Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Study on Light Diffusion of Creped Silk Inserted GFRP Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Assessing Graphical Robot Aids for Interactive Co-working

verfasst von : Iveta Eimontaite, Ian Gwilt, David Cameron, Jonathan M. Aitken, Joe Rolph, Saeid Mokaram, James Law

Erschienen in: Advances in Ergonomics of Manufacturing: Managing the Enterprise of the Future

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The shift towards more collaborative working between humans and robots increases the need for improved interfaces. Alongside robust measures to ensure safety and task performance, humans need to gain the confidence in robot co-operators to enable true collaboration. This research investigates how graphical signage can support human–robot co-working, with the intention of increased productivity. Participants are required to co-work with a KUKA iiwa lightweight manipulator on a manufacturing task. The three conditions in the experiment differ in the signage presented to the participants—signage relevant to the task, irrelevant to the task, or no signage. A change between three conditions is expected in anxiety and negative attitudes towards robots; error rate; response time; and participants’ complacency, suggested by facial expressions. In addition to understanding how graphical languages can support human–robot co-working, this study provides a basis for further collaborative research to explore human–robot co-working in more detail.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Gesture Detection Towards Real-Time Ergonomic Analysis for Intelligent Automation Assistance
Nächstes Kapitel High Value Intelligent Aerospace Turbofan Jet Engine Blade Re-manufacturing System
Fußnoten
1
Though care must be taken in designing signage to reduce ambiguity in interpretation [3].
 
Literatur
1.
Ososky, S., Schuster, D., Phillips, E., Jentsch, F.G.: Building appropriate trust in human-robot teams. In: 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium Series (2013)
2.
Chan, A.H.S., Ng, A.W.Y.: Investigation of guessability of industrial safety signs: effects of prospective-user factors and cognitive sign features. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40, 689–697 (2010)CrossRef
3.
Frixione, M., Lombardi, A.: Street signs and Ikea instruction sheets: pragmatics and pictorial communication. Rev. Philos. Psychol. 6, 133–149 (2015)CrossRef
4.
Tang, C.-H., Wu, W.-T., Lin, C.-Y.: Using virtual reality to determine how emergency signs facilitate way-finding. Appl. Ergon. 40, 722–730 (2009)CrossRef
5.
Vilar, E., Rebelo, F., Noriega, P.: Indoor human wayfinding performance using vertical and horizontal signage in virtual reality: indoor human wayfinding and virtual reality. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 24, 601–615 (2014)CrossRef
6.
Bahar, G., Masliah, M., Wolff, R., Park, P.: Desktop reference for crash reduction factors (2007)
7.
Laughery, K.R.: Safety communications: warnings. Appl. Ergon. 37, 467–478 (2006)CrossRef
8.
Chen, R., Wang, X., Hou, L.: Augmented reality for collaborative assembly design in manufacturing sector. Virtual Technol. Bus. Ind. Appl. Innov. Synerg. Approaches. 105 (2010)
9.
Tufte, E.R.: The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Connecticut (1993)
10.
Ben-Bassat, T., Shinar, D.: Ergonomic guidelines for traffic sign design increase sign comprehension. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 48, 182–195 (2006)CrossRef
11.
Lamont, D., Kenyon, S., Lyons, G.: Dyslexia and mobility-related social exclusion: the role of travel information provision. J. Transp. Geogr. 26, 147–157 (2013)CrossRef
12.
Mills, M.E., Sullivan, K.: The importance of information giving for patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a review of the literature. J. Clin. Nurs. 8, 631–642 (1999)CrossRef
13.
Little, P., Doward, M., Warner, G., Moore, M., Stephens, K., Senior, J., Kendrick, T.: Randomised controlled trial of effect of leaflets to empower patients in consultations in primary care. BMJ 328, 441 (2004)CrossRef
14.
Ussher, J., Kirsten, L., Butow, P., Sandoval, M.: What do cancer support groups provide which other supportive relationships do not? The experience of peer support groups for people with cancer. Soc. Sci. Med. 62, 2565–2576 (2006)CrossRef
15.
Lautizi, M., Laschinger, H.K.S., Ravazzolo, S.: Workplace empowerment, job satisfaction and job stress among Italian mental health nurses: an exploratory study. J. Nurs. Manag. 17, 446–452 (2009)CrossRef
16.
Ozer, E.M., Bandura, A.: Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: a self-efficacy analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 472 (1990)CrossRef
17.
Pearson, L.C., Moomaw, W.: The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educ. Res. Q. 29, 37 (2005)
18.
Mathews, A., Mackintosh, B.: A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety. Cogn. Ther. Res. 22, 539–560 (1998)CrossRef
19.
Kenworthy, J.B., Jones, J.: The roles of group importance and anxiety in predicting depersonalized ingroup trust. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 12, 227–239 (2009)CrossRef
20.
Balliet, D., Van Lange, P.A.M.: Trust, conflict, and cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 139, 1090–1112 (2013)CrossRef
21.
King-Casas, B.: Getting to know you: reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science 308, 78–83 (2005)CrossRef
22.
van’t Wout, M., Sanfey, A.G.: Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making. Cognition. 108, 796–803 (2008)
23.
Cameron, D., Aitken, J.M., Collins, E.C., Boorman, L., Chua, A., Fernando, S., McAree, O., Martinez-Hernandez, U., Law, J.: Framing Factors: The Importance of Context and the Individual in Understanding Trust in Human-Robot Interaction (2015)
24.
Hancock, P.A., Billings, D.R., Schaefer, K.E., Chen, J.Y.C., de Visser, E.J., Parasuraman, R.: A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 53, 517–527 (2011)CrossRef
25.
Thorvald, P., Lindblom, J.: Initial development of a cognitive load assessment Tool. In: The 5th AHFE International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, AHFE, pp. 223–232. 19–23 July 2014, Krakow, Poland (2014)
26.
Moreno-Jiménez, B., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Garrosa Hernández, E., Morante Benadero, M.A., et al.: Terminal versus non-terminal care in physician burnout: the role of decision-making processes and attitudes to death. Salud Ment. 31, 93–101 (2008)
27.
Stafford, R.Q., Broadbent, E., Jayawardena, C., Unger, U., Kuo, I.H., Igic, A., Wong, R., Kerse, N., Watson, C., MacDonald, B.A.: Improved robot attitudes and emotions at a retirement home after meeting a robot. In: RO-MAN, 2010 IEEE. pp. 82–87 (2010)
28.
Nomura, T., Shintani, T., Fujii, K., Hokabe, K.: Experimental investigation of relationships between anxiety, negative attitudes, and allowable distance of robots. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IASTED International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, pp. 13–18. ACTA Press, Chamonix, France. Citeseer (2007)
29.
Muir, B.M.: Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 27, 527–539 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRef
30.
ISO 3864-1: Graphical Symbols—Safety Colours and Safety Signs—Part 1: Design Principles for Safety Signs and Safety Markings. Downloaded at 2016-01-08
31.
Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., Kato, K.: Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interact. Stud. 7, 437–454 (2006)CrossRef
32.
Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., Kato, K.: Measurement of anxiety toward robots. In: The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ROMAN 2006, IEEE, pp. 372–377 (2006)
33.
Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Willman, P.: Personality and domain-specific risk taking. J. Risk Res. 8, 157–176 (2005)CrossRef
34.
MacDorman, K.F., Vasudevan, S.K., Ho, C.-C.: Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures. AI Soc. 23, 485–510 (2009)CrossRef
35.
Galea, E., Xie, H., Lawrence, P.: Experimental and survey studies on the effectiveness of dynamic signage systems. Fire Saf. Sci. 11, 1129–1143 (2014)CrossRef
36.
Lewinski, P., den Uyl, T.M., Butler, C.: Automated facial coding: validation of basic emotions and FACS AUs in FaceReader. J. Neurosci. Psychol. Econ. 7, 227–236 (2014)CrossRef
37.
Simpson, S.A., Wadsworth, E.J.K., Moss, S.C., Smith, A.P.: Minor injuries, cognitive failures and accidents at work: incidence and associated features. Occup. Med. 55, 99–108 (2005)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Assessing Graphical Robot Aids for Interactive Co-working
verfasst von
Iveta Eimontaite
Ian Gwilt
David Cameron
Jonathan M. Aitken
Joe Rolph
Saeid Mokaram
James Law
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Advances in Ergonomics of Manufacturing: Managing the Enterprise of the Future

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41696-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-41697-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41697-7_21