Skip to main content
Registrieren
Springer Professional
SUCHE
MENÜ 1 2 3 4
nach oben

Tipp

Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in:
NDT-Agile: An Agile, CMMI-Compatible Framework for Web Engineering Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | Supplement | Buchkapitel

Assessment Model for HCI Practice Maturity in Small and Medium Sized Software Development Companies

verfasst von : Abiodun Ogunyemi, David Lamas, Jan Stage, Marta Lárusdóttir

Erschienen in: Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
share
TEILEN

Abstract

Usability and user experience aspects need to be better integrated during software process improvements in the software industry. This study develops and evaluates a comprehensive continuous representation model for conducting peer and self-assessment of HCI practice in software development companies. In this paper, we report on the evolution of an HCI practice assessment model that can be used in software development projects and processes. The specific focus of the model is on the human-centered design practice in four categories: Human-centredness; Process and Infrastructure; Design and Outcomes; and Usability Impact. In order to know whether the model would be beneficial to companies, we conducted two case studies in Estonian software companies. The outcomes indicate that the model can help to increase HCI awareness, self-learning and sharing of a common vision among software practitioners and propel companies towards goal setting for continuous improvement of their HCI practice.

Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 69.000 Bücher
  • über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 50.000 Bücher
  • über 380 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe



 


Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 58.000 Bücher
  • über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko





Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Comparing SPI Survival Studies in Small Settings
Nächstes Kapitel Cultural Issues and Impacts of Software Process in Very Small Entities (VSEs)
Fußnoten
Literatur
1.
Bevan, N.: International standards for usability should be more widely used. J. Usability Stud. 4, 106–113 (2009)
2.
Boivie, I., Åborg, C., Persson, J., Löfberg, M.: Why usability gets lost or usability in in-house software development. Interact. Comput. 15, 623–639 (2003) CrossRef
3.
García-Mireles, G.A., Moraga, M.Á., García, F., Piattini, M.: Approaches to promote product quality within software process improvement initiatives: a mapping study. J. Syst. Softw. 103, 150–166 (2015) CrossRef
4.
Svanæs, D., Gulliksen, J.: Understanding the Context of Design – Towards Tactical User Centered Design. In: Proceedings: NordiCHI 2008, pp. 353–362 (2008)
5.
Kieffer, S., Vanderdonckt, J.: STRATUS : a questionnaire for strategic usability assessment. In: Proceedings of the SAC 2016 Conference, pp. 1–8. ACM, Pisa (2016)
6.
Maxim, B.R., Kessentini, M.: An introduction to modern software quality assurance. In: Mistrik, I., Soley, R., Ali, N., Grundy, J., Tekinerdogan, B. (eds.) Software Quality Assurance: In Large Scale and Complex Software-Intensive Systems, pp. 19–46. Morgan Kaufmann, Tokyo (2016)
7.
Ardito, C., Buono, P., Caivano, D., Costabile, M.F., Lanzilotti, R.: Investigating and promoting UX practice in industry: an experimental study. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 72, 542–551 (2014) CrossRef
8.
Kuusinen, K., Mikkonen, T., Pakarinen, S.: Agile user experience development in a large software organization: good expertise but limited impact. In: Winckler, M., Forbrig, P., Bernhaupt, R. (eds.) HCSE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7623, pp. 94–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.​1007/​978-3-642-34347-6_​6 CrossRef
9.
Misra, S.C., Kumar, V., Kumar, U.: Identifying some important success factors in adopting agile software development practices. J. Syst. Softw. 82, 1869–1890 (2009) CrossRef
10.
11.
Boivie, I., Gulliksen, J., Goransson, B.: The lonesome cowboy: A study of the usability designer role in systems development. Interact. Comput. 18, 601–634 (2006) CrossRef
12.
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York (2003)
13.
Earthy, J.: Usability Maturity Model: Human Centredness Scale (1998)
14.
ISO: ISO/IEC TR 15504-2: Information technology – Software process assessment – Part 2: A reference model for processes and process capability (1998)
15.
ISO: ISO TR 15504 Part 5, Information technology – Software Process Assessment – Part 5: An assessment model and indicator guidance (1999)
16.
Liu, Z.: An organisational human-centeredness assessment at Chinese software enterprises. In: Proceedings of APCHI 2002, pp. 251–259. Academic Press, London (2002)
17.
Hussein, I., Mahmud, M., Tap, A.O.: A survey of usability awareness in Malaysia IT industry. In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), pp. 146–151 (2011)
18.
Jokela, T.: The KESSU usability design process model, Oulu (2004)
19.
ISO: ISO 13407. Human-centred design processes for interactive systems, Geneve, Switzerland (1999)
20.
ISO: ISO/TR 18529: Ergonomics — Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Human-centred lifecycle process descriptions, Geneva (2000)
21.
Grama, C.: Adapting Lean User Experience Process for Enterprise Environment (2016)
22.
Kar, S., Das, S., Kumar Rath, A., Kar, S.K.: Self-assessment model and review technique for SPICE: SMART SPICE. In: Mas, A., Mesquida, A., Rout, T., O’Connor, Rory V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2012. CCIS, vol. 290, pp. 222–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.​1007/​978-3-642-30439-2_​20 CrossRef
23.
ISO: ISO/IEC 15504-5: Information technology – Process Assessment – Part 5: An exemplar Process Assessment Model (2006)
24.
de Bruin, T., Freeze, R., Kulkarni, U., Rosemann, M.: Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. In: Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–10. AIS, Sydney (2005)
25.
Wendler, R.: The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54, 1317–1339 (2012) CrossRef
26.
Bruno, V.: Improving Usability Outcomes in IS Projects: The Views of Usability Practitioners (2011)
27.
Kajaste, I., Mathew, D., Peltomäki, S., Poranen, T.: Using usability experts to improve software quality. In: Proceedings of the INSPIRE Conference, pp. 1–15 (2007)
28.
Ogunyemi, A., Lamas, D., Sarapuu, H., da Rosa, I.B.: Current state of HCI practice in the Estonian software development industry. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2015. CCIS, vol. 529, pp. 170–175. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.​1007/​978-3-319-21383-5_​29 CrossRef
29.
Ogunyemi, A.A., Lamas, D., Adagunodo, E.R., Loizides, F., Da Rosa, I.B.: Theory, practice and policy: an inquiry into the uptake of HCI practices in the software industry of a developing country. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 32, 665–681 (2016) CrossRef
30.
Fraser, P., Moultrie, J., Gregory, M.: The use of maturity models/grids as a tool in assessing product development capability : a review. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, pp. 18–20. IEEE, Cambridge (2002)
31.
De Paula, I.C., Fogliatto, F.S., Cristofari, C.A.: Method for assessing the maturity of product development management: A proposal. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 5, 10285–10302 (2012)
32.
ISO: Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction - Part 210: Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems. In: ISO 9241-210:2010, pp. 1–32. ISO (2010)
33.
Hussey, J., Hussey, R.: Business Research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students. Macmillan, London (1997) CrossRef
34.
Poeppelbuss, J., Niehaves, B., Simons, A., Becker, J.: Maturity models in information systems research: literature search and analysis. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 29, 505–532 (2011)
35.
Paananen, A.: Improving In-House Software Development Process: A User-Centered Approach (2014)
Metadaten
Titel
Assessment Model for HCI Practice Maturity in Small and Medium Sized Software Development Companies
verfasst von
Abiodun Ogunyemi
David Lamas
Jan Stage
Marta Lárusdóttir
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67382-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-67383-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_5

Premium Partner