nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | Buchkapitel

Assessing the Risk Associated with Lease Certificates in the Turkish Capital Market

verfasst von : Musa GÜN

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The risk management is an important concept due to the volatility and the market risks. Investors want to know the level of risk while they are making investment decisions. To that end, this chapter aims at assessing the risk associated with the lease certificates (Sukuk) traded in the Turkish capital market on the basis of Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) methods. In accordance with this purpose, the research investigates the emergence and development of the Sukuk market in Turkey and the lease certificates issued by the Ministry of Treasury and Finance. Values at risk were calculated using the aforementioned methods for one million Turkish Lira investments into the Sukuk portfolio at 1–10-day horizons and at a confidence interval of 99%. Consequently, the VaR amount, the minimum expected loss, is 444.8 Turkish Lira, which is approximately 0.044% of the investment on average during the sample holding period at the 99% confidence level. At the same confidence level and for the equivalent holding period, the CVaR proves a little higher risk percentage, which is 0.051% of loss or 518.8 Turkish Lira on average.

Ab Majid, H., Shahimi, S., & Abdullah, M. H. S. B. (2011, 19–21 December). Sukuk defaults and its implication: A case study of Malaysian capital market. In: Center for Islamic Economics and Finance, Qatar Faculty of Islamic Studies, Qatar Foundation, 8th international conference on Islamic economics and finance sustainable growth and inclusive economic development from an Islamic perspective. Doha, Qatar.

Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions. (2018). Governance standard for islamic financial institutions: Sukuk governance, exposure draft G2/2018 (ver.8). Available through: AAOFI web site http://aaoifi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Sukuk-Governance-Exposure-Draft-Final-for-Publishing-1.pdf.

Adıgüzel, B. (2010). A new security in the capital market: Rent certificate (Sukuk). Erciyes University, Journal of Law Faculty, 5(1–2), 29–57.

Afshar, T. A. (2013). Compare and contrast Sukuk (Islamic bonds) with conventional bonds, are they compatible? Journal of Global Business Management, 9(1), 44.

Aktaş, M. M. (2016). Musharaka Sukuk and Turkish legal framework. Journal of Court of Jurisdictional Disputes, 8, 1–48.

Anas, A. S., Ulum, Z. K. A. B., & Ibrahim, M. A. H. (2016, 26 October). New parameter dimension in estimating value-at-risk (VaR) for Sukuk market: A conceptual review. In: Social sciences postgraduate international seminar (SSPIS), Penang, Malaysia.

Ariff, M., & Safari, M. (2012). Are Sukuk securities the same as conventional bonds? Afro Eurasian Studies, 1(1), 101–125.

Ariff, M., Safari, M., & Mohamad, S. (2013). Sukuk securities and conventional bonds: Evidence of significant differences. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 21(2), 621–638.

Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. M., & Heath, D. (1997). Thinking coherently. Risk, 10(11), 68–71.

Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. M., & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203–228.CrossRef

Aslan, H. (2012). Sukuk as an alternative investment and financing tool: Structure, implementation and implications for Turkish market. Master Thesis, Marmara University.

Bank for International Settlements. (2000). Stress testing by large financial institutions: Current practice and aggregation issues. Basel, Switzerland: Committee on the Global Financial System.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (1996). Overview of amendment to the capital accord to incorporate market risk. Basel, Switzerland: Basel Committee.

Cakir, S., & Raei, F. (2007). Sukuk vs conventional bonds: Is there a difference in value at risk. International monetary fund working paper WP/07/237, Washington DC.

Damak, M., & Volland, E. (2008). The Sukuk market continues to soar and diversify, held aloft by huge financing needs. New York: Standard & Poor’s.

Dede, K. (2013). Sukuk lease certificates. İstanbul: Participation Banks Association of Turkey.

Echchabi, A., Abd Azız, H., & Idriss, U. (2016). Does Sukuk financing promote economic growth? An emphasis on the major issuing countrıes. Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics, 3(2), 63–73.CrossRef

El-Gamal, M. A. (1999). Involving Islamic banks in central bank open market operations. Thunderbird International Business Review, 41(4–5), 501–521.CrossRef

Godlewski, C. J., Turk-Ariss, R., & Weill, L. (2011). Do markets perceive sukuk and conventional bonds as different financing instruments? BOFIT Discussion Paper No. 6/2011, Helsinki.

Hafezian, P., Salamon, H., & Shitan, M. (2015). Estimating value at risk for sukuk market using generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. The Economics and Finance Letters, 2(2), 8–23.CrossRef

International Islamic Financial Market. (2017). Sukuk report, a comprehensive study of the global sukuk market. Retrieved January 5, 2018, from http://www.iifm.net/system/files/private/en/IIFM%20Sukuk%20Report%20%286th%20Edition%29_2.pdf.

Iqbal, Z., & Tsubota, H. (2006). Emerging Islamic capital markets: A quickening pace and new potential (Euromoney handbook). Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

Jabeen, Z., & Javed, M. T. (2007). Sukuk-structures: An analysis of risk-reward sharing and wealth circulation. The Pakistan Development Review, 46(4), 405–419.CrossRef

Jobst, A., Kunzel, P., Mills, P., & Sy, A. (2008). Islamic bond issuance: What sovereign debt managers need to know. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 1(4), 330–344.CrossRef

Jorion, P. (2006). Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

Konca, A. (2011). Lease certificates (lease Sukuk) and tax dimension. Yaklaşım Reviews, 219, 2–9.

Küçükçolak, N. (2008). Evaluation of interest-free financial certificate Sukuk within the framework of Turkish capital markets. Finance, Politics and Economic Reviews, 45(520), 25–50.

Lahsasna, A., Hassan, M. K., & Ahmad, R. (2018). Types of Sukuk, their classification and structure in Islamic capital market. In Forward lease Sukuk in Islamic capital markets (pp. 49–85). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Mansor, F., & Bhatti, M. I. (2011). Risk and return analysis on performance of the Islamic mutual funds: Evidence from Malaysia. Global Economy and Finance Journal, 4(1), 19–31.

Nasir, A., & Farooq, U. (2017). Analysis of value at risk of Sukuk and conventional bonds in Pakistan. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 8(4), 375–388.CrossRef

Özcan, S., & Elitaş, C. (2015). Recognition of Sukuk as the financial instrument. World of Accounting Science, 17(3), 559–586.

Özeroğlu, A. İ. (2014). Sukuk and assessment of implementation of Sukuk in Turkey. Journal of History School, 7(19), 751–772.CrossRef

Ramasamy, R., Munisamy, S., & Helmi, M. H. M. (2011). Relative risk of Islamic sukuk over government and conventional bonds. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11(6), 4–12.

Said, A. (2011). Does the use of sukuk (Islamic bonds) impact Islamic banks performances? A case study of relative performance during 2007–2009. Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 12, 65–76.

Sevinç, E. (2013). Comparison between equally weighted Sukuk portfolio’s value at risk and equally weighted Turkish eurobond portfolio’s value at risk. Bankacılar Reviews, 24(86), 78–100.

Tariq, A. A., & Dar, H. (2007). Risks of sukuk structures: Implications for resource mobilization. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49(2), 203–223.CrossRef

Tok, A. (2009). Sukuk (Islamic bonds) practices in the framework of Islamic finance system, evaluations in terms of participation banks and Turkey. Capital Markets Board of Turkey. Retrieved January 10, 2018, from http://www.spk.gov.tr/SiteApps/Yayin/YayinGoster/992.

Uğurlu, U. (2011). Taxation of lease certificates of asset leasing companies, as a new investment instrument. Yaklaşım Reviews, 223, 11–28.

Ülev, S., Savaşan, F., & Selçuk, M. (2017). Critical evaluation of the real estate certificates from the perspective of Islamic economics. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 3(2), 125–148.

Usmani, M. I. (2007). Fixed income securities Shari’a perspective. SBP Research Bulletin, 3(1), 63–74.

Vishwanath, S. R., & Azmi, S. (2009). An overview of Islamic sukuk bonds. The Journal of Project Finance, 14(4), 58.

Wilson, R. J. A. (2007). Global Islamic capital markets: Review of 2006 and prospects for 2007. Working Paper, Durham University, School of Government and International Affairs, Durham.

Wilson, R. (2008). Innovation in the structuring of Islamic sukuk securities. Humanomics, 24(3), 170–181.CrossRef

Yakar, S., Kandır, S. Y., & Önal, Y. B. (2013). Investigation of the tax aspect of Sukuk leasing certificate as a new financial instrument. Bankacılar Reviews, 24(84), 72–94.

Yilmaz, E. (2014). Sukuk as a new financial instruments: Types, application and taxation of Turkey. The Journal of Accounting and Finance, 61, 81–100.

Zaidi, J. A. (2009). Nature of risks present in Sukuk structures – Rating agency, perspective in Sukuk: Islamic capital market series (International ed.). Malaysia: Sweet & Maxwell Asia.

Titel: Assessing the Risk Associated with Lease Certificates in the Turkish Capital Market
verfasst von: Musa GÜN
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35040-6_13

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.