nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.05.2018 | Review

Aquaculture expansion in Brazilian freshwaters against the Aichi Biodiversity Targets

verfasst von: Dilermando Pereira Lima Junior, André Lincoln Barroso Magalhães, Fernando Mayer Pelicice, Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule, Valter M. Azevedo-Santos, Mário Luís Orsi, Daniel Simberloff, Angelo Antônio Agostinho

Erschienen in: Ambio | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The Convention on Biological Diversity proposed the Aichi Biodiversity Targets to improve conservation policies and to balance economic development, social welfare, and the maintenance of biodiversity/ecosystem services. Brazil is a signatory of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets and is the most diverse country in terms of freshwater fish, but its national policies have supported the development of unsustainable commercial and ornamental aquaculture, which has led to serious disturbances to inland ecosystems and natural resources. We analyzed the development of Brazilian aquaculture to show how current aquaculture expansion conflicts with all 20 Aichi Targets. This case suggests that Brazil and many other megadiverse developing countries will not meet international conservation targets, stressing the need for new strategies, such as the environmental management system, to improve biodiversity conservation.

Vorheriger Artikel Paradigm changes in freshwater aquaculture practices in China: Moving towards achieving environmental integrity and sustainability

Nächster Artikel Integrated mangrove-shrimp cultivation: Potential for blue carbon sequestration

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Agostinho, A.A., L.C. Gomes, H.I. Suzuki, and H.F. Júlio-Jr. 1999. Riscos da implantação de cultivos de espécies exóticas em tanques-redes em reservatórios do Rio Iguaçu. Cadernos da Biodiversidade 2: 1–9.

Agostinho, A.A., S.M. Thomaz, and L.C. Gomes. 2005. Conservation of the biodiversity of Brazil’s inland waters. Conservation Biology 19: 646–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00701.x.CrossRef

Agostinho, A.A., L.C. Gomes, and F.M. Pelicice. 2007. Ecologia e manejo de recursos pesqueiros em reservatórios do Brasil. Maringá: EDUEM.

Agostinho, A.A., L.C. Gomes, N.C.L. Santos, J.C.G. Ortega, and F.M. Pelicice. 2016. Fish assemblages in neotropical reservoirs: Colonization patterns, impacts and management. Fisheries Research 173: 26–36.CrossRef

Alves, A.L., E.S. Varela, G.V. Moro, and L.N.G. Kirschnik. 2014. Riscos genéticos da produção de híbridos de peixes nativos. Palmas: Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura.

Australia Productivity Commission. 2004. Assessing environmental regulatory arrangements for aquaculture. Melbourne, VIC: Productivity Commission.

Azevedo-Santos, V.M., O. Rigolin-Sá, and F.M. Pelicice. 2011. Growing, losing or introducing? Cage aquaculture as a vector for the introduction of non-native fish in Furnas Reservoir, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 9: 915–919. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252011000400024.CrossRef

Azevedo-Santos, V.M., F.M. Pelicice, D.P. Lima-Junior, A.L.B. Magalhães, M.L. Orsi, J.R.S. Vitule, and A.A. Agostinho. 2015. How to avoid fish introductions in Brazil: Education and information as alternatives. Natureza & Conservação 13: 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2015.06.002.CrossRef

Azevedo-Santos, V.M., P.M. Fearnside, C.S. Oliveira, A.A. Padial, F.M. Pelicice, D.P. Lima-Junior, D. Simberloff, T.E. Lovejoy, et al. 2017. Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decision in Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 26: 1745–1752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1316-x.CrossRef

Braga, R.R., L. Gómez-Aparicio, T. Heger, J.R.S. Vitule, and J.M. Jeschke. 2017. Structuring evidence for invasional meltdown: Broad support but with biased and gaps. Biological Invasions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1582-2.

Brengballe, J. 2015. A guide to recirculation aquaculture. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4626e.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2017.

Britton, J.R., and M.L. Orsi. 2012. Non-native fish in aquaculture and sport fishing in Brazil: Economic benefits versus risks to fish diversity in the upper River Paraná Basin. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 22: 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-012-9254-x.CrossRef

Bueno, G.W., A. Ostrensky, C. Canzi, F.T. de Matos, and R. Roubach. 2015. Implementation of aquaculture parks in Federal Government waters in Brazil. Reviews in Aquaculture 7: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12045.CrossRef

Bush, S.R., B. Belton, D. Hall, P. Vandergeest, F.J. Murray, S. Ponte, P. Oosterveer, M.S. Islan, et al. 2013. Certify sustainable aquaculture? Science 341: 1067–1068. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237314.CrossRef

Cabello, F.C. 2006. Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: A growing problem for human and animal health and for environment. Environmental Microbiology 8: 1137–1144.CrossRef

Canonico, G.C., A. Arthington, J.K. McCrary, and M.L. Thieme. 2005. The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.699.CrossRef

Casal, C.M.V. 2006. Global documentation of fish introductions: The growing crisis and recommendations for action. Biological Invasions 8: 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-0231-3.CrossRef

Coelho, P.N., and R. Henry. 2017. The small foreigner: New laws will promote the introduction of non-native zooplankton in Brazilian aquatic environments. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 29: e7. https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x0717.CrossRef

Colombia, 2015. Resulución 2287 de 2015. Autoridad Nacional de Acuicultura y Pesca:Por la cual se declaran unas especies de peces como domesticadas para el desarrollo de la acuicultura y se dictan otras disposiciones. http://legal.legis.com.co/document?obra=legcol&document=legcol_14790d1a48434c769e252071249e97d4.

Córdova-Tapia, F., M. Contreras, and L. Zambrano. 2015. Trophic niche overlap between native and non-native fishes. Hydrobiologia 746: 291–301.CrossRef

Cucherousset, J., and J.D. Olden. 2011. Ecological impacts of non-native freshwater fishes. Fisheries 36: 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2011.574578.CrossRef

Daga, V.S., F. Skóra, A.A. Padial, V. Abilhoa, E.A. Gubiani, and J.R.S. Vitule. 2015. Homogenization dynamics of the fish assemblages in Neotropical reservoirs: Comparing the roles of introduced species and their vectors. Hydrobiologia 746: 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2032-0.CrossRef

David, G.S., E.D. Carvalho, D. Lemos, A.N. Silveira, and M. Dall’Aglio-Sobrinho. 2015. Ecological carrying capacity for intensive tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cage aquaculture in a large hydroelectrical reservoir in Southeastern Brazil. Aquaculture Engineering 66: 30–40.CrossRef

Deines, A.M., M.E. Wittmann, J.M. Deines, and D.M. Lodge. 2016. Tradeoffs among ecosystem services associated with global tilapia introductions. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture 24: 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2015.1115466.CrossRef

Diana, J.S. 2009. Aquaculture production and biodiversity conservation. BioScience 59: 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.1.7.CrossRef

Di Marco, M., S.H.M. Butchart, P. Visconti, G.M. Buchanan, G.F. Ficetola, and C. Rondinini. 2015. Synergies and trade-offs in achieving global biodiversity targets. Conservation Biology 30: 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12559.CrossRef

EPA. 2017. Guide to developing and Environmental Management System—Plan. http://faostat3.fao.org/. Accessed 26 Oct 2017.

FAO. 2016. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture: Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Rome: FAO.

Fearnside, P.M. 2016. Brazilian politics threaten environmental policies. Science 353: 746–748. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag0254.CrossRef

Figueredo, C.C., and A. Giani. 2005. Ecological interaction between Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, L.) and the phytoplanktonic community of the Furnas Reservoir (Brazil). Freshwater Biology 50: 1391–1403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01407.x.CrossRef

Forneck, S.C., F.M. Dutra, C.E. Zacarkim, and A.M. Cunico. 2016. Invasion risks by non-native freshwater fishes due to aquaculture activity in a neotropical stream. Hydrobiologia 773: 193–205.CrossRef

Frehse, F.A., R.R. Braga, G.A. Nocera, and J.R.S. Vitule. 2016. Non-native species and invasion biology in a megadiverse country: Scientometric analysis and ecological interactions in Brazil. Biological Invasions 18: 3713–3725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1260-9.CrossRef

Garcia, F., J.M. Kimpara, W.C. Valenti, and L.A. Ambrosio. 2014. Emergy assessment of tilapia cage farming in a hydroelectric reservoir. Ecological Engineering 68: 72–79.CrossRef

Governo de Mato Grosso. 2017. Diário Oficial do Estado de Mato Grosso: Decreto 1190/2017. https://www.legisweb.com.br/legislacao/?id=350177. Accessed 26 Oct 2017.

Governo de Tocantins. 2016. Alteração da Resolução COEMA/TO N^o 27, de 22 de Novembro de 2011. https://www.legisweb.com.br/legislacao/?id=172017. Accessed 26 Oct 2017.

Hallwass, G., P.L. Lopes, A.A. Juras, and R.A.M. Silvano. 2013. Fishers’ knowledge identifies environmental changes and fish abundance trends in impounded tropical rivers. Ecological Applications 23: 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0429.1.CrossRef

Hashimoto, D.T., J.A. Senhorini, F. Foresti, and F. Porto-Foresti. 2012. Interspecific fish hybrids in Brazil: Management of genetic resources for sustainable use. Reviews in Aquaculture 4: 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5131.2012.01067.x.CrossRef

Havel, J.E., C.E. Lee, and J. Vander Zanden. 2005. Do reservoirs facilitate invasions into landscapes? BioScience 55: 518–525.CrossRef

IBGE. 2016. Produção da pecuária municipal. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.

Jarić, L., and G. Cvijanović. 2012. The tens rule in invasion biology: Measure of a true impact or our lack of knowledge and understanding. Environmental Management 50: 979–981.CrossRef

Jensen, Ø., T. Dempster, E.B. Thorstad, I. Uglem, and A. Fredheim. 2010. Escapes of fishes from Norwegian sea-cage aquaculture: Cause, consequences and prevention. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 1: 71–83. https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00008.CrossRef

Jeschke, J.M., L. Gómez Aparicio, S. Haider, T. Heger, C.J. Lortie, P. Pyšek, and D.L. Strayer. 2012. Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining. NeoBiota 14: 1–20.CrossRef

Johnson, P.T., J.D. Olden, and M.J. Vander Zanden. 2008. Dam invaders: Impoundments facilitate biological invasions into freshwaters. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1890/070156.CrossRef

Jones, A.C., A. Mead, M.J. Kaiser, M.C.V. Austen, A.W. Adrian, N.A. Auchterlonie, K.D. Black, L.C. Blow, et al. 2015. Prioritization of knowledge needs for sustainable aquaculture: A national and global perspective. Fish and Fisheries 16: 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12086.CrossRef

Joppa, L.N., P. Visconti, C.N. Jenkins, and S.L. Pimm. 2013. Achieving the convention on biological diversity’s goals for plant conservation. Science 341: 1100–1103. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241706.CrossRef

Klinger, D., and R. Naylor. 2012. Searching for solutions in aquaculture: Charting a sustainable course. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37: 247–276. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-021111-161531.CrossRef

Liew, J.H., H.H. Tan, and D.C.J. Yeo. 2016. Dammed rivers: Impoundments facilitate fish invasions. Freshwater Biology 61: 1421–1429. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12781.

Lima, L.B., F.J.M. Oliveira, H.C. Giacomini, and D.P. Lima-Junior. 2016. Expansion of aquaculture parks and the increasing risk of non-native species invasions in Brazil. Reviews in Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12150.

Lima-Junior, D.P., L.B. Lima, J.R.S. Vitule, M.L. Orsi, and V.M. Azevedo-Santos. 2014. Modificação das diretrizes do CONAMA n^o 413/2009 sobre o licenciamento ambiental da aquicultura: retirando os “obstáculos normativos” para a criação de espécies não nativas em águas continentais brasileiras. Boletim da Associação Brasileira de Limnologia 40: 3–11.

Lin, Y., Z. Gao, and A. Zhan. 2013. Introduction and use of non-native species for aquaculture in China: Status, risks and management solutions. Reviews in Aquaculture 7: 28–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12052.CrossRef

Mace, G.M., K. Norris, and A.H. Fitter. 2012. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27: 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006.CrossRef

Magalhães, A.L.B., and C.M. Jacobi. 2013. Asian aquarium fishes in a Neotropical biodiversity hotspot: Impeding establishment, spread and impacts. Biological Invasions 15: 2157–2163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0443-x.CrossRef

Magalhães, A.L.B., and C.M. Jacobi. 2017. Colorful invasion in permissive Neotropical ecosystems: Establishment of ornamental non-native poeciliids of the genera Poecilia/Xiphophorus (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae) and management alternatives. Neotropical Ichthyology 15: e160094. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20160094.

MFA. 2012. Instrução normativa interministerial n^o1 de 3 de Janeiro de 2012. Diário Oficial da União 3: 26–42.

Montanhini Neto, R., H.R. Nocko, and A. Ostrensky. 2015. Environmental characterization and impacts of fish farming in the cascade reservoirs of the Paranapanema river, Brazil. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 6: 255–272.CrossRef

Moura, R.S.T., W.C. Valenti, and G.G. Henry-Silva. 2016. Sustainability of Nile tilapia net-cage culture in a reservoir in a semi-arid region. Ecological Indicators 66: 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.052.CrossRef

Naylor, R.L., R.J. Goldburg, and J.H. Primavera. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405: 1017–1024. https://doi.org/10.1038/35016500.CrossRef

Naylor, R.L., S.L. Williams, and D.R. Strong. 2001. Aquaculture—a gateway for exotic species. Science 294: 1655–1656. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1064875.CrossRef

Naylor, R., K. Hindar, F. Fleming, R. Goldburg, S. Williams, J. Volpe, F. Whoriskey, et al. 2005. Fugitive salmon: Assessing the risks of escaped fish from net-pen aquaculture. BioScience 55: 427–437.CrossRef

O’Bryen, P.J., and C.S. Lee. 2003. Management of aquaculture effluents workshop discussion summary. Aquaculture 226: 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00480-0.CrossRef

Occhi, T.V.T., L.A. Faria, and J.R.S. Vitule. 2017. Native or non-native? That is the question: A complementary discussion to Saint-Paul (2017). Acta of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources 5: xii–xvi.

Ochoa-Ochoa, L.M., O.A. Flores-Villela, C.A. Ríos-Muñoz, J. Arroyo-Cabrales, and M. Martínez-Gordillo. 2017. Mexico’s ambiguous invasive species plan. Science 355: 1033. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9400.CrossRef

Ortega, J.C.G., H.F. Júlio Jr., L.C. Gomes, and A.A. Agostinho. 2015. Fish farming as the main driver of fish introductions in Neotropical reservoirs. Hydrobiologia 746: 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2025-z.CrossRef

Padial, A.A., A.A. Agostinho, V.M. Azevedo-Santos, F.A. Frehse, D.P. Lima-Junior, A.L.B. Magalhães, R.P. Mormul, F.M. Pelicice, et al. 2017. The “Tilapia Law” encouraging non-native fish threatens Amazonian river basins. Biodiversity and Conservation 26: 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1316-x.CrossRef

Pant, J., B.K. Barman, K. Murshed-E-Jahan, B. Belton, and M. Beveridge. 2014. Can aquaculture benefit the extreme poor? A case study of landless and socially marginalized Adivasi (ethnic) communities in Bangladesh. Aquaculture 418–419: 1–10.CrossRef

Pedroza-Filho, M.X., R.M. Barroso, R.M. Valadão-Flores, and A.P. Silva. 2014a. Diagnóstico da cadeia produtiva da piscicultura no estado de Tocantins. Palmas: EMBRAPA Pesca e Aquicultura.

Pedroza-Filho, M.X., R.M. Barroso, and R.M. Valadão Flores. 2014b. Effects of non-tariff barriers on Brazilian fisheries exports to the European Union. Agroalimentaria 20: 35–52.

Pedroza-Filho, M.X., R.M. Valadão-Flores, A.O. Rodrigues, and F.P. Rezende. 2015. Análise comparativa de resultados econômicos dos polos piscicultores no segundo trimestre de 2015. Palmas: EMBRAPA Pesca e Aquicultura.

Pelicice, F.M., J.R.S. Vitule, D.P. Lima-Junior, M.L. Orsi, and A.A. Agostinho. 2014. Serious new threat to Brazilian freshwater ecosystems: The naturalization of nonnative fish by decree. Conservation Letters 7: 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12029.CrossRef

Pelicice, F.M., V.M. Azevedo-Santos, J.R.S. Vitule, M.L. Orsi, D.P. Lima-Junior, A.L.B. Magalhães, P.S. Pompeu, M. Petrere-Junior, et al. 2017. Neotropical freshwater fishes imperilled by unsustainable policies. Fish and Fisheries 18: 1119–1133.CrossRef

Petesse, M.L., and M. Petrere Jr. 2012. Tendency towards homogenization in fish assemblages in the cascade reservoir system of the Tietê river basin, Brazil. Ecological Engineering 48: 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.033.CrossRef

Pyšek, P., S. Bacher, M. Chytrý, V. Vojtěch, J. Wild, L. Celesti-Grapow, N. Gassó, M. Kenis, et al. 2010. Constrasting patterns in the invasion of European terrestrial and freshwater habitats by alien plants, insects and vertebrates. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19: 317–331.CrossRef

Rosa, R.S., A.C. Aguiar, I.G. Boëchat, and B. Gücker. 2013. Impacts of fish farm pollution on ecosystem structure and function of tropical headwater streams. Environmental Pollution 174: 204–213.CrossRef

Saint-Paul, D. 2017. Native fish species boosting Brazilian’s aquaculture development. Acta of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources 5: 1–9.

Sampaio, F.D.F., C.A. Freire, T.V. Sampaio, J.R.S. Vitule, and F.F. Luís. 2015. The precautionary principle and its approach to risk analysis and quarantine related to the trade of marine ornamental fish in Brazil. Marine Policy 51: 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.08.003.CrossRef

São Paulo. 2016. Instituto de Pesca de São Paulo – Portaria: Dispõe sobre a lista de espécies aquícolas alóctones, exóticas e híbridos cultiváveis no Estado de São Paulo.

Scarano, F., A. Guimarães, and J.M. Silva. 2012. Rio + 20: Lead by example. Nature 486: 25–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/486025a.CrossRef

Sepúlveda, M., I. Arismendi, D. Soto, F. Jara, and F. Faria. 2013. Escaped farmed salmon and trout in Chile: Incidence, impacts and the need for an ecosystem view. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 4: 273–283. https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00089.CrossRef

Simberloff, D., and B. Von Holle. 1999. Positive interactions on nonindigenous species: Invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions 1: 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010086329619.CrossRef

Starling, F., X. Lazzaro, C. Cavalcanti, and R. Moreira. 2002. Contribution of omnivorous tilapia to eutrophication of a shallow tropical reservoir: Evidence from a fish kill. Freshwater Biology 47: 2443–2452. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.01013.x.CrossRef

Thorvaldsen, T., I.M. Holmen, and H.K. Moe. 2015. The escape of fish from Norwegian fish farms: Causes, risks and influence of organisational aspects. Marine Policy 55: 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.01.008.CrossRef

Titensor, D., M. Walpole, S.L.L. Hill, D.G. Boyce, G.L. Britten, N.D. Burgess, S.H.M. Butchart, P.W. Leadley, et al. 2014. A mid-tern analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science 346: 241–244. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257484.CrossRef

Tollefson, J. 2016. Political upheaval threatens Brazil’s environmental protections. Nature 539: 147–148. https://doi.org/10.1038/539147a.CrossRef

Troell, M., R.L. Naylor, M. Metian, M. Beveridge, P.H. Tyedmers, C. Folke, K.W. Arrow, S. Barret, et al. 2014. Does aquaculture add resilience to global food system? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 13257–13263. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404067111.CrossRef

Valadão Flores, R.M.V., and M.X. Pedroza Filho. 2014. Is the internal market able to accommodate the strong growth projected for Brazilian Aquaculture? Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 4: 407–417.

Valladão, G.M.R., S. Umeda, and F. Pilarski. 2016. South American fish for continental aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12164.

Vitule, J.R.S., C.A. Freire, and D. Simberloff. 2009. Introduction of non-native freshwater fish can certainly be bad. Fish and Fisheries 10: 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00312.x.CrossRef

Vitule, J.R.S., D.P. Lima-Junior, F.M. Pelicice, M.L. Orsi, and A.A. Agostinho. 2012. Ecology: Preserve Brazil’s aquatic biodiversity. Nature 485: 309. https://doi.org/10.1038/485309c.CrossRef

Vitule, J.R.S., F.D.F. Sampaio, and A.L.B. Magalhães. 2014. Aquarium trade: Monitor Brazil’s fish sampling closely. Nature 513: 315. https://doi.org/10.1038/513315d.CrossRef

Vitule, J.R.S., V.M. Azevedo-Santos, V.S. Daga, et al. 2015. Brazil’s drought: Protect biodiversity. Science 347: 1427–1428. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.347.6229.1427-b.CrossRef

Watson, R.A., D. Zeller, and D. Pauly. 2014. Primary productivity demands of global fishing fleets. Fish and Fisheries 15: 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12013.CrossRef

Williamson, M., and A. Fitter. 1996. The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77: 1661–1666.CrossRef

Zhang, X., X. Mei, and R.D. Gulati. 2017. Effects of omnivorous tilapia on water turbidity and primary production dynamics in shallow lakes: Implication for ecosystem management. Review in Fish Biology and Fisheries 27: 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-016-9458-6.CrossRef

Titel: Aquaculture expansion in Brazilian freshwaters against the Aichi Biodiversity Targets
verfasst von: Dilermando Pereira Lima Junior
André Lincoln Barroso Magalhães
Fernando Mayer Pelicice
Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule
Valter M. Azevedo-Santos
Mário Luís Orsi
Daniel Simberloff
Angelo Antônio Agostinho
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2018
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Ambio / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0044-7447
Elektronische ISSN: 1654-7209
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-1001-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Integrated mangrove-shrimp cultivation: Potential for blue carbon sequestration

Minimizing irrigation water demand: An evaluation of shifting planting dates in Sri Lanka

Should biodiversity and nature have to earn their keep? What it really means to bring environmental goods into the marketplace

The perception of aquaculture on the Swedish West Coast

The invisibility of fisheries in the process of hydropower development across the Amazon

Capturing forest dependency in the central Himalayan region: Variations between Oak (Quercus spp.) and Pine (Pinus spp.) dominated forest landscapes