Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Human–robot interaction studies have thus far been limited to simple tasks, such as route guidance or playing simple games. However, with the advance in robotic technologies, the stage has been reached where the requirements for highly complicated tasks, such as conducting humanlike conversations, should be explored. When robots start to play advanced roles in our lives, such as in health care, attributes such as the trust and reliance of the person and the persuasiveness of the robot also become important. In this study, we examined the effect of the appearance of robots on people’s attitudes toward them. Past studies have shown that the appearance of robots is one of the elements that influence people’s behavior. However, the effect of the robots appearance on a person when conducting serious conversations that require high-level activity remains unknown. Participants were asked to hold a discussion with teleoperated robots having various appearances, such as an android with a high similarity to a human and a humanoid robot having humanlike body parts. Through the discussion, the teleoperator attempted to persuade the participants. We examined the effect of the robots appearance on their persuasiveness, as well as on people’s behavior and their impression of the robots. A possible contribution to machine consciousness research is also discussed.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Nishio Shuichi, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2011. Attitude change induced by different appearances of interaction agents. International Journal of Machine Consciousness 3 (01): 115–126.
Fong, T., I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn. 2003. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42: 143–166. CrossRef
Petty Richard E. and Duane T. Wegener. 1998. Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables, 4th edn, 323–389. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fogg, B.J., and T. Hsiang. 1999. The elements of computer credibility. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 80–87. Pittsburg.
Shinozawa, K., F. Naya, J. Yamato, and K. Kogure. 2005. Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations of human decision-making. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies 62 (2). CrossRef
Kidd, C.D., and C. Breazeal. 2004. Effect of a robot on user perceptions. In Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, vol. 4, 9, 3559–3564.
Powers Aaron, Sara Kiesler, Susan Fussell, and Cristen Torrey. 2007. Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In Proceedings of the human-robot interaction, 145–152.
Catherine Zanbaka, Paula Goolkasian, and Larry Hodges. 2006. Can a virtual cat persuade you?: The role of gender and realism in speaker persuasiveness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1153–1162. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Bassili, J.N. 1981. The attractiveness stereotype: Goodness or glamour? Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2 (4): 235–252. CrossRef
Grammer, K. 1993. Signale der Liebe. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.
Solnick, S.J., and M.E. Schweitzer. 1999. The influence of physical attractiveness and gender on ultimatum game decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 79 (3): 199–215. CrossRef
Perani, D., F. Fazio, N.A. Borghese, M. Tettamanti, S. Ferrari, J. Decety, and M.C. Gilardi. 2001. Different brain correlates for watching real and virtual hand actions. Neuroimage, 14 (3): 749–758. CrossRef
Kilner, J.M., Y. Paulignan, and S.J. Blakemore. 2003. An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13 (6): 522–525. CrossRef
Chaminade, T., J. Hodgins, and M. Kawato. 2007. Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated characters’ actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2 (3): 206–216. CrossRef
Robins, B., K. Dautenhahn, R. te Boerkhorst, and A. Billard. 2004. Robots as assistive technology—does appearance matter. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2004), 277–282.
Goetz, J., S. Kiesler, and A. Powers. 2003. Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2003), 55–60.
Syrdal, D.S., K. Dautenhahn, S. Woods, M. Walters, and K.L. Koay. 2007. Looking good? appearance preferences and robot personality inferences at zero acquaintance. In Proceedings of AAAI summer symposium on multidisciplinary collaboration for socially assistive robotics, 86–92. AAAI press.
Nishio, S., H. Ishiguro, and N. Hagita. 2007. Can a teleoperated android represent personal presence?—A case study with children. Psychologia 50 (4): 330–343. CrossRef
Ishiguro, H., and S. Nishio. 2007. Building artificial humans to understand humans. Journal of Artificial Organs 10 (3): 133–42. CrossRef
Minato Takashi, Michihiro Shimada, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Shoji Itakura. 2004. Development of an android robot for studying human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on innovations in applied artificial intelligence, 424–434. Springer. CrossRef
Nishio, S., H. Ishiguro, and N. Hagita. 2007. Geminoid: Teleoperated android of an existing person. In Humanoid robots: New developments, A.C. de Pina Filho, ed. Vienna, Austria: I-Tech Education and Publishing.
Nass, C., and S. Brave. 2005. Wired for speech: How voice activates and advances the human-computer relationship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clowes, R.W., S. Torrance, and R. Chrisley. 2007. Machine consciousness: Embodiment and imagination. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (7): 7–14.
Botvinick, M. 1998. Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391 (6669): 756. CrossRef
Watanabe, T., S. Nishio, K. Ogawa, and H. Ishiguro. 2011. Body ownership transfer to android robot induced by teleoperation (in Japanese). Transaction on IEICE J94-D(1).
Armel, K.C., and V.S. Ramachandran. 2003. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 270 (1523): 1499–1506. CrossRef
Sanchez-Vives, M.V., and M. Slater. 2005. From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: 332–339. CrossRef
- Attitude Change Induced by Different Appearances of Interaction Agents
- Springer Singapore
- Chapter 15