Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
We examine the relation between accounting-based debt contracts and the economic response of firms with trust preferred stock (TPS) to mandated liability recognition under Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) 150. Our results show that firms’ financial covenants significantly affect their choice to redeem versus reclassify their outstanding TPS. Specifically, firms with bank debt covenants that would be adversely impacted by recognizing TPS as a debt liability are 26.88% more likely to redeem their TPS after FAS 150. We also find that firms are significantly more likely to redeem versus reclassify their TPS after FAS 150 if they used the original TPS proceeds to retire existing debt (id est, to enhance their balance sheets). Our findings suggest that when bank debt contracts use “floating” Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to construct financial covenant terms, changes in the underlying GAAP measure significantly influence firms’ economic behavior.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Ball, R., Bushman, R., & Vasvari, F. (2008a). The debt-contracting value of accounting information and loan syndicate structure. Journal of Accounting Research,46(2), 247–287. CrossRef
Ball, R., Robin, A., & Sadka, G. (2008b). Is financial reporting shaped by equity markets or by debt markets? An international study of timeliness and conservatism. Review of Accounting Studies,13, 168–205. CrossRef
Beatty, A., Ramesh, K., & Weber, J. (2002). The importance of accounting changes in debt contracts: The cost of flexibility in covenant calculations. Journal of Accounting and Economics,33, 205–227. CrossRef
Beatty, A., & Weber, J. (2003). The effects of debt contracting on voluntary accounting method changes. The Accounting Review,78(1), 119–142. CrossRef
Beatty, A., Weber, J., & Yu, J. (2008). Conservatism and debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics,45, 154–174. CrossRef
Carlin, T., Finch, N., & Ford, G. (2006). Hybrid financial instruments, cost of capital and regulatory arbitrage—An empirical investigation. The Journal of Applied Research in Accounting and Finance,1(1), 43–55.
Dichev, I., & Skinner, D. (2002). Large-sample evidence on the debt covenant hypothesis. Journal of Accounting Research,40(4), 1091–1123. CrossRef
El-Gazzar, S. (1993). Stock market effects of the closeness to debt covenant restrictions resulting from capitalization of leases. The Accounting Review,68(2), 258–272.
Engel, E., Erickson, M., & Maydew, E. (1999). Debt-equity hybrid securities. Journal of Accounting Research,37(2), 249–274. CrossRef
Fields, T., Lys, T., & Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics,31, 255–307. CrossRef
Financial Accounting Standards Board (2007) Preliminary views— Financial instruments with characteristics of equity. Financial Accounting Series No. 1550-100, Nov. Available at: http://www.fasb.org/pv_liab_and_equity.pdf.
Frankel, R., Seethamraju, C., & Zach, T. (2008). GAAP goodwill and debt contracting efficiency: Evidence from net-worth covenants. Review of Accounting Studies,13, 87–118. CrossRef
Gramlich, J., Mayew, W., & McAnally, M. (2006). Debt reclassification and capital market consequences. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,33(7), 1189–1212. CrossRef
Gramlich, J., McAnally, M., & Thomas, J. (2001). Balance sheet management: The case of short-term obligations reclassified as long-term debt. Journal of Accounting Research,39(2), 283–295. CrossRef
Guay, W., & Verrecchia, R. (2006). Discussion of an economic framework for conservative accounting and Bushman and Piotroski (2006). Journal of Accounting and Economics,42, 149–165. CrossRef
Holthausen, R., & Leftwich, R. (1983). The economic consequences of accounting choice: Implications of costly contracting and monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Economics,5, 77–117. CrossRef
Holthausen, R., & Watts, R. (2001). The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics,31, 3–75. CrossRef
Hopkins, P. (1996). The effect of financial statement classification of hybrid financial instruments on financial analysts’ stock price judgments. Journal of Accounting Research,34, 33–50. CrossRef
Irvine, P., & Rosenfeld, J. (2000). Raising capital using monthly income preferred stock: Market reaction and implications for capital structure theory. Financial Management,29, 5–20. CrossRef
Joint Committee on Taxation. (2003). Report of investigation of Enron corporation and related entities regarding federal tax and compensation issues, and policy recommendations. Available at: http://www.gpo.gov/congress/joint/jcs-3-03/vol1/index.html.
Krishnan, C., & Laux, P. (2005). Misreaction. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,40(2), 403–434. CrossRef
Levi, S., & Segal, B. (2005). The impact of debt-equity reporting classifications on firms’ decision to issue hybrid securities. Working paper, University of California-Berkley. Available at: http://www.papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=861685.
Li, N. (2009). Negotiated measurement rules in debt contracts. Working paper, London Business School. Available at: http://www.papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1464295.
MacKenzie, G. (2006). Taxation as a driver for designing hybrid securities. The Journal of Applied Research in Accounting and Finance,1(1), 31–42.
McCarthy, M., Schneider, D., & Seese, L. (2004). FAS No. 150: The effect on debt covenants. Commercial Lending Review,19(2), 36–40.
McKinnon, J., & Hitt, G. (2002). How the treasury department lost a battle against a dubious security. The Wall Street Journal, A1, February 4, 2002.
Mills, L., & Newberry, K. (2005). Firms’ off-balance sheet and hybrid debt financing: Evidence from their book-tax reporting differences. Journal of Accounting Research,43(2), 251–282. CrossRef
Rapoport, M., & Weil, J. (2003). More truth-in-labeling for accounting carries liabilities. The Wall Street Journal, C1, August 28, 2003.
Roberts, M., & Sufi, A. (2009). Renegotiation of financial contracts: Evidence from private credit agreements. Journal of Financial Economics,93, 159–184. CrossRef
Smith, C., & Warner, J. (1979). On financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenants. Journal of Financial Economics,7(2), 117–161. CrossRef
Watts, R. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons,17, 207–227. CrossRef
Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1986). Positive accounting theory, chapter 8. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1990). Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective. The Accounting Review,65(1), 131–156.
- Bank debt covenants and firms’ responses to FAS 150 liability recognition: evidence from trust preferred stock
- Springer US
microm, Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Avaloq/© Avaloq Evolution AG, Avaloq/© Avaloq