nach oben

Sexuality Research and Social Policy

Erschienen in:

23.12.2015

Assessing Political Opinions About Transgender Legal Rights Using a Multiple-Segment Factorial Vignette Approach

verfasst von: Claire Kimberly

Erschienen in: Sexuality Research and Social Policy | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Research has rarely teased apart the issues related to the transgender community from lesbian, gay, and bisexual concerns. This is particularly problematic due to the relatively delayed passing of legislation to protect transgender legal rights when compared to those of various sexual orientations. With research showing how important empirical evidence can be for advocacy, this study attempts to understand the nature of the general population’s attitudes about transgender rights separate from gays and lesbians by using a multiple-segment factorial vignette to bring clarity on the similarities and differences in political attitudes about sexual orientation and gender identity. Results reveal how attitudes about legal rights differ between groups and how stable the opinions are for policies that support transgender people. These findings have the potential to be useful in building effective policy campaigns targeting members of the dominant voting group.

Vorheriger Artikel Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Lesbian Family Life

Nächster Artikel Sexual Behavior and Sexual Risks Among Spanish University Students: a Descriptive Study of Gender and Sexual Orientation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

American Civil Liberties Union (2015). Non-discrimination laws: State by state. Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/map/non-discrimination-laws-state-state-information-map

Barry, K. M. (2014). Disabilityqueer: federal disability rights protection for transgender people. Yale Human Rights and Development Journal, 16, 1–50.

Baunach, D. M. (2012). Changing same-sex marriage attitudes in American from 1988 through 2010. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 364–378. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs022.CrossRef

Becker, A. B., & Todd, M. E. (2013). A new American family? Public opinion toward family status and perceptions of the challenges faced by children of same-sex parents. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 9, 425–448. doi:10.1080/1550428X.2013.822841.CrossRef

Bibbs, G. R. (2008). Analysing qualitative data. Washington: Sage.

Bolotin, J. (2015). Cracks in the shield: the necessity of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. Tennessee Journal of Race, Gender, & Social Justice, 4, 71–100.

Burdge, B. J. (2007). Bending gender, ending gender: Theoretical foundations for social work practice with the transgender community. Social Work, 52. doi:10.1093/sw/52.3.243

Califia, P. (2012). Sex changes: transgender politics. Berkeley: Cleis Press.

Diamond, L. M. (2009). Sexual fluidity: understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Ehret, E. K. (2015). Legal loophole: how LGBTQ nondiscrimination laws leave out the partners of transgender people. Rutgers University Law Review, 67, 469–498.

Erickson-Schroth, L. (Ed.). (2014). Trans bodies, trans selves: a resource for the transgender community. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2006). Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons. Fertility and Sterility, 86, 1333–1335. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.085.CrossRef

Feldblum, C. (2013). Law, policies in practice and social norms: coverage of transgender discrimination under sex discrimination law. JL Soc’y, 14, 1–23.

Gallup Poll (2015). Marriage: Gallup historical trends. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/117328/marriage.aspx

Ganong, L., & Coleman, M. (2005). Measuring intergenerational obligations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1003–1011. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00190.x.CrossRef

Ganong, L. H., & Coleman, M. (2006). Multiple segment factorial designs. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 455–468. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00264.x.CrossRef

Gates, G. J. (2011). How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender? The Williams Institute. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/09h684x2

GovTrack (2015). H.R. 2981 (111^th): Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2009. Retrieved from https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr2981

Grant, J. M., Mottet, L. A., Tanis, J., Herman, J. L., Harrison, J., & Keisling, M. (2011). National Transgender Discrimination Survey Report on health and health care (pp. 1–23). Washington: National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

Hans, J. D., & Kimberly, C. (2014). Abortion attitudes in context: a multidimensional vignette approach. Social Science Research, 48, 145–156. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.001.PubMedCrossRef

Hart, L. (2014). With inadequate protection under the law, transgender students fight to access restrooms in public schools based on their gender identity. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 41, 315–332.

Hill, D., & Willoughby, B. (2005). The development and validation of the genderism and transphobia scale. Sex Roles, 53, 531–544. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7140-x.CrossRef

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.PubMedCrossRef

King, M. E., Winter, S., & Webster, B. (2009). Contact reduces transprejudice: a study on attitudes towards transgenderism and transgender civil rights in Hong Kong. International Journal of Sexual Health, 21, 17–34. doi:10.1080/19317610802434609.CrossRef

Kramer, Z. A. (2004). Ultimate gender stereotype: equalizing gender-conforming and gender-nonconforming homosexuals under Title VII. University of Illinois Law Review, 2004, 465–500.

Lamda Legal (2015). Changing birth certificate sex designations: State-by-state guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.lambdalegal.org/know-your-rights/transgender/changing-birth-certificate-sex-designations

Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2009). Gay rights in the states: public opinion and policy responsiveness. American Political Science Review, 103, 367–386. doi:10.1017/S0003055409990050.CrossRef

Lombardi, E. (2009). Varieties of transgender/transsexual lives and their relationship with transphobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 56, 977–992. doi:10.1080/00918360903275393.PubMedCrossRef

Minter, S. P. (2006). Do transsexuals dream of gay rights? Getting real about transgender inclusion. In P. Currah, R. M. Juang, & S. Price Minter (Eds.), Transgender rights (pp. 141–170). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Nagoshi, J., Adams, K., Terrell, H., Hill, E., Brzuzy, S., & Nagoshi, C. (2008). Gender differences in correlates of homophobia and transphobia. Sex Roles, 59, 521–531. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9458-7.CrossRef

Nixon, L. (2013). Right to (trans) parent: a reproductive justice approach to reproductive rights, fertility, and family-building issues facing transgender people. William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 20, 95–102.

Norton, A. T., & Herek, G. M. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68, 738–753. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6.CrossRef

Parks, W. (2014). Removal of the impediment: the state of transgender marriage in Montana. Montana Law Review, 74, 309–342.

Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.PubMedCrossRef

Rossi, P., & Nock, P. (1982). Measuring social judgments. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Schilt, K., & Westbrook, L. (2009). Doing gender, doing heteronormativity: ‘Gender normal’, transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gender & Society, 23, 440–464. doi:10.1177/0891243209340034.CrossRef

Shepard, M. & Byrd, J. (2006). Hate Crimes Prevention Act § 4711, 18 U.S.C. § 249(a).

Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. Washington: Sage.

Smerdon, U. R. (2008). Crossing bodies, crossing borders: international surrogacy between the United States and India. Cumberland Law Review, 39, 15–85.

Spade, D. (2010). Medicaid policy & gender-confirming healthcare for trans people: an interview with advocates. Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 8, 497–514.

Stryker, S. (2006). (De)subjugated knowledges: an introduction to transgender studies. In S. Stryker & S. Whittle (Eds.), The transgender studies reader (pp. 1–17). New York: Routledge.

Stryker, S. (2008). Transgender history. Berkeley: Seal Press.

Taylor, J. K. (2007). Transgender identities and public policy in the United States: the relevance for public administration. Administration & Society, 39, 833–856. doi:10.1177/0095399707305548.CrossRef

Thompson, E. S. (2015). Compromising equality: an analysis of the religious exemption in the Employment Non-Discrimination Act and its impact on LGBT workers. Boston College Law School & Social Justice, 35, 284–319.

Tobin, H. J. (2011). Fair and accurate identification for transgender people, LGBTQ Policy Journal at the Harvard Kennedy School. Retrieved from http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k78405&pageid=icb.page414493

Traditional Values Coalition (2014). ENDA hurts kids: The impact on classrooms. Retrieved from http://traditionalvalues.org/data/sites/73/pdfs/_WPapers/070713_TVCELI_ENDA2013_FINAL.pdf

United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (2013). Questions and answers about the Employee Non-Discrimination Act. Retrieved from http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/labor-employment/upload/enda-backgrounder-2013.pdf

Valentine, D. (2007). Imagining transgender: an ethnography of a category. Durham: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822390213.CrossRef

Warriner, K., Nagoshi, C. T., & Nagoshi, J. L. (2013). Correlates of homophobia, transphobia, and internalized homophobia in gay or lesbian and heterosexual samples. Journal of Homosexuality, 60(9), 1297–1314.PubMedCrossRef

Weiss, J. T. (2004). GL vs BT: the archaeology of biphobia and transphobia within the U.S. gay and lesbian community. Journal of Bisexuality, 3, 25–55.CrossRef

Wenstrom, K. (2008). What the birth certificate shows: an argument to remove surgical requirements from birth certificate amendment policies. Sexuality Review of Lesbian, Gay, & Bisexual Legal Issues, 17, 131–140.

Wierckx, K., Caenegem, E. V., Pennings, G., Elaut, E., Dedecker, D., Van de Peer, F., & T’Sjoen, G. (2012). Reproductive wish in transsexual men. Human Reproduction, 27, 483–487. doi:10.1093/humrep/der406.PubMedCrossRef

Woodford, M. R., Atteberry, B., Derr, M., & Howell, M. (2013). Endorsement for civil rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people among heterosexual college students: informing socially just policy advocacy. Journal of Community Practice, 21, 203–227. doi:10.1080/10705422.2013.811623.CrossRef

Titel: Assessing Political Opinions About Transgender Legal Rights Using a Multiple-Segment Factorial Vignette Approach
verfasst von: Claire Kimberly
Publikationsdatum: 23.12.2015
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Sexuality Research and Social Policy / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1868-9884
Elektronische ISSN: 1553-6610
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0216-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Sexual Behavior and Sexual Risks Among Spanish University Students: a Descriptive Study of Gender and Sexual Orientation

Same-Sex Marriage Policies and Lesbian Family Life

Psychological Well-being Among Religious and Spiritual-identified Young Gay and Bisexual Men

Hypervisibility: Toward a Conceptualization of LGBTQ Aging

Recruiting a US National Sample of HIV-Negative Gay and Bisexual Men to Complete at-Home Self-Administered HIV/STI Testing and Surveys: Challenges and Opportunities

Routine Activities and Perceived Homophobia Among Older Lesbians