nach oben

vorheriges Kapitel On Verifying Hennessy-Milner Logic with Recursi...

nächstes Kapitel A Case Study on Runtime Monitoring of an Autono...

Tipp

Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Assuring the Guardians

Erstes Kapitel lesen

Autoren: Jonathan Laurent, Alwyn Goodloe, Lee Pike

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Erschienen in: Runtime Verification

» Jetzt Zugang zum Volltext erhalten

Abstract

Ultra-critical systems are growing more complex, and future systems are likely to be autonomous and cannot be assured by traditional means. Runtime Verification (RV) can act as the last line of defense to protect the public safety, but only if the RV system itself is trusted. In this paper, we describe a model-checking framework for runtime monitors. This tool is integrated into the Copilot language and framework aimed at RV of ultra-critical hard real-time systems. In addition to describing its implementation, we illustrate its application on a number of examples ranging from very simple to the Boyer-Moore majority vote algorithm.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Jetzt einloggen Kostenlos registrieren

Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 69.000 Bücher
über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Umwelt
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 50.000 Bücher
über 380 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Umwelt
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 58.000 Bücher
über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

Jetzt informieren

https://github.com/Copilot-Language.

Maintaining structure is important for two reasons. First, the model checker can use this structural information to optimize its search; see structural abstraction in [ 8]. Second, structured transition systems are easier to read, debug, and transform.

Akbarpour, B., Paulson, L.C.: MetiTarski: an automatic theorem prover for real-valued special functions. J. Automat. Reasoning 44(3), 175–205 (2010) MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

Caspi, P., Pialiud, D., Halbwachs, N., Plaice, J.: LUSTRE: a declarative language for programming synchronous systems. In: 14th Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 178–188 (1987)

de Moura, L., Rueß, H., Sorea, M.: Bounded model checking and induction: from refutation to verification. In: Hunt Jr., W.A., Somenzi, F. (eds.) CAV 2003. LNCS, vol. 2725, pp. 14–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

Dutertre, B.: Yices 2.2. In: Biere, A., Bloem, R. (eds.) CAV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8559, pp. 737–744. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

Eén, N., Sörensson, N.: Temporal induction by incremental SAT solving. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 89(4), 543–560 (2003) CrossRefMATH

Torlak, E., Bodik, R.: A lightweight symbolic virtual machine for solver-aided host languages. In: Proceedings of the 35th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, PLDI 2014, pp. 530–541. ACM (2014)

Gill, A.: Domain-specific languages and code synthesis using Haskell. Commun. ACM 57(6), 42–49 (2014) CrossRef

Hagen, G.: Verifying safety properties of Lustre programs: an SMT-based approach. PhD thesis, University of Iowa (2008)

Hagen, G., Tinelli, C.: Scaling up the formal verification of lustre programs with SMT-based techniques. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD 2008). IEEE (2008)

10.

Halbwachs, N., Lagnier, F., Raymond, P.: Synchronous observers and the verification of reactive systems. In: Nivat, M., Rattray, C., Rus, T., Scollo, G. (eds.) AMAST 1993. Workshops in Computing, pp. 83–96. Springer, London (1994)

11.

Havelund, K.: Runtime verification of C programs. In: Suzuki, K., Higashino, T., Ulrich, A., Hasegawa, T. (eds.) TestCom/FATES 2008. LNCS, vol. 5047, pp. 7–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2008) CrossRef

12.

Havelund, K., Roşu, G.: Efficient monitoring of safety properties. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 6(2), 158–173 (2004) CrossRef

13.

Hesselink, W.H.: The Boyer-Moore majority vote algorithm (2005)

14.

Jones, S.P. (ed.): Haskell 98 Language and Libraries: The Revised Report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002). http://haskell.org/

15.

Mikáć, J., Caspi, P.: Formal system development with Lustre: Framework and example. Technical Report TR-2005-11, Verimag Technical Report (2005)

16.

Moore, S.J., Boyer, R.S.: MJRTY - A Fast Majority Vote Algorithm. Technical Report 1981–32, Institute for Computing Science, University of Texas, February 1981

17.

University of Iowa: Kind Research Group. Kind 2: Multi-engine SMT-based Automatic Model Checker. http://kind2-mc.github.io/kind2/

18.

Pike, L., Goodloe, A., Morisset, R., Niller, S.: Copilot: a hard real-time runtime monitor. In: Barringer, H., Falcone, Y., Finkbeiner, B., Havelund, K., Lee, I., Pace, G., Roşu, G., Sokolsky, O., Tillmann, N. (eds.) RV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6418, pp. 345–359. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) CrossRef

19.

Pike, L., Hickey, P.C., Bielman, J., Elliott, T., DuBuisson, T., Launchbury, J.: Programming languages for high-assurance autonomous vehicles: extended abstract. In: Programming Languages Meets Program Verification, pp. 1–2. ACM (2014)

20.

Pike, L., Niller, S., Wegmann, N.: Runtime verification for ultra-critical systems. In: Khurshid, S., Sen, K. (eds.) RV 2011. LNCS, vol. 7186, pp. 310–324. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRef

21.

Pike, L., Wegmann, N., Niller, S., Goodloe, A.: Experience report: a do-it-yourself high-assurance compiler. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Functional Programming (ICFP). ACM, September 2012

22.

Pike, L., Wegmann, N., Niller, S., Goodloe, A.: Copilot: monitoring embedded systems. Innovations Syst. Softw. Eng. 9(4), 235–255 (2013) CrossRef

23.

Uhler, R., Dave, N.: Smten with satisfiability-based search. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Conference on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications, OOPSLA 2014, pp. 157–176. ACM (2014)

24.

Rushby, J.: Runtime certification. In: Leucker, M. (ed.) RV 2008. LNCS, vol. 5289, pp. 21–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2008) CrossRef

25.

Sheeran, M., Singh, S., Stålmarck, G.: Checking safety properties using induction and a SAT-solver. In: Johnson, S.D., Hunt Jr., W.A. (eds.) FMCAD 2000. LNCS, vol. 1954, pp. 108–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

26.

Somenzi, F., Bradley, A.R.: Ic3: where monolithic and incremental meet. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design, FMCAD 2011, pp. 3–8. FMCAD Inc. (2011)

Titel

Assuring the Guardians

Buch

Runtime Verification

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23819-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-23820-3

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23820-3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23820-3_6

Autoren:

Jonathan Laurent
Alwyn Goodloe
Lee Pike

Verlag

Springer International Publishing

Sequenznummer

Premium Partner

Bildnachweise