Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft
Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft 4/2016

12.10.2016

Behavioral and Attitudinal Customer Loyalty in the Power Sector

An Explorative Investigation of the Effectiveness of Reward Programs

verfasst von: Karoline Gamma

Erschienen in: Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The emergence of smart grids changes the customer-utility relationship. To facilitate the transition towards a sustainable, reliable and economically viable energy system, utilities need to develop smart grid products and services that have strong customer acceptance and enable different customer segments to engage in energy efficiency. Thus, integrating customer feedback on innovative smart grid services early in the innovation process is of crucial importance. Further, energy providers need to increase customer loyalty and invest in relationship marketing in order to survive and be successful in a competitive market environment.
This article presents the findings of a five-month field experiment that investigated the effectiveness of different reward programs in increasing customer loyalty and customer feedback provision in the energy sector. The results demonstrate that reward programs have a positive effect on behavioral (customer feedback provision) and attitudinal (e. g. satisfaction with the energy provider) aspects of customer loyalty. The reward type matters, however. While monetary reward programs are effective in increasing customer feedback provision, only social reward programs can improve attitudinal aspects of customer loyalty. Energy providers should therefore consider tailoring the reward type to meet their program objectives when employing reward programs.
Vorheriger Artikel Zahlungsbereitschaft für grünen Strom: Zunehmende Kluft zwischen Wunsch und Wirklichkeit
Nächster Artikel Markt- und Systemintegration von erneuerbaren Energien im Rahmen der Systemtransformation – Ein Beitrag zur definitorischen Abgrenzung

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft

Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft (ZfE) ist eine unabhängige Fachzeitschrift mit aktuellen Themen zu Energiewirtschaft, Energiepolitik und Energierecht. JETZT BESTELLEN

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
For example, in Germany the switching rates of household increased from 11 % in 2007 to 39.5 % in 2015 (Statista 2016).
 
2
Some consumers may have several providers, e. g. one for each house/apartment they own or rent. However, they do not buy services from different providers for a single house/apartment.
 
3
The remaining customers were assigned to 4 other reward programs of interest to the Swiss energy provider. Those reward programs were not of interest for the present study. Information on the 4 other reward programs can be obtained from the author.
 
4
Tasks 3 and 8 were online surveys administered with Unipark. Customers needed to provide a unique code (sent in the announcement email of the task) to start the surveys. This code was used to find out which customer had completed the task.
 
5
Table 8 (appendix) provides a detailed description of the content of each task and indicates how customers liked the tasks.
 
6
The materials, stimuli and procedures for the field study were developed in cooperation with the energy provider to ensure fit with the communication strategy and the company brand. All materials were in German and were translated for the purpose of this paper.
 
7
The current task (task 4) was signaled in light red. Tasks which were not completed and closed were signaled in grey (e. g. task 3).
 
8
Customers, who wished to participate in the program but had no online access, could contact the university (contact provided on the letter) and request a paper version of the tasks. No customer used this option.
 
9
Customers could only know about the different reward programs by reading the general terms and conditions which they had to accept (by setting a check in a box) when signing up for the customer program. To read the general terms and conditions, the customer had to click on a button, which opened another tab in the browser containing them.
 
10
A one-way ANOVA with all customers (including those who completed no task) yielded no significant results. However, as this study is not only interested in customer adoption of a program but also in customer loyalty behavior of participants of the customer program, selecting only participants for the analyses can be justified. The scale for average number of completed tasks thus ranged from 1 to 8.
 
11
The assumption of homogeneity of variances was violated, Levene (2, 71) = 12.32, p < 0.001. Thus, the Welch F-ratio is reported.
 
12
The correlation matrix of all items is provided in the appendix. Items which were assumed to belong to a common factor had a stronger correlation with each other than with items assumed to belong to the other factor.
 
13
According to Rucker et al. (2011), an indirect effect may also occur in the absence of a total effect. Thus, the existence of a total effect on the dependent variable is not necessary for investigating indirect effects in a mediation analysis.
 
14
The author assumes that the effect will become significant with a larger sample size (see limitations and further research).
 
15
Information obtained orally from the partner utility.
 
16
Image of the energy provider (3 items) and satisfaction with the energy provider (2 items) provided acceptable reliability with Cronbach alphas between 0.72 and 0.86. Further, all 7 items for measuring attitudinal company loyalty provided acceptable test-retest reliability with significant (p < 0.01) correlation coefficient ranging between 0.38 and 0.61.
 
Literatur
Anderson JC, Narus JA (1998) Business marketing: understand what customers value. Harvard Bus Rev 76:53–67
Antón C, Camarero C, Carrero M (2007) The mediating effect of satisfaction on consumers’ switching intention. Psychol Mark 24(6):511–538CrossRef
Apaolaza-Ibáñez V, Hartmann P, Calvo PZ (2006) Antecedents of customer loyalty in residential energy markets: Service quality, satisfaction, trust and switching costs. Serv Ind J 26(6):633–650CrossRef
Aronson E, Wilson TD, Akert RM (eds) (2013) Social Psychology, 8th edn. Pearson Education, New Jersey
Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R (2011) Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientiere Einführung, 13th edn. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefMATH
Berry LL (1995) Relationship marketing of services – growing interest, emerging perspectives. J Acad Mark Sci 23(4):236–245CrossRef
Berry LL (2002) Relationship marketing of services-perspectives from 1983 and 2000. J Relat Mark 1(1):59–77
Bridson K, Evans J, Hickman M (2008) Assessing the relationship between loyalty program attributes, store satisfaction and store loyalty. J Retail Consum Serv 15(5):364–374CrossRef
Burkhalter A, Kaenzig J, Wüstenhagen R (2009) Kundenpräferenzen für leistungsrelevante Attribute von Stromprodukten. Z Energiewirtsch 33(2):161–172CrossRef
Costello AB, Osborne JW (2005) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 10(7):173–178
Curtius HC, Kuenzel K, Loock M (2012) Generic customer segments and business models for smart grids. markt 51(2–3):63–74CrossRef
Darby S (2010) Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement? Build Res Inf 38(5):442–457CrossRef
Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press, New YorkCrossRef
Demoulin NT, Zidda P (2008) On the impact of loyalty cards on store loyalty: Does the customers’ satisfaction with the reward scheme matter? J Retail Consum Serv 15(5):386–398CrossRef
Dorotic M, Bijmolt TH, Verhoef PC (2012) Loyalty programmes: current knowledge and research directions. Int J Management Rev 14(3):217–237CrossRef
Eakin K, Faruqui A (2000) Bundling value-added and commodity services in retail electricity markets. Electr J 13(10):60–68CrossRef
Fehr E, Falk A (2002) Psychological foundations of incentives. Eur Econ Rev 46(4):687–724CrossRef
Frey BS (1999) Morality and rationality in environmental policy. J Consum Policy 22(4):395–417CrossRef
Frey BS, Jegen R (2001) Motivation crowding theory. J Econ Surveys 15(5):589–611CrossRef
Furinto A, Pawitra T, Balqiah TE (2009) Designing competitive loyalty programs: how types of program affect customer equity. J Target Meas Anal Marketing 17(4):307–319CrossRef
García Gómez B, Gutiérrez Arranz A, Gutiérrez Cillán J (2006) The role of loyalty programs in behavioral and affective loyalty. J Consum Marketing 23(7):387–396CrossRef
Gerpott TJ, Paukert M (2013) Gestaltung von Tarifen für kommunikationsfähige Messsysteme im Verbund mit zeitvariablen Stromtarifen. Z Energiewirtsch 37(2):83–105CrossRef
Goldsmith K, Amir O (2010) Can uncertainty improve promotions? J Mark Res 47(6):1070–1077CrossRef
Goulden M, Bedwell B, Rennick-Egglestone S, Rodden T, Spence A (2014) Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management. Energy Res Soc Sci 2:21–29CrossRef
Handgraaf MJ, de Jeude MAVL, Appelt KC (2013) Public praise vs. private pay: effects of rewards on energy conservation in the workplace. Ecol Econ 86:86–92CrossRef
Hartmann P, Apaolaza-Ibáñez V (2007) Managing customer loyalty in liberalized residential energy markets: the impact of energy branding. Energy Policy 35(4):2661–2672CrossRef
Hayes AF, Preacher KJ (2014) Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. Br J Math Stat Psychol 67(3):451–470MathSciNetCrossRef
Hennig-Thurau T, Paul M (2007) Can economic bonus programs jeopardize service relationships? Serv Bus 1(2):159–175CrossRef
Hennig-Thurau T, Gwinner KP, Gremler DD (2002) Understanding relationship marketing outcomes: an integration of relational benefits and relationship quality. J Serv Res 4(3):230–248CrossRef
Hillemacher L, Hufendiek K, Bertsch V, Wiechmann H, Gratenau J, Jochem P, Fichtner W (2013) Ein Rollenmodell zur Einbindung der Endkunden in eine smarte Energiewelt. Z Energiewirtsch 37(3):195–210CrossRef
Hu HS, Huang CT, Chen PT (2010) Do reward programs truly build loyalty for lodging industry? Int J Hosp Manag 29(1):128–135CrossRef
Kang J, Alejandro TB, Groza MD (2015) Customer-company identification and the effectiveness of loyalty programs. J Bus Res 68(2):464–471CrossRef
Kaufmann S, Kuenzel K, Loock M (2013) Customer value of smart metering: explorative evidence from a choice-based conjoint study in Switzerland. Energy Policy 53:229–239CrossRef
Keh HT, Lee YH (2006) Do reward programs build loyalty for services?: The moderating effect of satisfaction on type and timing of rewards. J Retail 82(2):127–136CrossRef
Kivetz R (2003) The effects of effort and intrinsic motivation on risky choice. Mark Sci 22(4):477–502CrossRef
Kumar V, Aksoy L, Donkers B, Venkatesan R, Wiesel T, Tillmanns S (2010) Undervalued or overvalued customers: capturing total customer engagement value. J Serv Res 13(3):297–310CrossRef
Ledesma RD, Valero-Mora P (2007) Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: an easy-to-use computer program for carrying out parallel analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 12(2):1–11
Lee JS, Tsang N, Pan S (2015) Examining the differential effects of social and economic rewards in a hotel loyalty program. Int J Hosp Manag 49:17–27CrossRef
Leenheer J, Van Heerde HJ, Bijmolt TH, Smidts A (2007) Do loyalty programs really enhance behavioral loyalty? An empirical analysis accounting for self-selecting members. Int J Res Mark 24(1):31–47CrossRef
Loock CM, Staake T, Fleisch E (2009) Kundenportale in der Energiebranche: Bestandsaufnahme und Entwicklungspotenziale. Z Energiewirtsch 33(3):268–274CrossRef
McCall M, Voorhees C (2010) The drivers of loyalty program success an organizing framework and research agenda. Cornell Hosp Q 51(1):35–52CrossRef
Melancon JP, Noble SM, Noble CH (2011) Managing rewards to enhance relational worth. J Acad Mark Sci 39(3):341–362CrossRef
Neumann N (2008) German energy market under pressure. Z Energiewirtsch 32(3):210–214CrossRef
Nguyen N, Leblanc G (2001) Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers’ retention decisions in services. J Retail Consum Serv 8(4):227–236CrossRef
O’Connor BP (2000) SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput C(32):396–402CrossRef
Payne A, Frow P (1997) Relationship marketing: key issues for the utilities sector. J Mark Manag 13(5):463–477CrossRef
Roehm ML, Pullins EB, Roehm HA Jr (2002) Designing loyalty-building programs for packaged goods brands. J Mark Res 39(2):202–213CrossRef
Rommel K, Meyerhoff J (2009) Empirische Analyse des Wechselverhaltens von Stromkunden. Was hält Stromkunden davon ab, zu Ökostromanbietern zu wechseln? Z Energiewirtsch 33(1):74–82CrossRef
Rucker DD, Preacher KJ, Tormala ZL, Petty RE (2011) Mediation analysis in social psychology: current practices and new recommendations. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 5(6):359–371CrossRef
Rudolph T, Nagengast L (2013) Kundenbindung in Handels- und Serviceunternehmen – Die Wirkung von Kundenbindungsinstrumenten auf Einstellungen und Kaufverhalten. J Betriebswirtsch 63(1):3–44CrossRef
Staake T, Graml T, Baeriswyl M, Loock C (2011) Durch Online-Interaktion Kunden für Energiedienstleistungen begeistern. Z Energ Markt Wettbew 11(2):54–57
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2013) Using multivariate statistics, 6th edn. Pearson Education, Boston
Tanford S (2013) The impact of tier level on attitudinal and behavioral loyalty of hotel reward program members. Int J Hosp Manag 34:285–294CrossRef
Walsh G, Groth M, Wiedmann KP (2005) An examination of consumers’ motives to switch energy suppliers. J Mark Manag 21(3–4):421–440CrossRef
Walsh G, Dinnie K, Wiedmann KP (2006) How do corporate reputation and customer satisfaction impact customer defection? A study of private energy customers in Germany. J Serv Mark 20(6):412–420CrossRef
Wiedmann KP (2004) Measuring brand equity for organising brand management in the energy sector: a research proposal and first empirical hints part 1: the development of a theoretical concept and a research programme. J Brand Manag 12(2):124–139CrossRef
Wiedmann KP (2005) Measuring brand equity for organising brand management in the energy sector – a research proposal and first empirical hints Part 2: Concept and results of an empirical study in the German energy market. J Brand Manag 12(3):207–219CrossRef
Wieringa JE, Verhoef PC (2007) Understanding customer switching behavior in a liberalizing service market an exploratory study. J Serv Res 10(2):174–186CrossRef
Wirtz J, Mattila AS, Lwin MO (2007) How effective are loyalty reward programs in driving share of wallet? J Serv Res 9(4):327–334CrossRef
de Wulf KD, Odekerken-Schröder G, Iacobucci D (2001) Investments in consumer relationships: a cross-country and cross-industry exploration. J Mark 65(4):33–50CrossRef
de Wulf KD, Odekerken-Schröder G, Canniére MHD, van Oppen C (2003) What drives consumer participation to loyalty programs? A conjoint analytical approach. J Relatsh Mark 2(1–2):69–83
Wunderlich P (2013) Green information systems in the residential sector. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef
Wüstenhagen R, Boehnke J (2008) Business models for sustainable energy. In: Tukker A, Charter M, Vezzoli C, Sto E, Andersen MM (eds) System innovation for sustainability 1 perspectives on radical changes to Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP). Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, pp 85–94
Yi Y, Jeon H (2003) Effects of loyalty programs on value perception, program loyalty, and brand loyalty. J Acad Marketing Sci 31(3):229–240CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Behavioral and Attitudinal Customer Loyalty in the Power Sector
An Explorative Investigation of the Effectiveness of Reward Programs
verfasst von
Karoline Gamma
Publikationsdatum
12.10.2016
Verlag
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Erschienen in
Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0343-5377
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-2765
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12398-016-0186-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Veranstaltungskalender

Veranstaltungskalender

OriginalPaper

Bioenergie – Beitrag zum heutigen und zukünftigen Energiesystem

OriginalPaper

Markt- und Systemintegration von erneuerbaren Energien im Rahmen der Systemtransformation – Ein Beitrag zur definitorischen Abgrenzung

OriginalPaper

Zahlungsbereitschaft für grünen Strom: Zunehmende Kluft zwischen Wunsch und Wirklichkeit