nach oben

NanoEthics

Erschienen in:

01.04.2013 | Introduction

Anticipating the Societal Challenges of Nanotechnologies

verfasst von: Diana M. Bowman, Elen Stokes, Michael G. Bennett

Erschienen in: NanoEthics | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

“In this article we sketch out the landscape for this Special Issue on anticipating and embedding the societal challenge of nanotechnologies. Tools that actors may choose to employ for these processes are articulated, and further explored through the introduction of the seven articles which comprise this Issue. Taken together, these articles create a cogent narrative on the societal challenges posed by nanotechnologies. They are drawn together by three distinct themes, each of which is briefly considered within this context of this Introductory article”.

Nächster Artikel Bridging the Gap Between Innovation and ELSA: The TA Program in the Dutch Nano-R&D Program NanoNed

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Dittmar JE (2011) Information technology and economic change: the impact of the printing press. Q J Econ 126(3):1133–1172CrossRef

Doubleday R (2007) Risk, public engagement and reflexivity: alternative framings of the public dimensions of nanotechnology. Health Risk Soc 9(2):211–227CrossRef

Eisenstein EL (1979) The printing press as an agent of change. CUP, Cambridge

Elzen B, Geels FW, Hofman PS, Green K (2004) Socio-technical scenarios as a tool for transaction policy: an example from the traffic and transport domain. In: Boelie E, Geels FW, Green K (eds) System innovation and the transition to sustainability: theory, evidence and policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, p 251

Fiedler FA, Reynolds GH (1994) Legal problems of nanotechnology: an overview. South Calif Interdiscip Law J 3:593–629

Foresight (2012) Annual review 2011. HM Government, London

Genus A, Coles AM (2005) On constructive technology assessment and limitations on public participation in technology assessment. Technol Anal Strat Manag 17(4):433–443CrossRef

Guston D (2008) Innovation policy: not just a jumbo shrimp. Nature 454:940–941CrossRef

Guston D, Sarawitz D (2002) Real-time technology assessment. Technol Soc 24(1–2):93–109CrossRef

10.

Hobsbawm EJ, Wrigley C (1999) Industry and empire: the birth of the industrial revolution. Penguin, New York

11.

Johnston R (2001) Foresight—refining the process. Int J Technol Manag 21(7):711–725CrossRef

12.

Kuosa T (2012) The evolution of strategic foresight: navigating public policy making. Gower, Surrey

13.

Landes DS (2003) The unbound Prometheus: technological chance and industrial development in western Europe from 1750 to the present. CUP, Cambridge

14.

Rip A, te Kulve H (2008) Construction technology assessment and socio-technical scenarios. In: Fisher E, Selin C, Wetmore JM (eds) The yearbook of nanotechnologies in society, vol 1. Springer, New York, pp 49–70

15.

Roco MC, Harthorn B, Guston D, Shapira P (2011) Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development. In: Roco MC et al. Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: retrospective and outlook. Science Policy Reports, 1, 561–617

16.

Schot J, Rip A (1997) The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 54(203):251–268CrossRef

17.

Seear K, Petersen A, Bowman DM (2010) Communicating with citizens about nanotechnologies: views of key stakeholders in Australia. Monash University and The University of Melbourne, Melbourne

18.

Wilsdon J, Wills R (2004) See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. Demos, London

Titel: Anticipating the Societal Challenges of Nanotechnologies
verfasst von: Diana M. Bowman
Elen Stokes
Michael G. Bennett
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2013
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: NanoEthics / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1871-4757
Elektronische ISSN: 1871-4765
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-013-0170-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Bridging the Gap Between Innovation and ELSA: The TA Program in the Dutch Nano-R&D Program NanoNed

Context Matters: Promises and Concerns Regarding Nanotechnologies for Water and Food Applications

Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Model for Responsible Governance

Transnational Governance Arrangements: Legitimate Alternatives to Regulating Nanotechnologies?

Discovering Specific Conditions for Compliance with Soft Regulation Related to Work with Nanomaterials

Meta-Regulation and Nanotechnologies: The Challenge of Responsibilisation Within the European Commission’s Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies Research