Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Verónica Gracia-Ibáñez is a lecturer in Computer-Aided Design at Jaume I University (UJI) in Castellón, Spain. Her professional background has been in the field of industrial engineering projects. Since her engagement as a part-time lecturer in 2011, she has developed an interest in researching both in the field of biomechanics, in which she is currently working on her PhD thesis, as well as in the field of education, as shown by her participation in two educational innovation projects, two publications at international congresses on education and the co-authorship of a textbook.
Margarita Vergara is Full Professor in Computer-Aided Design and Ergonomics at Jaume I University (UJI) in Castellón, Spain. Her professional research interests are biomechanics of the hand and the ergonomic evaluation of product design, as well as ways to improve her teaching. Thus, she has taught Computer-Aided Design and Graphics in different Engineering Degrees for more than 20 years and has authored 18 textbooks. As a result of her interest in improving teaching, she has published one paper in an international peer-reviewed journal and presented 18 communications at congresses and conferences on teaching.
A project involving innovation in university education is described in this paper. It was implemented in a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) course on the Bachelor’s Degree in Industrial Design and Product Development Engineering. Several studies have been published about CAD curricula, yet to the best of our knowledge nothing on applying Action Research (AR) to CAD teaching. The project was carried out over a two-year period, after detecting that academic results were not very good even when the course was not very demanding. In the first year, an experiment based on the AR methodology was planned and put into practice. We took the figure of the teacher-researcher as our own, owing to our conviction that teachers themselves must study their own work and reflect on it critically. Encouraged by the good results, throughout the following year, more changes were made in order to further improve the learning experience. The main actions were to develop self-learning material and to use rubrics for assessment, together with an increase in the level of difficulty in some parts of the evaluation. A detailed chronological description of the actions that were carried out, the implied motivations and both the expected results and those actually obtained are presented.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. Educational psychology a cognitive view. doi: 10.1107/S010827019000508X
Bain, K. (2007). Lo que hacen los mejores profesores universitarios. Traducción de Óscar Barberá: Servicio Publicaciones Universidad de Valencia, Valencia (Spain). ISBN 978-84-370-6669-1.
Chester, I. (2007). Teaching for CAD expertise. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17, 23–35. CrossRef
Coll, C. (1996). Constructivismo y educación escolar: ni hablamos siempre de lo mismo ni lo hacemos siempre desde la misma perspectiva epistemológica. Anuario de Psicología, 153–178.
Coll, C., Mauri, T., & Onrubia Goñi, J. (2006). Análisis y resolución de casos-problema mediante el aprendizaje colaborativo. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 3(2), 8. CrossRef
Contero, M., Naya, F., Company, P., & Saorín, J. L. (2006). Learning support tools for developing spatial abilities in engineering design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22, 470–477.
Contero, M., Naya, F., Company, P., Saorín, J. L., & Conesa, J. (2005). Improving visualization skills in engineering education. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 25, 24–31. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2005.107
Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2011). Speaking of Quality and Research that Counts: Making an Impact on Practice. Action Researcher in Education, 11, 10–18.
Marqués Andrés, M., & Ferrández Berrueco, R. (2011). Investigación práctica en educación: investigación-acción. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Informática: Universidad de Sevilla.
Novak, J. D. (2004). La teoría del aprendizaje significativo. Technology, 1–10.
Plumed, R., Calleja, P. C., Varley, P. A., & Martin, R. (2013). From Sketches to CAM Models: Perceiving Pockets and Steps in Single-view Wireframe Sketches of Polyhedral Shapes (pp. 951–958). In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing.
Riel, M. (2010). Understanding action research. Center for Collaborative Action Research, 43, 435–437. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.016
Riel, M., & Whitehead, J. (2011). Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association: Action Research Identity Outcomes: Shift in Self-Perception, Professional Role, and Researcher Identity Interactive Symposium. New: Orleans. A meta-analysis of the outcomes of action research.
Rubio Garcı́a, R., Gallego Santos, R., & Suárez Quirós, J. (2005). Present state of CAD teaching in Spanish Universities. Comparative Education, 44(3), 201–215. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.09.003
Rudduck, J., & Hopkins, D. (1985). Research As a Basis for Teaching: Readings from the Work of Lawrence Stenhouse. London: Heinemann.
Sanmartí, N. (2007). 10 ideas clave. Graó, Barcelona: Evaluar para aprender.
Siegel, S. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill. MATH
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.
Zaphiris, P., & Ioannou, A. (2014). Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Designing and Developing Novel Learning Experiences. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07482-5
- Applying action research in CAD teaching to improve the learning experience and academic level
- Springer International Publishing
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Elektronische ISSN: 2365-9440
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA