Skip to main content

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Application of Dashboards and Scorecards for Learning Models IT Risk Management: A User Experience

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The process of education of students and professional training in themes such as IT Risk Management entails use frameworks such as Magerit or Octave. The understanding of these frameworks becomes difficult when learning sessions are short, even if we use specific software, due to the large number of elements to identify, understand, relate and apply. Using dashboards and scorecards prepared in tools like Excel helps enhance this learning. The purpose of this study was to measure the usability and effectiveness in achieving the expected outcomes, evaluating the experience of users through questionnaires type System Usability Usability Scale (SUS); and to examine the needs and expectations of users. The results show that participants learn faster the practical application of the frameworks studied, because the dashboards and scorecards allows them easier to identify its elements and its practical application.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Information security risk assessment.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Joy, E., Garcia, F.: Measuring learning effectiveness: a new look at no-significant-difference findings. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 4, 33–39 (2000) Joy, E., Garcia, F.: Measuring learning effectiveness: a new look at no-significant-difference findings. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 4, 33–39 (2000)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganapati, Sukumar. Use of Dashboards in Government. Fostering Transparency and Democracy Series. (2011) Ganapati, Sukumar. Use of Dashboards in Government. Fostering Transparency and Democracy Series. (2011)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Eckerson, W.W.: Performance Dashboards: Measuring, Monitoring, and Managing Your Business, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2010) Eckerson, W.W.: Performance Dashboards: Measuring, Monitoring, and Managing Your Business, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballou, B., Heitger, D., Donnell, L.: Creating effective dashboards. Financ. Strateg. 91, 27–32 (2010) Ballou, B., Heitger, D., Donnell, L.: Creating effective dashboards. Financ. Strateg. 91, 27–32 (2010)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Grant, A., Moshyk, A., Diab, H., Caron, P., Lorenzi, F.D., Bisson, G.: Integrating feedback from a clinical data warehouse into practice organization. Int. J. Med. Inform. 75(3–4), 232–239 (2006)CrossRef Grant, A., Moshyk, A., Diab, H., Caron, P., Lorenzi, F.D., Bisson, G.: Integrating feedback from a clinical data warehouse into practice organization. Int. J. Med. Inform. 75(3–4), 232–239 (2006)CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartson, H., Andre, T., Williges, R.: Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods. Inter. J. Hum. Comput. 15, 145–181 (2003)CrossRef Hartson, H., Andre, T., Williges, R.: Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods. Inter. J. Hum. Comput. 15, 145–181 (2003)CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat ISO: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals - Part 11: Guidance on usability (1988) ISO: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals - Part 11: Guidance on usability (1988)
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Roco, M.: Possibilities for global governance of converging technologies. J. Nanopart. Res. 10, 11–29 (2008)CrossRef Roco, M.: Possibilities for global governance of converging technologies. J. Nanopart. Res. 10, 11–29 (2008)CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Shedden, P., Smith, W., Scheepers, R., Ahmad, A.: Towards a knowledge perspective in information security risk assessments – an illustrative case study. In: ACIS 2009 Proceedings. Paper 96. In 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Melbourne. (2009) Shedden, P., Smith, W., Scheepers, R., Ahmad, A.: Towards a knowledge perspective in information security risk assessments – an illustrative case study. In: ACIS 2009 Proceedings. Paper 96. In 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Melbourne. (2009)
11.
Zurück zum Zitat MAGERIT – versión 3.0 - Methods of Analysis and Risk Management Information Systems. Ministry of Finance and Public Administration: Madrid (2012) MAGERIT – versión 3.0 - Methods of Analysis and Risk Management Information Systems. Ministry of Finance and Public Administration: Madrid (2012)
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gong, L. Adding software downloading tasks to LEGO-based assembly simulators for on-site training (2014) Gong, L. Adding software downloading tasks to LEGO-based assembly simulators for on-site training (2014)
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Brooke, J.: SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, A.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor and Francis, London (1996) Brooke, J.: SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, A.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor and Francis, London (1996)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4(3), 114–123 (2009) Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4(3), 114–123 (2009)
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rauschenberger, M., Schrepp, M., Pérez Cota, M., Olschner, S., Thomaschewski, J.: Efficient measurement of the user experience of interactive products. How to use the user experience questionnaire (UEQ). Example spanish language version. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Interact. Multimed 2(1), 39–45 (2013) Rauschenberger, M., Schrepp, M., Pérez Cota, M., Olschner, S., Thomaschewski, J.: Efficient measurement of the user experience of interactive products. How to use the user experience questionnaire (UEQ). Example spanish language version. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Interact. Multimed 2(1), 39–45 (2013)
Metadaten
Titel
Application of Dashboards and Scorecards for Learning Models IT Risk Management: A User Experience
verfasst von
Ernesto Celi
Copyright-Jahr
2015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20889-3_15

Neuer Inhalt