nach oben

Environmental Management

Erschienen in:

01.06.2022

Assessing Factors of Environmental Stewardship Success: Organizational Perceptions from the Niagara Region of Ontario, Canada

verfasst von: Brooke Kapeller, Ryan Plummer, Julia Baird, Marilyne Jollineau

Erschienen in: Environmental Management | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Environmental stewardship is increasingly important as human actions threaten the natural world. Now, more than ever, it is necessary to understand what makes stewardship initiatives successful. This study investigates stewardship success in the Niagara Region of Ontario, Canada. Specifically, the research seeks to determine what factors are associated with the success of environmental stewardship initiatives, differences between stewardship organizations (staff-based vs. volunteer-based), and reasons why those factors are important. Ten factors for successful stewardship initiatives were uncovered. Differences between volunteer and staff-based organizations were revealed, especially regarding factors of motivations and capacity. Qualitative analysis provided rich insights into why factors were important for success, with the physical ability to conduct the work and the importance of motivation being highlighted. The findings from the study provide a basis for future research which expands the empirical contexts for understanding stewardship success, broadens the variety of stewardship organizations considered, and incorporates additional measures of success.

Vorheriger Artikel The Evolution of Polycentric Governance in the Galapagos Small-Scale Fishing Sector

Nächster Artikel Targeting Sagebrush (Artemisia Spp.) Restoration Following Wildfire with Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus Urophasianus) Nest Selection and Survival Models

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Andrews KT, Edwards B (2005) The organizational structure of local environmentalism. Mobilization Int J 10(2):213–234. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.10.2.028028u600744073CrossRef

Armitage DR, Plummer R, Berkes F, Arthur RI, Charles AT, Davidson-Hunt IJ, Wollenberg EK (2009) Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Front Ecol Environ 7(2):95–102. https://doi.org/10.1890/070089CrossRef

Asah ST, Blahna DJ (2013) Practical implications of understanding the influence of motivations on commitment to voluntary urban conservation stewardship. Conserv Biol 27(4):866–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12058CrossRef

Bach-Mortensen AM, Montgomery P (2018) What are the barriers and facilitators for third sector organisations (non-profits) to evaluate their services? A systematic review. Syst Rev 7(13):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0681-1CrossRef

Baynes J, Herbohn J, Smith C, Fisher R, Bray D (2015) Key factors which influence the success of community forestry in developing countries. Glob Environ Change 35:226–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.011CrossRef

Bennett N, Whitty TS, Finkbeiner E, Pittman J, Bassett H, Gelcich S, Allison EH (2018) Environmental stewardship: a conceptual review and analytical framework. Environ Manag 61:597–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2CrossRef

Biernacki P, Waldorf D (1981) Snowball sampling problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods Res 10(2):141–163CrossRef

Bodin O, Crona B, Thyresson M, Golz A-L, Ten M (2014) Conservation success as a function of good alignment of social and ecological structures and processes. Conserv Biol 28(5):1371–1379. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12306CrossRef

Bramston P, Pretty G, Zammit C (2011) Assessing environmental stewardship motivation. Environ Behav 43(6):776–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510382875CrossRef

Bryman A, Bell E, Teevan JJ (2012) Social research methods, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England

Carmin J (1999) Voluntary associations, professional organisations and the environmental movement in the United States. Environ Politics 8(1):101–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019908414440CrossRef

Carmin J, Balser DB (2002) Selecting repertoires of action in environmental movement organizations: an interpretative approach. Organ Environ 15(4):365–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026602238167CrossRef

Cetas ER, Yasué M (2016) A systematic review of motivational values and conservation success in and around protected areas. Conserv Biol 31(1):203–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12770CrossRef

Chapin FSI, Carpenter SR, Kofinas GP, Folke C, Abel N, Clark WC, Swanson FJ (2009) Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends Ecol Evolution 25(4):241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.10.008CrossRef

Chapin FSI, Kofinas GP, Folke C (2009) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer, New York, NY, 10.1007/978-0-387-73033-2

Chapin FSI, Power ME, Pickett STA, Freitag A, Reynolds JA, Jackson RB, … Bartuska A (2011) Earth Stewardship: science for action to sustain the human-earth system. Ecosphere 2(8). https://doi.org/10.1890/ES11-00166.1

Chapin FSI, Sommerkorn M, Robards MD, Hillmer-Pegram K (2015) Ecosystem stewardship: a resilience framework for arctic conservation. Glob Environ Change 34:207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.003CrossRef

Clifford N, French S, Valentine G (Eds.) (2010) Key methods in Geography, 2nd ed. Sage Publications, London

Close SL, Fisher DR, Yagatich W, Galli A (2016) Evaluating the environmental effectiveness of grassroots environmental stewardship organizations in Maryland, USA. Watershed Science Bulletin. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1076&context=soc_fac_pub

Connolly JJ, Svendsen ES, Fisher DR, Campbell LK (2013) Organizing urban ecosystem services through environmental stewardship governance in New York City. Landsc Urban Plan 109:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.07.001CrossRef

Conrad CT, Daoust T (2008) Community-based monitoring frameworks: increasing the effectiveness of environmental stewardship. Environ Manag 41(3):358–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9042-xCrossRef

Creswell, J.W. & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, California; Sage publications.

Dresner M, Handelman C, Braun S, Rollwagen-Bollens G (2015) Environmental identity, pro-environmental behaviors, and civic engagement of volunteer stewards in Portland area parks. Environ Educ Res 21(7):991–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.964188CrossRef

Driscoll CT, Lambert KF, Chapin FS, Nowak DJ, Spies TA, Swanson FJ, Hart CM (2012) Science and society: the role of long-term studies in environmental stewardship. BioScience 62(4):354–366. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.4.7CrossRef

Fisher DR, Campbell LK, Svendsen ES (2012) The organisational structure of urban environmental stewardship. Environ Politics 21(1):26–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.643367CrossRef

Folke C, Jansson Å, Rockström J, Olsson P, Carpenter SR, Stuart Chapin F, Westley F (2011) Reconnecting to the biosphere. Ambio 40(7):719–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0184-yCrossRef

Galbraith M, Towns DR, Bollard‐Breen B, MacDonald EA (2021) Ecological restoration success from community and agency perspectives–exploring the differences. Restoration Ecol 29, e13405

Gutiérrez NL, Hilborn R, Defeo O (2011) Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470:386–389. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09689CrossRef

Helmig B, Ingerfurth S, Pinz A (2014) Success and failure of nonprofit organizations: theoretical foundations, empirical evidence, and future research. Voluntas 25:1509–1538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9402-5CrossRef

Ives CD, Giusti M, Fischer J, Abson DJ, Klaniecki K, Dorninger C, von Wehrden H (2017) Human–nature connection: a multidisciplinary review. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability 26–27:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.005CrossRef

Johnson ML, Locke DH, Svendsen E, Campbell LK, Westphal LM, Romolini M, Grove JM (2019) Context matters: Influence of organizational, environmental, and social factors on civic environmental stewardship group intensity. Ecol Soc 24(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10924-240401

Kittinger JN, Bambico TM, Minton D, Miller A, Mejia M, Kalei N, Glazier EW (2016) Restoring ecosystems, restoring community: socioeconomic and cultural dimensions of a community-based coral reef restoration project. Regional Environ Change 16:301–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0572-xCrossRef

Locke DH, King KL, Svendsen ES, Campbell LK, Small C, Sonti NF, Lu JWT (2014) Urban environmental stewardship and changes in vegetative cover and building footprint in New York City neighborhoods (2000-2010). J Environ Stud Sci 4(3):250–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0176-xCrossRef

Martin LM, Moloney KA, Wilsey BJ (2005) An assessment of grassland restoration success using species diversity components. J Appl Ecol 42:327–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01019.xCrossRef

Mathevet R, Bousquet F, Raymond CM (2018) The concept of stewardship in sustainability science and conservation biology. Biol Conserv 217:363–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.015CrossRef

Merenlender AM, Crall AW, Drill S, Prysby M, Ballard H (2016) Evaluating environmental education, citizen science, and stewardship through naturalist programs. Conserv Biol 30(6):1255–1265. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12737CrossRef

Mountjoy NJ, Seekamp E, Davenport MA, Whiles MR (2013) The best laid plans: community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) group capacity and planning success. Environ Manag 52(6):1547–1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0169-7CrossRef

Pander J, Geist J (2013) Ecological indicators for stream restoration success. Ecol Indic 30:106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.039CrossRef

Plummer R, Baird J, Farhad S, Witkowski S (2020) How do biosphere stewards actively shape trajectories of social-ecological change? J Environ Manag 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110139

Raymond CM, Bieling C, Fagerholm N, Martin-Lopez B, Plieninger T (2016) The farmer as a landscape steward: comparing local understandings of landscape stewardship, landscape values, and land management actions. Ambio 45:173–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0694-0CrossRef

Roman LA, Walker LA, Martineau CM, Muffly DJ, MacQueen SA, Harris W (2015) Stewardship matters: case studies in establishment success of urban trees. Urban Forestry Urban Green 14(4):1174–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.001CrossRef

Romolini M, Bixler RP, Grove JM (2016) A social-ecological framework for urban stewardship network research to promote sustainable and resilient cities. Sustainability 8(956). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090956

Ruiz-Jaen MC, Aide TM (2005) Restoration success: how is it being measured? Restor Ecol 13(3):569–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00072.x/pdfCrossRef

Ryan RL, Kaplan R, Grese RE (2001) Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programmes. J Environ Plan Manag 44(5):629–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560120079948CrossRef

Salamon LM, Sokolowski SW (2016) Beyond nonprofits: re-conceptualizing the third sector. Voluntas 27(4):1515–1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9726-zCrossRef

Saldaña J (2013) The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 2nd ed. Sage Publications, London

Sawhill JC, Williamson D (2001) Mission impossible? Measuring success in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 11(3):371–386CrossRef

Sheppard JC, Ryan CM, Blahna DJ (2017) Evaluating ecological monitoring of civic environmental stewardship in the Green-Duwamish watershed, Washington. Landsc Urban Plan 158:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.017CrossRef

Steffen W, Persson S, Deutsch L, Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Richardson K, Svedin U (2011) The Anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship. AMBIO 40(739):739–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0185-xCrossRef

Svendsen ES, Campbell LK (2008) Urban ecological stewardship: understanding the structure, function and network of community-based urban land management. Cities Environ 1(1). http://escholarship.bc.edu/cate/vol1/iss1/5

Svendsen ES, Campbell LK, Fisher DR, Connolly JJT, Johnson ML, Sonti NF, … Wolf KL (2016) Stewardship mapping and assessment project: a framework for understanding community-based environmental stewardship. Gen. Tech. Rep. 156. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1184-4

Tallis H, Kareiva P, Marvier M, Chang A (2008) An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. PNAS 105(28):9457–9464. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705797105CrossRef

Van Riper CJ, Sharp R, Bagstad KJ, Kwenye J, Depper G, Freimund W (2016) Recreation, values, and stewardship: rethinking why people engage in environmental behaviors in parks and protected areas. In: Weber S (Ed.) Engagement, education, and expectations—the future of parks and protected areas: Proceedings of the 2015 George Wright Society Conference on parks, protected areas, and cultural sites. George Wright Society, Hancock, Michigan

Waylen KA, Fischer A, Mcgowan PJK, Thirgood SJ, Milner-Gulland EJ (2010) Effect of local cultural context on the success of community-based conservation interventions. Conserv Biol 24(4):1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01446.xCrossRef

Wolf KL, Blahna DJ, Brinkley W, Romolini M (2013) Environmental stewardship footprint research: linking human agency and ecosystem health in the Puget Sound region. Urban Ecosyst 16:13–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0175-6CrossRef

Worrell R, Appleby MC (2000) Stewardship of natural resources: definition, ethical and practical aspects. J Agric Environ Ethics 12:263–277CrossRef

Wyborn C, Bixler PR (2013) Collaboration and nested environmental governance: scale dependency, scale framing, and cross-scale interactions in collaborative conservation. J Environ Manag 123:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.014CrossRef

Zhao Q, Bai J, Huang L, Gu B, Lu Q, Gao Z (2016) A review of methodologies and success indicators for coastal wetland restoration. Ecol Indic 60:442–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.003CrossRef

Zylstra MJ, Knight AT, Esler KJ, Le Grange LLL (2014) Connectedness as a core conservation concern: an interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springe Sci Rev 2:119–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40362-014-0021-3CrossRef

Titel: Assessing Factors of Environmental Stewardship Success: Organizational Perceptions from the Niagara Region of Ontario, Canada
verfasst von: Brooke Kapeller
Ryan Plummer
Julia Baird
Marilyne Jollineau
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Environmental Management / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01669-w

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Policy Implementation Inconsistency and Emission Leakage: Evidence from The Closure of Polluting Firms

Biological Invasions in Neotropical Regions: Continental Ichthyofauna and Risk Assessment Protocols

Ecological Sustainability Assessment of Water Distribution for the Maintenance of Ecosystems, their Services and Biodiversity

Can the Framing of Climate Mitigation Actions into Government Policies Lead to Delivering Them? – Insights from Nepal’s Experience

Considering Fish as Recipients of Ecosystem Services Provides a Framework to Formally Link Baseline, Development, and Post-operational Monitoring Programs and Improve Aquatic Impact Assessments for Large Scale Developments

Cross-Cultural Environmental Research: Lessons from the Field