nach oben

Erschienen in:

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Assessing Public Participation Through Different Lens: The Case of Public Participation Geographic Information Systems

verfasst von : Paola Barbara Floreddu, Cabiddu Francesca

Erschienen in: Government e-Strategic Planning and Management

Verlag: Springer New York

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS) pertain to the use of geographic information systems (GIS) to broaden public involvement in policymaking. Despite the importance of this topic, there is a lack of evaluation methods regarding the participation of the public through PPGISs. To fill this gap, the objective of this study is to analyze the level of e-democracy of PPGIS’s websites and identify lessons that will enable PPGIs to develop appropriate strategies for e-democracy implementation and diffusion. To achieve the above-mentioned objectives, we analyze PPGISs websites; we also apply a multiple case study methodology.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Evaluating e-Government: A Comprehensive Methodological Framework to Assess Policy Impacts

Nächstes Kapitel Location Information Strategies: Bringing Location into e-Government

Abelson, J. (2006). Assessing the impacts of public participation: Concepts, evidence, and policy implications, Ottawa. : Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc.

Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224.CrossRef

Anttiroiko, A. V. (2007). Democratic e-Governance basic concepts, issue and future trends. Digest of Electronic Government Policy and Regulation, 30, 83–90.

Cabiddu F. (2012). Misurazione dell’e-democracy nelle amministrazioni provinciali:un caso esplorativo. Azienda Pubblica, 2 (apr-giu), 159-186.

Cabiddu F. (2009). The use of web services for inclusive decision process: Towards the Enhancement of E-Democracy. In Alessandro D’Atri; Domenico Saccà (Eds.), Information Systems: People, Organizations, Institutions, and Technologies. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag, Springer.

Carver, S. (2003). The future of participatory approaches using geographic information: developing a research agenda for the 21st Century. URISA Journal, 15(1), 61–71.

Censis – Rur. (2004).E-democracy: un’opportunità per tutti?. Roma: CENSIS.

Curry, M. (1995). Rethinking rights and responsibilities in geographic information systems: Beyond the Power of the Image. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 22(1), 58–69.CrossRef

Demchak C. C., Friis C., & La Porte T. M. (2000), Webbing governance: national differences in constructing the public face. In G. D. Garson (ed.), Handbook of public information systems. New York: Marcel Dekker Publishers.

Dunn, C. (2007). Participatory GIS: a people GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 616–637.CrossRef

Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

Floreddu, P., Cabiddu, F., & Pettinao, D. (2011). Public participation in environmental decision-making: the case of PPGIS. In A. D’Atri, M. Ferrara, & J. F. George (Eds.), Information Technology And Innovation Trends In Organizations. Heidelberg, Springer.

Ganapati, S. (2011). Uses of public participation geographic information systems application in e-Governement. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 425–434.CrossRef

Gant D. B., & Gant J. P. (2002) Enhancing E-Service Delivery, E-government series, state web portals: delivering and financing e-service. Price waterhouse Coopers Endowment.

Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial Data Infrastructure in the World of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2, 24–32.

Grönlund, A., (2009). ICT is not participation is not democracy: eParticipation development models revisited. In A. Macintosh, & E. Tambouris (Eds.), Proceedings of 1 ^st International Conference on Electronic Participation, ePart 2009 (pp. 12–23). Berlin: Springer-LNCS 5694.

Grönlund, A. (2002). Electronic Government: design, Application and Management. London, UK: Idea Group Publishing.

Jankowsky, P. (2009). Toward participatory geographic information system for community based environmental decision making. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(6), 1966–1971.CrossRef

Jordan, G. (2002). GIS for community forestry user groups in Nepal: putting people before the technology. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 232–245). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.

Kingston, R. (2007). Public participation in local policy decision-making: the role of web-based mapping. Cartographic Journal, 44(2), 138–144.CrossRef

Hansen, H. S., & Prosperi, D. C. (2005). Citizen participation and internet GIS: Some recent advances. Computers Environment and Urban System, 9(6), 617–629.CrossRef

Holden, S. H. (2003). The evolution of information technology management at the federal level: implications for public administration. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Public Information Technology Policy and Management Issues (pp. 53–73). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

Laituri, M. (2003). The Issue of Access: An Assessment, Guide for Evaluating Public Participation Geographic Information Science Case Studies. URISA Journal, 15(2), 25–32.

Macintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2008). Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2(1), 16–30.

Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing E-Participation in Policy-Making. Proceedings of the 37° Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 5–8, 2004, Big Island, Hawaii.

Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Nyerges, T., Ramsey, K., & Wilson, M. (2006). Design Considerations for an Internet Portal to Support Public Participation in Transportation Improvement Decision Making. In S. Balram & S. Dragićević (Eds.), Collaborative Geographic Information Systems (pp. 208–236). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.CrossRef

OECD. (2001). Citizens as Partners: Information, consultation and public participation in policy-making. Paris.: OECD.

Obermeyer, N. (1998). PPGIS: The Evolution of Public Participation GIS. Cartography and GIS, 25, 65–66.

Peng, Z. R. (2001). Internet GIS for public participation. Environmental and Planning B., 28, 889–905.CrossRef

Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2007). Are ICT’s improving transparency and accountability in the EU regional and local development. Public Administration, 85(2), 449-472.

Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 25(1), 3–29.CrossRef

Rowe, G., Marsh, R., & Frewer, L. J. (2004). Evaluation of a deliberative conference. Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(1), 88–121.CrossRef

Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Skiftenes Flak, L. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400–428.CrossRef

Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491–507.CrossRef

Schlossberg, M., & Shuford, E. (2003). Delineating “Public” and “Participation” in PPGIS. URISA Journal, 16(2), 15–26.

The EcoCities Spatial Portal (http://www.ppgis.manchester.ac.uk/ecocities/).

Tulloch, D. L., & Shapiro, T. (2003). The intersection of data access and public participation: impacting GIS users’ success? URISA Journal, 15(2), 55–60.

Turner, A., & Forrest, B. (2008). Where 2.0: The State of the Geospatial Web.,http://radar.oreilly.com/research/where2-report.html

Yildiz, M. (2007). e-Government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665.CrossRef

Yin, R. K. (2008). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Titel: Assessing Public Participation Through Different Lens: The Case of Public Participation Geographic Information Systems
verfasst von: Paola Barbara Floreddu
Cabiddu Francesca
Verlag: Springer New York
Buch: Government e-Strategic Planning and Management
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8461-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4614-8462-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8462-2_3