nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

17.01.2017

Are intensive data collection methods in pain research feasible in those with physical disability? A study in persons with chronic pain and spinal cord injury

verfasst von: A. L. Kratz, C. Z. Kalpakjian, R. A. Hanks

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

Intensive repeated measures data collection procedures, such as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and end-of-day (EOD) diaries, are becoming more prominent in pain research. Existing data on the feasibility of such methods is encouraging; however, almost nothing is known about feasibility in clinical populations with significant physical disabilities. Research methodology feasibility is crucial to the inclusion of individuals with physical disability in pain research given the high prevalence and impact of pain in these populations. The aim of this study was to examine study compliance, protocol acceptability, and reactivity of intensive data collection methods in adults with chronic pain and spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods

Secondary analysis of data from a 7-day EMA and EOD diary study in a sample of 131 community dwelling adults with SCI.

Results

Results showed rates of missing data ranged from 18.4 to 22.8% across measures. Participant compliance was related to time of day/presence of audible prompts, mobility aid use, race, and baseline levels of pain and pain interference, with more missing data at wake and bedtimes/no prompts, and for those who used hand-held mobility devices, identified as black/African American, and/or reported higher baseline pain and pain interference. Participants rated the study methodology as generally highly acceptable and expressed willingness to participate in similar studies of much longer duration. There was no evidence of reactivity, defined as temporal shifts in pain or pain interference ratings.

Conclusions

Overall, intensive pain data collection is feasible in persons with SCI with no evidence that the methodology impacts pain intensity or pain interference ratings.

Vorheriger Artikel Establishing clinical meaning and defining important differences for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis using standard setting with patients, parents, and providers

Nächster Artikel In support of an individualized approach to assessing quality of life: comparison between Patient Generated Index and standardized measures across four health conditions

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Pengel, L.H., Refshauge, K.M., & Maher, C.G. (2004). Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 29(8), 879–883.CrossRef

Ullrich, P.M. (2007). Pain following spinal cord injury. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 18(2), 217–233. vi.CrossRefPubMed

Willen, C., & Grimby, G. (1998). Pain, physical activity, and disability in individuals with late effects of polio. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79(8), 915–919.CrossRefPubMed

Ehde, D.M., Osborne, T.L., Hanley, M.A., Jensen, M.P., & Kraft, G.H. (2006). The scope and nature of pain in persons with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 12(5), 629–638.CrossRef

Ehde, D.M., Osborne, T.L., & Jensen, M.P. (2005). Chronic pain in persons with multiple sclerosis. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 16(2), 503–512.CrossRefPubMed

Ehde, D.M., Jensen, M.P., Engel, J.M., Turner, J.A., Hoffman, A.J., & Cardenas, D.D. (2003). Chronic pain secondary to disability: a review. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 19(1), 3–17.CrossRefPubMed

Heapy, A., Dziura, J., Buta, E., Goulet, J., Kulas, J.F., & Kerns, R.D. (2014). Using multiple daily pain ratings to improve reliability and assay sensitivity: how many is enough? The Journal of Pain: Official Journal of the American Pain Society, 15(12), 1360–1365.CrossRef

Schneider, S., & Stone, A.A. (2016). Ambulatory and diary methods can facilitate the measurement of patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research: an International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 25(3), 497–506.CrossRef

Shiffman, S., Stone, A.A., & Hufford, M.R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Stone, A.A., & Shiffman, S. (1994). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in behavioral medicine. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16(3), 199–202.

11.

Sorbi, M.J., Mak, S.B., Houtveen, H., Kleiboer, A.M., & van Doornen, L.J.P. (2007). Mobile web-based monitoring and coaching: feasibility in chronic migraine. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9(5).

12.

Stinson, J.N., Petroz, G.C., Stevens, B.J., Feldman, B.M., Streiner, D., McGrath, P.J., & Gill, N. (2008). Working out the kinks: testing the feasibility of an electronic pain diary for adolescents with arthritis. Pain Research and Management, 13(5), 375–382.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Litcher-Kelly, L., Kellerman, Q., Hanauer, S.B., & Stone, A.A. (2007). Feasibility and utility of an electronic diary to assess self-report symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(2), 207–212.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Stone, A.A., Shiffman, S., Schwartz, J.E., Broderick, J.E., & Hufford, M.R. (2003). Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Controlled Clinical Trials, 24(2), 182–199.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Stone, A.A., Shiffman, S., Schwartz, J.E., Broderick, J.E., & Hufford, M.R. (2002). Patient non-compliance with paper diaries. British Medical Journal, 324(7347), 1193–1194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Stone, A.A., Broderick, J.E., Schwartz, J.E., Shiffman, S., Litcher-Kelly, L., & Calvanese, P. (2003). Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction. Pain, 104(1–2), 343–351.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Kratz, A.L., Davis, M.C., & Zautra, A.J. (2012). Attachment predicts daily catastrophizing and social coping in women with pain. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 31(3), 278–285.CrossRef

18.

Mazza, G. L., & Enders, C. K. (2014). Missing data analysis. In Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 627–652). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Enders, C. K., & Gottschall, A. C. (2011). The Impact of missing data on the ethical quality of a research study. In Handbook of ethics in quantitative methodology (pp. 357–381). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

20.

Enders, C.K. (2004). The impact of missing data on sample reliability estimates: Implications for reliability reporting practices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(3), 419–436.CrossRef

21.

Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.

22.

Cruise, C.E., Broderick, J., Porter, L., Kaell, A., & Stone, A.A. (1996). Reactive effects of diary self-assessment in chronic pain patients. Pain, 67(2–3), 253–258.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Vonbaeyer, C.L. (1994). Reactive effects of measurement of pain. Clinical Journal of Pain, 10(1), 18–21.CrossRef

24.

Finnerup, N.B., Johannesen, I.L., Sindrup, S.H., Bach, F.W., & Jensen, T. S. (2001). Pain and dysesthesia in patients with spinal cord injury: a postal survey. Spinal Cord: the Official Journal of the International Medical Society of Paraplegia, 39(5), 256–262.CrossRef

25.

Siddall, P.J., & Loeser, J.D. (2001). Pain following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord: the Official Journal of the International Medical Society of Paraplegia, 39(2), 63–73.CrossRef

26.

Bonica, J.J. (1991). History of pain concepts and pain therapy. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, New York, 58(3), 191–202.PubMed

27.

Liam, C. K., Lim, K. H., Wong, C. M. M., & Tang, B. G. (1999). Attitudes and knowledge of newly diagnosed tuberculosis patients regarding the disease, and factors affecting treatment compliance. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 3(4), 300–309.PubMed

28.

Singh, N., Squier, C., Sivek, C., Wagener, M., Nguyen, M. H., & Yu, V. L. (1996). Determinants of compliance with antiretroviral therapy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus: prospective assessment with implications for enhancing compliance. AIDS Care, 8(3), 261–269.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Barocas, D.A., Grubb, R., Black, A., Penson, D.F., Fowke, J.H., Andriole, G., & Crawford, E.D. (2013). Association between race and follow-up diagnostic care after a positive prostate cancer screening test in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial. Cancer, 119(12), 2223–2229.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Fischer, S., Sun, S., Howard, L.E., Moreira, D.M., Castro-Santamaria, R., Andriole, G.L., Vidal, A.C., & Freedland, S.J. (2016). Baseline subject characteristics predictive of compliance with study-mandated prostate biopsy in men at risk of prostate cancer: results from REDUCE. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 19(2), 202–208.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Bryant, K., Wicks, M.N., & Willis, N. (2014). Recruitment of older African American males for depression research: lessons learned. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 28(1), 17–20.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Dennis, B.P., & Neese, J.B. (2000). Recruitment and retention of African American elders into community-based research: lessons learned. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 14(1), 3–11.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Paskett, E.D., Reeves, K.W., McLaughlin, J.M., Katz, M.L., McAlearney, A.S., Ruffin, M.T., Halbert, C.H., Merete, C., Davis, F., & Gehlert, S. (2008). Recruitment of minority and underserved populations in the United States: the Centers for Population Health and Health Disparities experience. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 29(6), 847–861.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Kalpakjian, C.Z., Farrell, D.J., Albright, K.J., Chiodo, A., & Young, E.A. (2009). Association of daily stressors and salivary cortisol in spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54(3), 288–298.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Kratz, A. L., Ehde, D. M., Bombardier, C. H., Kalpakjian, C. Z., & Hanks, R. A. (2017). Pain acceptance decouples the momentary associations between pain, pain interference, and physical activity in the daily lives of people with chronic pain and spinal cord injury. The Journal of Pain (in press).

36.

Cleeland, C. S. (1989). Measurement of pain by subjective report. In C. R. Chapman & J. D. Loeser (Eds.), Advances in pain research and therapy (Vol. 12, pp. 391–403). New York: Raven Press.

37.

Cleeland, C. S., & Ryan, K. M. (1994). Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 23(2), 129–138.PubMed

38.

Hanley, M.A., Jensen, M.P., Ehde, D.M., Hoffman, A.J., Patterson, D.R., & Robinson, L.R. (2004). Psychosocial predictors of long-term adjustment to lower-limb amputation and phantom limb pain. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(14–15), 882–893.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Jensen, M P., Ehde, D.M., Hoffman, A.J., Patterson, D.R., Czerniecki, J.M., & Robinson, L.R. (2002). Cognitions, coping and social environment predict adjustment to phantom limb pain. Pain, 95(1–2), 133–142.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Osborne, T.L., Raichle, K.A., Jensen, M.P., Ehde, D.M., & Kraft, G. (2006). The reliability and validity of pain interference measures in persons with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 32(3), 217–229.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Raichle, K.A., Osborne, T.L., Jensen, M.P., & Cardenas, D. (2006). The reliability and validity of pain interference measures in persons with spinal cord injury. The Journal of Pain: Official Journal of the American Pain Society, 7(3), 179–186.CrossRef

42.

Tyler, E. J., Jensen, M. P., Engel, J. M., & Schwartz, L. (2002). The reliability and validity of pain interference measures in persons with cerebral palsy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(2), 236–239.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Riley, W.T., Rothrock, N., Bruce, B., Christodolou, C., Cook, K., Hahn, E.A., & Cella, D. (2010). Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domain names and definitions revisions: further evaluation of content validity in IRT-derived item banks. Quality of Life Research, 19(9), 1311–1321.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., Cook, K., DeVellis, R., DeWalt, D., Fries, J.F., Gershon, R., Hahn, E.A., Lai, J.S., Pilkonis, P., Revicki, D., Rose, M., Weinfurt, K., Hays, R., & Grp, P.C. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Czajkowski, S.M., Cella, D., Stone, A.A., Amtmann, D., & Keefe, F. (2010). Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (Promis): using new theory and technology to improve measurement of patient-reported outcomes in clinical research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 39, 46–46.

46.

Cella, D., Rothrock, N., Choi, S., Lai, J.S., Yount, S., & Gershon, R. (2010). Promis overview: development of new tools for measuring health-related quality of life and related outcomes in patients with chronic diseases. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 39, 47–47.

47.

Tulsky, D.S., Kisala, P.A., Victorson, D., Choi, S.W., Gershon, R., Heinemann, A.W., & Cella, D. (2015). Methodology for the development and calibration of the SCI-QOL item banks. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 38(3), 270–287.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Tulsky, D.S., Kisala, P.A., Victorson, D., Tate, D.G., Heinemann, A.W., Charlifue, S., Kirshblum, S.C., Fyffe, D., Gershon, R., Spungen, A.M., Bombardier, C.H., Dyson-Hudson, T.A., Amtmann, D., Kalpakjian, C.Z., Choi, S.W., Jette, A.M., Forchheimer, M., & Cella, D. (2015). Overview of the Spinal Cord Injury–Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 38(3), 257–269.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Tulsky, D.S., & Kisala, P.A. (2015). The spinal cord injury–quality of life (SCI-QOL) measurement system: development, psychometrics, and item bank calibration. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 38(3), 251–256.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

51.

Cook, K.F., Jensen, S.E., Schalet, B.D., Beaumont, J.L., Amtmann, D., Czajkowski, S., Dewalt, D.A., Fries, J.F., Pilkonis, P.A., Reeve, B.B., Stone, A.A., Weinfurt, K.P., & Cella, D. (2016). PROMIS measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 89–102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Stone, A.A., Broderick, J.E., Junghaenel, D. U., Schneider, S., & Schwartz, J.E. (2016). PROMIS fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference, pain behavior, physical function, depression, anxiety, and anger scales demonstrate ecological validity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 74, 194–206.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Haerens, L., Deforche, B., Vandelanotte, C., Maes, L., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2007). Acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention in adolescents. Patient Education and Counseling, 66(3), 303–310.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Vandelanotte, C., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2003). Acceptability and feasibility of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention using stages of change: project FAITH. Health Education Research, 18(3), 304–317.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Stone, A.A., & Neale, J.M. (1984). New measure of daily coping: development and preliminary results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 892–906.CrossRef

56.

Rovner, G.S., Arestedt, K., Gerdle, B., Borsbo, B., & McCracken, L.M. (2014). Psychometric properties of the 8-item chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ-8) in a Swedish chronic pain cohort. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine: Official Journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 46(1), 73–80.CrossRef

57.

Tulsky, D.S., Kisala, P.A., Kalpakjian, C.Z., Bombardier, C.H., Pohlig, R.T., Heinemann, A.W., Carle, A., & Choi, S.W. (2015). Measuring depression after spinal cord injury: development and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL depression item bank and linkage with PHQ-9. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 38(3), 335–346.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Tulsky, D.S., Jette, A.M., Kisala, P.A., Kalpakjian, C., Dijkers, M.P., Whiteneck, G., Ni, P., Kirshblum, S., Charlifue, S., Heinemann, A.W., Forchheimer, M., Slavin, M.D., Houlihan, B., Tate, D.G., Dyson-Hudson, T., Fyffe, D.G., Williams, S., & Zanca, J. (2012). Spinal cord injury-functional index: item banks to measure physical functioning in individuals with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(10), 1722–1732.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Bertisch, H., Kalpakjian, C.Z., Kisala, P.A., & Tulsky, D. S. (2015). Measuring positive affect and well-being after spinal cord injury: development and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL positive affect and Well-being bank and short form. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 38(3), 356–365.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Heinemann, A. W., Kisala, P. A., Hahn, E. A., & Tulsky, D. S. (2015). Development and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL ability to participate and satisfaction with social roles and activities item banks and short forms. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 38(3), 397–408.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Taylor, S., Allsop, M.J., Shaw, J., Bennett, M.I., Jones, R., & Bewick, B.M. (2015). The feasibility of collecting patient reported pain data using a system delivered across four modes of technology. Pain Medicine (Malden, Mass.), 16(11), 2212–2213.CrossRef

62.

Hess, D.W., Ripley, D.L., McKinley, W.O., & Tewksbury, M. (2000). Predictors for return to work after spinal cord injury: a 3-year multicenter analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(3), 359–363.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Krause, J.S., & Broderick, L. (2004). Outcomes after spinal cord injury: comparisons as a function of gender and race and ethnicity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(3), 355–362.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Hunt, P.C., Boninger, M.L., Cooper, R.A., Zafonte, R.D., Fitzgerald, S.G., & Schmeler, M.R. (2004). Demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with disparity in wheelchair customizability among people with traumatic spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(11), 1859–1864.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Edwards, C.L., Fillingim, R.B., & Keefe, F. (2001). Race, ethnicity and pain. Pain, 94(2), 133–137.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Broderick, J.E., Schwartz, J.E., Schneider, S., & Stone, A.A. (2009). Can End-of-day reports replace momentary assessment of pain and fatigue? The Journal of Pain: Official Journal of the American Pain Society, 10(3), 274–281.CrossRef

67.

Stone, A.A., Broderick, J.E., Shiffman, S.S., & Schwartz, J.E. (2004). Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: absolute agreement, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain. Pain, 107(1–2), 61–69.CrossRefPubMed

68.

Carlson, E.B., Field, N.P., Ruzek, J.I., Bryant, R.A., Dalenberg, C.J., Keane, T.M., & Spain, D.A. (2016). Advantages and psychometric validation of proximal intensive assessments of patient-reported outcomes collected in daily life. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 25(3), 507–516.CrossRef

69.

Ballantyne, J.C., & Sullivan, M.D. (2015). Intensity of chronic pain–the wrong metric? The New England Journal of Medicine, 373(22), 2098–2099.CrossRefPubMed

70.

Ballantyne, J.C., & Sullivan, M.D. (2016). Intensity of chronic pain. The New England Journal of Medicine, 374(14), 1395.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Sullivan, M.D., & Ballantyne, J.C. (2016). Must we reduce pain intensity to treat chronic pain? Pain, 157(1), 65–69.CrossRefPubMed

72.

Wilson, M. (2014). Integrating the concept of pain interference into pain management. Pain Management nursing: Official Journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses, 15(2), 499–505.CrossRef

73.

Fox, P.L., Raina, P., & Jadad, A.R. (1999). Prevalence and treatment of pain in older adults in nursing homes and other long-term care institutions: a systematic review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 160(3), 329–333.PubMedPubMedCentral

74.

Herr, K.A., & Garand, L. (2001). Assessment and measurement of pain in older adults. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 17(3), 457–478. vi.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

75.

Thomas, E., Peat, G., Harris, L., Wilkie, R., & Croft, P.R. (2004). The prevalence of pain and pain interference in a general population of older adults: cross-sectional findings from the north staffordshire osteoarthritis project (NorStOP). Pain, 110(1–2), 361–368.CrossRefPubMed

76.

Miro, J., Paredes, S., Rull, M., Queral, R., Miralles, R., Nieto, R., Huguet, A., & Baos, J. (2007). Pain in older adults: a prevalence study in the Mediterranean region of Catalonia. European Journal of Pain (London, England), 11(1), 83–92.CrossRef

77.

Havercamp, S.M., Scandlin, D., & Roth, M. (2004). Health disparities among adults with developmental disabilities, adults with other disabilities, and adults not reporting disability in North Carolina. Public Health Reports (Washington, D. C.: 1974), 119(4), 418–426.CrossRefPubMedCentral

78.

Drum, C.E., Krahn, G., Cullley, C., & Hammond, L. (2005). Recognizing and responding to the health disparities of people with disabilities. California Journal of Health Promotion, 3(3), 29–42.

79.

Department of Health and Human Services. (2016). National pain strategy: A comprehensive population health strategy for pain. https://iprcc.nih.gov/docs/HHSNational_Pain_Strategy.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2017.

Titel: Are intensive data collection methods in pain research feasible in those with physical disability? A study in persons with chronic pain and spinal cord injury
verfasst von: A. L. Kratz
C. Z. Kalpakjian
R. A. Hanks
Publikationsdatum: 17.01.2017
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1494-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Congruence between polysomnography obstructive sleep apnea and the pediatric sleep questionnaire: fatigue and health-related quality of life in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Improving measures of work-related physical functioning

Art therapy based on appreciation of famous paintings and its effect on distress among cancer patients

Life satisfaction of women of working age shortly after breast cancer surgery

A comparison of children and adolescent’s self-report and parental report of the PedsQL among those with and without autism spectrum disorder

Patient and caregiver goals for dementia care