Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
The paper is studying Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)—integration grouping, through the prism of trade regionalism and the concept of two-speed. Author provided an indicatory analysis in order to embrace different dimensions of development gap between ASEAN-6 (Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand) and CLMV (Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, Vietnam), while pointing out the context of convergence and perspectives of narrowing the distance successfully. A special emphasis was put on the context of competitive mega-regional projects of Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), with overlapping memberships of four ASEAN states, namely, Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, Singapore and Vietnam. Author attempts to draw implications of eventual successful establishment of two trade blocks led by the United States on the one side, and China on the other, including the threat of internal decomposition of ASEAN and division into pro-TPP and pro-RCEP coalitions, while affecting ASEAN’s centralist role in Asian regionalism. Two-speed ASEAN was studied both in economic and political terms in this matter, while Vietnam was recognized as prospective member of the ASEAN’s core operating at higher speed.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Andréani, G. (2002). What future for federalism? [pdf] London: Centre for European Reform Essays. Accessed October 24, 2015, from https://www.cer.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/attachments/pdf/2011/e335_federalism-2185.pdf
ASEAN. (2015). ASEAN integration report 2015. Jakarta: The ASEAN Secretariat.
Bimmer, F. (2015, May 28). German vice chancellor says Europe may need to move at different speeds. Reuters. [online] Accessed November 11, 2015, from http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-germany-gabriel-europe-idUKKBN0OD2VS20150528
Bobowski, S. (2011). Baldwin’s “domino theory” of regionalism—Its sources and implications for East Asian states. In B. Skulska & A. H. Jankowiak (Eds.), Faces of competitiveness in Asia Pacific (pp. 29–40). Wrocław: Publishing House of Wrocław University of Economics.
Bobowski, S. (2014a). Japan’s vision of East Asian regionalism—Toward soft balancing strategy. Economics of the 21st Century, 4(4), 80–91.
Bobowski, S. (2014b). Multilateral context of the project of trilateral China–Japan–Republic of Korea Free Trade Agreement. International Business and Global Economy, 33, 262–272. Research Papers of University of Gdansk.
Bobowski, S. (2015). An insight into Asian trade regionalism: Japan’s double membership in the exclusive games of TPP, and RCEP. Review of Asian and Pacific Studies. (Accepted for publication October 2015).
Bolton, A. (2011). The two-speed world. [pdf] Germany: Kronberg. Accessed October 24, 2015, from https://www.fidelity.de/static/pdf/institutional/two-speed-world-201112.pdf
Center for Environmental Law & Policy. (2014). 2014 environmental performance index. Full report and analysis. [pdf] Yale, MI: Center for Environmental Law & Policy. Accessed October 14, 2015, from http://epi.yale.edu/files/2014_epi_report.pdf
Cheong, I., & Tongzon, J. (2013). Comparing the economic impact of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. Asian Economic Papers, 12(2), 161–163. CrossRef
Habeeb, W. M. (1988). Power and tactics in international negotiations, how weak nations bargain with strong nations. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
Hamanaka, S. (2008). Comparing summitry, financial, and trade regionalisms in East Asia: From the Japanese perspective. In C. M. Dent (Ed.), China, Japan, and regional leadership in East Asia (pp. 75–77). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hamanaka, S. (2010). Asian regionalism and Japan. London: Routledge.
Hamanaka, S. (2014). TPP versus RCEP: Control of membership and agenda setting. Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, 18(2), 163–186. CrossRef
Kassim, Y. R. (2007). ASEAN at 40: The end of a two-speed grouping? [online] Accessed November 12, 2015, from https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/977-asean-at-40-the-end-of-a-two/#.VnLyPeL85uw
Kassim, Y. R. (2012). East Asian regionalism: End of ASEAN centrality? Eurasia Review. [online] Accessed October 31, 2015, from http://hdl.handle.net/10220/8674
Lewis, M. K. (2011). The Trans-Pacific Partnership: New paradigm or wolf in sheep’s clothing? Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 34(1), 27–52.
Mertes, M., & Prill, N. J. (1989, July 19). Der verhängnisvolle Irrtum eines Entweder-Oder. Eine Vision für Europa (The fatal mistake of either-or. A vision for Europe). Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.
Nan, H. (2010, September 18). Conference strengthens cooperation in commerce. China Daily. [online] Accessed December 1, 2015, from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/regional/2010-09/18/content_11321859.htm
OECD. (2015). FDI regulatory restrictiveness index. [online] Accessed December 4, 2015, from http://www.oecd.org/investment/fdiindex.htm
Pakpahan, B. (2012, November 28). Will RCEP compete with the TPP? East Asia Forum. [online] Accessed November 6, 2015, from http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/11/28/will-rcep-compete-with-the-tpp/
Panda, J. P. (2014). Factoring the RCEP and the TPP: China, India, and the politics of regional integration. Strategic Analysis, 38(1), 49–67. CrossRef
Pfetsch, F. R. (1995). Machterwerb—Machterhalt—Machtverlust (Acquisition of power—Maintaining Power—Power loss). In F. R. Pfetsch (Ed.), Handlung und Reflexion (pp. 85–86). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Ravenhill, J. (2003). The new bilateralism in the Asia-Pacific. Third World Quarterly, 24(2), 299–317. CrossRef
Sally, R. (2014, September 10). Is bigger better for ASEAN in a mega-regional world? East Asia Forum. [online] Accessed November 24, 2015, from http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2014/09/10/is-bigger-better-for-asean-in-a-mega-regional-world/
Tso, Ch.-D. (2012). Trans-Pacific Partnership and China-Japan-Korea FTA: Implications for Taiwan. [pdf] National Taiwan University. Accessed December 1, 2015, from http://www.stimson.org/images/uploads/Trans_Pacific_Partnership_and_China_Japan_Korea_FTA.pdf
UNDP. (2009). Human development report 2009. Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. [pdf] Accessed December 11, 2015, from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/269/hdr_2009_en_complete.pdf
UNDP. (2015). Human development report 2015. Work for human development. [pdf] Accessed November 14, 2015, from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2015_human_development_report.pdf
World Bank. (2015a) . World development indicators. [online] Accessed November 14, 2015, from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=World-Development-Indicators.
World Bank. (2015b). Historical data sets and trends data. [online] Accessed November 16, 2015, from http://www.doingbusiness.org/custom-query
World Bank. (2015c). Trading across borders. [online] Accessed November 16, 2015, from http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploretopics/trading-across-borders
WTO. (2015a) . World Trade Organization Regional Trade Agreements Information System (RTA-IS). [online] Accessed November 21, 2015, from http://rtais.wto.org/UI/PublicAllRTAList.aspx
WTO. (2015b). World Trade Organization I-TIP goods: Integrated analysis and retrieval of notified non-tariff measures. [online] Accessed October 14, 2015, from http://i-tip.wto.org/goods/default.aspx?language=en
Zartman, I. W. (1997). The structuralist dilemma in negotiation. Research on Negotiations in Organizations, 6, 227–245.
- ASEAN and Trade Regionalism: An Opportunity for Convergence or Threat of “Two Speeds”?
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta