Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology 5/2023

06.08.2022 | Original Paper

Are Biasing Factors Idiosyncratic to Measures? A Comparison of Interpersonal Conflict, Organizational Constraints, and Workload

verfasst von: Paul E. Spector, Cheryl E. Gray, Christopher C. Rosen

Erschienen in: Journal of Business and Psychology | Ausgabe 5/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Widespread concern has been raised about the possibility of potential biasing factors influencing the measurement of organizational variables and distorting inferences and conclusions reached about them. Recent research calls for a measure-centric approach in which every measure is independently evaluated to assess what factor(s) may uniquely bias it. This paper examines three popular stressor measures from this perspective. Across three studies, we examine factors that may bias three popular measures of job stressors: The Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale (ICAWS), the Organizational Constraints Scale (OCS), and the Quantitative Workload Inventory (QWI). The first study used a two-wave design to survey 276 MTurk workers to assess the three stressor scales, four strains, and five measures of potential bias sources: hostile attribution bias, negative affectivity, mood, neutral objects satisfaction, and social desirability. The second study used an experimental design with 439 MTurk workers who were randomly assigned to a positive, negative, or no mood induction condition to assess effects on means of the three stressor measures and their correlations with strains. The third study surveyed 161 employee-supervisor dyads to explore the convergence of results involving the three stressor measures across sources. Based on several forms of evidence we conclude that potential biasing factors affect the three stressor measures differently, supporting the merits of a measure centric approach, even among measures in the same domain.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bal, A., & O'Brien, K. E. (2010, April 8–10). Field validation of the Hostile Atrributional Style Survey Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA, April 8–10. Bal, A., & O'Brien, K. E. (2010, April 8–10). Field validation of the Hostile Atrributional Style Survey Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA, April 8–10.
Zurück zum Zitat Brief, A. P., Burke, M. J., George, J. M., Robinson, B. S., & Webster, J. (1988). Should negative affectivity remain an unmeasured variable in the study of job stress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 193–198.CrossRefPubMed Brief, A. P., Burke, M. J., George, J. M., Robinson, B. S., & Webster, J. (1988). Should negative affectivity remain an unmeasured variable in the study of job stress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 193–198.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Zurück zum Zitat Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.CrossRefPubMed Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. John Wiley. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. John Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. Dryden Press. Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. Dryden Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1988). Methodological issues in the study of work stress: Objective vs subjective measurement of work stress and the question of longitudinal studies. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work (pp. 375–411). John Wiley & Sons. Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1988). Methodological issues in the study of work stress: Objective vs subjective measurement of work stress and the question of longitudinal studies. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work (pp. 375–411). John Wiley & Sons.
Zurück zum Zitat Gabriel, A. S., Podsakoff, N. P., Beal, D. J., Scott, B. A., Sonnentag, S., Trougakos, J. P., & Butts, M. M. (2019). Experience sampling methods: A discussion of critical trends and considerations for scholarly advancement. Organizational Research Methods, 22(4), 969–1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118802626CrossRef Gabriel, A. S., Podsakoff, N. P., Beal, D. J., Scott, B. A., Sonnentag, S., Trougakos, J. P., & Butts, M. M. (2019). Experience sampling methods: A discussion of critical trends and considerations for scholarly advancement. Organizational Research Methods, 22(4), 969–1006. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​1094428118802626​CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kuyumcu, D., & Dahling, J. J. (2014). Constraints for some, opportunities for others? Interactive and indirect effects of machiavellianism and organizational constraints on task performance ratings [journal article]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9314-9CrossRef Kuyumcu, D., & Dahling, J. J. (2014). Constraints for some, opportunities for others? Interactive and indirect effects of machiavellianism and organizational constraints on task performance ratings [journal article]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 301–310. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10869-013-9314-9CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., & Rodgers, B. (1999). A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(3), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00251-7CrossRef Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., & Rodgers, B. (1999). A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(3), 405–416. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0191-8869(98)00251-7CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moorman, R. H., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65(2), 131–149.CrossRef Moorman, R. H., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65(2), 131–149.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill.
Zurück zum Zitat Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefPubMed Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Rau, R., Morling, K., & Rösler, U. (2010). Is there a relationship between major depression and both objectively assessed and perceived demands and control? Work & Stress, 24(1), 88-106. http://www.informaworld.com/https://doi.org/10.1080/02678371003661164 Rau, R., Morling, K., & Rösler, U. (2010). Is there a relationship between major depression and both objectively assessed and perceived demands and control? Work & Stress, 24(1), 88-106. http://​www.​informaworld.​com/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​0267837100366116​4
Zurück zum Zitat Skyrme, P. Y. T. (1992). The relationship of job stressors to work performance, intent to quit, and absenteeism of first line supervisors University of South Florida]. Tampa, FL. Skyrme, P. Y. T. (1992). The relationship of job stressors to work performance, intent to quit, and absenteeism of first line supervisors University of South Florida]. Tampa, FL.
Zurück zum Zitat Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.356CrossRefPubMed Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 356–367. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​1076-8998.​3.​4.​356CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Spector, P. E., & Nixon, A. E. (2019). How often do I agree: An experimental test of item format method variance in stress measures. Occupational Health Science, 3, 125–143.CrossRef Spector, P. E., & Nixon, A. E. (2019). How often do I agree: An experimental test of item format method variance in stress measures. Occupational Health Science, 3, 125–143.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, E. J. (1959). The comparison of regression variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (series b), 21, 396–399. Williams, E. J. (1959). The comparison of regression variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (series b), 21, 396–399.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou, Z. E., Yan, Y., Che, X. X., & Meier, L. L. (2015). Effect of workplace incivility on end-of-work negative affect: Examining individual and organizational moderators in a daily diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(1), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038167CrossRefPubMed Zhou, Z. E., Yan, Y., Che, X. X., & Meier, L. L. (2015). Effect of workplace incivility on end-of-work negative affect: Examining individual and organizational moderators in a daily diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(1), 117–130. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​a0038167CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Are Biasing Factors Idiosyncratic to Measures? A Comparison of Interpersonal Conflict, Organizational Constraints, and Workload
verfasst von
Paul E. Spector
Cheryl E. Gray
Christopher C. Rosen
Publikationsdatum
06.08.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Business and Psychology / Ausgabe 5/2023
Print ISSN: 0889-3268
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-353X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09838-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2023

Journal of Business and Psychology 5/2023 Zur Ausgabe