Skip to main content
Log in

Slave ownership and fossil fuel usage: a commentary

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Response to this article was published on 11 December 2013

The Original Article was published on 25 November 2010

Abstract

In a recent, thought-provoking article, Jean-François Mouhot argues that there are many similarities between historical slave ownership and present-day fossil fuel usage. For that reason, Mouhot believes, members of modern fossil-fuel-dependent civilization should not feel morally superior to slave owners. While it is easy to sympathize with Mouhot’s intentions of furthering a transition to sustainable energy use, some arguments made in the article are in need of refinement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen R (2009) The British Industrial Revolution in global perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin G (2009) Factor markets in Nieboer conditions: Pre-Colonial West Africa, c. 1500c. 1900. Contin Chang 24(1):23–53

  • Azar C (2007) Bury the chains and the carbon dioxide. Clim Chang 85:473–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baks C, Breman J, Nooij A (1966) Slavery as a system of production in tribal society. Bijdragen Taal Land Volkenkunde 122(1):90–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bales K (2004) Disposable people: new slavery in the global economy. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales K (2005) Understanding global slavery: a reader. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales K, Trodd Z, Williamson AK (2009) Modern slavery: the secret world of 27 million people. Oneworld, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn R (1988) The overthrow of colonial slavery, 1776–1848. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn R (1997) The making of new world slavery: from the Baroque to the Modern 1492–1800. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomgaard P (2009) Labour, land, and capital markets in early modern southeast Asia from the fifteenth to the nineteenth century. Contin Chang 24(1):55–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass T (1999) Towards a comparative political economy of unfree labour: case studies and debates. Cass, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass T (2011) Labour regime change in the twenty-first century: unfreedom, capitalism and primitive accumulation. Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands

  • Brown CL (2006) Moral capital: foundations of British abolitionism. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington S (2002) The sugar industry and the abolition of the slave trade 1775–1810. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson M (2008) Parallels in reactionary argumentation in the US congressional debates on the abolition of slavery and the Kyoto Protocol. Clim Chang 86:67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis DB (2006) Inhuman bondage: the rise and fall of slavery in the New World. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Domar E (1970) The causes of slavery or serfdom: a hypothesis. J Econ Hist 30(1):18–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Drescher S (2009) Abolition: a history of slavery and antislavery. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eltis D (1987) Economic growth and the ending of the transatlantic slave trade. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltis D (2000) The rise of African slavery in the Americas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Engerman S (1973) Some considerations relating to property rights in man. J Econ Hist 33(1):43–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engerman S (1992) Coerced and free labor: property rights and the development of the labor force. Explor Econ Hist 29:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans R (1970) Some notes on coerced labor. J Econ Hist 30:861–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny D (1989) The decline of property rights in man in Thailand, 1800–1913. J Econ Hist 49(2):285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenske J (2011) Land abundance and economic institutions: Egba land and slavery, 1830–1914. Econ Hist Rev. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.2011.00613.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemery H, Hogendorn J (1974) The Atlantic slave trade: a tentative economic model. J Afr Hist 15(2):223–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuman G, Walvin J (2003) The slavery reader. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO (2012) ILO global estimate of forced labour: results and methodology. ILO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolchin P (1987) Unfree labor: American slavery and Russian serfdom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Malanima P (2006) Energy crisis and growth 1650–1850: the European deviation in a comparative perspective. J Glob Hist 1:101–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning P (1990) Slavery and African life: occidental, oriental and African slave trades. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks R (2007) The origins of the modern world: a global and ecological narrative from the fifteenth to the twenty-first century. Rowman and Littlefield, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill JR (2000) Something new under the sun: an environmental history of the twentieth-century world. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouhot J-F (2011) Past connections and present similarities in slave ownership and fossil fuel usage. Clim Chang 105:329–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieboer HJ (1910) Slavery as an industrial system: ethnological researches. Nijoff, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye D (1998) Consuming power: a social history of American energies. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield J (1995) Popular politics and British anti-slavery: mobilisation of public opinion against the slave trade, 1787–1807. Manchester University Press, Manchester

  • Patterson O (1977) The structural origins of slavery: a critique of the Nieboer-Domar hypothesis from a comparative perspective. Ann N Y Acad Sci 292:12–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz K (2001) The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor F (1977) A comparative study of slave societies. J Comp Econ 1:25–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radkau J (2002) Nature and power: a global history of the environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryden DB (2009) West Indian slavery and British abolition, 1783–1807. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil V (1994) Energy in world history. Westview, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil V (2010) Energy transitions. Praeger, Santa Barbara, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R (2009) Global human development: accounting for its regional disparities. Qual Quant 43:1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld R (1991) The Invention of free labor: the employment relation in English and American law and culture, 1350–1870. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC

  • Steinfeld R (2001) Coercion, contract, and free labor in the nineteenth century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turley D (2000) Slavery. Blackwell, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2012) International human development indicators. http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/. Accessed 2012-04-12

  • Warde P (2007) Energy consumption in England & Wales 1560–2004. CNR-ISS, Naples, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M (2003) Deforesting the earth: from prehistory to global crisis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

  • World Bank (2012) World bank data online, http://data.worldbank.org/. Accessed 2012-04-12

  • Wrigley EA (2010) Energy and the English Industrial Revolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Stefan Öberg, John Lapidus and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on previous drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klas Rönnbäck.

Additional information

An author’s reply to this comment is available at doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0999-6

This comment refers to the article available at doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9982-7

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rönnbäck, K. Slave ownership and fossil fuel usage: a commentary. Climatic Change 122, 1–9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0998-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0998-7

Keywords

Navigation