (11)—Walt Wilhelm; General Court, Case T-141/89, ECLI:EU:T:1995:62 (para 191)—Tréfileurope; Case T-149/89, ECLI:EU:T:1995:69 (para 29)—Sotralentz.
 
954
Dannecker and Biermann, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 247.
 
955
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 23 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 71.
 
956
For respective competence, see Klees (2006), 1227.
 
957
Dannecker and Biermann, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 258.
 
958
Dannecker and Biermann, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 248.
 
959
ECJ, Case C-238 inter alia/99 P, ECLI:EU:C:2002:582 (paras 61 et seq.)—Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij confirming General Court, Case T-305 inter alia/94, ECLI:EU:T:1999:80 (para 98)—Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij.
 
960
Kuck (2002), 690.
 
961
In any case, a sufficient legal basis is missing, Dannecker and Biermann, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Vor Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 248 with fn. 722.
 
962
General Court, Case T-236 inter alia/01, ECLI:EU:T:2004:118 (paras 134 et seq.)—Tokai Carbon; see also below paras 312, 424 et seq. as well as further discussion 2937 et seq.
 
963
Detailed discussion contra General Court, Case T-223/00, ECLI:EU:T:2003:194 (para 99)—Kyowa Hakko; Case T-224/00, ECLI:EU:T:2003:195 (paras 88 et seq.)—Archer Daniels; still open, by contrast, ECJ, Case C-7/72, ECLI:EU:C:1972:125 (para 3)—Boehringer.
 
964
See above paras 2926 et seq.
 
965
ECJ, Case 14/68, ECLI:EU:C:1969:4 (para 11)—Walt Wilhelm.
 
966
Pro Eilmansberger (2004), 54.
 
967
ECJ, Case 14/68, ECLI:EU:C:1969:4 (para 11)—Walt Wilhelm.
 
968
See General Court, Case T-224/00, ECLI:EU:T:2003:195 (para 103)—Archer Daniels.
 
969
See the approach by ECJ, Case 7/72, ECLI:EU:C:1972:125 (para 4)—Boehringer, who has not investigated the question of ne bis in idem any further with regard to sanctions by third countries.
 
970
Using this is a starting point, Eilmansberger (2004), 53 et seq.
 
971
See below paras 2940 et seq.
 
972
ECJ, Cases 100–103/80, ECLI:EU:C:1983:158 (para 105)—Musique Diffusion Française.
 
973
ECJ, Cases 100–103/80, ECLI:EU:C:1983:158 (para 105, 109)—Musique Diffusion Française.
 
974
Ackermann (2010), 329; contra Bechtold and Bosch (2011), 160.
 
975
See above para 2922.
 
976
On this function, above para 2893.
 
977
ECJ, Case C-501 inter alia/06 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:610—GlaxoSmithKline Services; further discussion above, paras 70 et seq.
 
978
See above paras 2940 et seq.
 
979
Contra Soltész et al. (2003), 207 et seq.; see also Schwarze (2003), 267 et seq.
 
980
Referring to this aspect as well, Weitbrecht (2003b), 361.
 
981
ECJ, Cases 100–103/80, ECLI:EU:C:1983:158 (para 108)—Musique Diffusion Française.
 
982
See also, e.g., General Court, Case T-12/89, ECLI:EU:T:1992:34 (para 309)—Solvay; Case T-13/89, ECLI:EU:T:1992:35 (para 385)—ICI; Case T-14/89, ECLI:EU:T:1992:36 (para 346)—Montedipe.
 
983
Detailed discussion, Scholz and Haus (2002), 688.
 
984
See, e.g. General Court, Case T-150/89, ECLI:EU:T:1995:70 (para 59)—Martinelli; Case T-49/95, ECLI:EU:T:1996:186 (para 53)—Van Megen Sports; Case T-229/94, ECLI:EU:T:1997:155 (para 127)—Deutsche Bahn.
 
985
General Court, Case T-9/99, ECLI:EU:T:2002:70 (para 491)—HFB; see however General Court, Case T-23/99, ECLI:EU:T:2002:75 (para 274)—LR: “determine, generally and abstractly, the method”; critical view Kallmayer and Haupt (2002), 679.
 
986
ECJ, Case C-295/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2062 (para 190)—Telefónica and Telefónica de España.
 
987
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (2006 Fine Guidelines). These superseded the Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 15(2) of Regulation No. 17 and Article 65 (5) of the ECSC Treaty, OJ 1998 C 9, p. 3 (1998 Fine Guidelines).
 
988
Detailed discussion in General Court, Case T-9/99, ECLI:EU:T:2002:70 (paras 422 et seq.)—HFB; critical in part, Kallmayer and Haupt (2002), 677 et seq.
 
989
ECJ, Cases 100–103/80, ECLI:EU:C:1983:158 (para 121)—Musique Diffusion Française.
 
990
Commission, press release of 29 January 2014, IP/14/88, p. 2—Polyurethane foam manufacturer.
 
991
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2.
 
992
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 11).
 
993
See above paras 2945 et seq.
 
994
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 13 fn. 6).
 
995
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 18).
 
996
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 13).
 
997
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 17).
 
998
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 14).
 
999
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 16).
 
1000
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 20).
 
1001
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 21).
 
1002
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 23 fn. 7).
 
1003
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 23).
 
1004
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 26).
 
1005
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 28 1st indent).
 
1006
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 28 3rd indent).
 
1007
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 29 1st indent).
 
1008
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 29 2nd indent).
 
1009
ECJ, Case 19/77, ECLI:EU:C:1978:19 (paras 17 et seq.)—Miller; General Court, Case T-305 inter alia/94, ECLI:EU:T:1999:80 (paras 1111 et seq.)—Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij; Commission Decision 2003/437/EC, OJ 2003 L 153, p. 1 (para 264)—Zinc phosphate.
 
1010
Commission Decision 2003/207/EC, OJ 2003 L 84, p. 1 (para 412)—Industrial gas; see also ECJ, Case 246/86, ECLI:EU:C:1989:301 (para 41)—Belasco.
 
1011
General Court, Case T-66/92, ECLI:EU:T:1994:84 (para 45)—Herlitz; Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 29.
 
1012
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 29 3rd indent).
 
1013
See current Commission, press release of 29 January 2014, IP/14/88.
 
1014
ECJ, Case C-360/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:389 (para 20)—Pfleiderer.
 
1015
Most recently, Commission Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases, OJ 2006 C 298, p. 17; see OJ 1996 C 207, p. 4; OJ 2002 C 45, p. 3. Detailed discussion of developments in relation to the leniency rules from 1996, Feddersen, In: Grabitz and Hilf (2005), nach Art. 83 EGV—Art. 23 VO 1/2003 paras 265 et seq.; regarding the then-applicable practice, detailed discussion in Schneider (2004), p. 61 et seq.
 
1016
Regarding information-sharing aspects, Blake and Schnichels (2004), 551 et seq.
 
1017
Regarding concerns based on superordinate law, Schneider (2004), p. 156 et seq. Additional discussion, immediately following paras 2985 et seq.
 
1018
Polley and Seeliger (2002), 401.
 
1019
Commission, press release of 29 January 2014, IP/14/88.
 
1020
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 29 4th indent). See detailed discussion, below paras 2985 et seq.
 
1021
Most recently, Commission, press release of 29 January 2014, IP/14/88, p. 3; see the settlements referred to therein with participants in cartels in the sectors DRAMs (see IP/10/586), Feed phosphates (see IP/10/985), Detergent (see IP/11/473), Glass for cathode-ray tubes (see IP/11/1214), Cooling compressors (see IP/11/1511), Water management products (see IP/12/704), Wire harnesses (see IP/13/673) as well as Euro and Yen derivatives (see IP/13/1208).
 
1022
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 29 5th indent).
 
1023
For additional discussion, see paras 3020 et seq.
 
1024
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404—Schenker.
 
1025
ECJ, Case C-198/01, ECLI:EU:C:2003:430—CIF; further discussion above, para 2971.
 
1026
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 30).
 
1027
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 31).
 
1028
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 33).
 
1029
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 35).
 
1030
Most recently, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:770 (para 101)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1031
ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:770 (para 102)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1032
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 35).
 
1033
ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:770 (para 102)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1034
For further discussion, see paras 3075 et seq.
 
1035
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 36).
 
1036
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 37).
 
1037
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 37) in explicit deviation from No. 21.
 
1038
ECJ, Case C-189 inter alia/02 P, ECLI:EU:C:2005:408—Dansk Rørindustri.
 
1039
Schwarze (2009), 185; Frenz (2010), para 1567.
 
1040
See, e.g. ECJ, Case C-89/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:738 (paras 132 et seq.)—E.ON.
 
1041
Commission Communication—Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 15 (2) of Regulation No. 17 and Article 65 (5) of the ECSC Treaty, OJ 1998 C 9, p. 3 (3 et seq., section 1. A.).
 
1042
Commission Communication—Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 15 (2) of Regulation No. 17 and Article 65 (5) of the ECSC Treaty, OJ 1998 C 9, p. 3 (4 et seq., section 1. B.).
 
1043
For details, see Commission Communication—Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 15 (2) of Regulation No. 17 and Article 65 (5) of the ECSC Treaty, OJ 1998 C 9, p. 3 (4 et seq., sections 2 and 3).
 
1044
Commission Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases, OJ 2006 C 298, p. 17 (paras 10 et seq.).
 
1045
General Court, Case T-338/94, ECLI:EU:T:1998:99 (para 363)—Finnboard; similarly ECJ, Case C-298/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:634—Finnboard.
 
1046
Commission Decision 2004/138/EC, OJ 2004 L 56, p. 1 (para 547)—Austrian banks (“Lombard Club”); Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 81, likewise with regard to the following.
 
1047
General Court, Case T-13/89, ECLI:EU:T:1992:35 (para 393)—ICI.
 
1048
Commission Decision 2003/674/EC, OJ 2003 L 255, p. 1 (para 339)—Methionin.
 
1049
Commission Decision, ruling of 9 December 2004, COMP/37533 (para 222)—Choline chloride.
 
1050
Commission Decision 2003/674/EC, OJ 2003 L 255, p. 1 (para 339)—Methionin; Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 82, also for the previous section.
 
1051
Commission Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases, OJ 2006 C 298, p. 17 (paras 10 et seq.). Detailed discussion of the individual requirements, Hetzel (2004), p. 89 et seq.
 
1052
Commission Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases, OJ 2006 C 298, p. 17 (para 12).
 
1053
General Court, Case T-12/06, ECLI:EU:T:2011:441—Deltafina.
 
1054
General Court, Case T-235/07, ECLI:EU:T:2011:283—Bavaria; in favour of a mere right to bring an action for damages in the event of unreasonably-long proceedings, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:770—Groupe Gascogne; see above, paras 2976 et seq.
 
1055
Commission Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases, OJ 2006 C 298, p. 17 (paras 14 et seq.).
 
1056
Commission Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases, OJ 2006 C 298, p. 17 (paras 16, 19).
 
1057
Commission Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases, OJ 2006 C 298, p. 17 (para 20).
 
1058
Regarding the requirements in detail, Commission Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases, OJ 2006 C 298, p. 17 (paras 23 et seq.).
 
1059
General Court, Case T-224/00, ECLI:EU:T:2003:195—Archer Daniels.
 
1060
See ECJ, Case C-328/05 P, ECLI:EU:C:2007:277 (para 81)—SGL Carbon; General Court, Case T-410/03, ECLI:EU:T:2008:211 (para 555)—Hoechst.
 
1061
Völcker (2012), p. 169 et seq. with the demand for detailed grounds for a decision on the part of the Commission.
 
1062
Regarding the leniency rules in particular, see above paras 2995 et seq.
 
1063
General Court, Case T-311/94, ECLI:EU:T:1998:93 (para 309)—BPB de Eendracht citing the jurisprudence in general.
 
1064
General Court, Case T-67 inter alia/00, ECLI:EU:T:2004:221 (paras 573 et seq.)—JFE Engineering.
 
1065
Berg (2005), 55.
 
1066
ECJ, Case C-295/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2062 (para 189 et seq)—Telefónica and Telefónica de España.
 
1067
See fundamentally ECJ, Case 14/68, ECLI:EU:C:1969:4 (para 11)—Walt Wilhelm.
 
1068
Such with the same objective are prohibited based on the principle of ne bis idem, see above paras 2920 et seq., likewise with regard to the following.
 
1069
General Court, Case T-224/00, ECLI:EU:T:2003:195—Archer Daniels.
 
1070
See above paras 2937 et seq.
 
1071
See recent comprehensive discussion, Schultze (2014).
 
1072
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2.
 
1073
Müller (2012), p. 173 et seq., 177; Frenz (2013g), 49 et seq. for the following as well.
 
1074
Commission Decision 1999/210/EC, OJ 1999 L 76, p. 1 (para 208)—British Sugar II, affirmed in General Court, Case T-202 inter alia/98, ECLI:EU:T:2001:185—Tate & Lyle.
 
1075
Commission Decision 1999/210/EC, OJ 1999 L 76, p. 1 (para 208)—British Sugar II.
 
1076
Stadler (2006), p. 72.
 
1077
Bosch et al. (2009), 744; Müller (2012), p. 185.
 
1078
Almunia, SPEECH/10/586, p. 5 et seq., quoted in Müller (2012), p. 184 et seq. in conjunction with fn. 1209.
 
1079
Commission Decision 2004/420/EC, OJ 2004 L 125, p. 45 (313)—Electrical and mechanical carbon and graphite products; Judgement of 21 February 2007, COMP/38823 (para 754)—“Elevators and escalators”; Judgement of 22 July 2009, COMP/39396 (paras 237 et seq.)—Calcium carbide.
 
1080
See additional discussion in Müller (2012), p. 183, citing Commission Decision 2006/793/EC, OJ 2006 L 322, p. 20 (para 19)—Methacrylate.
 
1081
Commission Decision 2001/418/EC, OJ 2001 L 152, p. 24 (para 312)—Amino acids.
 
1082
General Court, Case T-7/89, ECLI:EU:T:1991:75 (para 357)—Hercules Chemicals; similarly, Case T-279/02, ECLI:EU:T:2006:103 (para 350)—Degussa.
 
1083
General Court, Case T-7/89, ECLI:EU:T:1991:75 (para 357 end)—Hercules Chemicals.
 
1084
General Court, Case T-7/89, ECLI:EU:T:1991:75 (para 357)—Hercules Chemicals; similarly, ECJ, Case C-189 inter alia/02 P, ECLI:EU:C:2005:408 (para 191)—Dansk Rørindustri.
 
1085
As viewed by Müller (2012), p. 183 et seq. citing, inter alia, Commission Decision 2003/2/EC, OJ 2003 L 6, p. 1 (para 736)—Vitamins; 2006/793/EC, OJ 2006 L 322, p. 20 (para 386)—Methacrylate.
 
1086
Commission Decision 82/853/EEC, OJ 1982 L 354, p. 28 (paras 67 et seq.)—National Panasonic.
 
1087
Müller (2012), p. 182 et seq. citing Commission Decision 88/518/EEC, OJ 1988 L 284, p. 41 (para 82)—Napier Brown/British Sugar I; Commission Decision 88/86/EEC, OJ 1988 L 49, p. 19 (para 27)—Fisher-Price/Quacker Oats as a result of the investigations by the Commission.
 
1088
See, e.g. General Court, Case T-77/92, ECLI:EU:T:1994:85 (para 93)—Parker Pen.
 
1089
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (paras 19 et seq.).
 
1090
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 66; Weitbrecht and Tepe (2001), 228 with regard to the British Sugar case; additional discussion below paras 3014 et seq.
 
1091
See Müller (2012), p. 193 et seq.
 
1092
Müller (2012), p. 196 et seq., 200.
 
1093
Bosch et al. (2009), 745.
 
1094
See ECJ, Cases 100–103/80, ECLI:EU:C:1983:158 (para 108)—Musique Diffusion Française; see also, e.g. General Court, Case T-14/89, ECLI:EU:T:1992:36 (para 346)—Montedipe.
 
1095
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (in particular, paras 18 et seq.); regarding the associated systemic arrangement using turnover as a basis in accordance with Art. 23 Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 44.
 
1096
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (Recital 5).
 
1097
Lampert (2002), 2243; Müller (2012), p. 201; Stadler (2006), p. 73.
 
1098
Regarding the question of group-wide compliance responsibility and thus responsibility for subsidiaries, Habersack (2011), p. 1175 et seq.
 
1099
In favour of an assessment of effectiveness, however only of the system as such, see also Müller (2012), p. 214 et seq.
 
1100
By contrast, against making a distinction, Müller (2012), p. 212.
 
1101
However, rejecting this, see, e.g. ECJ, Case C-550/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:512—Akzo Nobel.
 
1102
ECJ, Case 45/69, ECLI:EU:C:1970:73 (para 58)—Boehringer.
 
1103
Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 23 VO 1/2003 para 67.
 
1104
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2.
 
1105
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 29 2nd indent).
 
1106
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (para 37)—Schenker. See, e.g. Kersting (2013), 845 et seq.
 
1107
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (paras 38 et seq.)—Schenker; concurring Fleischer (2013), 326 et seq.; Frenz (2013e), 209 et seq.
 
1108
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (paras 35 et seq.)—Schenker.
 
1109
ECJ, Case C-226/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:795 (paras 24, 36 et seq.)—Expedia.
 
1110
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 48)—Schenker.
 
1111
Frenz (2013f), 272 et seq., regarding the following issue as well.
 
1112
ECJ, Case C-375/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:270 (paras 19 et seq.)—Tele2 Polska.
 
1113
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (para 42)—Schenker.
 
1114
See ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (para 42 end)—Schenker.
 
1115
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 88)—Schenker.
 
1116
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (paras 37 et seq.)—Schenker with additional citations.
 
1117
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 78)—Schenker.
 
1118
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (para 39)—Schenker.
 
1119
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 92)—Schenker.
 
1120
Related to this AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 70, 92)—Schenker.
 
1121
Related to this AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 92)—Schenker.
 
1122
Further discussion, AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (paras 64 et seq.)—Schenker.
 
1123
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (para 40)—Schenker.
 
1124
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (para 41)—Schenker.
 
1125
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (para 41 end)—Schenker.
 
1126
Correctly so, AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 47 end)—Schenker.
 
1127
Further development in the wake of the ECJ decision Schenker by Frenz (2013e), 209 et seq.
 
1128
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 41)—Schenker.
 
1129
Regarding Art. 6 (2) ECHR, see ECJ, Case C-199/92 P, ECLI:EU:C:1999:358 (paras 149 et seq.)—Hüls; regarding Art. 48 (1) CFR, see ECJ, Case C-89/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:738 (paras 72 et seq.)—E.ON. The latter provision must ensure the standard derived from Art. 6 (2) ECHR; cf. regarding Art. 6 (1) ECHR and Art. 47 CFR, see ECJ, Case C-199/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:684 (para 47)—Otis.
 
1130
ECHR, ruling of 27 September 2011, No. 43509/08 (paras 38 et seq.)—Menarini/Italy.
 
1131
Most recently, ECJ, Case C-199/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:684 (paras 46 et seq.)—Otis for the principle of effective judicial right to pursue effective legal remedy; further discussion of other decisions as well, Frenz (2013c), 123 et seq.
 
1132
See prior view ECJ, Cases C-628/10 P and 14/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:479 (para 42)—Alliance One International and previously, e.g. Case C-97/08 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:536 (para 56)—Akzo Nobel; Case C-49/92 P, ECLI:EU:C:1999:356 (para 145 and 204)—Anic Partecipazioni.
 
1133
The principle of fault additionally comprises a fundamental principle common to the constitutional law of the Member States, AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 41)—Schenker citing AG van Gerven, ECJ, Case C-116/92, ECLI:EU:C:1993:357 (para 18)—Charlton.
 
1134
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 48)—Schenker.
 
1135
See ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (paras 37 et seq. with further citations)—Schenker.
 
1136
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 85)—Schenker.
 
1137
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (paras 37 et seq. with further citations)—Schenker.
 
1138
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (paras 90 and 93)—Schenker in relation to administrative and judicial decisions, paras 63 and 66 for legal advice.
 
1139
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 59)—Schenker.
 
1140
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 68)—Schenker.
 
1141
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 60)—Schenker.
 
1142
Referring to this basis, AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 61)—Schenker.
 
1143
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 62)—Schenker.
 
1144
For example, regarding the deduction of input VAT, see ECJ, Case C-110/94, ECLI:EU:C:1996:67 (para 24)—INZO; Case C-400/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:304 (para 40)—Breitsohl; Case C-255/02, ECLI:EU:C:2006:121 (para 75)—Halifax; related Frenz (2013b), 582 et seq.; regarding fundamental freedoms, ECJ, Case 115/78, ECLI:EU:C:1979:31 (paras 24 et seq.)—Knoors.
 
1145
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 64)—Schenker: no self-created “free pass”.
 
1146
Esp. ECJ, Case C-550/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:512—Akzo Nobel.
 
1147
See e.g., Henssler (2009), 952.
 
1148
Frenz (2012a), 138 et seq.
 
1149
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 65)—Schenker.
 
1150
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 76)—Schenker.
 
1151
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 67)—Schenker.
 
1152
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 66)—Schenker.
 
1153
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 69)—Schenker.
 
1154
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 70)—Schenker.
 
1155
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 70 end)—Schenker.
 
1156
Regarding the definition of a hardcore restriction, cf. in particular Commission Notice on agreements of minor importance which do not appreciably restrict competition under Article 101 (1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (De Minimis Notice), OJ 2014 C 291, p. 1; AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 70)—Schenker.
 
1157
See, e.g. Frenz (2013d), 165.
 
1158
Guidelines on the effect on trade concept contained in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 81 (section 3.​2.​1, in particular para 78); AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 77)—Schenker.
 
1159
ECJ, Case C-226/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:795 (paras 37 et seq.)—Expedia.
 
1160
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 71)—Schenker.
 
1161
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 73)—Schenker citing General Court, Case T-99/04, ECLI:EU:T:2008:256—AC-Treuhand.
 
1162
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 78)—Schenker.
 
1163
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 78)—Schenker.
 
1164
See, e.g. AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 85 end)—Schenker.
 
1165
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 83)—Schenker.
 
1166
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 93)—Schenker.
 
1167
Referring to confidence, AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 94)—Schenker: “not … reasonable”.
 
1168
ECJ, Case C-24/95, ECLI:EU:C:1997:163—Alcan.
 
1169
See fundamentally ECJ, Case 283/81, ECLI:EU:C:1982:335 (paras 14 et seq.)—C.I.L.F.I.T.; see also, e.g. Case C-461/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:742 (para 16)—Gaston Schul; Herrmann (2006), 233 et seq.; with additional citations Frenz (2010), paras 3310 et seq.
 
1170
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 90)—Schenker.
 
1171
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 91)—Schenker citing ECJ, Case C-47/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2008:726 (para 81, 86)—Masdar.
 
1172
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 92)—Schenker citing, inter alia, ECJ, Case C-94/05, ECLI:EU:C:2006:185 (para 31)—Emsland-Stärke.
 
1173
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 92, 101)—Schenker.
 
1174
See most recently, ECJ, Case C-226/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:795 as well as further discussion in this context, AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 101)—Schenker.
 
1175
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 88)—Schenker.
 
1176
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (para 48)—Schenker.
 
1177
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 89)—Schenker.
 
1178
General Court, Case T-67/01, ECLI:EU:T:2004:3 (para 40)—JCB Service.
 
1179
ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:770 (para 72)—Groupe Gascogne citing ECHR, NJW 2001, 2694 (paras 156 et seq.)—Kudla/Poland.
 
1180
ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:770 (para 74)—Groupe Gascogne; Case C-385/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:456 (para 193)—Duales System Deutschland.
 
1181
See ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:770 (para 78)—Groupe Gascogne; Case C-385/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:456 (para 194)—Duales System Deutschland.
 
1182
ECJ, Case C-185/95 P, ECLI:EU:C:1998:608 (para 48)—Baustahlgewebe.
 
1183
ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:770 (paras 82 et seq.)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1184
ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:770 (para 85)—Groupe Gascogne citing Case C-385/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:456 (para 181)—Duales System Deutschland with additional citations.
 
1185
ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:770 (para 86)—Groupe Gascogne; Case C-385/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:456 (para 182)—Duales System Deutschland with additional citations.
 
1186
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 110)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1187
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 112)—Groupe Gascogne: “I cannot emphasize enough that …”.
 
1188
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-50/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:350 (para 123)—Kendrion citing the AG Opinion in Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 94)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1189
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 94 end)—Groupe Gascogne; in such cases, she “would require being persuaded otherwise”.
 
1190
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-50/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:350 (para 123)—Kendrion.
 
1191
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-40/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:361 (para 134)—Gascogne Sack Deutschland.
 
1192
ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:770 (para 92)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1193
Detailed discussion, AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 105)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1194
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-40/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:361 (para 132)—Gascogne Sack Deutschland.
 
1195
See ECJ, Case C-185/95 P, ECLI:EU:C:1998:608 (para 45)—Baustahlgewebe.
 
1196
ECJ, Case C-185/95 P, ECLI:EU:C:1998:608 (para 29)—Baustahlgewebe citing applicable rulings from the ECHR.
 
1197
Detailed discussion, AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (paras 82 et seq.)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1198
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-40/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:361 (para 140)—Gascogne Sack Deutschland as well as the AG Opinion in Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 148)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1199
ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:770 (para 103)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1200
ECJ, Case C-385/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:456—Duales System Deutschland.
 
1201
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 127)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1202
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 130)—Groupe Gascogne contrary to General Court, Case T-235/07, ECLI:EU:T:2011:283—Bavaria.
 
1203
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 131)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1204
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-40/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:361 (para 140)—Gascogne Sack Deutschland; AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 148)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1205
ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:770 (para 96)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1206
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 132)—Groupe Gascogne. See also General Court, Case T-18/03, ECLI:EU:T:2009:132—CD Contact Data; Case T-214/06, ECLI:EU:T:2012:275; see also AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-110/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:257 (para 198)—Solvay.
 
1207
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 132)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1208
See ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (paras 48 et seq.)—Schenker with additional citations.
 
1209
Similar view, AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 139)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1210
Citing this, AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 140)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1211
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 147)—Groupe Gascogne: other panel.
 
1212
See AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 133)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1213
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (paras 142 et seq.)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1214
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 147)—Groupe Gascogne.
 
1215
AG Sharpston, ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:360 (para 143)—Groupe Gascogne citing ECHR, judgement of 25 February 1997, No. 22107/93 (paras 73 et seq.)—Findlay/United Kingdom.
 
1216
ECJ, Case C-58/12 P, ECLI:EU:C:2013:770 (para 101)—Groupe Gascogne; with additional citations, Case C-328/05 P, ECLI:EU:C:2007:277 (para 100)—SGL Carbon.
 
1217
ECJ, Case C-3/06 P, ECLI:EU:C:2007:88 (para 82)—Danone.
 
1218
ECJ, Case C-89/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:738 (para 126)—E.ON.
 
1219
ECJ, Case C-89/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:738 (paras 127 et seq.)—E.ON.
 
1220
ECJ, Case C-386/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:815 (para 63)—Chalkor; Case C-199/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:684 (para 62)—Otis; Frenz (2013c), 123 et seq. regarding the following issue as well.
 
1221
ECJ, Case C-199/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:684 (para 63)—Otis citing Case C-386/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:815 (para 67)—Chalkor.
 
1222
General Court, Case T-67 inter alia/00, ECLI:EU:T:2004:221 (para 578)—JFE Engineering.
 
1223
In general, see above paras 2685 et seq.
 
1224
General Court, Case T-67 inter alia/00, ECLI:EU:T:2004:221 (para 579)—JFE Engineering; similarly Gaitanides, In: von der Groeben et al. (2015), Art. 261 AEUV para 16; different view to some extent in the literature, e.g. Booß, In: Grabitz et al. (2014), Art. 261 AEUV para 14 with additional citations.
 
1225
ECJ, Case C-199/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:684 (para 61)—Otis.
 
1226
Nehl (2012), p. 148, citing General Court, Case T-69/04, ECLI:EU:T:2008:415 (paras 240 et seq.)—Schunk; General Court, Case T-11/05, ECLI:EU:T:2010:201 (paras 244, 248 et seq.)—Wieland-Werke.
 
1227
See AG Mazák, ECJ, Case C-407/08 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:70 (para 96)—Knauf Gips.
 
1228
Nehl (2012), p. 150 et seq.; similar, Polzin (2011), 461.
 
1229
Emphasizing this aspect, ECJ, Case C-386/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:815 (paras 64 et seq.)—Chalkor; Case C-389/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:816 (paras 131 et seq.)—KME Germany.
 
1230
See ECJ, Case C-407/08 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:389 (paras 89 et seq.)—Knauf Gips.
 
1231
Völcker (2012), p. 180 et seq.
 
1232
Accordingly dismissive, General Court, Case T-67 inter alia/00, ECLI:EU:T:2004:221 (para 578)—JFE Engineering; Nehl (2012), p. 148 with additional citations, in particular contrary decision of the ECJ, Case C-89/08 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:742 (paras 50 et seq.)—Commission/Ireland; Case C-197/09 RX-II, ECLI:EU:C:2009:804 (paras 39 et seq.)—Revision M/EMEA.
 
1233
Nehl (2012), p. 149 citing opinions of AG Maduro, ECJ, Case C-3/06 P, ECLI:EU:C:2006:720 (para 53)—Danone.
 
1234
Nehl (2012), p. 149. See e.g. ECJ, Case C-386/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:815 (paras 63 et seq.)—Chalkor; General Court, Case T-132/07, ECLI:EU:T:2011:344 (para 207)—Fuji Electric; Case T-11/06, ECLI:EU:T:2011:560 (paras 265 et seq.)—Romana Tabacchi.
 
1235
See General Court, Case T-38/05, ECLI:EU:T:2011:585 (paras 270 et seq.)—Agroexpansión.
 
1236
Nehl (2012), p. 145 with fn. 93, citing General Court, Case T-217/06, ECLI:EU:T:2011:251 (paras 249 et seq.)—Arkema; Case T-322/01, ECLI:EU:T:2006:267 (paras 293 et seq., 311 et seq.)—Roquette Frères with incorrectly provided turnover figures for which the plaintiff was supposedly responsible.
 
1237
ECJ, Case C-3/06 P, ECLI:EU:C:2007:88 (para 62)—Danone.
 
1238
Völcker (2012), p. 180, citing General Court, Case T-67 inter alia/00, ECLI:EU:T:2004:221 (paras 578 et seq.)—JFE Engineering.
 
1239
Believing this to be incompatible per se, Völcker (2012), p. 180.
 
1240
Völcker (2012), p. 179.
 
1241
General Court, Case T-101 and 111/05, ECLI:EU:T:2007:380 (para 212)—BASF; on the topic as a whole, Polzin (2011), 456 et seq.
 
1242
For additional discussion, see above paras 2968 et seq., 2985 et seq.
 
1243
ECJ, Case C-123/03 P, ECLI:EU:C:2004:783 (para 45)—Greencore Group. Cf. with regard to a simple Commission letter, General Court, Case T-308/02, ECLI:EU:T:2004:119 (paras 39 et seq.)—SGL Carbon.
 
1244
General Court, Case T-275/94, ECLI:EU:T:1995:141 (para 59)—Groupement des cartes bancaires. Further discussion, Klees (2005), paras 151, 168.
 
1245
ECJ, Case C-320/92 P, ECLI:EU:C:1994:414 (paras 45 et seq.)—Finsider.
 
1246
See above paras 2399 et seq., 2478 et seq.
 
1247
See above paras 2401 et seq.
 
1248
For additional discussion, see above paras 316 et seq.
 
1249
Comprehensive discussion of this topic, see below paras 4152 et seq.
 
1250
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (paras 35 et seq.)—Schenker; see above paras 3022 et seq.
 
1251
ECJ, Case C-198/01, ECLI:EU:C:2003:430 (paras 54 et seq.)—CIF; cf. Case 40 inter alia/73, ECLI:EU:C:1975:174 (para 619/620)—Suiker Unie.
 
1252
Likewise referring to this, with additional citations ECJ, Case C-198/01, ECLI:EU:C:2003:430 (paras 45 et seq.)—CIF.
 
1253
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (para 35)—Schenker.
 
1254
For additional discussion, see above para 2479.
 
1255
See in this context, Frenz (2010), paras 1892 et seq.
 
1256
Hossenfelder, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 5 VerfVO para 2; critical of this monopoly, see e.g. Wolf and Fink (1994), 289 et seq.
 
1257
By contrast, apparently in favour of a constitutive character, Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 1; Hossenfelder, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 5 VerfVO para 3.
 
1258
Hossenfelder, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 5 VerfVO paras 8 et seq.
 
1259
Similarly in favour of a declaratory meaning, Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 1.
 
1260
Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 3; Hossenfelder, In: Loewenheim et al. (2009), Art. 5 VerfVO para 3; Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 1; Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004) § 8 paras 11 et seq.
 
1261
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 5 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 1.
 
1262
Klees (2005), § 7 para 37.
 
1263
Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 paras 11 et seq.
 
1264
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (para 35)—Schenker.
 
1265
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (para 36)—Schenker.
 
1266
Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 paras 2 et seq.
 
1267
Thus posited by the chairman of the Monopolies Commission, Zimmer, quoted in F.A.Z. dated 25 January 2014, p. 14.
 
1268
Further, see immediately below at paras 3122 et seq.
 
1269
ECJ, Case 127/73, ECLI:EU:C:1974:25 (para 18/23)—BRT/SABAM; Bechtold et al. (2009), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 3.
 
1270
ECJ, Case 127/73, ECLI:EU:C:1974:25 (para 18/23)—BRT/SABAM.
 
1271
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 3.
 
1272
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 4.
 
1273
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 8.
 
1274
Schütz, In: Busche and Röhling (2013), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 3; narrower Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 19.
 
1275
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 11.
 
1276
ECJ, Case 127/73, ECLI:EU:C:1974:25 (para 18/23)—BRT/SABAM.
 
1277
ECJ, Case C-344/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:689 (para 49)—Masterfoods; Ritter, In: Immenga and Mestmäcker (2012), Art. 11 VO 1/2003 para 27.
 
1278
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 5 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 18.
 
1279
For additional discussion, see above paras 2760 et seq.
 
1280
Contrary opinion Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 13.
 
1281
ECJ, Case C-375/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:270 (paras 19 et seq.)—Tele2 Polska. Under ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (para 42)—Schenker, this precludes any protection of legitimate expectations; different result, different conclusion, above paras 3054 et seq.
 
1282
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 5 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 10.
 
1283
Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 13.
 
1284
Commission Notice on cooperation within the Network of Competition Authorities, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 43 (para 2).
 
1285
De Bronett (2005), Art. 5 para 4.
 
1286
De Bronett (2012), Art. 5 para 7.
 
1287
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 5 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 10.
 
1288
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (paras 12, 19 et seq.) regarding the following as well.
 
1289
Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003, OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2 (para 30).
 
1290
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 5 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 10.
 
1291
Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 paras 26 et seq.
 
1292
Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 32; Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 5 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 13.
 
1293
Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 32.
 
1294
See, previously, Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 5 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 15.
 
1295
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (para 42)—Schenker.
 
1296
See above paras 2937 et seq.
 
1297
For additional discussion, see above para 2478.
 
1298
For additional discussion, see above paras 2919 et seq.
 
1299
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 8 para 14.
 
1300
Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 24.
 
1301
Bechtold et al. (2014), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 11.
 
1302
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 8 para 18: Bauer, In: Hirsch et al. (2007), Art. 5 VO 1/2003 para 23.
 
1303
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (para 45)—Schenker; with an argumentum a maiore ad minus AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (para 110)—Schenker.
 
1304
ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:404 (paras 46 et seq., 49)—Schenker.
 
1305
AG Kokott, ECJ, Case C-681/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:126 (paras 111 et seq.)—Schenker.
 
1306
For additional discussion, see above paras 2379 et seq.
 
1307
ECJ, Case C-375/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:270 (paras 22 et seq.)—Tele2 Polska. See above para 2855.
 
1308
Further discussion, Andreangeli (2013), p. 110 et seq.
 
1309
Pelikánová (2013), p. 106 et seq.
 
1310
See above para 2748 for safeguarding rights to mount a defence.
 
1311
ECJ, Case C-67/13 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2204 (paras 43 et seq.)—CB.
 
1312
See paras 3170 et seq.
 
1313
Cf. above at para 2436.
 
1314
See also, Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 10 paras 42 et seq.
 
1315
See above paras 2478 et seq.
 
1316
Drawing a distinction, Pohlmann (2011), p. 476 et seq.
 
1317
Pohlmann (2011), p. 484 et seq.
 
1318
See e.g. ECJ, Cases C-12 and 13/03 P, ECLI:EU:C:2010:280 (paras 39 et seq.)—Tetra Laval.
 
1319
See fundamentally ECJ, Case 42/84, ECLI:EU:C:1985:327 (para 34)—Remia; still citing Gündisch (2002), 31 et seq.
 
1320
ECJ, Case C-67/13 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2204 (paras 44 et seq.)—CB.
 
1321
ECJ, Case C-67/13 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2204 (para 43).
 
1322
ECJ, Case C-199/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:684—Otis.
 
1323
The following discussion of Art. 47 CFR are based on Frenz (2013c), 123 et seq.
 
1324
ECJ, Case C-199/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:684 (para 49)—Otis.
 
1325
ECJ, Case C-199/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:684 (para 47)—Otis as well as Case C-386/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:815 (para 51)—Chalkor.
 
1326
ECHR, ruling of 27 September 2011, No. 43509/08 (para 59)—Menarini/Italy.
 
1327
ECHR, ruling of 27 September 2011, No. 43509/08 (paras 63 et seq.)—Menarini/Italy, translated by Nehl (2012), p. 133 et seq.
 
1328
ECHR, ruling of 27 September 2011, No. 43509/08 (paras 63 et seq.)—Menarini/Italy.
 
1329
Dissenting opinion Pinto di Albuquerque, presented by Nehl (2012), p. 134.
 
1330
See also ECJ, Case C-67/13 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2204 (para 46)—CB.
 
1331
ECJ, Case C-67/13 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2204 (para 46)—CB; Case C-199/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:684 (para 59)—Otis in continuation of Case C-386/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:815 (para 54)—Chalkor.
 
1332
ECJ, Case C-199/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:684 (para 60)—Otis citing Case C-386/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:815 (para 61)—Chalkor.
 
1333
Trend from prior case law, see Nehl (2012), p. 126.
 
1334
ECJ, Case C-125 inter alia/07 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:576 (paras 143 as well as 174 et seq., 193)—Erste Group Bank.
 
1335
ECJ, Case C-386/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:815 (para 62)—Chalkor.
 
1336
ECJ, Case C-199/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:684 (para 61)—Otis.
 
1337
ECJ, Case C-386/10 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:815 (para 62)—Chalkor; Case C-199/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:684 (para 61)—Otis.
 
1338
ECJ, Case 73/74, ECLI:EU:C:1975:160 (para 30/33)—Papiers peints de Belgique.
 
1339
Cf. General Court, Case T-191/98 inter alia, ECLI:EU:T:2003:245—Atlantic Container Line, which revoked in part the underlying Commission Decision 1999/243/EC, OJ 1999 L 95, p. 1 based on a lack of a sufficient opportunity to respond.
 
1340
Skouris (2002), 74.
 
1341
ECJ, Cases C-395 and 396/96 P, ECLI:EU:C:2000:132 (paras 142 et seq.)—Compagnie maritime belge transports.
 
1342
General Court, Case T-439/07, ECLI:EU:T:2012:320 (para 45)—Coats Holdings.
 
1343
General Court, Case T-439/07, ECLI:EU:T:2012:320 (para 50)—Coats Holdings.
 
1344
General Court, Case T-439/07, ECLI:EU:T:2012:320 (para 48)—Coats Holdings.
 
1345
Additional detailed discussion of the burden of proof and evidentiary requirements, General Court, Case T-214/06, ECLI:EU:T:2012:275 (paras 52 et seq.)—ICI.
 
1346
General Court, Case T-379/06, ECLI:EU:T:2011:110 (para 47)—Kaimer, confirmed by ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 6)—Kaimer; Cases 29 and 30/83, ECLI:EU:C:1984:130 (para 20)—CRAM and Rheinzink.
 
1347
General Court, Case T-379/06, ECLI:EU:T:2011:110 (para 47)—Kaimer, confirmed by ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 6)—Kaimer; General Court, Case T-38/02, ECLI:EU:T:2005:367 (para 215)—Groupe Danone.
 
1348
General Court, Case T-379/06, ECLI:EU:T:2011:110 (para 51)—Kaimer, confirmed by ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 6)—Kaimer.
 
1349
General Court, Case T-439/07, ECLI:EU:T:2012:320 (para 38)—Coats Holdings with additional citations.
 
1350
General Court, Case T-439/07, ECLI:EU:T:2012:320 (para 39)—Coats Holdings citing ECJ, Case C-235/92 P, ECLI:EU:C:1999:362 (para 181)—Montecatini.
 
1351
General Court, Case T-439/07, ECLI:EU:T:2012:320 (para 40)—Coats Holdings.
 
1352
General Court, Case T-439/07, ECLI:EU:T:2012:320 (paras 41 et seq.)—Coats Holdings.
 
1353
General Court, Case T-439/07, ECLI:EU:T:2012:320 (para 43)—Coats Holdings.
 
1354
General Court, Case T-379/06, ECLI:EU:T:2011:110 (para 48)—Kaimer, confirmed by ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 6)—Kaimer General Court, Case T-67 inter alia/00, ECLI:EU:T:2004:221 (para 180)—JFE Engineering; see also below para 3160.
 
1355
Further discussion, Völcker (2012), p. 171.
 
1356
See General Court, Case T-379/06, ECLI:EU:T:2011:110 (para 47)—Kaimer, confirmed by ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 6)—Kaimer.
 
1357
ECJ, Case C-226/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:795 (para 37)—Expedia.
 
1358
See only ECJ, Case C-501 inter alia/06 P, ECLI:EU:C:2009:610 (paras 58 et seq.)—GlaxoSmithKline Services.
 
1359
Moderating in such cases as well, Grune (2013), 117.
 
1360
Völcker (2012), p. 159 et seq.
 
1361
General Court, Case T-53/03, ECLI:EU:T:2008:254 (para 63)—BPB.
 
1362
Völcker (2012), p. 171.
 
1363
Völcker (2012), p. 172.
 
1364
General Court, Case T-379/06, ECLI:EU:T:2011:110 (para 50)—Kaimer, confirmed by ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 6)—Kaimer.
 
1365
General Court, Case T-379/06, ECLI:EU:T:2011:110 (para 56)—Kaimer, confirmed by ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 6)—Kaimer.
 
1366
General Court, Case T-379/06, ECLI:EU:T:2011:110 (para 51)—Kaimer, confirmed by ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 6)—Kaimer.
 
1367
ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (paras 22 et seq.)—Kaimer; Case C-487/06 P, ECLI:EU:C:2008:757 (para 76)—British Aggregates.
 
1368
ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 22)—Kaimer; ECJ, Case C-487/06 P, ECLI:EU:C:2008:757 (para 76)—British Aggregates.
 
1369
ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 24)—Kaimer.
 
1370
ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 22)—Kaimer.
 
1371
ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (paras 44 et seq.)—Kaimer.
 
1372
General Court, Case T-379/06, ECLI:EU:T:2011:110 (para 56)—Kaimer, confirmed by ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 6)—Kaimer.
 
1373
ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 46)—Kaimer.
 
1374
ECJ, Case C-264/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:498 (para 61)—Kaimer with additional citations.
 
1375
ECJ, Case C-67/13 P, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2204 (para 45)—CB; von Köckritz (2014), 908.
 
1376
ECJ, Case C-68/95, ECLI:EU:C:1996:452 (para 59)—Port.
 
1377
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 10 paras 21 et seq.
 
1378
By contrast, not in relation to a decision of the Commission that there is no reason to act pursuant to Art. 9 (1) sent. 2 Council Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003; Schmidt (2003), 1242.
 
1379
See paras 3182 et seq.
 
1380
Ultimately in agreement, Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 paras 111 et seq.
 
1381
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 para 114.
 
1382
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 6 paras 115 et seq. citing ECJ, Case 75/84, ECLI:EU:C:1986:399 (paras 21 et seq.)—Metro II.
 
1383
See General Court, Case T-83/92, ECLI:EU:T:1993:93 (para 30)—Zunis; Case T-3/93, ECLI:EU:T:1994:36 (para 82)—Air France I and further discussion below, paras 3980 et seq., 4146 in the merger control context.
 
1384
Regarding this process, cf. Notice on cooperation between national courts and the Commission in applying Articles 81 and 82 of the EEC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 54 (paras 15 et seq.).
 
1385
Notice on cooperation between national courts and the Commission in applying Articles 81 and 82 of the EEC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 54 (paras 12 et seq.).
 
1386
Diekmann, In: Wiedemann (2008), § 40 para 2. For additional discussion, see above paras 1772 et seq.
 
1387
Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union Text with EEA relevance, OJ L 349, p. 1.
 
1388
See above paras 1788 et seq.
 
1389
See above paras 3174 et seq.
 
1390
De Bronett (2012), Art. 16 para 7.
 
1391
De Bronett (2012), Art. 16 para 7.
 
1392
Cf. above para 2891.
 
1393
Schwarze and Weitbrecht (2004), § 11 para 39.
 
1394
Contra based on fundamental considerations, Andreangeli (2013), p. 110 et seq.
 
1395
See above para 1791 et seq.
 
1396
General Court, Case T-67 inter alia/00, ECLI:EU:T:2004:221 (paras 343 et seq.)—JFE Engineering.
 
1397
ECJ, Case C-204 inter alia/00 P, ECLI:EU:C:2004:6 (para 328)—Aalborg Portland.
 
1398
Andreangeli (2013), p. 132 et seq.
 
1399
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65.
 
1400
For additional discussion, see above paras 2490 et seq., likewise with regard to the following. The focus here is on the sequence of the proceedings.
 
1401
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (paras 31 et seq.).
 
1402
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (paras 36 et seq.) citing General Court, Case T-37/92, ECLI:EU:T:1994:54 (para 36)—BEUC and NCC.
 
1403
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 37).
 
1404
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 47).
 
1405
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 45).
 
1406
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 47).
 
1407
Commission Notice—Guidelines on the effect on trade concept contained in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 81.
 
1408
Commission Notice on agreements of minor importance which do not appreciably restrict competition under Article 101 (1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (De Minimis Notice), OJ 2014 C 291, p. 1.
 
1409
Commission Communication—Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 (3) of the Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 97.
 
1410
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 59).
 
1411
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (paras 60 et seq.).
 
1412
General Court, Case T-213/01 R, ECLI:EU:T:2001:292 (para 47)—Österreichische Postsparkasse.
 
1413
See General Court, Case T-213/01 R, ECLI:EU:T:2001:292 (para 46)—Österreichische Postsparkasse citing ECJ, Case 60/81, ECLI:EU:C:1981:264 (para 9)—IBM.
 
1414
Art. 6 Regulation (EC) No. 773/2004, OJ 2004 L 123, p. 18; Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (paras 64 et seq.).
 
1415
Cf. above at paras 2707 et seq.
 
1416
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 7 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 21.
 
1417
Sura, In: Langen and Bunte (2014), Art. 7 VO Nr. 1/2003 para 21.
 
1418
ECJ, Cases 142 and 156/84, ECLI:EU:C:1987:490 (paras 20 et seq.)—BAT and Reynolds with regard to business secrets.
 
1419
ECJ, Cases 142 and 156/84, ECLI:EU:C:1987:490 (para 21)—BAT and Reynolds.
 
1420
Klees (2005), § 6 para 45.
 
1421
General Court, Case T-38/96, ECLI:EU:T:1997:110 (paras 26 et seq., 31 et seq.)—Guérin automobiles.
 
1422
General Court, Case T-38/96, ECLI:EU:T:1997:110 (para 42)—Guérin automobiles.
 
1423
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (paras 68 et seq.).
 
1424
Above para 3199.
 
1425
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (paras 74 et seq.).
 
1426
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (paras 77 et seq.).
 
1427
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 80).
 
1428
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (para 81).
 
1429
For additional discussion, see above paras 3178 et seq.
 
1430
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (paras 12 et seq.).
 
1431
Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, OJ 2004 C 101, p. 65 (paras 17, 44).
 
1432
See above para 3179.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ackermann T (2010) Prävention als Paradigma: Zur Verteidigung eines effektiven kartellrechtlichen Sanktionssystems. ZWeR:329–352 Ackermann T (2010) Prävention als Paradigma: Zur Verteidigung eines effektiven kartellrechtlichen Sanktionssystems. ZWeR:329–352
Zurück zum Zitat Andreangeli A (2013) Private antitrust claims as a ‘Special Case’: can the general court be envisaged as the Appellate Court vis-à-vis decisions of national courts? In: Danov M, Becker F, Beaumont P (eds) Cross-border EU competition law actions. Hart, Oxford, pp 109–134 Andreangeli A (2013) Private antitrust claims as a ‘Special Case’: can the general court be envisaged as the Appellate Court vis-à-vis decisions of national courts? In: Danov M, Becker F, Beaumont P (eds) Cross-border EU competition law actions. Hart, Oxford, pp 109–134
Zurück zum Zitat Bartosch A (2001) Von der Freistellung zur Legalausnahme: Der Vorschlag der EG-Kommission für eine “neue Verordnung Nr. 17”. EuZW:101–107 Bartosch A (2001) Von der Freistellung zur Legalausnahme: Der Vorschlag der EG-Kommission für eine “neue Verordnung Nr. 17”. EuZW:101–107
Zurück zum Zitat Baur J, Pritzsche K, Pooschke S (2008) “Ownership Unbundling” von Energienetzen und der europäische Schutz des Eigentums. DVBl.:483–492 Baur J, Pritzsche K, Pooschke S (2008) “Ownership Unbundling” von Energienetzen und der europäische Schutz des Eigentums. DVBl.:483–492
Zurück zum Zitat Bechtold R (1992) Die Stellung der Kommission und der Unternehmen im EWG-Kartellverfahren. EuR:41–54 Bechtold R (1992) Die Stellung der Kommission und der Unternehmen im EWG-Kartellverfahren. EuR:41–54
Zurück zum Zitat Bechtold R, Bosch W (2011) Der Zweck heiligt nicht alle Mittel. ZWeR:160–169 Bechtold R, Bosch W (2011) Der Zweck heiligt nicht alle Mittel. ZWeR:160–169
Zurück zum Zitat Bechtold R, Bosch W, Brinker I, Hirsbrunner S (2009) EG-Kartellrecht, 2nd edn. C.H. Beck, Munich Bechtold R, Bosch W, Brinker I, Hirsbrunner S (2009) EG-Kartellrecht, 2nd edn. C.H. Beck, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Bechtold R, Bosch W, Brinker I (2014) EU-Kartellrecht, 3rd edn. C.H. Beck, Munich Bechtold R, Bosch W, Brinker I (2014) EU-Kartellrecht, 3rd edn. C.H. Beck, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Berg W (2005) Die Rechtsprechung des EuGH und EuG auf dem Gebiet des Kartellrechts im Jahr 2004. EWS:49–61 Berg W (2005) Die Rechtsprechung des EuGH und EuG auf dem Gebiet des Kartellrechts im Jahr 2004. EWS:49–61
Zurück zum Zitat Blake S, Schnichels D (2004) Schutz der Kronzeugen im neuen EG-Wettbewerbsrecht. EuZW:551–555 Blake S, Schnichels D (2004) Schutz der Kronzeugen im neuen EG-Wettbewerbsrecht. EuZW:551–555
Zurück zum Zitat Böge U (2003) Das Netzwerk der EU-Wettbewerbsbehörden nimmt Gestalt an: Anforderungen an das Bundeskartellamt und Änderungsbedarf im deutschen Kartellrecht. EWS:441–445 Böge U (2003) Das Netzwerk der EU-Wettbewerbsbehörden nimmt Gestalt an: Anforderungen an das Bundeskartellamt und Änderungsbedarf im deutschen Kartellrecht. EWS:441–445
Zurück zum Zitat Bosch W, Colbus B, Harbusch A (2009) Berücksichtigung von Compliance-Programmen in Kartellbußgeldverfahren. WuW:740–749 Bosch W, Colbus B, Harbusch A (2009) Berücksichtigung von Compliance-Programmen in Kartellbußgeldverfahren. WuW:740–749
Zurück zum Zitat Brinker I (1994) Missbrauchsaufsicht auf der Grundlage der Gruppenfreistellungsverordnungen. Bedeutung des Widerrufsrechts der EG-Kommission im Rahmen der Gruppenfreistellungsverordnungen nach Artikel 85 Absatz 3 EG-Vertrag. Diss., Munich Brinker I (1994) Missbrauchsaufsicht auf der Grundlage der Gruppenfreistellungsverordnungen. Bedeutung des Widerrufsrechts der EG-Kommission im Rahmen der Gruppenfreistellungsverordnungen nach Artikel 85 Absatz 3 EG-Vertrag. Diss., Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Bueren E (2011a) Akteneinsicht Dritter im Vergleichsverfahren – Viel Wissen, viel Ärger? ZWeR:74–94 Bueren E (2011a) Akteneinsicht Dritter im Vergleichsverfahren – Viel Wissen, viel Ärger? ZWeR:74–94
Zurück zum Zitat Bueren E (2011b) Verständigungen – Settlements in Kartellbußgeldverfahren. Eine Untersuchung des Vergleichsverfahrens der Kommission mit einer rechtsvergleichenden und rechtsökonomischen Analyse. Nomos, Baden-Baden Bueren E (2011b) Verständigungen – Settlements in Kartellbußgeldverfahren. Eine Untersuchung des Vergleichsverfahrens der Kommission mit einer rechtsvergleichenden und rechtsökonomischen Analyse. Nomos, Baden-Baden
Zurück zum Zitat Busche J, Röhling A (eds) (2013) Kölner Kommentar, vol 4: VO Nr. 1/2003 – FKVO (VO Nr. 139/2004) – Besondere Wirtschaftszweige. Carl Heymanns, Cologne Busche J, Röhling A (eds) (2013) Kölner Kommentar, vol 4: VO Nr. 1/2003 – FKVO (VO Nr. 139/2004) – Besondere Wirtschaftszweige. Carl Heymanns, Cologne
Zurück zum Zitat Busse M, Leopold A (2005) Entscheidungen über Verpflichtungszusagen nach Art. 9 VO (EG) Nr. 1/2003. WuW:146–155 Busse M, Leopold A (2005) Entscheidungen über Verpflichtungszusagen nach Art. 9 VO (EG) Nr. 1/2003. WuW:146–155
Zurück zum Zitat Calliess C, Ruffert M (eds) (2011) EUV/AEUV. Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta, 4th edn. C.H. Beck, Munich Calliess C, Ruffert M (eds) (2011) EUV/AEUV. Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta, 4th edn. C.H. Beck, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Craig P (2004) Competence: clarity, conferral, containment and consideration. ELRev 29:323–344 Craig P (2004) Competence: clarity, conferral, containment and consideration. ELRev 29:323–344
Zurück zum Zitat Dalheimer D, Feddersen CT, Miersch G (2005) EU-Kartellverfahrensverordnung. Kommentar zur VO 1/2003. C.H. Beck, Munich Dalheimer D, Feddersen CT, Miersch G (2005) EU-Kartellverfahrensverordnung. Kommentar zur VO 1/2003. C.H. Beck, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat de Bronett G-K (2005) Kommentar zum Europäischen Kartellverfahrensrecht – VO 1/2003. Hermann Luchterhand, Cologne de Bronett G-K (2005) Kommentar zum Europäischen Kartellverfahrensrecht – VO 1/2003. Hermann Luchterhand, Cologne
Zurück zum Zitat de Bronett G-K (2012) Europäisches Kartellverfahrensrecht. Kommentar zur VO 1/2003, 2nd edn. Carl Heymanns, Cologne de Bronett G-K (2012) Europäisches Kartellverfahrensrecht. Kommentar zur VO 1/2003, 2nd edn. Carl Heymanns, Cologne
Zurück zum Zitat Dougan M (2003) The Convention’s Draft Constitutional Treaty. ELRev 28:763–793 Dougan M (2003) The Convention’s Draft Constitutional Treaty. ELRev 28:763–793
Zurück zum Zitat Dreher M (2007) Die komplexe und fortdauernde Zuwiderhandlung im europäischen Kartellrecht. ZWeR:276–302 Dreher M (2007) Die komplexe und fortdauernde Zuwiderhandlung im europäischen Kartellrecht. ZWeR:276–302
Zurück zum Zitat Eilmansberger T (2004) “Ne bis in idem” und kartellrechtliche Drittstaatssanktionen. EWS:49–55 Eilmansberger T (2004) “Ne bis in idem” und kartellrechtliche Drittstaatssanktionen. EWS:49–55
Zurück zum Zitat Fleischer H (2013) Verbotsirrtum und Vertrauen auf Rechtsrat im europäischen Wettbewerbsrecht. EuZW:326–331 Fleischer H (2013) Verbotsirrtum und Vertrauen auf Rechtsrat im europäischen Wettbewerbsrecht. EuZW:326–331
Zurück zum Zitat Fluck J, Theuer A (eds) (2012) Informationsfreiheitsrecht mit Umweltinformations- und Verbraucherinformationsrecht, IFG/UIG/VIG/IWG. Kommentar. Vorschriften der EU, des Bundes und der Länder, Internationales Recht, Rechtsprechung, loose-leaf-collection of October 2012. Rehm, Heidelberg Fluck J, Theuer A (eds) (2012) Informationsfreiheitsrecht mit Umweltinformations- und Verbraucherinformationsrecht, IFG/UIG/VIG/IWG. Kommentar. Vorschriften der EU, des Bundes und der Länder, Internationales Recht, Rechtsprechung, loose-leaf-collection of October 2012. Rehm, Heidelberg
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W (2009) Handbuch Europarecht, vol 4, Europäische Grundrechte. Springer, Heidelberg Frenz W (2009) Handbuch Europarecht, vol 4, Europäische Grundrechte. Springer, Heidelberg
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W (2010) Handbuch Europarecht, vol 5, Wirkungen und Rechtsschutz. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef Frenz W (2010) Handbuch Europarecht, vol 5, Wirkungen und Rechtsschutz. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W (2011) Handbuch Europarecht, vol 6, Insitutionen und Politiken. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef Frenz W (2011) Handbuch Europarecht, vol 6, Insitutionen und Politiken. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W (2012a) Die Anwaltsrichtlinien: Vom europäischen Anwalt zum deutschen Rechtsanwalt. AnwBl:138–143 Frenz W (2012a) Die Anwaltsrichtlinien: Vom europäischen Anwalt zum deutschen Rechtsanwalt. AnwBl:138–143
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W (2012b) Handbuch Europarecht, vol 1: Europäische Grundfreiheiten, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg Frenz W (2012b) Handbuch Europarecht, vol 1: Europäische Grundfreiheiten, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W (2013a) Dokumentenzugang vs. Kronzeugenregelung. EuZW:778–781 Frenz W (2013a) Dokumentenzugang vs. Kronzeugenregelung. EuZW:778–781
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W (2013b) Fehlende Anerkennung der umsatzsteuerlichen Unternehmereigenschaft und unionsrechtliche Staatshaftung. DStZ:582–590 Frenz W (2013b) Fehlende Anerkennung der umsatzsteuerlichen Unternehmereigenschaft und unionsrechtliche Staatshaftung. DStZ:582–590
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W (2013c) Grundrechtlich geprägte Kontrolldichte im EU-Wettbewerbsrecht. EWS:123–127 Frenz W (2013c) Grundrechtlich geprägte Kontrolldichte im EU-Wettbewerbsrecht. EWS:123–127
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W (2013d) Kartellrecht im Kraftfahrzeugsektor – Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ). WRP:163–167 Frenz W (2013d) Kartellrecht im Kraftfahrzeugsektor – Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ). WRP:163–167
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W (2013e) Kartellrechtlicher Verbotsirrtum. EWS:209–212 Frenz W (2013e) Kartellrechtlicher Verbotsirrtum. EWS:209–212
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W (2013f) Kartellrechtlicher Verbotsirrtum – definitiv ausgeschlossen? EWS:272–274 Frenz W (2013f) Kartellrechtlicher Verbotsirrtum – definitiv ausgeschlossen? EWS:272–274
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W (2013g) Vorstandsverantwortlichkeit und Compliance am Beispiel des Kartellrechts. CB:49–52 Frenz W (2013g) Vorstandsverantwortlichkeit und Compliance am Beispiel des Kartellrechts. CB:49–52
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W (2014) Ausreichendes Kartellbußgeldsystem – keine Notwendigkeit von Haftstrafen. WRP:367–374 Frenz W (2014) Ausreichendes Kartellbußgeldsystem – keine Notwendigkeit von Haftstrafen. WRP:367–374
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W, Bresges T (2012) Kartellrecht: Vergleichsverfahren der Kommission. EWS:72–79 Frenz W, Bresges T (2012) Kartellrecht: Vergleichsverfahren der Kommission. EWS:72–79
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W, Ehlenz C (2010a) Defizitäre gerichtliche Wettbewerbskontrolle durch More-economic-Approach und Vermutungen? EuR:490–516 Frenz W, Ehlenz C (2010a) Defizitäre gerichtliche Wettbewerbskontrolle durch More-economic-Approach und Vermutungen? EuR:490–516
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W, Ehlenz C (2010b) Die Verhältnismäßigkeit im Wettbewerbsrecht – “Alrosa”. EWS:305–308 Frenz W, Ehlenz C (2010b) Die Verhältnismäßigkeit im Wettbewerbsrecht – “Alrosa”. EWS:305–308
Zurück zum Zitat Frenz W, Lülsdorf T (2013) Aktuelles Kartellverfahrensrecht. EWS:169–174 Frenz W, Lülsdorf T (2013) Aktuelles Kartellverfahrensrecht. EWS:169–174
Zurück zum Zitat Geiger A (2000) Das Weißbuch der EG-Kommission zu Art. 81, 82 EG – eine Reform, besser als ihr Ruf. EuZW:165–169 Geiger A (2000) Das Weißbuch der EG-Kommission zu Art. 81, 82 EG – eine Reform, besser als ihr Ruf. EuZW:165–169
Zurück zum Zitat Grabitz E, Hilf M (eds) (2005) Das Recht der Europäischen Union. Kommentar, loose-leaf-collection of March 2005. C.H. Beck, Munich Grabitz E, Hilf M (eds) (2005) Das Recht der Europäischen Union. Kommentar, loose-leaf-collection of March 2005. C.H. Beck, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Grabitz E, Hilf M, Nettesheim M (eds) (2014) Das Recht der Europäischen Union. Kommentar, loose-leaf-collection of September 2014. C.H. Beck, Munich Grabitz E, Hilf M, Nettesheim M (eds) (2014) Das Recht der Europäischen Union. Kommentar, loose-leaf-collection of September 2014. C.H. Beck, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Graham C (2013) EU and UK competition law, 2nd edn. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow Graham C (2013) EU and UK competition law, 2nd edn. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow
Zurück zum Zitat Groß T (2004) Exekutive Vollzugsprogrammierung durch tertiäres Gemeinschaftsrecht? DÖV:20–26 Groß T (2004) Exekutive Vollzugsprogrammierung durch tertiäres Gemeinschaftsrecht? DÖV:20–26
Zurück zum Zitat Groß T (2007) Verantwortung und Effizienz in der Mehrebenenverantwortung. VVDStRL 66:152–215 Groß T (2007) Verantwortung und Effizienz in der Mehrebenenverantwortung. VVDStRL 66:152–215
Zurück zum Zitat Gruber JP (2005) Verpflichtungszusagen im europäischen Kartellrecht. EWS:310–315 Gruber JP (2005) Verpflichtungszusagen im europäischen Kartellrecht. EWS:310–315
Zurück zum Zitat Grune JK (2013) Kartellrecht: Spürbarkeit einer Wettbewerbsbeschränkung – Unverbindlichkeit der De-minimis-Bekanntmachung. EuZW:116–117 Grune JK (2013) Kartellrecht: Spürbarkeit einer Wettbewerbsbeschränkung – Unverbindlichkeit der De-minimis-Bekanntmachung. EuZW:116–117
Zurück zum Zitat Gündisch J (2002) Rechtsschutz gegenüber der europäischen Wirtschaftsverwaltung. Supplement to issue 2, EuR:29–55 Gündisch J (2002) Rechtsschutz gegenüber der europäischen Wirtschaftsverwaltung. Supplement to issue 2, EuR:29–55
Zurück zum Zitat Gussone P, Maritzen L (2013) Kommentar zu: EuGH, Urt. vom 6.6.2013 – Rs. C-536/11. EWS:292–294 Gussone P, Maritzen L (2013) Kommentar zu: EuGH, Urt. vom 6.6.2013 – Rs. C-536/11. EWS:292–294
Zurück zum Zitat Habersack M (2011) Gedanken zur konzernweiten Compliance-Verantwortung des Geschäftsleiters eines herrschenden Unternehmens. In: Bechtold S, Jickeli J, Rohe M (eds) Recht, Ordnung und Wettbewerb. Festschrift für Wernhard Möschel. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 1175–1192CrossRef Habersack M (2011) Gedanken zur konzernweiten Compliance-Verantwortung des Geschäftsleiters eines herrschenden Unternehmens. In: Bechtold S, Jickeli J, Rohe M (eds) Recht, Ordnung und Wettbewerb. Festschrift für Wernhard Möschel. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 1175–1192CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hauger N, Palzer C (2012) Verweigerung der Einsichtnahme in Bonusanträge nach EuGH “Pfleiderer” – die Folgeentscheidung des AG Bonn vom 18.1.2012 – 51 Gs 53/09. EWS:124–130 Hauger N, Palzer C (2012) Verweigerung der Einsichtnahme in Bonusanträge nach EuGH “Pfleiderer” – die Folgeentscheidung des AG Bonn vom 18.1.2012 – 51 Gs 53/09. EWS:124–130
Zurück zum Zitat Haus FC (2001) Entflechtung nach der KartellVO? WuW:659–664 Haus FC (2001) Entflechtung nach der KartellVO? WuW:659–664
Zurück zum Zitat Heidenreich JP (2004) Anhörungsrechte im EG-Kartell- und Fusionskontrollverfahren. Zugleich ein Beitrag zu Aufgaben und Kompetenzen des Anhörungsbeauftragten der Europäischen Kommission. Nomos, Baden-Baden Heidenreich JP (2004) Anhörungsrechte im EG-Kartell- und Fusionskontrollverfahren. Zugleich ein Beitrag zu Aufgaben und Kompetenzen des Anhörungsbeauftragten der Europäischen Kommission. Nomos, Baden-Baden
Zurück zum Zitat Hempel R (2013) Anmerkung zur Entscheidung des EuGH vom 6.6.2013 (C-536/11, EuZW 2013, 586) – Zur Frage des Akteneinsichtsrechts durch Schadenersatzkläger im kartellrechtlichen Verfahren. EuZW:589–590 Hempel R (2013) Anmerkung zur Entscheidung des EuGH vom 6.6.2013 (C-536/11, EuZW 2013, 586) – Zur Frage des Akteneinsichtsrechts durch Schadenersatzkläger im kartellrechtlichen Verfahren. EuZW:589–590
Zurück zum Zitat Henssler M (2009) Die grenzüberschreitende Tätigkeit von Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaften in der Rechtsform der Kapitalgesellschaft innerhalb der EU zur Fussnote. NJW:950–954 Henssler M (2009) Die grenzüberschreitende Tätigkeit von Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaften in der Rechtsform der Kapitalgesellschaft innerhalb der EU zur Fussnote. NJW:950–954
Zurück zum Zitat Herrmann C (2006) Die Reichweite der gemeinschaftsrechtlichen Vorlagepflicht in der neueren Rechtsprechung des EuGH. EuZW:231–235 Herrmann C (2006) Die Reichweite der gemeinschaftsrechtlichen Vorlagepflicht in der neueren Rechtsprechung des EuGH. EuZW:231–235
Zurück zum Zitat Hetzel P (2004) Kronzeugenregelungen im Kartellrecht. Anwendung und Auslegung von Vorschriften über den Erlass oder die Ermäßigung von Geldbußen im Lichte elementarer Rechtsgrundsätze. Nomos, Baden-Baden Hetzel P (2004) Kronzeugenregelungen im Kartellrecht. Anwendung und Auslegung von Vorschriften über den Erlass oder die Ermäßigung von Geldbußen im Lichte elementarer Rechtsgrundsätze. Nomos, Baden-Baden
Zurück zum Zitat Hirsbrunner S (2011) Settlements in EU-Kartellverfahren – Kritische Anmerkungen nach den ersten Anwendungsfällen. EuZW:12–16 Hirsbrunner S (2011) Settlements in EU-Kartellverfahren – Kritische Anmerkungen nach den ersten Anwendungsfällen. EuZW:12–16
Zurück zum Zitat Hirsbrunner S, Rhomberg L (2005) Verpflichtungszusagen im EG-Kartellrechtsverfahren – Erste praktische Erfahrungen mit der Neuregelung der Kartellverfahrensverordnung 1/2003. EWS:61–66 Hirsbrunner S, Rhomberg L (2005) Verpflichtungszusagen im EG-Kartellrechtsverfahren – Erste praktische Erfahrungen mit der Neuregelung der Kartellverfahrensverordnung 1/2003. EWS:61–66
Zurück zum Zitat Hirsch G (2003) Anwendung der Kartellverfahrensordnung (EG) Nr. 1/2003 durch nationale Gerichte. ZWeR:233–254 Hirsch G (2003) Anwendung der Kartellverfahrensordnung (EG) Nr. 1/2003 durch nationale Gerichte. ZWeR:233–254
Zurück zum Zitat Hirsch G, Montag F, Säcker FJ (eds) (2007) Münchener Kommentar zum Europäischen und Deutschen Wettbewerbsrecht (Kartellrecht), vol 1 et seq. C.H. Beck, Munich Hirsch G, Montag F, Säcker FJ (eds) (2007) Münchener Kommentar zum Europäischen und Deutschen Wettbewerbsrecht (Kartellrecht), vol 1 et seq. C.H. Beck, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Hossenfelder S, Lutz M (2003) Die neue Durchführungsverordnung zu den Artikeln 81 und 82 EG-Vertrag. WuW:118–129 Hossenfelder S, Lutz M (2003) Die neue Durchführungsverordnung zu den Artikeln 81 und 82 EG-Vertrag. WuW:118–129
Zurück zum Zitat Immenga U (2005) Europäisches Gemeinwohl und nationale Kartellrechtsverfahren. EuZW:353 Immenga U (2005) Europäisches Gemeinwohl und nationale Kartellrechtsverfahren. EuZW:353
Zurück zum Zitat Immenga U (2012) Gestaltungsspielräume der Kommission. In: Immenga U, Körber T (eds) Die Kommission zwischen Gestaltungsmacht und Rechtsbindung. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 9–36CrossRef Immenga U (2012) Gestaltungsspielräume der Kommission. In: Immenga U, Körber T (eds) Die Kommission zwischen Gestaltungsmacht und Rechtsbindung. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 9–36CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Immenga U, Mestmäcker E-J (eds) (2012) Wettbewerbsrecht. Kommentar zum Europäischen Kartellrecht, vol 1, part 2, 5th edn. C.H. Beck, Munich Immenga U, Mestmäcker E-J (eds) (2012) Wettbewerbsrecht. Kommentar zum Europäischen Kartellrecht, vol 1, part 2, 5th edn. C.H. Beck, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Jaeger W, Pohlmann P, Schroeder D, Rieger H (eds) (2013) Frankfurter Kommentar zum Kartellrecht, loose-leaf-collection of November 2013. Otto Schmidt, Cologne Jaeger W, Pohlmann P, Schroeder D, Rieger H (eds) (2013) Frankfurter Kommentar zum Kartellrecht, loose-leaf-collection of November 2013. Otto Schmidt, Cologne
Zurück zum Zitat Jungheim S (2013) Zusammenarbeit im ECN und die Rechte der Unternehmen. EWS:305–311 Jungheim S (2013) Zusammenarbeit im ECN und die Rechte der Unternehmen. EWS:305–311
Zurück zum Zitat Kallmayer A, Haupt H (2002) Die Urteile des EuG zum Fernwärmerohrkartell. Die Bußgeldleitlinien der Kommission auf dem Prüfstand. EuZW:677–682 Kallmayer A, Haupt H (2002) Die Urteile des EuG zum Fernwärmerohrkartell. Die Bußgeldleitlinien der Kommission auf dem Prüfstand. EuZW:677–682
Zurück zum Zitat Kersting C (2013) Behandlung des unvermeidbaren Verbotsirrtums im europäischen Kartellrecht. Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urt. vom 18.6.2013, C-681/11 – Schenker & Co. AG. WuW:845–850 Kersting C (2013) Behandlung des unvermeidbaren Verbotsirrtums im europäischen Kartellrecht. Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urt. vom 18.6.2013, C-681/11 – Schenker & Co. AG. WuW:845–850
Zurück zum Zitat Klees A (2005) Europäisches Kartellverfahrensrecht mit Fusionskontrollverfahren. Carl Heymanns, Cologne Klees A (2005) Europäisches Kartellverfahrensrecht mit Fusionskontrollverfahren. Carl Heymanns, Cologne
Zurück zum Zitat Klees A (2006) Der Grundsatz ne bis in idem und seine Auswirkungen auf die Zusammenarbeit der Kartellbehörden im European Competition Network (ECN). WuW:1222–1230 Klees A (2006) Der Grundsatz ne bis in idem und seine Auswirkungen auf die Zusammenarbeit der Kartellbehörden im European Competition Network (ECN). WuW:1222–1230
Zurück zum Zitat Klees A, Hauser SM (2007) Eigentumsrechtliche Entflechtung in der Energiewirtschaft als strukturelle Maßnahme im Sinne des Art 7 Abs 1 Satz 2 VO 1/2003? WuW:596–603 Klees A, Hauser SM (2007) Eigentumsrechtliche Entflechtung in der Energiewirtschaft als strukturelle Maßnahme im Sinne des Art 7 Abs 1 Satz 2 VO 1/2003? WuW:596–603
Zurück zum Zitat Kleine M (2007) Grenzenloser Zugang zu Dokumenten der Kartellbehörden? ZWeR:303–318 Kleine M (2007) Grenzenloser Zugang zu Dokumenten der Kartellbehörden? ZWeR:303–318
Zurück zum Zitat Koenigs F (2003) Die VO Nr. 1/2003 – Wende im EG-Kartellrecht. DB:755–759 Koenigs F (2003) Die VO Nr. 1/2003 – Wende im EG-Kartellrecht. DB:755–759
Zurück zum Zitat Krumstroh T (2004) Das Weißbuch und der Verordnungsvorschlag der Europäischen Kommission zur Modernisierung der Anwendung der Vorschriften der Art. 81 und 82 EG und deren Einfluss auf nationale Wettbewerbsregeln, Kartellbehörden und Gerichte. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M. Krumstroh T (2004) Das Weißbuch und der Verordnungsvorschlag der Europäischen Kommission zur Modernisierung der Anwendung der Vorschriften der Art. 81 und 82 EG und deren Einfluss auf nationale Wettbewerbsregeln, Kartellbehörden und Gerichte. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuck T (2002) Die Anerkennung des Grundsatzes ne bis in idem im europäischen Kartellrecht und seine Anwendung in internationalen Kartellverfahren. WuW:689–698 Kuck T (2002) Die Anerkennung des Grundsatzes ne bis in idem im europäischen Kartellrecht und seine Anwendung in internationalen Kartellverfahren. WuW:689–698
Zurück zum Zitat Ladenburger C (2008) Evolution oder Kodifikation eines allgemeinen Verwaltungsrechts in der EU. In: Trute H-H, Groß T, Röhl HC, Möllers C (eds) Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht – zur Tragfähigkeit eines Konzepts. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 107–133 Ladenburger C (2008) Evolution oder Kodifikation eines allgemeinen Verwaltungsrechts in der EU. In: Trute H-H, Groß T, Röhl HC, Möllers C (eds) Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht – zur Tragfähigkeit eines Konzepts. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 107–133
Zurück zum Zitat Lampert T (2002) Gestiegenes Unternehmensrisiko Kartellrecht – Risikoreduzierung durch Competition-Compliance-Programme. BB:2237–2243 Lampert T (2002) Gestiegenes Unternehmensrisiko Kartellrecht – Risikoreduzierung durch Competition-Compliance-Programme. BB:2237–2243
Zurück zum Zitat Lampert T, Niejahr N, Kübler J, Weidenbach G (2004) EG-KartellVO. Praxiskommentar. Recht und Wirtschaft, Heidelberg Lampert T, Niejahr N, Kübler J, Weidenbach G (2004) EG-KartellVO. Praxiskommentar. Recht und Wirtschaft, Heidelberg
Zurück zum Zitat Lang JT (2003) Commitment decisions under regulation 1/2003: legal aspects of a new kind of competition decision. ECLR:347–356 Lang JT (2003) Commitment decisions under regulation 1/2003: legal aspects of a new kind of competition decision. ECLR:347–356
Zurück zum Zitat Langen E, Bunte H-J (eds) (2014) Kommentar zum deutschen und europäischen Kartellrecht, vol 2: Europäisches Kartellrecht, 12th edn. Carl Heymanns, Cologne Langen E, Bunte H-J (eds) (2014) Kommentar zum deutschen und europäischen Kartellrecht, vol 2: Europäisches Kartellrecht, 12th edn. Carl Heymanns, Cologne
Zurück zum Zitat Leopold A (2004) Das Aufgreifen eines Verfahrens durch die Kommission nach Art. 11 Abs. 6 VO (EG) Nr. 1/2003. EWS:539–546 Leopold A (2004) Das Aufgreifen eines Verfahrens durch die Kommission nach Art. 11 Abs. 6 VO (EG) Nr. 1/2003. EWS:539–546
Zurück zum Zitat Loewenheim U, Meessen KM, Riesenkampff A (eds) (2009) Kartellrecht – Kommentar, 2nd edn. C.H. Beck, Munich Loewenheim U, Meessen KM, Riesenkampff A (eds) (2009) Kartellrecht – Kommentar, 2nd edn. C.H. Beck, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Ludwig M (2004) Die Kompetenzordnung der Europäischen Union im Vertragsentwurf über eine Verfassung für Europa. ZeuS:211–249 Ludwig M (2004) Die Kompetenzordnung der Europäischen Union im Vertragsentwurf über eine Verfassung für Europa. ZeuS:211–249
Zurück zum Zitat Mestmäcker E-J, Schweitzer H (2004) Europäisches Wettbewerbsrecht, 2nd edn. C.H. Beck, Munich Mestmäcker E-J, Schweitzer H (2004) Europäisches Wettbewerbsrecht, 2nd edn. C.H. Beck, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Milde S (2013) Schutz des Kronzeugen im Spannungsfeld von behördlicher Kartelldurchsetzung und privaten Schadensersatzklagen. Eine Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtgung vorprozessualer Dokumentenzugangs- und Akteneinsichtsrechte Dritter auf europäischer und deutscher Ebene. Nomos, Baden-Baden Milde S (2013) Schutz des Kronzeugen im Spannungsfeld von behördlicher Kartelldurchsetzung und privaten Schadensersatzklagen. Eine Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtgung vorprozessualer Dokumentenzugangs- und Akteneinsichtsrechte Dritter auf europäischer und deutscher Ebene. Nomos, Baden-Baden
Zurück zum Zitat Montag F, Rosenfeld A (2003) A solution to the problems? Regulation 1/2003 and the modernization of competition procedure. ZWeR:107–134 Montag F, Rosenfeld A (2003) A solution to the problems? Regulation 1/2003 and the modernization of competition procedure. ZWeR:107–134
Zurück zum Zitat Möschel W (2003) Die 7. GWB-Novelle ante portas. WuW:571 Möschel W (2003) Die 7. GWB-Novelle ante portas. WuW:571
Zurück zum Zitat Müller CH (2012) Kartellrechtscompliance in Deutschland. Rechtspflicht, Gründe und Auswirkungen. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M. Müller CH (2012) Kartellrechtscompliance in Deutschland. Rechtspflicht, Gründe und Auswirkungen. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M.
Zurück zum Zitat Nehl HP (2012) Kontrolle kartellrechtlicher Sanktionsentscheidungen der Kommission durch die Unionsgerichte. In: Immenga U, Körber T (eds) Die Kommission zwischen Gestaltungsmacht und Rechtsbindung. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 113–152CrossRef Nehl HP (2012) Kontrolle kartellrechtlicher Sanktionsentscheidungen der Kommission durch die Unionsgerichte. In: Immenga U, Körber T (eds) Die Kommission zwischen Gestaltungsmacht und Rechtsbindung. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 113–152CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oppermann T, Classen CD, Nettesheim M (2014) Europarecht. Ein Studienbuch, 6th edn. C.H. Beck, Munich Oppermann T, Classen CD, Nettesheim M (2014) Europarecht. Ein Studienbuch, 6th edn. C.H. Beck, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Pace LF (2004) Die Dezentralisierungspolitik im EG-Kartellrecht. Sind Art. 3 II, 6 der VO 1/2003 rechtmäßig? EuZW:301–305 Pace LF (2004) Die Dezentralisierungspolitik im EG-Kartellrecht. Sind Art. 3 II, 6 der VO 1/2003 rechtmäßig? EuZW:301–305
Zurück zum Zitat Pache E (2007) Verantwortung und Effizienz in der Mehrebenenverantwortung. VVDStRL 66:106–144 Pache E (2007) Verantwortung und Effizienz in der Mehrebenenverantwortung. VVDStRL 66:106–144
Zurück zum Zitat Palzer C (2012) Stolperstein für die Kommission? Die Kronzeugenregelung auf dem Prüfstand der Transparenz-VO. Zugleich Besprechung der Urteile des EuG vom 15.12.2011, Rs. T-437/08 (CDC/Kommission) und vom 22.5.2012, Rs. T-344/08 (EnBW/Kommission). EuR:583–607 Palzer C (2012) Stolperstein für die Kommission? Die Kronzeugenregelung auf dem Prüfstand der Transparenz-VO. Zugleich Besprechung der Urteile des EuG vom 15.12.2011, Rs. T-437/08 (CDC/Kommission) und vom 22.5.2012, Rs. T-344/08 (EnBW/Kommission). EuR:583–607
Zurück zum Zitat Pelikánová I (2013) The general court and its role in EU competition law cases. In: Danov M, Becker F, Beaumont P (eds) Cross-border EU competition law actions. Hart, Oxford, pp 103–108 Pelikánová I (2013) The general court and its role in EU competition law cases. In: Danov M, Becker F, Beaumont P (eds) Cross-border EU competition law actions. Hart, Oxford, pp 103–108
Zurück zum Zitat Pielow J-C, Ehlers E (2007) Rechtsfragen zum Ownership Unbundling. IR:259–265 Pielow J-C, Ehlers E (2007) Rechtsfragen zum Ownership Unbundling. IR:259–265
Zurück zum Zitat Pohlmann P (1999) Der Unternehmensverbund im Europäischen Kartellrecht. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin Pohlmann P (1999) Der Unternehmensverbund im Europäischen Kartellrecht. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat Pohlmann P (2011) Verfahrensrecht für ein ökonomisiertes Kartellrecht: Der Beurteilungsspielraum der Kommission. In: Bechtold S, Jickeli J, Rohe M (eds) Recht, Ordnung und Wettbewerb. Festschrift für Wernhard Möschel. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 471–488CrossRef Pohlmann P (2011) Verfahrensrecht für ein ökonomisiertes Kartellrecht: Der Beurteilungsspielraum der Kommission. In: Bechtold S, Jickeli J, Rohe M (eds) Recht, Ordnung und Wettbewerb. Festschrift für Wernhard Möschel. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 471–488CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Polley R, Seeliger D (2002) Die neue Mitteilung der Europäischen Kommission über den Erlass und die Ermäßigung von Geldbußen in EG-Kartellsachen. EuZW:397–401 Polley R, Seeliger D (2002) Die neue Mitteilung der Europäischen Kommission über den Erlass und die Ermäßigung von Geldbußen in EG-Kartellsachen. EuZW:397–401
Zurück zum Zitat Polzin M (2011) Die Erhöhung von Kartellbußgeldern durch den Unionsrichter. WuW:454–462 Polzin M (2011) Die Erhöhung von Kartellbußgeldern durch den Unionsrichter. WuW:454–462
Zurück zum Zitat Rengeling H-W, Middeke A, Gellermann M (eds) (2014) Handbuch des Rechtsschutzes der Europäischen Union, 3rd edn. C.H. Beck, Munich Rengeling H-W, Middeke A, Gellermann M (eds) (2014) Handbuch des Rechtsschutzes der Europäischen Union, 3rd edn. C.H. Beck, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Riemann F (2004) Die Transparenz der Europäischen Union. Das neue Recht auf Zugang zu Dokumenten von Parlament, Rat und Kommission. Duncker & Humblot, BerlinCrossRef Riemann F (2004) Die Transparenz der Europäischen Union. Das neue Recht auf Zugang zu Dokumenten von Parlament, Rat und Kommission. Duncker & Humblot, BerlinCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roesen K (2010) Mehrfache Sanktionen im internationalen und europäischen Kartellrecht. Carl Heymanns, Cologne Roesen K (2010) Mehrfache Sanktionen im internationalen und europäischen Kartellrecht. Carl Heymanns, Cologne
Zurück zum Zitat Röhling A (2003) Die Zukunft des Kartellverbots in Deutschland nach In-Kraft-Treten der neuen EU-Verfahrensrechtsordnung. GRUR:1019–1025 Röhling A (2003) Die Zukunft des Kartellverbots in Deutschland nach In-Kraft-Treten der neuen EU-Verfahrensrechtsordnung. GRUR:1019–1025
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt K (2003) Umdenken im Kartellverfahrensrecht! Gedanken zur Europäischen VO Nr. 1/2003. BB:1237–1245 Schmidt K (2003) Umdenken im Kartellverfahrensrecht! Gedanken zur Europäischen VO Nr. 1/2003. BB:1237–1245
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt-Aßmann E (1999) Strukturen des Europäischen Verwaltungsrechts – Einleitende Problemskizze. In: Schmidt-Aßmann E, Hoffmann-Riem W (eds) Strukturen des Europäischen Verwaltungsrechts. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 9–44 Schmidt-Aßmann E (1999) Strukturen des Europäischen Verwaltungsrechts – Einleitende Problemskizze. In: Schmidt-Aßmann E, Hoffmann-Riem W (eds) Strukturen des Europäischen Verwaltungsrechts. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 9–44
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt-Aßmann E (2005) Einleitung. Der Europäische Verwaltungsverbund und die Rolle des Europäischen Verwaltungsrechts. In: Schmidt-Aßmann E, Schöndorf-Haubold B (eds) Der Europäische Verwaltungsverbund. Formen und Verfahren der Verwaltungszusammenarbeit in der EU. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 1–24 Schmidt-Aßmann E (2005) Einleitung. Der Europäische Verwaltungsverbund und die Rolle des Europäischen Verwaltungsrechts. In: Schmidt-Aßmann E, Schöndorf-Haubold B (eds) Der Europäische Verwaltungsverbund. Formen und Verfahren der Verwaltungszusammenarbeit in der EU. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 1–24
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider M (2004) Kronzeugenregelung im EG-Kartellrecht. Die Praxis der Europäischen Kommission beim Erlass und der Ermäßigung von Geldbußen in Kartellsachen unter Einbeziehung der “Leniency Notice” des US-Department of Justice und der “Bonusregelung” des Bundeskartellamtes. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M. Schneider M (2004) Kronzeugenregelung im EG-Kartellrecht. Die Praxis der Europäischen Kommission beim Erlass und der Ermäßigung von Geldbußen in Kartellsachen unter Einbeziehung der “Leniency Notice” des US-Department of Justice und der “Bonusregelung” des Bundeskartellamtes. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnelle U, Bartosch A, Hübner A (2004) Das neue EU-Kartellverfahrensrecht: Auswirkungen der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1/2003 auf die Kartellrechtspraxis. Boorberg, Stuttgart Schnelle U, Bartosch A, Hübner A (2004) Das neue EU-Kartellverfahrensrecht: Auswirkungen der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1/2003 auf die Kartellrechtspraxis. Boorberg, Stuttgart
Zurück zum Zitat Scholz U, Haus F (2002) Geldbußen im EG-Kartellrecht und Einkommensteuerrecht. EuZW:682–688 Scholz U, Haus F (2002) Geldbußen im EG-Kartellrecht und Einkommensteuerrecht. EuZW:682–688
Zurück zum Zitat Schroll G (2012) Der Einfluss interner und externer Faktoren auf die Effektivität der Kronzeugenprogramme der EU-Kommission und des Bundeskartellamtes. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M. Schroll G (2012) Der Einfluss interner und externer Faktoren auf die Effektivität der Kronzeugenprogramme der EU-Kommission und des Bundeskartellamtes. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M.
Zurück zum Zitat Schultze J-M (ed) (2014) Compliance-Handbuch Kartellrecht. Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft, Frankfurt a.M. Schultze J-M (ed) (2014) Compliance-Handbuch Kartellrecht. Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft, Frankfurt a.M.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarze J (2002) Die Bedeutung des Grundsatzes der Verhältnismäßigkeit bei der Behandlung von Verpflichtungszusagen nach der europäischen Fusionskontrollverordnung. EuZW:741–746 Schwarze J (2002) Die Bedeutung des Grundsatzes der Verhältnismäßigkeit bei der Behandlung von Verpflichtungszusagen nach der europäischen Fusionskontrollverordnung. EuZW:741–746
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarze J (2003) Rechtsstaatliche Grenzen der gesetzlichen und richterlichen Qualifikation von Verwaltungssanktionen im europäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht. EuZW:261–269 Schwarze J (2003) Rechtsstaatliche Grenzen der gesetzlichen und richterlichen Qualifikation von Verwaltungssanktionen im europäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht. EuZW:261–269
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarze J (2006) Die Anfechtung der Fallverteilung im europäischen Netzwerk der Wettbewerbsbehörden. In: Brinker I, Scheuing DH, Stockmann K (eds) Recht und Wettbewerb. Festschrift für Rainer Bechtold zum 65. Geburtstag. C.H. Beck, Munich, pp 483–500 Schwarze J (2006) Die Anfechtung der Fallverteilung im europäischen Netzwerk der Wettbewerbsbehörden. In: Brinker I, Scheuing DH, Stockmann K (eds) Recht und Wettbewerb. Festschrift für Rainer Bechtold zum 65. Geburtstag. C.H. Beck, Munich, pp 483–500
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarze J (2009) Europäische Kartellbußgelder im Lichte übergeordneter Vertrags- und Verfassungsgrundsätze. EuR:171–199 Schwarze J (2009) Europäische Kartellbußgelder im Lichte übergeordneter Vertrags- und Verfassungsgrundsätze. EuR:171–199
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarze J, Weitbrecht A (2004) Grundzüge des europäischen Kartellverfahrensrechts. Die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1/2003. Nomos, Baden-Baden Schwarze J, Weitbrecht A (2004) Grundzüge des europäischen Kartellverfahrensrechts. Die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1/2003. Nomos, Baden-Baden
Zurück zum Zitat Schweitzer H (2011) Verpflichtungszusagen im Gemeinschaftsrecht. In: Bechtold S, Jickeli J, Rohe M (eds) Recht, Ordnung und Wettbewerb. Festschrift zum 70. Geburtstag von Wernhard Möschel. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 637–662 Schweitzer H (2011) Verpflichtungszusagen im Gemeinschaftsrecht. In: Bechtold S, Jickeli J, Rohe M (eds) Recht, Ordnung und Wettbewerb. Festschrift zum 70. Geburtstag von Wernhard Möschel. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 637–662
Zurück zum Zitat Seifert K (2013) Die einheitliche und fortgesetzte Zuwiderhandlung. Komplexe Kartelle im europäischen Kartellrecht. Nomos, Baden-BadenCrossRef Seifert K (2013) Die einheitliche und fortgesetzte Zuwiderhandlung. Komplexe Kartelle im europäischen Kartellrecht. Nomos, Baden-BadenCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seitz C (2004) Unternehmensjuristen und das Anwaltsprivileg im europäischen Wettbewerbsverfahren – Wandel in der europäischen Rechtsprechung? EuZW:231–235 Seitz C (2004) Unternehmensjuristen und das Anwaltsprivileg im europäischen Wettbewerbsverfahren – Wandel in der europäischen Rechtsprechung? EuZW:231–235
Zurück zum Zitat Skouris W (2002) Die Kontrolle der europäischen Wirtschaftsverwaltung durch die Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofes. Supplement to issue 2, EuR:71–82 Skouris W (2002) Die Kontrolle der europäischen Wirtschaftsverwaltung durch die Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofes. Supplement to issue 2, EuR:71–82
Zurück zum Zitat Soltész U, Steinle C, Bielesz H (2003) Rekordgeldbußen versus Bestimmtheitsgebot. Die Kartellverordnung auf dem Prüfstein höherrangigen Gemeinschaftsrechts. EuZW:202–210 Soltész U, Steinle C, Bielesz H (2003) Rekordgeldbußen versus Bestimmtheitsgebot. Die Kartellverordnung auf dem Prüfstein höherrangigen Gemeinschaftsrechts. EuZW:202–210
Zurück zum Zitat Stadler C (2006) Compliance-Programme – Vorbeugung gegen Kartellverstöße im Unternehmen. In: Forschungsinstitut für Wirtschaftsverfassung und Wettbewerb (ed) Schwerpunkte des Kartellrechts 2004, FIW-Schriftenreihe Heft 206. Carl Heymanns, Cologne, pp 67–76 Stadler C (2006) Compliance-Programme – Vorbeugung gegen Kartellverstöße im Unternehmen. In: Forschungsinstitut für Wirtschaftsverfassung und Wettbewerb (ed) Schwerpunkte des Kartellrechts 2004, FIW-Schriftenreihe Heft 206. Carl Heymanns, Cologne, pp 67–76
Zurück zum Zitat Steinle C (2004) Kartellgeldbußen gegen Konzernunternehmen nach dem “Aristrain”-Urteil des EuGH. EWS:118–124 Steinle C (2004) Kartellgeldbußen gegen Konzernunternehmen nach dem “Aristrain”-Urteil des EuGH. EWS:118–124
Zurück zum Zitat Terhechte JP (2004) Die Vollstreckung von EG-Bußgeldbescheiden in den Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Gemeinschaft – Rechtliche Grundlagen, Umsetzungspraxis und Rechtsmittel am Beispiel der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. EuZW:235–240 Terhechte JP (2004) Die Vollstreckung von EG-Bußgeldbescheiden in den Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Gemeinschaft – Rechtliche Grundlagen, Umsetzungspraxis und Rechtsmittel am Beispiel der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. EuZW:235–240
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas H, Putzo H (2013) Zivilprozessordnung – ZPO, 34th edn. C.H. Beck, Munich Thomas H, Putzo H (2013) Zivilprozessordnung – ZPO, 34th edn. C.H. Beck, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Vilsmeier I (2013) Tatsachenkontrolle und Beweisführung im EU-Kartellrecht auf dem Prüfstand der EMRK. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen Vilsmeier I (2013) Tatsachenkontrolle und Beweisführung im EU-Kartellrecht auf dem Prüfstand der EMRK. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
Zurück zum Zitat Völcker SB (2012) Allmacht der Kommission? Anmerkungen aus anwaltlicher Sicht zur Divergenz von Kommissionsbefugnissen und gerichtlicher Kontrolle im Bereich der Kartellrechtsanwendung. In: Immenga U, Körber T (eds) Die Kommission zwischen Gestaltungsmacht und Rechtsbindung. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 153–184CrossRef Völcker SB (2012) Allmacht der Kommission? Anmerkungen aus anwaltlicher Sicht zur Divergenz von Kommissionsbefugnissen und gerichtlicher Kontrolle im Bereich der Kartellrechtsanwendung. In: Immenga U, Körber T (eds) Die Kommission zwischen Gestaltungsmacht und Rechtsbindung. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 153–184CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat von Danwitz T (2008) Europäisches Verwaltungsrecht. Springer, Heidelberg von Danwitz T (2008) Europäisches Verwaltungsrecht. Springer, Heidelberg
Zurück zum Zitat von der Groeben H, Schwarze J, Hatje A (eds) (2015) Europäisches Unionsrecht, vol 4, 7th edn. Nomos, Baden-Baden von der Groeben H, Schwarze J, Hatje A (eds) (2015) Europäisches Unionsrecht, vol 4, 7th edn. Nomos, Baden-Baden
Zurück zum Zitat von Köckritz C (2014) EuGH, 11.9.2014 – C-67/13 P: Kartellrecht: Bezweckte Wettbewerbsbeschränkung – CB, Anmerkung. EuZW:907–909 von Köckritz C (2014) EuGH, 11.9.2014 – C-67/13 P: Kartellrecht: Bezweckte Wettbewerbsbeschränkung – CB, Anmerkung. EuZW:907–909
Zurück zum Zitat Weitbrecht A (2003a) Das neue EG-Kartellverfahrensrecht. EuZW:69–73 Weitbrecht A (2003a) Das neue EG-Kartellverfahrensrecht. EuZW:69–73
Zurück zum Zitat Weitbrecht A (2003b) Europäisches Kartellrecht 2002. EuZW:357–362 Weitbrecht A (2003b) Europäisches Kartellrecht 2002. EuZW:357–362
Zurück zum Zitat Weitbrecht A, Tepe G (2001) Erste Erfahrungen mit den neuen Bußgeldleitlinien der Europäischen Kommission. EWS:220–228 Weitbrecht A, Tepe G (2001) Erste Erfahrungen mit den neuen Bußgeldleitlinien der Europäischen Kommission. EWS:220–228
Zurück zum Zitat Wessely T (2001) Polypropylene appeal cases. CMLR 38:739–765 Wessely T (2001) Polypropylene appeal cases. CMLR 38:739–765
Zurück zum Zitat Westhoff J-P (2007) Der Zugang zu Beweismitteln bei Schadensersatzklagen im Kartellrecht: eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung. Diss., Münster Westhoff J-P (2007) Der Zugang zu Beweismitteln bei Schadensersatzklagen im Kartellrecht: eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung. Diss., Münster
Zurück zum Zitat Wiedemann G (ed) (2008) Handbuch des Kartellrechts, 2nd edn. C.H. Beck, Munich Wiedemann G (ed) (2008) Handbuch des Kartellrechts, 2nd edn. C.H. Beck, Munich
Zurück zum Zitat Wils WPJ (2003) The principle of Ne Bis in Idem in EC antitrust enforcement: a legal and economic analysis. World Competition 26:131–148 Wils WPJ (2003) The principle of Ne Bis in Idem in EC antitrust enforcement: a legal and economic analysis. World Competition 26:131–148
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf D, Fink R (1994) Mit der Verordnung Nr. 17 in. nächste Jahrtausend? WuW:289–293 Wolf D, Fink R (1994) Mit der Verordnung Nr. 17 in. nächste Jahrtausend? WuW:289–293
Zurück zum Zitat Zöller R (2014) Zivilprozessordnung – ZPO, 30th edn. Otto Schmidt, Cologne Zöller R (2014) Zivilprozessordnung – ZPO, 30th edn. Otto Schmidt, Cologne
Metadaten
Titel
Anti-trust Proceedings and Fines
verfasst von
Walter Frenz
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48593-4_8