Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Communicated by David Hawksworth.
Environmental impact assessments (EIAs) are used globally as the evidence-base for planning decisions, yet their efficacy is uncertain. Given that EIAs are extremely expensive and are enshrined in legislation, their place in evidence-based decision making deserves evaluation. The mean is the most commonly used summary statistic in ecological assessments, yet it is unlikely to be a good summary where the distribution of data is skewed; and its use without any indication of variability can be highly misleading. Here, using bats as an example, we show that EIAs frequently summarise these data using the mean or fail to define the term ‘average’. This can lead to the systematic misinterpretation of evidence which has serious implications for assessing risk. There is therefore a pressing need for guidance to specify data processing techniques so that planning decisions are made on a firm evidence-base. By ensuring that data processing is systematic and transparent it will result in mitigation decisions and conservation strategies that are cost-effective and proportionate to the predicted degree of risk.
Battersby J (2010) Guidelines for surveillance and monitoring of European bats. EUROBATS publication series no. 5. UNEP/EUROBATS Secretariat, Bonn
Elkin TJ, Smith PGR (1988) What is a good environmental impact statement? Reviewing screening reports from Canada’s National Parks. J Environ Manage 26:71–89
Fischer J, Stott J, Law BS, Adams MD, Forrester RI (2009) Designing effective habitat studies: quantifying multiple sources of variability in bat activity. Acta Chiropterol 11:127–137 CrossRef
Mathews F, Richardson S, Lintott PR, Hosken D (2016) Understanding the risk to European protected species (bats) at onshore wind turbine sites to inform risk management. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs Science and Research Projects, WCO0753 final report (Phase 2)
Skalak SL, Sherwin RE, Brigham M (2012) Sampling period, size and duration influence measures of bat species richness from acoustic surveys. Methods Ecol Evol 3:490–502 CrossRef
Sowler S, Stoffberg S, MacEwan K, Aronson J, Ramalho R, Forssman K, Lötter C (2016) South African good practice guidelines for surveying bats at wind energy facility developments—pre-construction, 4th edn. South African Bat Assessment Association
Sutherland WJ et al (2006) The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. J Appl Ecol 43:617–627 CrossRef
- Basic mathematical errors may make ecological assessments unreliable
P. R. Lintott
- Springer Netherlands
Fallstudie Überschwemmungskarten/© Thaut Images | Fotolia