nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

11.05.2018

Are preservice teachers really literate enough to integrate technology in their classroom practice? Determining the technology literacy level of preservice teachers

verfasst von: Serkan Dinçer

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

At the present time, many researchers conduct studies in order to ensure technology integration in education. But most of these studies are related to material design. Material is an important concept but it is also important to examine knowledge, skills and attitude, namely technology literacy, of students or teachers who would use these materials. Although technology literacy was investigated in some studies, data collection tools measured different variables. As knowledge, skills and attitude are different concepts, they need to be examined together to determine literacy level. Thus, the purpose of the study is to determine knowledge, skills and attitude about technology use of preservice teachers. Although most of preservice teachers said they had knowledge, skills and positive attitude to use technology in teaching activities, the results revealed that they had a low level of technology literacy in terms of knowledge and skills. The results showed that no relationship was found between knowledge/skill test scores and attitude, so preservice teachers could not correctly describe their level of technology literacy. As the results obtained from scale based on participants’ claims and those obtained from the tests were very contradictory, it is stated that would cause incorrect results and interpretations. The fact that preservice teachers didn’t take any technology related courses in their teacher training programs or they had such courses with insufficient contents was considered one of the main reasons for this low level. Therefore, courses about technology literacy must sufficiently be given in teacher training.

Vorheriger Artikel Introducing fundamental object-oriented programming concepts in preschool education within the context of physical science courses

Nächster Artikel Adult content filtering: Restricting minor audience from accessing inappropriate internet content

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

ACER (2008). National assessment program e Information communication and technology literacy. Year 6 and year 10 (Technical report 2005). The Australian Council for Educational Research. Curriculum, assessment and reporting authority. Retrieved from: www.nap.edu.au/verve/_resources/2005_ICTL_Technical_Report_file_main.pdf.

Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. M. (2011). Exploring the potential of the will, skill, tool model in Ghana: Predicting prospective and practicing teachers’ use of technology. Computers and Education, 56(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.017.CrossRef

Aldunate, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2013). Teacher adoption of technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.017.CrossRef

Almerich, G., Orellana, N., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., & Díaz-García, I. (2016). Teachers’ information and communication technology competences: A structural approach. Computers & Education, 100, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.002.CrossRef

Amburgey, V. (2006). One model of professional development for higher education faculty. Computers in the Schools, 23(3–4), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v23n03_07.CrossRef

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., … Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

Athanassios, J. (2008). Factors determining teachers’ beliefs and perceptions of ICT in education. In Encyclopedia of information communication technology (pp. 321–334). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905.CrossRef

Becker, J. D., Hodge, C. A., & Sepelyak, M. W. (2010). Assessing technology literacy: The case for an authentic, project-based learning approach recommended citation (No. Paper 3). Retrieved from http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/edlp_pubs

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc..

Brown, M. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenman, & G. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). New York, NY: Routledge.

Carroll, J. B., & Morrell, P. D. (2006). A comparison of teacher education faculty and preservice teacher technology competence. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(1), 5–10.

Cha, S. E., Jun, S. J., Kwon, D. Y., Kim, H. S., Kim, S. B., Kim, J. M., … Lee, W. G. (2011). Measuring achievement of ICT competency for students in Korea. Computers & Education, 56(4), 990–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.003.CrossRef

Chai, C. S., Ng, E. M. W., Li, W., Hong, H. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2013). Validating and modelling technological pedagogical content knowledge framework among Asian preservice teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1234/ajet.v29i1.174.CrossRef

Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2008). Self-report measures and findings for information technology attitudes and competencies. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 349–365). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_21.CrossRef

Dinçer, S. (2017). Bilgisayar destekli öğretimde bilgisayar okuryazarlığının, motivasyonun ve öz yeterliliğin öğrenme başarısı üzerindeki etkisi: Değişkenlerin araştırma süresi ile incelenmesi. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 7(14), 147–162.

Dinçer, S. & Doğanay, A. (2017). The effects of multiple-pedagogical agents on learners' academic success, motivation, and cognitive load. Computers & Education, 111, 74–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.005 CrossRef

Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51(1), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.001.CrossRef

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597.CrossRef

Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683.CrossRef

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551.CrossRef

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001.CrossRef

Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age. International Association for the Evaluation of educational achievement (IEA). New Zealand: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14222-7.CrossRef

Friel, T., Britten, J., Compton, B., Peak, A., Schoch, K., & VanTyle, W. K. (2009). Using pedagogical dialogue as a vehicle to encourage faculty technology use. Computers & Education, 53(2), 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.002.CrossRef

Garmire, E. M., & Pearson, G. (2006). Tech tally : Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.

Georgina, D. A., & Olson, M. R. (2008). Integration of technology in higher education: A review of faculty self-perceptions. Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.11.002.CrossRef

Goktas, Y., Gedik, N., & Baydas, O. (2013). Enablers and barriers to the use of ICT in primary schools in Turkey: A comparative study of 2005–2011. Computers & Education, 68, 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.002.CrossRef

Groth, L. A., Dunlap, K. L., & Kidd, J. K. (2007). Becoming technologically literate through technology integration in PK-12 preservice literacy courses: Three case studies. Reading Research and Instruction, 46(4), 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070709558476.CrossRef

Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085.CrossRef

Heitink, M., Voogt, J., Verplanken, L., van Braak, J., & Fisser, P. (2016). Teachers’ professional reasoning about their pedagogical use of technology. Computers and Education, 101, 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.009.CrossRef

Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Barron, A. E., & Kemker, K. (2008). Examining the digital divide in K-12 public schools: Four-year trends for supporting ICT literacy in Florida. Computers and Education, 51(4), 1648–1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.04.002.CrossRef

Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Barron, A. E. (2010). Development and validation of the student tool for technology literacy (ST²L). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(4), 361–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782556.CrossRef

Huggins, A. C., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Dawson, K. (2014). Measuring information and communication technology literacy using a performance assessment: Validation of the student tool for technology literacy (ST²L). Computers & Education, 77, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.005.CrossRef

Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016.CrossRef

ISTE (2017). ISTE standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/standards/standards-for-teachers

Kabakci Yurdakul, I., Odabasi, H. F., Kilicer, K., Coklar, A. N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computers & Education, 58(3), 964–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012.CrossRef

Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., Pieters, J., & Voogt, J. (2015). ICT use in science and mathematics teacher education in Tanzania: Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1240.CrossRef

Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into pre-service education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 385–410.MathSciNetCrossRef

Kegel, R. H. P., & Wieringa, R. J. (2016). Measuring computer literacy without questionnaires. In Fourth International Workshop on Behavior Change Support Systems, BCSS 2016 (pp. 61–65). Salzburg, Austria.

Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005.CrossRef

Kim, M. K., Xie, K., & Cheng, S. L. (2017). Building teacher competency for digital content evaluation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.006.CrossRef

Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Hancock, R., & Shoho, A. (2000, February). Toward a structural model of technology integration. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii Educational Research Association.

Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1109–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.014.CrossRef

Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2008). The educational electronic book as a tool for supporting children’s emergent literacy in low versus middle SES groups. Computers and Education, 50(1), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.04.002.CrossRef

Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309921.CrossRef

Leu, D. J., O’byrne, W. I., Zawilinski, L., McVerry, J. G., & Everett-Cacopardo, H. (2009). Comments on Greenhow, Robelia, and Hughes: Expanding the new literacies conversation. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09336676.CrossRef

Li, K., & Keller, J. M. (2018). Use of the ARCS model in education: A literature review. Computers & Education, 122, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.019.CrossRef

Lim, C. P., Chai, C. S., & Churchill, D. (2011). A framework for developing pre-service teachers’ competencies in using technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Educational Media International, 48(2), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2011.576512.CrossRef

Llorens, S., Salanova, M., & Grau, R. (2002). Training to technological change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(2), 206–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782380.CrossRef

Lund, A., Furberg, A., Bakken, J., & Engelien, K. L. (2014). What does professional digital competence mean in teacher education? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(4), 281–299.

Matthew, K., Stephens, E., Callaway, R., Letendre, C., & Kimbell-Lopez, K. (2002). Adoption of information communication technology by teacher educators: One-on-one coaching. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 11(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390200200122.CrossRef

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRef

Niederhauser, D. ., & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers’ instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00036-6.CrossRef

Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2005.03.006.CrossRef

O’brien, C., Aguinaga, N. J., Hines, R., & Hartshorne, R. (2011). Using contemporary technology tools to improve the effectiveness of teacher educators in special education. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30(3), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051103000305.CrossRef

OECD. (2005). Are students ready for a technology-rich world?, what PISA studies tell us. Paris: OECD.

OECD (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en.

Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002.CrossRef

Ottestad, G., Throndsen, I., Hatlevik, O., & Rohatgi, A. (2014). Digitale ferdigheter for alle? Norske resultater fra ICILS 2013. Retrieved from http://www.ks.no/globalassets/vedlegg-til-hvert-fagomrader/utdanning-og-oppvekst/skole/fylkeskommunalt-kvalitetsnettverk/forskning/icils_rapport_rettet.pdf

Polly, D., McGee, J. R., & Sullivan, C. (2010). Employing technology-rich mathematical tasks to develop teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 29(4), 455–472.

Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report. (2006). Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential#importance

Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028.CrossRef

Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203.CrossRef

Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with technology : Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.

Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010.CrossRef

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2015). Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers’ perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers and Education, 88, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.005.CrossRef

Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016). Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students’ ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 19, 58–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002.CrossRef

Teo, T. (2010). A path analysis of pre-service teachers’ attitudes to computer use: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model in an educational context. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820802231327.CrossRef

Tømte, C., Enochsson, A. B., Buskqvist, U., & Kårstein, A. (2015). Educating online student teachers to master professional digital competence: The TPACK-framework goes online. Computers & Education, 84, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.005.CrossRef

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009.CrossRef

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2016). Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use: Its meaning and measurement. Computers & Education, 94, 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.009.CrossRef

Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Pynoo, B., van Braak, J., Fraeyman, N., & Erstad, O. (2017). Developing a validated instrument to measure preservice teachers’ ICT competencies: Meeting the demands of the 21st century. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12380.CrossRef

Uerz, D., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators’ competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005.CrossRef

Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J.CrossRef

Vongkulluksn, V. W., Xie, K., & Bowman, M. A. (2018). The role of value on teachers’ internalization of external barriers and externalization of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration. Computers & Education, 118, 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.009.CrossRef

Voogt, J., Tilya, F., & van den Akker, J. (2009). Science teacher learning of MBL-supported student-centered science education in the context of secondary education in Tanzania. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9160-8.CrossRef

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge - a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x.CrossRef

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6.CrossRef

Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390400200183.CrossRef

Williams, M., Linn, M. C., Ammon, P., & Gearhart, M. (2004). Learning to teach inquiry science in a technology-based environment: A case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 189–206.CrossRef

Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(2), 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1302_4.CrossRef

Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165–205. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039001165.CrossRef

Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. (2006). Implementing computer technologies-teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173–207.

Titel: Are preservice teachers really literate enough to integrate technology in their classroom practice? Determining the technology literacy level of preservice teachers
verfasst von: Serkan Dinçer
Publikationsdatum: 11.05.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9737-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Using virtual laboratories in chemistry classrooms as interactive tools towards modifying alternate conceptions in molecular symmetry

Digital game elements, user experience and learning: A conceptual framework

Technology for Social Change in school contexts: A new landscape for K-12 educational technology research

Blended learning and traditional learning: A comparative study of college mechanics courses

ICT in the classroom: Primary education student teachers’ perceptions of the interactive whiteboard during the teaching practicum

Investigating the effects of peer instruction on preservice mathematics teachers’ achievements in statistics and probability