nach oben

Demography

Erschienen in:

01.12.2016

Assimilation and Health: Evidence From Linked Birth Records of Second- and Third-Generation Hispanics

verfasst von: Osea Giuntella

Erschienen in: Demography | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study explores the effects of assimilation on the health of Hispanics in the United States, using ethnic intermarriage as a metric of acculturation. I exploit a unique data set of linked confidential use birth records in California and Florida from 1970–2009. The confidential data allow me to link mothers giving birth in 1989–2009 to their own birth certificate records in 1970–1985 and to identify second-generation siblings. Thus, I can analyze the relationship between the parental exogamy of second-generation Hispanic women and the birth outcomes of their offspring controlling for grandmother fixed effects as well as indicators for second generation’s birth weight. Despite their higher socioeconomic status, third-generation children of second-generation intermarried Hispanic women are more likely to have poor health at birth, even after I account for second-generation health at birth and employ only within-family variations in the extent of assimilation. I find that a second-generation Hispanic woman married to a non-Hispanic man is 9 % more likely to have a child with low birth weight relative to a second-generation woman married to another Hispanic. These results largely reflect the higher incidence of risky behaviors (e.g., smoking during pregnancy) among intermarried Hispanic women.

Vorheriger Artikel The Contributions of Places to Metropolitan Ethnoracial Diversity and Segregation: Decomposing Change Across Space and Time

Nächster Artikel Moving Beyond Salmon Bias: Mexican Return Migration and Health Selection

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

In a companion study (Giuntella 2013), I showed that modest positive selection on health at the time of migration can account for the initial advantage in birth outcomes of second-generation Mexicans. Moreover, a simple process of regression toward the mean reverses the apparent paradox and predicts a greater deterioration than that observed in the data. Yet, the convergence would have occurred more quickly if immigrants had not socioeconomically assimilated or if they had fully assimilated in the incidence of risky behaviors during pregnancy.

Throughout the article, I use the term “intermarriage” loosely because I use only the father’s ethnicity regardless of the actual marital status.

Economists have shown growing interest in studying the determinants of intermarriage (Bisin and Verdier 2000; Bisin et al. 2004) and the effect of family structure on the economic assimilation of immigrants (Baker and Benjamin 1997; Eckstein and Weiss 2002; Furtado and Trejo 2012; Meng and Gregory 2005). Most studies have focused on first-generation immigrants, suggesting that marrying a native is positively associated with the success of immigrants in the labor market. These studies have provided evidence that intermarriage may improve job prospects and increase the rate of economic assimilation by facilitating the adoption of the host country’s customs, improving language proficiency, and expanding social connections (Furtado and Theodoropoulos 2010).

To gain access to the data and conduct this study, I obtained approval from the Florida Department of Health Institutional Review Board, the California Health and Human Service’s Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects, and the Boston University Institutional Review Board, where I conducted the analysis.

I obtained data from the California Department of Public Health for the years 1970–1981 and 1989–2009.

However, when I considered individuals whose mothers were born abroad and reported Hispanic origin, the results are substantially unchanged. In addition, only 0.06 % of second-generation Hispanic women in the sample reported black race. Excluding them from the analysis did not change the results.

Regarding the matching of mothers to grandmothers, in California, I matched only one daughter in 84 % of the cases, I matched two daughters in 12 % of the cases, and I matched three or more daughters to each grandmother in 4 % of the cases. In Florida, I matched only one daughter in 80 % of the cases, I matched two daughters in 17 % of the cases, and I matched three or more daughters to each grandmother in approximately 3 % of the cases. Over the entire sample, the average number of children matched to each mother is 1.91; the average number of grandchildren linked to each grandmother is 2.50, and this figure would be 4.20 if it were conditioned on linking at least two second-generation sisters to their offspring.

Because the information on father’s race is missing for 40 % of the sample, I do not use it in the main analysis. For those observations for which information on father’s race is available, only 2.37 % of second-generation Hispanic women had a black partner. Similarly using national data from the Natality Detail data (see the Possible Mechanisms section), I find that approximately 96 % of the non-Hispanic fathers of children born to Hispanic mothers report a white race, 3 % report black race, and 1 % report other races (American Indian, Alaskan, Asian, and Pacific Islander). Among those for whom information on father’s country of birth is available, 98 % of non-Hispanics were born in the United States. Controlling for father’s race or excluding black fathers from the analysis does not affect the main results.

Data are available online (http://www.census.gov/topics/population/genealogy.html).

Using the 2000 U.S. Census Bureaus surname list, I consider as Hispanic any surname with a posterior probability of being associated with Hispanic ethnicity higher than .7, but the results are robust to the use of different thresholds. Furthermore, using self-reported ethnicity to define intermarriage yields similar findings.

Information on father’s surname is missing for approximately 13 % of third-generation births. However, information on self-reported ethnicity is available in 99 % of the sample. In Online Resource 3, I show that using father’s self-reported ethnicity to define intermarriage yields substantially identical results (see Table S8).

Adequate prenatal care is defined as beginning prenatal care in the first trimester of pregnancy. Access to first-trimester care is a conventional way to assess the access to care for pregnant women (http://www.hrsa.gov/quality/toolbox/introduction/coreclinical/index.html).

Note that the information on marital status is available only for a subsample of the observations and relies on apparent marital status.

For this measure, I consider children who were reported dead within a year. However, most of the children who died in their first year of birth died in their first week.

The APGAR scale is determined by evaluating the newborn baby on five criteria (appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration) on a 10-point scale.

As a robustness check, I also estimate a probit model; see Table S7 in Online Resource 3.

The number of times a woman has given birth.

When the estimates are broken down by country of origin, the coefficient on intermarriage is positive and significant for Mexicans (0.004; SE = 0.002), although it is positive but not statistically significant for Cubans (0.006; SE = 0.007) and Puerto Ricans (0.003; SE = 0.012). Using information on father’s country of origin to define intermarriage and excluding U.S.-born Hispanic men results are similar (0.009; SE = 0.009), but the results are not precisely estimated given that we have information on father’s country of origin for only a subsample of the data.

Because LBW due to shortened gestational age has different causes and different short- and long-run consequences than those cases due to intrauterine growth restriction, I estimate the baseline specification of column 4 controlling nonlinearly for gestational weeks. The estimated effect is only marginally smaller (0.004; SE = 0.002).

Restricting the analysis to third-generation children born after 1995 (2000), the point estimates are larger but not statistically different from the main results illustrated in the article (see Online Resource 3).

Similar results are obtained when analyzing alcohol consumption, although the differences are not significant for gestational hypertension. Results are available upon request.

Using only first-generation immigrants or including all individuals reporting a given ethnic origin, which includes second and later generations, yields similar results.

However, it is possible that a pregnant Hispanic woman married to a non-Hispanic man feels additional stress from her child’s loss of ethnicity (i.e., many third-generation Hispanics do not speak Spanish).

The result on white non-Hispanic women is robust not only to the addition of the father’s and mother’s education but also to the separate analysis of women who married equally, more-, or less-educated Hispanic men (results available upon request). In addition, when controlling for grandmother fixed effects and the previous generation’s birth weight, I find that marrying a high school dropout has no significant effect on the risk of LBW among children born to non-Hispanic U.S.-born mothers.

The TUS-CPS is an NCI-sponsored survey of tobacco use and policy information that has been administered as part of the Current Population Survey (CPS) since 1992. The CPS is a monthly survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau for the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Results are available upon request.

Although the prevalence of smoking among Hispanics is lower than the prevalence among non-Hispanic whites, smoking prevalence among Hispanic men is substantially higher than among Hispanic women and is not statistically different from the prevalence observed among non-Hispanic whites (Agaku et al. 2014). Hispanic women are also much more likely than non-Hispanic white women to quit smoking during pregnancy (Osterman et al. 2013).

These results are available upon request.

Including information on maternal weight gain and maternal diabetes leaves the estimates practically unchanged. The results are available upon request.

For instance, maternal dietary practices are significant determinants of health at birth, and there is evidence of unhealthy assimilation with respect to dietary habits (Guendelman and Abrams 1995). Using the American Time Use Survey, I find evidence that among immigrants of Hispanic origin, intramarriage is positively associated with time spent on food preparation and consumption.

Acevedo-Garcia, D., Barbeau, E., Bishop, J. A., Pan, J., & Emmons, K. M. (2004). Undoing an epidemiological paradox: The tobacco industry’s targeting of US immigrants. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 2188–2193.CrossRef

Acevedo-Garcia, D., Pan, J., Jun, H.-J., Osypuk, T. L., & Emmons, K. M. (2005). The effect of immigrant generation on smoking. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 1223–1242.CrossRef

Agaku, I. T., King, B. A., & Dube, S. R. (2014). Current cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2005–2012. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63(2), 29–34.

Almond, D., Chay, K. Y., & Lee, D. S. (2005). The cost of low birth weight. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 1031–1083.

Angrist, J. (2002). How do sex ratios affect marriage and labor markets? Evidence from America’s second generation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 997–1038.CrossRef

Antecol, H., & Bedard, K. (2006). Unhealthy assimilation: Why do immigrants converge to American health status levels? Demography, 43, 337–360.CrossRef

Arcia, E., Skinner, M., Bailey, D., & Correa, V. (2001). Models of acculturation and health behaviors among Latino immigrants to the us. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 41–53.CrossRef

Baker, M., & Benjamin, D. (1997). The role of the family in immigrants’ labor-market activity: An evaluation of alternative explanations. American Economic Review, 87, 705–727.

Bates, L. M., & Teitler, J. O. (2008). Immigration and low birthweight in the US: The role of time and timing (Working Paper No. 08–15-FF). Princeton, NJ: Center for Research on Child Wellbeing.

Bethel, J. W., & Schenker, M. B. (2005). Acculturation and smoking patterns among Hispanics: A review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29, 143–148.CrossRef

Bisin, A., Patacchini, E., Verdier, T., & Zenou, Y. (2011). Ethnic identity and labour market outcomes of immigrants in Europe. Economic Policy, 26, 57–92.

Bisin, A., Topa, G., & Verdier, T. (2004). Religious intermarriage and socialization in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 615–664.CrossRef

Bisin, A., & Verdier, T. (2000). Beyond the melting pot: Cultural transmission, marriage, and the evolution of ethnic and religious traits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 955–988.

Black, S., Devereux, P. J., & Salvanes, K. (2014). Does grief transfer across generations? In-utero deaths and child outcomes (NBER Working Paper No. 19979). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau for Economic Research.

Borjas, G. J. (2000). Ethnic enclaves and assimilation. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 7(2), 89–122.

Case, A., Fertig, A., & Paxson, C. (2005). The lasting impact of childhood health and circumstance. Journal of Health Economics, 24, 365–389.CrossRef

Case, A., Lubotsky, D., & Paxson, C. (2002). Economic status and health in childhood: The origins of the gradient. American Economic Review, 92, 1308–1334.

Chiswick, B. R., & Houseworth, C. (2011). Ethnic intermarriage among immigrants: Human capital and assortative mating. Review of Economics of the Household, 9, 149–180.CrossRef

Conley, D., & Bennett, N. G. (2000). Is biology destiny? Birth weight and life chances. American Sociological Review, 65, 458–476.CrossRef

Currie, J. (2011). Inequality at birth: Some causes and consequences (NBER Working Paper No. 16798). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau for Economic Research.

Currie, J., & Moretti, E. (2007). Biology as destiny? Short- and long-run determinants of intergenerational transmission of birth weight. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 231–263.CrossRef

Currie, J., & Rossin-Slater, M. (2013). Weathering the storm: Hurricanes and birth outcomes. Journal of Health Economics, 32, 487–503.CrossRef

Currie, J., & Schmieder, J. (2009). Fetal exposures to toxic releases and infant health. American Economic Review, 99, 117–183.CrossRef

Delavari, M., Sønderlund, A. L., Swinburn, B., Mellor, D., & Renzaho, A. (2013). Acculturation and obesity among migrant populations in high income countries–A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 13(458), 2–11. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-458

Duncan, B., & Trejo, S. J. (2007). Ethnic identification, intermarriage, and unmeasured progress by Mexican Americans. In G. J. Borjas (Ed.), Mexican immigration to the United States (pp. 229–268). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef

Duncan, B., & Trejo, S. J. (2009). Ancestry versus ethnicity: The complexity and selectivity of Mexican identification in the United States. Research in Labor Economics, 29, 31–66.CrossRef

Duncan, B., & Trejo, S. J. (2011). Tracking intergenerational progress for immigrant groups: The problem of ethnic attrition. American Economic Review, 101, 603–608.CrossRef

Duncan, B., & Trejo, S. J. (2012). The complexity of immigrant generations: Implications for assessing the socioeconomic integration of Hispanics and Asians (IZA Discussion Paper No. 6276). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.

Eckstein, Z., & Weiss, Y. (2002). The integration of immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the Israeli labor market. In A. Ben-Basat (Ed.), The Israeli economy, 1985–1998: From government intervention to market economics (pp. 349–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Elder, T. E., Goddeeris, J. H., & Haider, S. J. (2013). Racial and ethnic infant mortality gaps and the role of SES (Working paper). Retrieved from https://www.msu.edu/~telder/SES_Current.pdf

Elliott, M. N., Fremont, A., Morrison, P. A., Pantoja, P., & Lurie, N. (2008). A new method for estimating race/ethnicity and associated disparities where administrative records lack self-reported race/ethnicity. Health Services Research, 43, 1722–1736.CrossRef

Fenelon, A. (2013). Revisiting the Hispanic mortality advantage in the United States: The role of smoking. Social Science & Medicine, 82, 1–9.CrossRef

Fernandez, R. (2011). Does culture matter? In J. Benhabib, M. O. Jackson, & A. Bisin (Eds.), Handbook of social economics (Vol. 1A, pp. 481–510). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.

Finch, B. K., Lim, N., Perez, W., & Do, D. P. (2007). Toward a population health model of segmented assimilation: The case of low birth weight in Los Angeles. Sociological Perspectives, 50, 445–468.CrossRef

Fox, M., Entringer, S., Buss, C., DeHaene, J., & Wadhwa, P. D. (2015). Intergenerational transmission of the effects of acculturation on health in Hispanic Americans: A fetal programming perspective. American Journal of Public Health, 105(Suppl. 3), S409–S423.CrossRef

Furtado, D., & Theodoropoulos, N. (2010). Why does intermarriage increase immigrant employment? The role of networks. B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 10. doi:10.2202/1935-1682.2527

Furtado, D., & Trejo, S. (2012). Interethnic marriages and their economic effects (CReAM Discussion Paper No. 1205). London, UK: Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration, Department of Economics, University College London.

Giuntella, O. (2013). Why does the health of immigrants deteriorate? (IZA Discussion Paper No. 7588). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.

Gordon, M. A. (1964). Assimilation in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Guendelman, S., & Abrams, B. (1995). Dietary intake among Mexican-American women: Generational differences and a comparison with non-Hispanic women. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 20–25.CrossRef

Hummer, R. A., Powers, D. A., Pullum, S. G., Gossman, G. L., & Frisbie, W. P. (2007). Paradox found (again): Infant mortality among the Mexican-origin population in the United States. Demography, 44, 441–457.CrossRef

Jasso, G., Massey, D. S., Rosenzweig, M. R., & Smith, J. P. (2004). Immigrant health: Selectivity and acculturation. In N. B. Anderson, R. A. Bulatao, & B. Cohen (Eds.), Critical perspectives on racial and ethnic differences in late life (pp. 227–266). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Kaushal, N., & Kaestner, R. (2010). Health and health insurance trajectories of Mexicans in the US (NBER Working Paper No. 16139). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Kramer, M. S. (1987). Intrauterine growth and gestational duration determinants. Pediatrics, 80, 502–511.

Lara, M., Gamboa, C., Kahramanian, M. I., Morales, L. S., & Hayes Bautista, D. E. (2005). Acculturation and Latino health in the United States: A review of the literature and its sociopolitical context. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 367–397.CrossRef

Leung, L. A. (2014). Healthy and unhealthy assimilation: Country of origin and smoking behavior among immigrants. Health Economics, 23, 1411–1429.CrossRef

Marmot, M. G., & Syme, L. S. (1976). Acculturation and coronary heart disease in Japanese-Americans. American Journal of Epidemiology, 104, 225–247.

Meng, X., & Gregory, R. G. (2005). Intermarriage and the economic assimilation of immigrants. Journal of Labor Economics, 23, 135–174.CrossRef

Nekby, L. (2010). Inter- and intra-marriage premiums revisited: It’s probably who you are, not who you marry! (IZA Discussion Paper No. 5317). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.

Osterman, M. J. K., Martin, J. A., Curtin, S. C., Matthews, T. J., Wilson, E. C., & Kirmeyer, S. (2013). Newly released data from the revised us birth certificate, 2011 (National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 62, No. 4). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

Osypuk, T. L., & Acevedo-Garcia, D. (2010). Support for smoke-free policies: A nationwide analysis of immigrants, US-born, and other demographic groups, 1995–2002. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 171–181.CrossRef

Osypuk, T. L., Bates, L., & Acevedo-Garcia, D. (2010). Another Mexican birth weight paradox? The role of residential enclaves and neighborhood poverty in the birth weight of Mexican-origin infants. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 550–560.CrossRef

Powers, D. A. (2013). Paradox revisited: A further investigation of racial/ethnic differences in infant mortality by maternal age. Demography, 50, 495–520.CrossRef

Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T. (2007). Social boundaries and marital assimilation: Interpreting trends in racial and ethnic intermarriage. American Sociological Review, 72, 68–94.CrossRef

Riosmena, F., Wong, R., & Palloni, A. (2013). Paradox lost: Explaining the Hispanic adult mortality advantage. Demography, 50, 1039–1064.CrossRef

Sassler, S. (2005). Gender and ethnic differences in marital assimilation in the early twentieth century. International Migration Review, 39, 608–634.CrossRef

Shaw, R. J., Pickett, K. E., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2010). Ethnic density effects on birth outcomes and maternal smoking during pregnancy in the US linked birth and infant death data set. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 707–713.CrossRef

Torche, F. (2011). The effect of maternal stress on birth outcomes: Exploiting a natural experiment. Demography, 48, 1473–1491.CrossRef

Ullmann, S. H., Goldman, N., & Massey, D. S. (2011). Healthier before they migrate, less healthy when they return? Social Science & Medicine, 73, 421–428.CrossRef

Unger, J. B., Rohrbach, L. A., Boley Cruz, T., Baezconde-Garbanati, L., Palmer, P. H., Anderson Johnson, C., & Howard, K. A. (2001). Ethnic variation in peer influences on adolescent smoking. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 3, 167–176.CrossRef

Wang, W. (2012). The rise of intermarriage (Pew Social and Demographic Trends report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/02/16/the-rise-of-intermarriage/

Word, D. L., Coleman, C. D., Nunziata, R., & Kominski, R. (2008). Demographic aspects of surnames from census 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/topics/population/genealogy/data/2000_surnames.html

Titel: Assimilation and Health: Evidence From Linked Birth Records of Second- and Third-Generation Hispanics
verfasst von: Osea Giuntella
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Demography / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0070-3370
Elektronische ISSN: 1533-7790
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0522-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Relationship Transitions and the Risk for Child Maltreatment

Incarceration and Household Asset Ownership

Midpregnancy Marriage and Divorce: Why the Death of Shotgun Marriage Has Been Greatly Exaggerated

Moving Beyond Salmon Bias: Mexican Return Migration and Health Selection

Ready, Willing, and Able? Impediments to the Onset of Marital Fertility Decline in the United States

Quantifying Intrinsic and Extrinsic Contributions to Human Longevity: Application of a Two-Process Vitality Model to the Human Mortality Database